Hillary won more votes for President

BS44325

The Obama coalition rejected Clinton in 2008. Obama doesn't like her. Axelrod doesn't like her. The coalition doesn't like her. Even if all the major players endorse her the average Obama voter will never be excited about her. No matter how much these voters hate Trump a lack of excitement in Hillary will effectively depress turnout. The question is to what degree? Hillary needs to quickly figure out how to inspire these people otherwise she is going down. Being against Trump is not enough when the electorate is looking for change.

CM189191

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

"I only agree with facts when they help support my narrow world view"
The article cites polls from Pew and Gallup. You know - a couple of the largest and most reliable polling organizations out there.

Or you can choose to stick your head in the ground and ignore reality like this guy

Free

tonifig8 said:

Free said:

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

Germ was a big part of the movement, so he/she claims.

The fact is that the polls are so tight now. Many are voting third party and many are simply not voting. The reality is that if trump supporters turnout and if people on the left spread out their votes it might just give trump the narrow win. Sanders went on CNN today pleading with his supporters to back Clinton. It's clearly a serious concern for the left.

People like germ making not voting for Clinton that much easier.

The thing about us Bernie supporters are that but we are independent minded, and are not easily swayed into voting for the corrupt two-party system. That's why were his supporters in the first place: it's like ass-backwards. So this move to get him to actively campaign for her in Ohio begging for votes, will probably not work.

Free

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

uh....it was a Pew Poll...the Post is just reporting what the poll said. Come on man.

And you know how reliable polls are, like I've been saying this entire time...

Especially a Washington Post published poll

rssesq

Free

fife said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

what news papers if any would you agree with if they said the same thing?

It's already out there how corrupt the media is, and polls are used to manipulate voter behavior and nothing else, I worked in media marketing. I mean really, daily polls? The mere idea of a daily poll is to create nothing more than drama and increase media ratings.

Just talking and listening to people in groups, locally and online, The feeling is heavily still against Hillary from Bernie supporters, the majority anyway. Hearsay and first person testimonials have more weight on the topic then any supposed national bs poll.

Gern Blansten

Free said:

tonifig8 said:

Free said:

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

Germ was a big part of the movement, so he/she claims.

The fact is that the polls are so tight now. Many are voting third party and many are simply not voting. The reality is that if trump supporters turnout and if people on the left spread out their votes it might just give trump the narrow win. Sanders went on CNN today pleading with his supporters to back Clinton. It's clearly a serious concern for the left.

People like germ making not voting for Clinton that much easier.

The thing about us Bernie supporters are that but we are independent minded, and are not easily swayed into voting for the corrupt two-party system. That's why were his supporters in the first place: it's like ass-backwards. So this move to get him to actively campaign for her in Ohio begging for votes, will probably not work.

yeah that's why you would vote for him....as a DEMOCRAT

fife

Free said:

fife said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

what news papers if any would you agree with if they said the same thing?

It's already out there how corrupt the media is, and polls are used to manipulate voter behavior and nothing else, I worked in media marketing.

Just talking and listening to people in groups, locally and online, The feeling is heavily still against Hillary from Bernie supporters, the majority anyway. Hearsay and first person testimonials have more weight on the topic then any supposed national bs poll.

while yes I agree with you on polls (the best poll is the end count after voting imo) Bernie got millions of votes and you have not meet all the people who have voted for him so it is really hard to say that the majority of bernie supporters will not vote for hillary.

rssesq

you can store a fully workable operating room in that medivacvan, is she still parkin in handicap spots, for shame

fife

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2016/2/theres-a-strong-feminist-case-for-hillary-clinton.html
interesting article. hopefully this news site is not considered to bias for people

Boxes&Books

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

tonifig8 said:

Free said:

I've posted articles and there are several other articles backing it up. Not to mention FB groups, news stories, pieces, etc with hundreds and hundreds of people commenting who won't vote for her. This was a huge movement, and if you weren't a part of it then you will not understand. Just how many people out there who won't vote for Hillary, out of the way the Democratic Party have treated Bernie, how she herself have dissed Bernie supporters publicly, and how he has been screwed over. This might seem like a joke to many of Hillary supporters because you can't understand the enormity of it all, but it's very real.

His supporters votes mean a whole lot to the Clinton campaign. But they certainly didn't win us over.

Germ was a big part of the movement, so he/she claims.

The fact is that the polls are so tight now. Many are voting third party and many are simply not voting. The reality is that if trump supporters turnout and if people on the left spread out their votes it might just give trump the narrow win. Sanders went on CNN today pleading with his supporters to back Clinton. It's clearly a serious concern for the left.

People like germ making not voting for Clinton that much easier.

The thing about us Bernie supporters are that but we are independent minded, and are not easily swayed into voting for the corrupt two-party system. That's why were his supporters in the first place: it's like ass-backwards. So this move to get him to actively campaign for her in Ohio begging for votes, will probably not work.

yeah that's why you would vote for him....as a DEMOCRAT

This coming from a former Bernie Bro, and now the biggest Clinton supporter in existence.. It's funny to read you're post.

Jason P

rssesq said:

you can store a fully workable operating room in that medivacvan, is she still parkin in handicap spots, for shame

I would drive that!

Go Beavers

Free said:

fife said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/the-democratic-convention-is-chaotic-the-democratic-base-isnt/

I was off...it's 90% of Sanders voters plan to vote Clinton. Not too many butthurts

Nice try, but Washington Post is Clinton biased and always have been

what news papers if any would you agree with if they said the same thing?

It's already out there how corrupt the media is, and polls are used to manipulate voter behavior and nothing else, I worked in media marketing. I mean really, daily polls? The mere idea of a daily poll is to create nothing more than drama and increase media ratings.

Just talking and listening to people in groups, locally and online, The feeling is heavily still against Hillary from Bernie supporters, the majority anyway. Hearsay and first person testimonials have more weight on the topic then any supposed national bs poll.

You should inform yourself on how scientific polls are conducted before dismissing them. If you want to check them against reality in order to have an informed opinion, compare the poll numbers leading up to the election vs. the actual election results. You'll see which ones are more valid and trustworthy, and which are less.

unsung

Gern Blansten said:

unsung said:

Gern Blansten said:

JC29856 said:

Go Beavers said:

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

JC29856 said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

getting nervous....Trump closing the gap

Nothing to be nervous about, the president has no significant difference in day to day life. Whether its bush 1 or 2 Obama or pokemon, no real difference, it's supposed to be that way.

Unless your a member of the armed forces or have a family member who is. Just ask those 4000+ that died in Iraq.

Explain the difference? They died under the family values republican president and the hope and change democratic president? What difference does the president make?

So do you think we have the Iraq war if Gore was president? Do we have the Affordable Care Act if McCain was? The Supreme Court would look essentially the same no matter who was president?

Speaking of Gore and war..... Remember him, the guy that refused to have his president campaign for him, the guy who lost his home state to Bush, the guy that couldn't convince more Florida democrats to vote for him versus Bush, if that's not enough to jog your memory this certainly will, the guy that invented the interwebs.

Mrs. Clinton may also get an assist from one Democrat who has been largely quiet about the race, but can testify to the importance of resisting the third-party temptation: former Vice President Al Gore. Her staff has had conversations with aides to Mr. Gore about bringing him onto the campaign trail to emphasize the importance of supporting Mrs. Clinton if they want to make progress on combating climate change.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

Snopes...LOL

Yeah...your life nemesis. Proving all your shit wrong

Funded by Soros and his vermin.

rssesq

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIQdqKEP4ns

g under p

Hillary amazes me, she finds a way to chip away at her lead.

Peace

brianlux

^^^ "I'm very proud that I was a Goldwater girl." Most of you are too young perhaps to understand how revealing this is. And then there's all the rest of the switcheroo going on in the last few to several years. Watch the video.

We need new candidates, period.

unsung

g under p said:

Hillary amazes me, she finds a way to chip away at her lead.

Peace

I think she's going to lose.

brianlux

unsung said:

g under p said:

Hillary amazes me, she finds a way to chip away at her lead.

Peace

I think she's going to lose.

I hope they both lose... but of course she or The Donald will win.

Either way, WE are going to lose.

BS44325

Just saw a preview of Hillary on Jimmy Fallon. He put on a surgical mask and then used hand sanitizer after she high fives him! That is going to sting.