^^^ It is better to post links to videos. That way people can choose to click on it or not. I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
^^^ It is better to post links to videos. That way people can choose to click on it or not. I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
^^^ It is better to post links to videos. That way people can choose to click on it or not. I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
No, it's better to embed the videos so that we have a chance to see what it is without actually watching it and so we can stay on the same website instead of being redirected. You can choose not to play it. Embedded youtube vids don't just play automatically. Pretty sure there is no way to just post a link to a youtube video anyway. If you post the link it automatically embeds, right?
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
That is not my boy! He is an asshole. Again, my prob is the race to the bottom our country is running. I have never voted Republican in a presidential election but party loyalty doesn't make me a blind man. She is a nasty nasty woman. lol
^^^ It is better to post links to videos. That way people can choose to click on it or not. I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
I thought I was posting a link....it kind of takes over once you post
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
^^^ It is better to post links to videos. That way people can choose to click on it or not. I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
I thought I was posting a link....it kind of takes over once you post
Yes, it's the only way to post a youtube vid. The link embeds it. That's how this message board is set up. No worries, it's good to be able to see the vid before playing.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
I think he's quite annoying as far as his personality goes. But I agree with the point about the campaign would be best off saying "yup! We said that shit! Oops, sucks that everyone read all these personal emails from all kinds of people working for the campaign, and a lot of shit was flung within the campaign, although not by Hillary Clinton herself, as I'm sure everyone can see. We regret some of the things said in the personal emails, and some we don't regret. We're moving forward now." That would be a fine response. Not much else to be said. They could then start a new paragraph to address the much more serious problem of Russia interfering with US elections, which really does seem to be the case. For me, I just don't care what people I've never heard of before said to each other. Show me something shocking that Hillary Clinton said in emails and I'll perk up.
But it's pretty silly that this guy seems to think that people working for a campaign should be handling information objectively no matter whose campaign is being discussed. He seems to expect that an advisor for the Hillary campaign should be giving that and the Trump campaign the exact same treatment. That is obviously an idiotic expectation.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously too? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
^^^ It is better to post links to videos. That way people can choose to click on it or not. I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
nonsense. but keep whining.
I would love to post a video right now to show you how I feel about Hillary.
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
This is what makes a non-Hillary supporter (doesn't mean a Trump supporter) have a headache. Reading opinions like this. No coherency whatsoever. Of course in no personal way whatsoever as well.
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
I'm joining that LOL... Bernie Sanders got okay treatment?!?! ... WTF... Anyhow.. those types of comments have been posted over and over and over... They're a drain to read and it's incredible how people continue to make excuses... excuse after excuse after excuse...
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
This is what makes a non-Hillary supporter (doesn't mean a Trump supporter) have a headache. Reading opinions like this. No coherency whatsoever. Of course in no personal way whatsoever as well.
It's perfectly coherent - maybe you don't know what that word means.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
I'm joining that LOL... Bernie Sanders got okay treatment?!?! ... WTF... Anyhow.. those types of comments have been posted over and over and over... They're a drain to read and it's incredible how people continue to make excuses... excuse after excuse after excuse...
Seemed to me that the press like Bernie. What examples can you give showing that Bernie was badly treated by the media besides the point I already mentioned, which was not enough coverage?
What about my post seemed like an excuse to you? Do you not agree that objectivity of the media is the responsibility of the media and not a political candidate trying to win an election?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
This to me just makes Hillary seem a lot smarter than her opponents. I don't think she's the one who should be criticized about this.... If I really wanted to win an election I'd try to get the media on my side too. Brilliant. The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular. But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously to? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it. FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
lol
I'm joining that LOL... Bernie Sanders got okay treatment?!?! ... WTF... Anyhow.. those types of comments have been posted over and over and over... They're a drain to read and it's incredible how people continue to make excuses... excuse after excuse after excuse...
First off, the media wasnt tough on Bernie at all. They didnt challenge his policies and didnt explore his past. I'll buy that he didn't get as much TV time as Hillary, but Trump got more than any candidate and the right wing wasn't complaining about it being rigged for that reason.
Second, Huffington Post absolutely fawned over Bernie and savaged Hillary until she won the nomination. And they are not exactly small time. They are in the top 5 media sites in the country. It's where Democrats go for mainstream news and I'm sure you can't argue that point.
Comments
www.headstonesband.com
https://www.yahoo.com/news/teen-girls-arrested-video-assault-201435046.html
Hilarious....just listen and enjoy
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
It is better to post links to videos.
That way people can choose to click on it or not.
I'd assume though that if it is a positive Hillary video only people can post away.
www.headstonesband.com
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
But it's pretty silly that this guy seems to think that people working for a campaign should be handling information objectively no matter whose campaign is being discussed. He seems to expect that an advisor for the Hillary campaign should be giving that and the Trump campaign the exact same treatment. That is obviously an idiotic expectation.
The fucking press needs to be put under a microscope though. Is the journalistic ideal dead in America? That is an issue unrelated to Hillary Clinton or any other politician in particular.
But then my third thought comes up.... What exactly was the press expected to do in this case? Act as though Trump is perfectly normal, and a reasonable candidate for POTUS???? I feel like Trump himself put the press in an impossible situation if it's total objectivity people are looking for in this election cycle. I mean, if you had a chimp running against Hillary, would the press be expected to take that seriously too? To not just be honest with the clear fact that a chimp is not a legitimate nominee? I honestly think that is a perfectly valid comparison to the Clinton vs Trump situation and how the mainstream press is supposed to handle it.
FWIW, I think Bernie Sanders got okay treatment from the press, but probably not enough. If we're looking to really evaluate how the press is biased towards Hillary, that would be the case study to look at.
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
Reading opinions like this.
No coherency whatsoever.
Of course in no personal way whatsoever as well.
What about my post seemed like an excuse to you? Do you not agree that objectivity of the media is the responsibility of the media and not a political candidate trying to win an election?
Second, Huffington Post absolutely fawned over Bernie and savaged Hillary until she won the nomination. And they are not exactly small time. They are in the top 5 media sites in the country. It's where Democrats go for mainstream news and I'm sure you can't argue that point.