hopefull nobama will be out before he can stir up anymore gun babble.....
Godfather.
No worries, as with EVERY OTHER president no matter how much babble you may hear it won't change any gun reform in this country. This country love it's guns and what they can way too much to change much of anything. Rest easy ALL will be well no matter what Fox says the president is babbling.
Peace
No kidding.
I said it before, but it begs saying again: if Sandy Hook couldn't be the catalyst for some measure of change... then nothing can.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
<<<<<FYI: louisiana is probably around 7th or 8th in terms of lax gun laws according to the brady campaign. arizona has the most lax gun laws in the united states.>>>>>>>>
#1 in partying and #1 in food tho! Just dont visit our urban areas. There's murders every night.
So another cop shoots a black guy. Are they so trigger happy because they are worried people have guns? Everyone should be packing because that is their god given right as a freedom loving American.
Either way, the tyranny of the police is getting our of hand. I am glad Americans can own guns so they can rebel agaisnt said tyranny.
So another cop shoots a black guy. Are they so trigger happy because they are worried people have guns? Everyone should be packing because that is their god given right as a freedom loving American.
Either way, the tyranny of the police is getting our of hand. I am glad Americans can own guns so they can rebel agaisnt said tyranny.
right?
The second amendment is a great thing. Thanks for chiming in from Taipei.
So another cop shoots a black guy. Are they so trigger happy because they are worried people have guns? Everyone should be packing because that is their god given right as a freedom loving American.
Either way, the tyranny of the police is getting our of hand. I am glad Americans can own guns so they can rebel agaisnt said tyranny.
right?
The second amendment is a great thing. Thanks for chiming in from Taipei.
So another cop shoots a black guy. Are they so trigger happy because they are worried people have guns? Everyone should be packing because that is their god given right as a freedom loving American.
Either way, the tyranny of the police is getting our of hand. I am glad Americans can own guns so they can rebel agaisnt said tyranny.
right?
The second amendment is a great thing. Thanks for chiming in from Taipei.
So another cop shoots a black guy. Are they so trigger happy because they are worried people have guns? Everyone should be packing because that is their god given right as a freedom loving American.
Either way, the tyranny of the police is getting our of hand. I am glad Americans can own guns so they can rebel agaisnt said tyranny.
right?
The second amendment is a great thing. Thanks for chiming in from Taipei.
Does that include tear gas grenades?
Single shot muzzle loaders.
And the first amendment only covers the printing press.
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
So because they were written in the same year they can be compared to each other? What's the argument? Who's free speech was threatened? This is the gun thread, right?
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
I'd like to call for a ban on 300+ DPI printers. Anything less should be fine, but I am offended by high-resolution, crisp text output. And I'm tired of the high-res lobbyists telling me that laser printers and printing presses are the same, they clearly are not!
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
I'd like to call for a ban on 300+ DPI printers. Anything less should be fine, but I am offended by high-resolution, crisp text output. And I'm tired of the high-res lobbyists telling me that laser printers and printing presses are the same, they clearly are not!
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
I'd like to call for a ban on 300+ DPI printers. Anything less should be fine, but I am offended by high-resolution, crisp text output. And I'm tired of the high-res lobbyists telling me that laser printers and printing presses are the same, they clearly are not!
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
I'd like to call for a ban on 300+ DPI printers. Anything less should be fine, but I am offended by high-resolution, crisp text output. And I'm tired of the high-res lobbyists telling me that laser printers and printing presses are the same, they clearly are not!
At a very minimum... charge more for the ink.
Or something.
You kidding? That shit is already out of control!
No shit. It's cheaper to buy a new printer than it is to buy an ink cartridge.
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
I'd like to call for a ban on 300+ DPI printers. Anything less should be fine, but I am offended by high-resolution, crisp text output. And I'm tired of the high-res lobbyists telling me that laser printers and printing presses are the same, they clearly are not!
I'm thinking the printing presses from the 1700s might have killed a few people, but I've never heard of death by 300+ DPI printers.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
Not much difference between printing press and laser printer but there is a world of difference between print media and 24 hour news channels and internet based news outlets that can broadcast globally in a matter of seconds. Propaganda spreads at the speed of light these days.
If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
Mcgruff10, which well-regulated militia do you belong to?
I 'm in the nra and belong to a range. I also have a hunting license in the state of new york and new jersey and have legally owned weapons to protect my family. How's that sound? and comparing the 2nd amendment to muskets is like saying the founding fathers only meant freedom of press was for the printing press. it's a dumb argument because the founding fathers knew that in time many things were going to change in this country. rights do not change just because technology advances.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Mcgruff10, which well-regulated militia do you belong to?
I 'm in the nra and belong to a range. I also have a hunting license in the state of new york and new jersey and have legally owned weapons to protect my family. How's that sound? and comparing the 2nd amendment to muskets is like saying the founding fathers only meant freedom of press was for the printing press. it's a dumb argument because the founding fathers knew that in time many things were going to change in this country. rights do not change just because technology advances.
I don't understand why people want to compare amendments. They're not the same. Yes, the first amendment covers most forms of speech. But it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre (when there isn't one). Why? Common sense. It puts peoples lives in danger.
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
both amendments were made at the same time; why isn't fair to compare amendments? why is it ok to argue muskets but not the printing press? you can't have it both ways.
Because there is no essential difference between the results rendered by a printing press vs. a laser printer. But there is a huge difference between the results of the use of muskets vs. the kinds of weapons we have today. As Last mentioned: common sense.
Not much difference between printing press and laser printer but there is a world of difference between print media and 24 hour news channels and internet based news outlets that can broadcast globally in a matter of seconds. Propaganda spreads at the speed of light these days.
So it's the speed of propaganda that bothers you?? Pretty sure the first amendment is about free speech, not anti-propaganda. Sorry, just not seeing the connection there. I'll put it this way: I don't think the first amendment would really be any different if those who wrote it could see the future. The speed at which info is spread has no impact on what the amendment stands for. But i think the second amendment would be very different if they could have seen the future.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Comments
I said it before, but it begs saying again: if Sandy Hook couldn't be the catalyst for some measure of change... then nothing can.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
#1 in partying and #1 in food tho! Just dont visit our urban areas. There's murders every night.
ok good.
for a minute there i really believed obama was coming to take them away.
suppose i should try living in the real world instead of the fox news and right wing radio cyclone of bullshit.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Either way, the tyranny of the police is getting our of hand. I am glad Americans can own guns so they can rebel agaisnt said tyranny.
right?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I can't remember the government ever attempting to take any law abiding citizens guns. But make it illegal for a civilian to own a weapon designed for the military and you'd think you just killed their child. this country has never had or tried any form of gun control. Gun control does not infringe on your rights to own guns.
Godfather.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Or something.
and comparing the 2nd amendment to muskets is like saying the founding fathers only meant freedom of press was for the printing press. it's a dumb argument because the founding fathers knew that in time many things were going to change in this country. rights do not change just because technology advances.
http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-news/oh-huron/sheriff-huron-county-woman-shot-dead-by-neighbor-for-mowing-her-lawn-too-late-at-night
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14