obama not after your guns ?

rgambs

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

I gave you a pretty easy question - define one person who does not collect his or her own Social Security, who still has the faculties that he or she should be carrying a gun. You said nothing - in other words you have literally zero evidence to contribute to validate your point.

Today you make a passive aggressive joke about how those who don't agree with you are all sheep.

Let me be more direct: it astounds me how obtuse and arrogant you are, that you think your own unsubstantiated and miscomprehended understanding of a law that you're incapable of refuting, leaves us as the blind followers of a policy-maker. Especially when the topic is as important as guns - guns, the items who some say protects, but statistics actually show lead to an epidemic of senseless suffering and death in your country.

Almost makes me wonder if you don't collect your own SS and feel you deserve a gun - and I must say, if you carry firearms, I hope this bill gets passed and they collect it from your intolerant and pathetically close-minded self. Then, with all that free time you'll have because you can no longer wound or kill animals for menial sport, maybe you'll have time to actually educate yourself on the English language and come back here and justify properly why that was a mistake. But I don't see that happening.

But then again, I just wasted a minute and a half of my life, as I included big words and probably lost your attention pretty early on.

I'd love to see a cogent argument from you one day on this topic. Until then, maybe you should shut your mouth before issuing blanket statements on so many people for having an iota of logic in the things they say. It legitimately scares me that there could be so many people like you in your country who will determine what is arguably the most powerful position in the world (given America's track record of meddling).

so you don't like my mexico idea ?
but you seem to think anybody who collects SS is not able to cary a weapon ? do you think when people turn 65-67 they are no longer capable of rational thought ?...I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue once you've turned the age that you can collect SS, another thing since your rambling about senseless suffering due to gun violence why don't you look at the age of the killers and tell us how many commited senseless MURDER (not self defence) over the age of 65-67, I'm willing to bet the younger groups have the % for those crimes, I do not collect SS but that has nothing to do with some asshat telling the country if you collect SS you are suspect of being to old and crazy to own a gun, and yes you did waste a minute and of your life babbling about restricting the rights of americans based on thier age, your time will come to be an older person and hopefully you will have learned something about the equal rights everybody seems to be so caught up in, equal rights are for everybody not just the under 65 crowd, oh yea and "shut my mouth" ? please......you are a lost soul arnt you.

Godfather.

Those who collect SS can't have guns? Where on Earth did you get that?
What planet are you on? You misunderstand the situation so entirely I don't see any point in correcting you, you don't seem to be able to comprehend your own posts so I see no hope in you comprehending anyone else's.

Gern Blansten

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

I gave you a pretty easy question - define one person who does not collect his or her own Social Security, who still has the faculties that he or she should be carrying a gun. You said nothing - in other words you have literally zero evidence to contribute to validate your point.

Today you make a passive aggressive joke about how those who don't agree with you are all sheep.

Let me be more direct: it astounds me how obtuse and arrogant you are, that you think your own unsubstantiated and miscomprehended understanding of a law that you're incapable of refuting, leaves us as the blind followers of a policy-maker. Especially when the topic is as important as guns - guns, the items who some say protects, but statistics actually show lead to an epidemic of senseless suffering and death in your country.

Almost makes me wonder if you don't collect your own SS and feel you deserve a gun - and I must say, if you carry firearms, I hope this bill gets passed and they collect it from your intolerant and pathetically close-minded self. Then, with all that free time you'll have because you can no longer wound or kill animals for menial sport, maybe you'll have time to actually educate yourself on the English language and come back here and justify properly why that was a mistake. But I don't see that happening.

But then again, I just wasted a minute and a half of my life, as I included big words and probably lost your attention pretty early on.

I'd love to see a cogent argument from you one day on this topic. Until then, maybe you should shut your mouth before issuing blanket statements on so many people for having an iota of logic in the things they say. It legitimately scares me that there could be so many people like you in your country who will determine what is arguably the most powerful position in the world (given America's track record of meddling).

so you don't like my mexico idea ?
but you seem to think anybody who collects SS is not able to cary a weapon ? do you think when people turn 65-67 they are no longer capable of rational thought ?...I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue once you've turned the age that you can collect SS, another thing since your rambling about senseless suffering due to gun violence why don't you look at the age of the killers and tell us how many commited senseless MURDER (not self defence) over the age of 65-67, I'm willing to bet the younger groups have the % for those crimes, I do not collect SS but that has nothing to do with some asshat telling the country if you collect SS you are suspect of being to old and crazy to own a gun, and yes you did waste a minute and of your life babbling about restricting the rights of americans based on thier age, your time will come to be an older person and hopefully you will have learned something about the equal rights everybody seems to be so caught up in, equal rights are for everybody not just the under 65 crowd, oh yea and "shut my mouth" ? please......you are a lost soul arnt you.

Godfather.

GF your reading comprehension has to be the worst I have ever come across.

The issue has nothing to do with collecting social security. It's related to social security "DISABILITY" which is a completely separate type of benefit. To qualify for SSI you have to have a proven DISABILITY (i.e. mental) in order to collect benefits. If you are mental why should you get a gun?

You can still be old and crazy and collect social security and have your stupid gun. If you collect SSI you can't be crazy.....see?

The article that YOU POSTED even refers to those payments being made to "representative payees"...that means that those whose benefits are being managed by someone else because they are disabled or completely unable to care for themselves.

Smellyman

pure comedy gold

benjs

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

I gave you a pretty easy question - define one person who does not collect his or her own Social Security, who still has the faculties that he or she should be carrying a gun. You said nothing - in other words you have literally zero evidence to contribute to validate your point.

Today you make a passive aggressive joke about how those who don't agree with you are all sheep.

Let me be more direct: it astounds me how obtuse and arrogant you are, that you think your own unsubstantiated and miscomprehended understanding of a law that you're incapable of refuting, leaves us as the blind followers of a policy-maker. Especially when the topic is as important as guns - guns, the items who some say protects, but statistics actually show lead to an epidemic of senseless suffering and death in your country.

Almost makes me wonder if you don't collect your own SS and feel you deserve a gun - and I must say, if you carry firearms, I hope this bill gets passed and they collect it from your intolerant and pathetically close-minded self. Then, with all that free time you'll have because you can no longer wound or kill animals for menial sport, maybe you'll have time to actually educate yourself on the English language and come back here and justify properly why that was a mistake. But I don't see that happening.

But then again, I just wasted a minute and a half of my life, as I included big words and probably lost your attention pretty early on.

I'd love to see a cogent argument from you one day on this topic. Until then, maybe you should shut your mouth before issuing blanket statements on so many people for having an iota of logic in the things they say. It legitimately scares me that there could be so many people like you in your country who will determine what is arguably the most powerful position in the world (given America's track record of meddling).

so you don't like my mexico idea ?
but you seem to think anybody who collects SS is not able to cary a weapon ?
I think that anyone who needs a representative payee to collect SS for a disability is likely incapable of carrying a gun. I also invited you to find me one single case where that doesn't ring true, and you gave me nothing.

do you think when people turn 65-67 they are no longer capable of rational thought ?
Don't just read the words you want to in the article - actually attempt to comprehend them. Nowhere does it say anything like this.

...I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue once you've turned the age that you can collect SS
When I reach the age that I can collect SS, I hope I don't need to. If I do, I hope it isn't on disability. If it is on disability, I hope I don't feel the need to protect myself. If I feel the need to protect myself and I'm not even well enough to collect my own SSI cheque, I certainly don't think I deserve the right to do so with firearms.

, another thing since your rambling about senseless suffering due to gun violence why don't you look at the age of the killers and tell us how many commited senseless MURDER (not self defence) over the age of 65-67
That number's probably not so low in the mentally or physically handicapped departments - the ONLY departments this would affect.

, I'm willing to bet the younger groups have the % for those crimes, I do not collect SS but that has nothing to do with some asshat telling the country if you collect SS you are suspect of being to old and crazy to own a gun
Again, nowhere in the article does it say if you collect SS you are too old to own a gun. It says if you collect SSI you are not fit - either physically or mentally - to own a gun. Not too many quadriplegics vying for gun rights. Not too many representatives of theirs vying for them to have them either - I wonder why. Far too many mentally unsound vying for gun rights, however.

, and yes you did waste a minute and of your life babbling about restricting the rights of americans based on their age
I did no such thing - READ THE ARTICLE

, your time will come to be an older person and hopefully you will have learned something about the equal rights everybody seems to be so caught up in, equal rights are for everybody not just the under 65 crowd, oh yea and "shut my mouth" ? please......you are a lost soul arnt you.
Yes - shut your mouth when it comes to throwing insults as though your opinion is the word of a preacher or a god (or both). I know your right to be proudly ignorant is the only thing you protect more than your right to have a gun.

Godfather.

Ben.

benjs

Just to add to this - it's shocking to me to hear that (if we're going to make outlandish statements) Godfather truly believes that the right to bear arms of a quadriplegic or schizophrenic who cannot collect his or her own survival funds are so fundamental to the way of life in America, that the President should be impeached for infringing on them.

Godfather.

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

I gave you a pretty easy question - define one person who does not collect his or her own Social Security, who still has the faculties that he or she should be carrying a gun. You said nothing - in other words you have literally zero evidence to contribute to validate your point.

Today you make a passive aggressive joke about how those who don't agree with you are all sheep.

Let me be more direct: it astounds me how obtuse and arrogant you are, that you think your own unsubstantiated and miscomprehended understanding of a law that you're incapable of refuting, leaves us as the blind followers of a policy-maker. Especially when the topic is as important as guns - guns, the items who some say protects, but statistics actually show lead to an epidemic of senseless suffering and death in your country.

Almost makes me wonder if you don't collect your own SS and feel you deserve a gun - and I must say, if you carry firearms, I hope this bill gets passed and they collect it from your intolerant and pathetically close-minded self. Then, with all that free time you'll have because you can no longer wound or kill animals for menial sport, maybe you'll have time to actually educate yourself on the English language and come back here and justify properly why that was a mistake. But I don't see that happening.

But then again, I just wasted a minute and a half of my life, as I included big words and probably lost your attention pretty early on.

I'd love to see a cogent argument from you one day on this topic. Until then, maybe you should shut your mouth before issuing blanket statements on so many people for having an iota of logic in the things they say. It legitimately scares me that there could be so many people like you in your country who will determine what is arguably the most powerful position in the world (given America's track record of meddling).

so you don't like my mexico idea ?
but you seem to think anybody who collects SS is not able to cary a weapon ?
I think that anyone who needs a representative payee to collect SS for a disability is likely incapable of carrying a gun. I also invited you to find me one single case where that doesn't ring true, and you gave me nothing.

do you think when people turn 65-67 they are no longer capable of rational thought ?
Don't just read the words you want to in the article - actually attempt to comprehend them. Nowhere does it say anything like this.

...I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue once you've turned the age that you can collect SS
When I reach the age that I can collect SS, I hope I don't need to. If I do, I hope it isn't on disability. If it is on disability, I hope I don't feel the need to protect myself. If I feel the need to protect myself and I'm not even well enough to collect my own SSI cheque, I certainly don't think I deserve the right to do so with firearms.

, another thing since your rambling about senseless suffering due to gun violence why don't you look at the age of the killers and tell us how many commited senseless MURDER (not self defence) over the age of 65-67
That number's probably not so low in the mentally or physically handicapped departments - the ONLY departments this would affect.

, I'm willing to bet the younger groups have the % for those crimes, I do not collect SS but that has nothing to do with some asshat telling the country if you collect SS you are suspect of being to old and crazy to own a gun
Again, nowhere in the article does it say if you collect SS you are too old to own a gun. It says if you collect SSI you are not fit - either physically or mentally - to own a gun. Not too many quadriplegics vying for gun rights. Not too many representatives of theirs vying for them to have them either - I wonder why. Far too many mentally unsound vying for gun rights, however.

, and yes you did waste a minute and of your life babbling about restricting the rights of americans based on their age
I did no such thing - READ THE ARTICLE

, your time will come to be an older person and hopefully you will have learned something about the equal rights everybody seems to be so caught up in, equal rights are for everybody not just the under 65 crowd, oh yea and "shut my mouth" ? please......you are a lost soul arnt you.
Yes - shut your mouth when it comes to throwing insults as though your opinion is the word of a preacher or a god (or both). I know your right to be proudly ignorant is the only thing you protect more than your right to have a gun.

Godfather.

Ben.

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAH....TESTY are we ? shut yo mouth man HAHHAHHAHHAHHAH

Godfather.

benjs

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

I gave you a pretty easy question - define one person who does not collect his or her own Social Security, who still has the faculties that he or she should be carrying a gun. You said nothing - in other words you have literally zero evidence to contribute to validate your point.

Today you make a passive aggressive joke about how those who don't agree with you are all sheep.

Let me be more direct: it astounds me how obtuse and arrogant you are, that you think your own unsubstantiated and miscomprehended understanding of a law that you're incapable of refuting, leaves us as the blind followers of a policy-maker. Especially when the topic is as important as guns - guns, the items who some say protects, but statistics actually show lead to an epidemic of senseless suffering and death in your country.

Almost makes me wonder if you don't collect your own SS and feel you deserve a gun - and I must say, if you carry firearms, I hope this bill gets passed and they collect it from your intolerant and pathetically close-minded self. Then, with all that free time you'll have because you can no longer wound or kill animals for menial sport, maybe you'll have time to actually educate yourself on the English language and come back here and justify properly why that was a mistake. But I don't see that happening.

But then again, I just wasted a minute and a half of my life, as I included big words and probably lost your attention pretty early on.

I'd love to see a cogent argument from you one day on this topic. Until then, maybe you should shut your mouth before issuing blanket statements on so many people for having an iota of logic in the things they say. It legitimately scares me that there could be so many people like you in your country who will determine what is arguably the most powerful position in the world (given America's track record of meddling).

so you don't like my mexico idea ?
but you seem to think anybody who collects SS is not able to cary a weapon ?
I think that anyone who needs a representative payee to collect SS for a disability is likely incapable of carrying a gun. I also invited you to find me one single case where that doesn't ring true, and you gave me nothing.

do you think when people turn 65-67 they are no longer capable of rational thought ?
Don't just read the words you want to in the article - actually attempt to comprehend them. Nowhere does it say anything like this.

...I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue once you've turned the age that you can collect SS
When I reach the age that I can collect SS, I hope I don't need to. If I do, I hope it isn't on disability. If it is on disability, I hope I don't feel the need to protect myself. If I feel the need to protect myself and I'm not even well enough to collect my own SSI cheque, I certainly don't think I deserve the right to do so with firearms.

, another thing since your rambling about senseless suffering due to gun violence why don't you look at the age of the killers and tell us how many commited senseless MURDER (not self defence) over the age of 65-67
That number's probably not so low in the mentally or physically handicapped departments - the ONLY departments this would affect.

, I'm willing to bet the younger groups have the % for those crimes, I do not collect SS but that has nothing to do with some asshat telling the country if you collect SS you are suspect of being to old and crazy to own a gun
Again, nowhere in the article does it say if you collect SS you are too old to own a gun. It says if you collect SSI you are not fit - either physically or mentally - to own a gun. Not too many quadriplegics vying for gun rights. Not too many representatives of theirs vying for them to have them either - I wonder why. Far too many mentally unsound vying for gun rights, however.

, and yes you did waste a minute and of your life babbling about restricting the rights of americans based on their age
I did no such thing - READ THE ARTICLE

, your time will come to be an older person and hopefully you will have learned something about the equal rights everybody seems to be so caught up in, equal rights are for everybody not just the under 65 crowd, oh yea and "shut my mouth" ? please......you are a lost soul arnt you.
Yes - shut your mouth when it comes to throwing insults as though your opinion is the word of a preacher or a god (or both). I know your right to be proudly ignorant is the only thing you protect more than your right to have a gun.

Godfather.

Ben.

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAH....TESTY are we ? shut yo mouth man HAHHAHHAHHAHHAH

Godfather.

It's so much easier to laugh than to learn, isn't it?

Gern Blansten

Oh there will be no learnin...no sir

mickeyrat

Trolly McTroller trolling down the hall

g under p

CH156378 said:

Ohhh shit! I hope nobody tells Biden.

I knew that comment was coming.....it appears some have fears this is the beginning of the end to owning guns in this country. I don't think that's the case, I'm all for background checks. One has to have one to rent an apartment, job etc....so why not to see if a person is incapable of caring for themselves. With all the many mass shootings which have had a link to mental unfitness this purposal could curtail these shootings.

Any better suggestions to stop these shootings when dealing with those who are deemed mentally unfit? It's a difficult issue but this country has approach it, start the process to do something dealing mental illness. It's STILL rather easy to get all the guns we need even with our lax background check.


Peace

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

benjs said:

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

I gave you a pretty easy question - define one person who does not collect his or her own Social Security, who still has the faculties that he or she should be carrying a gun. You said nothing - in other words you have literally zero evidence to contribute to validate your point.

Today you make a passive aggressive joke about how those who don't agree with you are all sheep.

Let me be more direct: it astounds me how obtuse and arrogant you are, that you think your own unsubstantiated and miscomprehended understanding of a law that you're incapable of refuting, leaves us as the blind followers of a policy-maker. Especially when the topic is as important as guns - guns, the items who some say protects, but statistics actually show lead to an epidemic of senseless suffering and death in your country.

Almost makes me wonder if you don't collect your own SS and feel you deserve a gun - and I must say, if you carry firearms, I hope this bill gets passed and they collect it from your intolerant and pathetically close-minded self. Then, with all that free time you'll have because you can no longer wound or kill animals for menial sport, maybe you'll have time to actually educate yourself on the English language and come back here and justify properly why that was a mistake. But I don't see that happening.

But then again, I just wasted a minute and a half of my life, as I included big words and probably lost your attention pretty early on.

I'd love to see a cogent argument from you one day on this topic. Until then, maybe you should shut your mouth before issuing blanket statements on so many people for having an iota of logic in the things they say. It legitimately scares me that there could be so many people like you in your country who will determine what is arguably the most powerful position in the world (given America's track record of meddling).

so you don't like my mexico idea ?
but you seem to think anybody who collects SS is not able to cary a weapon ?
I think that anyone who needs a representative payee to collect SS for a disability is likely incapable of carrying a gun. I also invited you to find me one single case where that doesn't ring true, and you gave me nothing.

do you think when people turn 65-67 they are no longer capable of rational thought ?
Don't just read the words you want to in the article - actually attempt to comprehend them. Nowhere does it say anything like this.

...I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue once you've turned the age that you can collect SS
When I reach the age that I can collect SS, I hope I don't need to. If I do, I hope it isn't on disability. If it is on disability, I hope I don't feel the need to protect myself. If I feel the need to protect myself and I'm not even well enough to collect my own SSI cheque, I certainly don't think I deserve the right to do so with firearms.

, another thing since your rambling about senseless suffering due to gun violence why don't you look at the age of the killers and tell us how many commited senseless MURDER (not self defence) over the age of 65-67
That number's probably not so low in the mentally or physically handicapped departments - the ONLY departments this would affect.

, I'm willing to bet the younger groups have the % for those crimes, I do not collect SS but that has nothing to do with some asshat telling the country if you collect SS you are suspect of being to old and crazy to own a gun
Again, nowhere in the article does it say if you collect SS you are too old to own a gun. It says if you collect SSI you are not fit - either physically or mentally - to own a gun. Not too many quadriplegics vying for gun rights. Not too many representatives of theirs vying for them to have them either - I wonder why. Far too many mentally unsound vying for gun rights, however.

, and yes you did waste a minute and of your life babbling about restricting the rights of americans based on their age
I did no such thing - READ THE ARTICLE

, your time will come to be an older person and hopefully you will have learned something about the equal rights everybody seems to be so caught up in, equal rights are for everybody not just the under 65 crowd, oh yea and "shut my mouth" ? please......you are a lost soul arnt you.
Yes - shut your mouth when it comes to throwing insults as though your opinion is the word of a preacher or a god (or both). I know your right to be proudly ignorant is the only thing you protect more than your right to have a gun.

Godfather.

Ben.

Well done Miastro, some of us need some guidance and understanding in this thing we call life. Your patience is outstanding, I have some but from time to time I can completely lose it and I can't even bother to participate properly. That said its cool we can come here and learn something From what the AMT members have to say.....so friends carry on.

Peace

Godfather.

learn from you guy's ? you'd better think aout that for a bit gents.

Godfather.

Last-12-Exit

Why learn when it's so much easier to be filled with hate and ignorance?

Thirty Bills Unpaid

Godfather. said:

good morning ! it's a new day and I have turned over a new leaf, how are uncle obamas sheep today ? I truley hope everybody is well and grazing in the field of obedience.

Godfather.

Did you have a nice conversation with Santa Claus last night before you went to bed? I hope he managed to put some individual time aside for you with the other millions of people praying for good fortune at the same time.

Keep tithing away obedient one.

Bentleyspop

Last-12-Exit said:

Why learn when it's so much easier to be filled with hate and ignorance?

Don't forget fear
People like godfoxer are filled with fear as well as hate and ignorance.

Thirty Bills Unpaid

Godfather. said:

learn from you guy's ? you'd better think aout that for a bit gents.

Godfather.

Let us get productive here:

1. Firstly... look at learn from you guy's?

In the modern era, it seems to have become acceptable to refrain from capitalizing the first letter of the first word in a sentence- so... no biggie there; however, guy's indicates a possessive and is a grammatical error. Look at the following two examples:

This guy's written work needs help.

Those guys suck.

You needed to use the second example, GF, in your attempt to slap everyone in the face.

2. aout.

Hmmm. I've never seen this word before.

3. gents.

This forum has contributors for both genders, GF. For future, to be more respectful, use a gender neutral term such as: people, folks, or everyone. This way, women who offer much here do not feel as if they have been marginalized as an afterthought to some degree.


Have a nice day!

oftenreading

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

Godfather. said:

learn from you guy's ? you'd better think aout that for a bit gents.

Godfather.

Let us get productive here:

1. Firstly... look at learn from you guy's?

In the modern era, it seems to have become acceptable to refrain from capitalizing the first letter of the first word in a sentence- so... no biggie there; however, guy's indicates a possessive and is a grammatical error. Look at the following two examples:

This guy's written work needs help.

Those guys suck.

You needed to use the second example, GF, in your attempt to slap everyone in the face.

2. aout.

Hmmm. I've never seen this word before.

3. gents.

This forum has contributors for both genders, GF. For future, to be more respectful, use a gender neutral term such as: people, folks, or everyone. This way, women who offer much here do not feel as if they have been marginalized as an afterthought to some degree.


Have a nice day!

Thirty, I'm surprised at you, not recognizing the French word for August. And you call yourself a Canadian!

Clearly GF wants us to think about this until August. Or maybe that we'll still be talking about this in August. Personally, I think the thread will be closed way before August.

brianlux

oftenreading said:

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

Godfather. said:

learn from you guy's ? you'd better think aout that for a bit gents.

Godfather.

Let us get productive here:

1. Firstly... look at learn from you guy's?

In the modern era, it seems to have become acceptable to refrain from capitalizing the first letter of the first word in a sentence- so... no biggie there; however, guy's indicates a possessive and is a grammatical error. Look at the following two examples:

This guy's written work needs help.

Those guys suck.

You needed to use the second example, GF, in your attempt to slap everyone in the face.

2. aout.

Hmmm. I've never seen this word before.

3. gents.

This forum has contributors for both genders, GF. For future, to be more respectful, use a gender neutral term such as: people, folks, or everyone. This way, women who offer much here do not feel as if they have been marginalized as an afterthought to some degree.


Have a nice day!

Thirty, I'm surprised at you, not recognizing the French word for August. And you call yourself a Canadian!

Clearly GF wants us to think about this until August. Or maybe that we'll still be talking about this in August. Personally, I think the thread will be closed way before August.

Actually. oftenreading, I think GF was using the adjective definition of the word "august" being: respected and impressive (Why in French? Je ne sais pas!) He wants us guys (not the ladies here) to think respectfully and impressively regarding any possibility of him learning from us.

GF, all kidding aside, perhaps try the "preview" button.

g under p

oftenreading said:

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

Godfather. said:

learn from you guy's ? you'd better think aout that for a bit gents.

Godfather.

Let us get productive here:

1. Firstly... look at learn from you guy's?

In the modern era, it seems to have become acceptable to refrain from capitalizing the first letter of the first word in a sentence- so... no biggie there; however, guy's indicates a possessive and is a grammatical error. Look at the following two examples:

This guy's written work needs help.

Those guys suck.

You needed to use the second example, GF, in your attempt to slap everyone in the face.

2. aout.

Hmmm. I've never seen this word before.

3. gents.

This forum has contributors for both genders, GF. For future, to be more respectful, use a gender neutral term such as: people, folks, or everyone. This way, women who offer much here do not feel as if they have been marginalized as an afterthought to some degree.


Have a nice day!

Thirty, I'm surprised at you, not recognizing the French word for August. And you call yourself a Canadian!

Clearly GF wants us to think about this until August. Or maybe that we'll still be talking about this in August. Personally, I think the thread will be closed way before August.

Lol, where does one find those smiley emoticons? Also, I think it won't last the rest of the week. I think someone here will get reported.

Peace

Thirty Bills Unpaid

oftenreading said:

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

Godfather. said:

learn from you guy's ? you'd better think aout that for a bit gents.

Godfather.

Let us get productive here:

1. Firstly... look at learn from you guy's?

In the modern era, it seems to have become acceptable to refrain from capitalizing the first letter of the first word in a sentence- so... no biggie there; however, guy's indicates a possessive and is a grammatical error. Look at the following two examples:

This guy's written work needs help.

Those guys suck.

You needed to use the second example, GF, in your attempt to slap everyone in the face.

2. aout.

Hmmm. I've never seen this word before.

3. gents.

This forum has contributors for both genders, GF. For future, to be more respectful, use a gender neutral term such as: people, folks, or everyone. This way, women who offer much here do not feel as if they have been marginalized as an afterthought to some degree.


Have a nice day!

Thirty, I'm surprised at you, not recognizing the French word for August. And you call yourself a Canadian!

Clearly GF wants us to think about this until August. Or maybe that we'll still be talking about this in August. Personally, I think the thread will be closed way before August.

Well holy shit. Godfather is French.

This explains a ton.

GF... with English being your second language... you're not doing that badly at all!

Godfather.

I stated quite a few post back that the fact that dumb bama used the term SS recipents was a red flag
so pretty much.......---- ---

Godfather.