GF,you know I fall right of center and I'm also gun owner with a CCP license.But I am also aware that we need to strengthen our resolve when it comes to who gets guns ,at least legally. Who cares if there is more backround checks? If your legit,you should have no issue.No one is asking for an inventory of your arsenal. When 1 idiot tried to blow up a plane with a shoe bomb,all of us paid for it by having to ridiculously take shoes off when getting on a plane.ONE GUY,ONE TIME. So know we have multiple mass shootings of hundreds of innocent victims,including kids and families.We have done nothing!!!!! Not one fucking thing.Any gun owner who is responsible should have no issue with making it tougher for those who want to acquire,Espescially illegal immigrants and those already relying on the entitlements of the government tit.They should be more concerned with buying milk,books and clothes not Bullets and Guns.
I don't think GF explained himself well here (at all) - sorry, GF. If he's saying what I think he is, I completely agree with him (with the exception of the infantile name-calling of the President).
This law, if I understand it correctly, models its background checks on the Department of Veteran Affairs' background checks. In this, it stipulates that anyone who is incapable of handling their own financial affairs would be ineligible for the service requested. The way of checking this is by determining whether a person is able, him or herself, to collect Social Security on a regular basis (without a representative sent on his or her behalf).
Social Security is for those who are retired, disabled in a way, shape or form, or unemployed. The question at hand is really simple. Are there legitimate reasons why one might not want to or be able to collect his or her own Social Security regularly and/or assign someone else to do it for him or herself, but should still be deemed eligible to carry a weapon?
If there are none, then this is an effective background check.
If there are some, then this is an ineffective background check, as it prohibits some who should not be prohibited from carrying a weapon.
Really not much more to it than that.
I can't pretend to know each individuals circumstances, but if someone doesn't have the physical ability to cash their own check should they be able to wield a firearm?
GF,you know I fall right of center and I'm also gun owner with a CCP license.But I am also aware that we need to strengthen our resolve when it comes to who gets guns ,at least legally. Who cares if there is more backround checks? If your legit,you should have no issue.No one is asking for an inventory of your arsenal. When 1 idiot tried to blow up a plane with a shoe bomb,all of us paid for it by having to ridiculously take shoes off when getting on a plane.ONE GUY,ONE TIME. So know we have multiple mass shootings of hundreds of innocent victims,including kids and families.We have done nothing!!!!! Not one fucking thing.Any gun owner who is responsible should have no issue with making it tougher for those who want to acquire,Espescially illegal immigrants and those already relying on the entitlements of the government tit.They should be more concerned with buying milk,books and clothes not Bullets and Guns.
I don't think GF explained himself well here (at all) - sorry, GF. If he's saying what I think he is, I completely agree with him (with the exception of the infantile name-calling of the President).
This law, if I understand it correctly, models its background checks on the Department of Veteran Affairs' background checks. In this, it stipulates that anyone who is incapable of handling their own financial affairs would be ineligible for the service requested. The way of checking this is by determining whether a person is able, him or herself, to collect Social Security on a regular basis (without a representative sent on his or her behalf).
Social Security is for those who are retired, disabled in a way, shape or form, or unemployed. The question at hand is really simple. Are there legitimate reasons why one might not want to or be able to collect his or her own Social Security regularly and/or assign someone else to do it for him or herself, but should still be deemed eligible to carry a weapon?
If there are none, then this is an effective background check.
If there are some, then this is an ineffective background check, as it prohibits some who should not be prohibited from carrying a weapon.
Really not much more to it than that.
I can't pretend to know each individuals circumstances, but if someone doesn't have the physical ability to cash their own check should they be able to wield a firearm?
Like I said above, the answer to that question is the answer to the question of whether or not this is a fair and effective background check!
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
this president is a asshat, obama needs to move his stupid ass back to kenya.
Godfather.
GF, is there a proper link to this story or not.....I'd like to read the entire article.
As you may already know I did not vote for Obama in the first election. Now if as you say he's STUPID then what do you think of President George W. Bush and the condition he left this country in when he left office? I'm pretty sure in the 16+ months President Obama has left in office this country will not be anywhere in the condition GWB left it. Which to the current being elected into office by the people and for the citizenry.....not the SCOTUS.
I know now you obviously don't like BHO, he seems to get under your skin. However, just a suggestion when you make a post/thread pointing out his inefficiencies/disagreements one can do so without showing your obvious biases. Your threads can move along in a much more positive/progressive (forgive me for using the word progressive) fashion.
I also know you have your own style and substance to which you have stuck to through the years (ain't none of AMT participants are going to change that) but basically stick to the damn subject matter right, wrong or indifferent.
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
GF,you know I fall right of center and I'm also gun owner with a CCP license.But I am also aware that we need to strengthen our resolve when it comes to who gets guns ,at least legally. Who cares if there is more backround checks? If your legit,you should have no issue.No one is asking for an inventory of your arsenal. When 1 idiot tried to blow up a plane with a shoe bomb,all of us paid for it by having to ridiculously take shoes off when getting on a plane.ONE GUY,ONE TIME. So know we have multiple mass shootings of hundreds of innocent victims,including kids and families.We have done nothing!!!!! Not one fucking thing.Any gun owner who is responsible should have no issue with making it tougher for those who want to acquire,Espescially illegal immigrants and those already relying on the entitlements of the government tit.They should be more concerned with buying milk,books and clothes not Bullets and Guns.
I don't think GF explained himself well here (at all) - sorry, GF. If he's saying what I think he is, I completely agree with him (with the exception of the infantile name-calling of the President).
This law, if I understand it correctly, models its background checks on the Department of Veteran Affairs' background checks. In this, it stipulates that anyone who is incapable of handling their own financial affairs would be ineligible for the service requested. The way of checking this is by determining whether a person is able, him or herself, to collect Social Security on a regular basis (without a representative sent on his or her behalf).
Social Security is for those who are retired, disabled in a way, shape or form, or unemployed. The question at hand is really simple. Are there legitimate reasons why one might not want to or be able to collect his or her own Social Security regularly and/or assign someone else to do it for him or herself, but should still be deemed eligible to carry a weapon?
If there are none, then this is an effective background check.
If there are some, then this is an ineffective background check, as it prohibits some who should not be prohibited from carrying a weapon.
Really not much more to it than that.
I can't pretend to know each individuals circumstances, but if someone doesn't have the physical ability to cash their own check should they be able to wield a firearm?
Like I said above, the answer to that question is the answer to the question of whether or not this is a fair and effective background check!
So under what type of circumstances would someone not be able to handle their own affairs yet still carry a gun? I'm seriously asking without my mind made up. This specific rule seems like a complicated issue.
little by little gun rights are being restricted and everybody just keeps drinking the cool-aid. how about the stories about these welfare folks using guns ? are they next to lose thier right to own a gun ? that's it folks just keep dringing the cool-aid....uncle obama will make everything better....he's a idiot.
Godfather.
Didn't you chastise folks for using the term "gun nuts" because resorting to name calling is a position of weakness or something like that?? It's ok for you but not others right?
little by little gun rights are being restricted and everybody just keeps drinking the cool-aid. how about the stories about these welfare folks using guns ? are they next to lose thier right to own a gun ? that's it folks just keep dringing the cool-aid....uncle obama will make everything better....he's a idiot.
Godfather.
Didn't you chastise folks for using the term "gun nuts" because resorting to name calling is a position of weakness or something like that?? It's ok for you but not others right?
well yes and your right, but obama is my exception LOL! just to clearify who did I name call ? other than obama ? if I have used any name calling (other than obama) I aploigize....yea yea I know it's wrong I'll try not to do that anymore.
GF,you know I fall right of center and I'm also gun owner with a CCP license.But I am also aware that we need to strengthen our resolve when it comes to who gets guns ,at least legally. Who cares if there is more backround checks? If your legit,you should have no issue.No one is asking for an inventory of your arsenal. When 1 idiot tried to blow up a plane with a shoe bomb,all of us paid for it by having to ridiculously take shoes off when getting on a plane.ONE GUY,ONE TIME. So know we have multiple mass shootings of hundreds of innocent victims,including kids and families.We have done nothing!!!!! Not one fucking thing.Any gun owner who is responsible should have no issue with making it tougher for those who want to acquire,Espescially illegal immigrants and those already relying on the entitlements of the government tit.They should be more concerned with buying milk,books and clothes not Bullets and Guns.
I don't think GF explained himself well here (at all) - sorry, GF. If he's saying what I think he is, I completely agree with him (with the exception of the infantile name-calling of the President).
This law, if I understand it correctly, models its background checks on the Department of Veteran Affairs' background checks. In this, it stipulates that anyone who is incapable of handling their own financial affairs would be ineligible for the service requested. The way of checking this is by determining whether a person is able, him or herself, to collect Social Security on a regular basis (without a representative sent on his or her behalf).
Social Security is for those who are retired, disabled in a way, shape or form, or unemployed. The question at hand is really simple. Are there legitimate reasons why one might not want to or be able to collect his or her own Social Security regularly and/or assign someone else to do it for him or herself, but should still be deemed eligible to carry a weapon?
If there are none, then this is an effective background check.
If there are some, then this is an ineffective background check, as it prohibits some who should not be prohibited from carrying a weapon.
Really not much more to it than that.
I can't pretend to know each individuals circumstances, but if someone doesn't have the physical ability to cash their own check should they be able to wield a firearm?
Like I said above, the answer to that question is the answer to the question of whether or not this is a fair and effective background check!
So under what type of circumstances would someone not be able to handle their own affairs yet still carry a gun? I'm seriously asking without my mind made up. This specific rule seems like a complicated issue.
I was seriously asking as well, as I honestly don't know the answer! Nothing comes to mind, but if someone (Godfather) opposes this policy, someone (Godfather) should be able to answer this question.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
little by little gun rights are being restricted and everybody just keeps drinking the cool-aid. how about the stories about these welfare folks using guns ? are they next to lose thier right to own a gun ? that's it folks just keep dringing the cool-aid....uncle obama will make everything better....he's a idiot.
Godfather.
Didn't you chastise folks for using the term "gun nuts" because resorting to name calling is a position of weakness or something like that?? It's ok for you but not others right?
well yes and your right, but obama is my exception LOL! just to clearify who did I name call ? other than obama ? if I have used any name calling (other than obama) I aploigize....yea yea I know it's wrong I'll try not to do that anymore.
Godfather.
Just Obama and those who drink his coolaid...but I don't really see a distinction lol
can we move on to the real serious issue at hand? WTF is that hat Ben put up?.Is it a mule,donkey,pig ,cow.dog,sock monkey? i can't look away and think i somehow need to own one.
can we move on to the real serious issue at hand? WTF is that hat Ben put up?.Is it a mule,donkey,pig ,cow.dog,sock monkey? i can't look away and think i somehow need to own one.
It's an "asshat"
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Holy goodness. Just when you thought a human being couldn't be any dumber, this thread gets opened.
GF, the gift that just keeps on giving. I wish you were my crazy uncle.
I just might be...........the 80's were pretty blurry, you should respect your elders. LOL!!!!!!! by the way speaking of dumber how are those special ed classes working out for you ? good luck my friend...I mean Nephew.
GF,you know I fall right of center and I'm also gun owner with a CCP license.But I am also aware that we need to strengthen our resolve when it comes to who gets guns ,at least legally. Who cares if there is more backround checks? If your legit,you should have no issue.No one is asking for an inventory of your arsenal. When 1 idiot tried to blow up a plane with a shoe bomb,all of us paid for it by having to ridiculously take shoes off when getting on a plane.ONE GUY,ONE TIME. So know we have multiple mass shootings of hundreds of innocent victims,including kids and families.We have done nothing!!!!! Not one fucking thing.Any gun owner who is responsible should have no issue with making it tougher for those who want to acquire,Espescially illegal immigrants and those already relying on the entitlements of the government tit.They should be more concerned with buying milk,books and clothes not Bullets and Guns.
Holy goodness. Just when you thought a human being couldn't be any dumber, this thread gets opened.
GF, the gift that just keeps on giving. I wish you were my crazy uncle.
I just might be...........the 80's were pretty blurry, you should respect your elders. LOL!!!!!!! by the way speaking of dumber how are those special ed classes working out for you ? good luck my friend...I mean Nephew.
You liberals need to leave Godfoxer alone He is absolutely correct when he says that President Obama is Kenyan and that when he goes back to Kenya he is taking all of your guns with him.
But before that he has 18 months left in his presidency. And during those 18 months he will......
Take all your guns Raise your taxes Abort your babies Legalize pot Create more govt. And allow people of color to be U.S. citizens.
I really don't understand the issue here. We want to take guns away from people who for whatever reason can't manage their own lives and need the government to do it for them. Sounds like a no brainer. This to me is no different that wanting to take drivers licenses away from people who go blind. The right to bear arms is not absolute. We do not allow felons to own guns for reasons we don't trust them anymore. I feel the same way for someone who is taking my tax dollars. If you have a real mental or physical issue that makes it to where you need my taxes then I don't trust you to own a gun.
Tom Brady & Donald Trump, BFF's Fuckus rules all Rob Seattle
Comments
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
As you may already know I did not vote for Obama in the first election. Now if as you say he's STUPID then what do you think of President George W. Bush and the condition he left this country in when he left office? I'm pretty sure in the 16+ months President Obama has left in office this country will not be anywhere in the condition GWB left it. Which to the current being elected into office by the people and for the citizenry.....not the SCOTUS.
I know now you obviously don't like BHO, he seems to get under your skin. However, just a suggestion when you make a post/thread pointing out his inefficiencies/disagreements one can do so without showing your obvious biases. Your threads can move along in a much more positive/progressive (forgive me for using the word progressive) fashion.
I also know you have your own style and substance to which you have stuck to through the years (ain't none of AMT participants are going to change that) but basically stick to the damn subject matter right, wrong or indifferent.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
If you don't have the mental capacity to manage your own affairs why should you be able to possess a firearm?
Obviously if you have applied for benefits under the guise of mental capacity and then you show up to fill out a gun permit a flag should go up.
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Godfather.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
WTF is that hat Ben put up?.Is it a mule,donkey,pig ,cow.dog,sock monkey?
i can't look away and think i somehow need to own one.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Obama Seeks To Build Secret Stockpile Of American Weapons In Kenyan Homeland
It will be part of Donald Trump's stump speech by next week.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
GF, the gift that just keeps on giving. I wish you were my crazy uncle.
LOL...I wouldn't be surprised one bit. Chances are some right wingnut will blog about that and give the other wingnuts a link to refer to as "proof."
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
by the way speaking of dumber how are those special ed classes working out for you ?
good luck my friend...I mean Nephew.
Godfather.
Godfather.
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Not even BS would stoop this low.
He is absolutely correct when he says that President Obama is Kenyan and that when he goes back to Kenya he is taking all of your guns with him.
But before that he has 18 months left in his presidency. And during those 18 months he will......
Take all your guns
Raise your taxes
Abort your babies
Legalize pot
Create more govt.
And allow people of color to be U.S. citizens.
Fuckus rules all
Rob
Seattle