This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
I'm joining that LOL... Bernie Sanders got okay treatment?!?! ... WTF... Anyhow.. those types of comments have been posted over and over and over... They're a drain to read and it's incredible how people continue to make excuses... excuse after excuse after excuse...
First off, the media wasnt tough on Bernie at all. They didnt challenge his policies and didnt explore his past. I'll buy that he didn't get as much TV time as Hillary, but Trump got more than any candidate and the right wing wasn't complaining about it being rigged for that reason.
Second, Huffington Post absolutely fawned over Bernie and savaged Hillary until she won the nomination. And they are not exactly small time. They are in the top 5 media sites in the country. It's where Democrats go for mainstream news and I'm sure you can't argue that point.
First - No one cared about him or his policies.
Second - That may be where Dems go but it certainly isn't where others go.
Third - This is a Hillary for POTUS thread. Get happy! She is the next POTUS! Positive vibes only here mister.
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
This is what makes a non-Hillary supporter (doesn't mean a Trump supporter) have a headache. Reading opinions like this. No coherency whatsoever. Of course in no personal way whatsoever as well.
It's perfectly coherent - maybe you don't know what that word means.
TV yes, but online is definitely Huffington. I don't know if MSNBC was partial to HRC or not. I didn't really watch it. I would have thought Maddow would be pro HRC, but may be wrong.
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
I'm joining that LOL... Bernie Sanders got okay treatment?!?! ... WTF... Anyhow.. those types of comments have been posted over and over and over... They're a drain to read and it's incredible how people continue to make excuses... excuse after excuse after excuse...
First off, the media wasnt tough on Bernie at all. They didnt challenge his policies and didnt explore his past. I'll buy that he didn't get as much TV time as Hillary, but Trump got more than any candidate and the right wing wasn't complaining about it being rigged for that reason.
Second, Huffington Post absolutely fawned over Bernie and savaged Hillary until she won the nomination. And they are not exactly small time. They are in the top 5 media sites in the country. It's where Democrats go for mainstream news and I'm sure you can't argue that point.
First - No one cared about him or his policies.
Second - That may be where Dems go but it certainly isn't where others go.
Third - This is a Hillary for POTUS thread. Get happy! She is the next POTUS! Positive vibes only here mister.
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
This is what makes a non-Hillary supporter (doesn't mean a Trump supporter) have a headache. Reading opinions like this. No coherency whatsoever. Of course in no personal way whatsoever as well.
It's perfectly coherent - maybe you don't know what that word means.
I must admit that use to be me. I haven't watched MSNBC in almost two years. Gave it up completely, been sober for almost two years...
I use to be a big fan of Rachel M. and was probably one of maybe 10 people in the country who would actually watch lawrence o'donnell
Do you disagree with my post?
Btw, I like O'Donnell as a guest but he isn't good enough to have his own show. He's not that interesting. Rachel is. So is Megan Kelly, btw. I think they are the two strongest political personalities today.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Is this a reference that Hillary supporters don't know about? If it isn't well why are you so upset?
Que? What reference?
Nevermind. Something strange is going on with your posts lately. Everyone goes through something at times. A Hillary for POTUS thread may not be the best one to unleash. Trust me.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Is this a reference that Hillary supporters don't know about? If it isn't well why are you so upset?
Que? What reference?
Nevermind. Something strange is going on with your posts lately. Everyone goes through something at times. A Hillary for POTUS thread may not be the best one to unleash. Trust me.
Why did you edit my post in your quote above? You removed the historical references.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Now who's being melodramatic? Nobody's talking about a revolution but just a mass restructuring of government agencies at the federal level. Washington is broken. You are either voting to take a stab at fixing it or voting for more of the same.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Is this a reference that Hillary supporters don't know about? If it isn't well why are you so upset?
Que? What reference?
Nevermind. Something strange is going on with your posts lately. Everyone goes through something at times. A Hillary for POTUS thread may not be the best one to unleash. Trust me.
Why did you edit my post in your quote above? You removed the historical references.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Yup. There is nothing wrong with looking ahead and hoping for a better system, but unless people want the entire American civilization to basically collapse, they should be looking at doable ways to improve the existing system rather than having fantasies about something else. I mean, in the scheme of things, Americans still have it pretty good (not to minimize bullshit - I'm not trying to do that), and even the most radical anti-establishment types would probably be well-served to keep that in mind when they think about what they do and don't want in the future. In other words, it's important to keep things in perspective. Only fanatics/extremists/morons have a problem doing that.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Now who's being melodramatic? Nobody's talking about a revolution but just a mass restructuring of government agencies at the federal level. Washington is broken. You are either voting to take a stab at fixing it or voting for more of the same.
Words matter, Mr. Trump. Use the proper ones. It why we are in this shit election today.
Edit- funny that Trump never said anything close to what you described above. He has no agenda except removing two regs for every new one. Oh and he thinks we have too many food regulations in this country. Again, how about you take that mantra to your country... STOP REGULATING OUR FOOD! What a winning platform.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Yup. There is nothing wrong with looking ahead and hoping for a better system, but unless people want the entire American civilization to basically collapse, they should be looking at doable ways to improve the existing system rather than having fantasies about something else. I mean, in the scheme of things, Americans still have it pretty good (not to minimize bullshit - I'm not trying to do that), and even the most radical anti-establishment types would probably be well-served to keep that in mind when they think about what they do and don't want in the future. In other words, it's important to keep things in perspective. Only fanatics/extremists/morons have a problem doing that.
1789 is a stretch with thoughts of today. However, it is a thought. Kind of like gems and rhinestones. And wtf are we talking about this bleep for? Hillary for POTUS!
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Now who's being melodramatic? Nobody's talking about a revolution but just a mass restructuring of government agencies at the federal level. Washington is broken. You are either voting to take a stab at fixing it or voting for more of the same.
Words matter, Mr. Trump. Use the proper ones. It It's why we are in this shit election today.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Yup. There is nothing wrong with looking ahead and hoping for a better system, but unless people want the entire American civilization to basically collapse, they should be looking at doable ways to improve the existing system rather than having fantasies about something else. I mean, in the scheme of things, Americans still have it pretty good (not to minimize bullshit - I'm not trying to do that), and even the most radical anti-establishment types would probably be well-served to keep that in mind when they think about what they do and don't want in the future. In other words, it's important to keep things in perspective. Only fanatics/extremists/morons have a problem doing that.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Now who's being melodramatic? Nobody's talking about a revolution but just a mass restructuring of government agencies at the federal level. Washington is broken. You are either voting to take a stab at fixing it or voting for more of the same.
Words matter, Mr. Trump. Use the proper ones. It why we are in this shit election today.
You are in this shit election today because the professional politicians from either party have been bystandards to horrible governance for the longest time. Washington is broken and people are now willing to throw in their lot with a charlatan. Is the cure worse then the disease? Is the cure even a cure at all? Who knows but it is time for alternative forms of treatment because the disease cannot go on.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Now who's being melodramatic? Nobody's talking about a revolution but just a mass restructuring of government agencies at the federal level. Washington is broken. You are either voting to take a stab at fixing it or voting for more of the same.
Words matter, Mr. Trump. Use the proper ones. It why we are in this shit election today.
You are in this shit election today because the professional politicians from either party have been bystandards to horrible governance for the longest time. Washington is broken and people are now willing to throw in their lot with a charlatan. Is the cure worse then the disease? Is the cure even a cure at all? Who knows but it is time for alternative forms of treatment because the disease cannot go on.
People want change, and they also don't want change. Check and see how many incumbents stay in congress for your evidence.
Shocking that the washington establishment is voting for the washington establishment.
Yeah four star general, sec of state, etc. What a piece of shit.
Not a piece of shit just a man who wants to maintain the status quo. That's the choice. Keep it going or burn it down.
Burn it down? Give me some examples in the 300 years where they burned it down and something better came behind it.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
Now who's being melodramatic? Nobody's talking about a revolution but just a mass restructuring of government agencies at the federal level. Washington is broken. You are either voting to take a stab at fixing it or voting for more of the same.
Words matter, Mr. Trump. Use the proper ones. It why we are in this shit election today.
You are in this shit election today because the professional politicians from either party have been bystandards to horrible governance for the longest time. Washington is broken and people are now willing to throw in their lot with a charlatan. Is the cure worse then the disease? Is the cure even a cure at all? Who knows but it is time for alternative forms of treatment because the disease cannot go on.
Washington is broken because the GOP is controlled by radicals and their media arm who inhibit the smallest bit of a progress. These radicals are upset because their world is changing. Gays, minorities and those educated at the liberal universities are growing in the share of the electorate, to the point where these radicals can no longer win general elections. The times they are a changing.
I must admit that use to be me. I haven't watched MSNBC in almost two years. Gave it up completely, been sober for almost two years...
I use to be a big fan of Rachel M. and was probably one of maybe 10 people in the country who would actually watch lawrence o'donnell
Do you disagree with my post?
Btw, I like O'Donnell as a guest but he isn't good enough to have his own show. He's not that interesting. Rachel is. So is Megan Kelly, btw. I think they are the two strongest political personalities today.
Matt's buzzing!!!! hahaha
I must also admit, getting buzzed and hitting AMT is a lot of fun! Especially when you have a lot of users on board.
Comments
Second - That may be where Dems go but it certainly isn't where others go.
Third - This is a Hillary for POTUS thread. Get happy! She is the next POTUS! Positive vibes only here mister.
That is all. No more no less.
http://reason.com/archives/2016/07/25/hillary-clintons-dangerously-coherent-fo
I use to be a big fan of Rachel M. and was probably one of maybe 10 people in the country who would actually watch lawrence o'donnell
Btw, I like O'Donnell as a guest but he isn't good enough to have his own show. He's not that interesting. Rachel is. So is Megan Kelly, btw. I think they are the two strongest political personalities today.
Uh, oh.
Someone has just voted Hillary.
France 1789? Russia 1917? Germany 33? Spain? How about China and the Cultural Revolution. No thanks. Burn down your own fucking country, leave ours alone.
If it isn't well why are you so upset?
Something strange is going on with your posts lately.
Everyone goes through something at times.
A Hillary for POTUS thread may not be the best one to unleash.
Trust me.
It must've been the Huffington Post in me.
Edit- funny that Trump never said anything close to what you described above. He has no agenda except removing two regs for every new one. Oh and he thinks we have too many food regulations in this country. Again, how about you take that mantra to your country... STOP REGULATING OUR FOOD! What a winning platform.
However,
it is a thought.
Kind of like gems and rhinestones.
And wtf are we talking about this bleep for?
Hillary for POTUS!
I must also admit, getting buzzed and hitting AMT is a lot of fun! Especially when you have a lot of users on board.