Hillary won more votes for President

Gern Blansten

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Spend millions fear mongering against third parties then shut them out of debates (when 76% of voters want 3rd parties included).


While still optimistic that the race will turn decisively back in Mrs. Clinton’s favor after the debates, leading Democrats have been alarmed by the drift of young voters toward the third-party candidates.

This.

And I don't care who Sanders now campaigns for, I'll never vote Hillary.

And we still don't care.

Free

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Spend millions fear mongering against third parties then shut them out of debates (when 76% of voters want 3rd parties included).


While still optimistic that the race will turn decisively back in Mrs. Clinton’s favor after the debates, leading Democrats have been alarmed by the drift of young voters toward the third-party candidates.

This.

And I don't care who Sanders now campaigns for, I'll never vote Hillary.

And we still don't care.

Yet you all care that a majority of Bernie supporters won't vote for Hillary. Because without those voters she may not win.

PJ_Soul

tonifig8 said:

Hillary was asked twice by reporters, if Tim K. knew about her condition? First response was completely ignored. Second time she was asked she said, "I communicated with Tim; I talked to him again last night," Clinton said. "We communicated, but I’m not going to go into our personal conversations."

Wtf.

What are you hoping for here? Seems reasonable to me.

CM189191

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Spend millions fear mongering against third parties then shut them out of debates (when 76% of voters want 3rd parties included).


While still optimistic that the race will turn decisively back in Mrs. Clinton’s favor after the debates, leading Democrats have been alarmed by the drift of young voters toward the third-party candidates.

This.

And I don't care who Sanders now campaigns for, I'll never vote Hillary.

And we still don't care.

Yet you all care that a majority of Bernie supporters won't vote for Hillary. Because without those voters she may not win.

Boxes&Books

PJ_Soul said:

tonifig8 said:

Hillary was asked twice by reporters, if Tim K. knew about her condition? First response was completely ignored. Second time she was asked she said, "I communicated with Tim; I talked to him again last night," Clinton said. "We communicated, but I’m not going to go into our personal conversations."

Wtf.

What are you hoping for here? Seems reasonable to me.

Nearly 70% untrustworthy. You would think that something as basic as this would get a regular answer. The internet almost crashed on Sunday. Her health has been the center of conversation 24/7 since Sunday.

David Axelrod's comment immediately comes to mind

fife

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Spend millions fear mongering against third parties then shut them out of debates (when 76% of voters want 3rd parties included).


While still optimistic that the race will turn decisively back in Mrs. Clinton’s favor after the debates, leading Democrats have been alarmed by the drift of young voters toward the third-party candidates.

This.

And I don't care who Sanders now campaigns for, I'll never vote Hillary.

And we still don't care.

Yet you all care that a majority of Bernie supporters won't vote for Hillary. Because without those voters she may not win.

can you proof that this is actually true?

HughFreakingDillon

fife said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Spend millions fear mongering against third parties then shut them out of debates (when 76% of voters want 3rd parties included).


While still optimistic that the race will turn decisively back in Mrs. Clinton’s favor after the debates, leading Democrats have been alarmed by the drift of young voters toward the third-party candidates.

This.

And I don't care who Sanders now campaigns for, I'll never vote Hillary.

And we still don't care.

Yet you all care that a majority of Bernie supporters won't vote for Hillary. Because without those voters she may not win.

can you proof that this is actually true?

he got it from a dramatic poll.

Gern Blansten

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Spend millions fear mongering against third parties then shut them out of debates (when 76% of voters want 3rd parties included).


While still optimistic that the race will turn decisively back in Mrs. Clinton’s favor after the debates, leading Democrats have been alarmed by the drift of young voters toward the third-party candidates.

This.

And I don't care who Sanders now campaigns for, I'll never vote Hillary.

And we still don't care.

Yet you all care that a majority of Bernie supporters won't vote for Hillary. Because without those voters she may not win.

The majority will. There is like 25%-30% of butthurts that won't

Free

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

Gern Blansten

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

unsung

Gern Blansten said:

JC29856 said:

Go Beavers said:

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

JC29856 said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

getting nervous....Trump closing the gap

Nothing to be nervous about, the president has no significant difference in day to day life. Whether its bush 1 or 2 Obama or pokemon, no real difference, it's supposed to be that way.

Unless your a member of the armed forces or have a family member who is. Just ask those 4000+ that died in Iraq.

Explain the difference? They died under the family values republican president and the hope and change democratic president? What difference does the president make?

So do you think we have the Iraq war if Gore was president? Do we have the Affordable Care Act if McCain was? The Supreme Court would look essentially the same no matter who was president?

Speaking of Gore and war..... Remember him, the guy that refused to have his president campaign for him, the guy who lost his home state to Bush, the guy that couldn't convince more Florida democrats to vote for him versus Bush, if that's not enough to jog your memory this certainly will, the guy that invented the interwebs.

Mrs. Clinton may also get an assist from one Democrat who has been largely quiet about the race, but can testify to the importance of resisting the third-party temptation: former Vice President Al Gore. Her staff has had conversations with aides to Mr. Gore about bringing him onto the campaign trail to emphasize the importance of supporting Mrs. Clinton if they want to make progress on combating climate change.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

Snopes...LOL

Free

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

Gern Blansten

unsung said:

Gern Blansten said:

JC29856 said:

Go Beavers said:

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

JC29856 said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

getting nervous....Trump closing the gap

Nothing to be nervous about, the president has no significant difference in day to day life. Whether its bush 1 or 2 Obama or pokemon, no real difference, it's supposed to be that way.

Unless your a member of the armed forces or have a family member who is. Just ask those 4000+ that died in Iraq.

Explain the difference? They died under the family values republican president and the hope and change democratic president? What difference does the president make?

So do you think we have the Iraq war if Gore was president? Do we have the Affordable Care Act if McCain was? The Supreme Court would look essentially the same no matter who was president?

Speaking of Gore and war..... Remember him, the guy that refused to have his president campaign for him, the guy who lost his home state to Bush, the guy that couldn't convince more Florida democrats to vote for him versus Bush, if that's not enough to jog your memory this certainly will, the guy that invented the interwebs.

Mrs. Clinton may also get an assist from one Democrat who has been largely quiet about the race, but can testify to the importance of resisting the third-party temptation: former Vice President Al Gore. Her staff has had conversations with aides to Mr. Gore about bringing him onto the campaign trail to emphasize the importance of supporting Mrs. Clinton if they want to make progress on combating climate change.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

Snopes...LOL

Yeah...your life nemesis. Proving all your shit wrong

rssesq

speakin o butthurt
#angrywhite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2uf-vpXV6E

Free

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Hey Brian, get a load of that article!

Boxes&Books

Free said:

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

Germ was a big part of the movement, so he/she claims.

The fact is that the polls are so tight now. Many are voting third party and many are simply not voting. The reality is that if trump supporters turnout and if people on the left spread out their votes it might just give trump the narrow win. Sanders went on CNN today pleading with his supporters to back Clinton. It's clearly a serious concern for the left.

People like germ making not voting for Clinton that much easier.

fife

Free said:

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

while i respect you passion, you cant reallyt say that the majority of bernie followers won't vote for hillary and just back it up with "fb groups, news stories etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her"

what you can say is that there is a group of die hard bernie supporters whom won't vote for her which i think you are right about but bernie got way more than hundreds of votes.

fife

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

what news papers if any would you agree with if they said the same thing?

Gern Blansten

tonifig8 said:

Free said:

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

Germ was a big part of the movement, so he/she claims.

The fact is that the polls are so tight now. Many are voting third party and many are simply not voting. The reality is that if trump supporters turnout and if people on the left spread out their votes it might just give trump the narrow win. Sanders went on CNN today pleading with his supporters to back Clinton. It's clearly a serious concern for the left.

People like germ making not voting for Clinton that much easier.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=2016-election#now

Gern Blansten

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

uh....it was a Pew Poll...the Post is just reporting what the poll said. Come on man.