Options

Jerusalem Post/Ben Red Completely Off Base In Criticism of Eddie and Pearl Jam

13468913

Comments

  • Options
    dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam NINUNINOPRO Posts: 139,314
    BinFrog said:

    The only people calling out Eddie's speech as being anti-Israel are...Jews and people from Israel who are just so freaking uptight about anyone having anything to say about the situation that doesn't paint them in a favorable light.

    (My last name is Horwitz, so take that for what it is worth).

    Here is what he said, let's break it down, shall we?

    "“What the fuck? We have this many people having a peaceful time, we can have modern technology, we can reach our friends, they know what we’re thinking it. The advertisers know what we’re thinking before we’re thinking it. We have technology, all of this in our hand. But at the same time as something this positive is happening, at the same fucking time, not even that far away, dropping bombs on each other. What the fucking fuck? And I get if war is the last resort, you don’t want to be in that situation. But I swear to fucking God, there are some people out there looking for a reason to kill. They’re looking for a reason to go across borders and take over land that doesn't belong to them. They should get the fuck out, and mind their own fucking business!

    He added, “Eat, procreate, draw a painting, make some art, listen to music, fuck some more, have another baby, eat, work, eat, work, love, love, love. Everyone’s the fucking same, so why are people at war? Stop the fucking shit now! Now! Now! We don’t want to give them our money! They don’t get our taxes to drop bombs on children! No! No more!”"


    Ok. We live in a time where so much is possible and there is so much to be amazed with. Then we have to deal with: Israel and the Palestinians, Russia invading the Ukraine, North Korea waving their missile dicks, the US butting in where they are not wanted/needed. And on and on. He is as much talking about Israel as he is talking about his OWN FUCKING COUNTRY. So all you blowhards who love ripping those "liberal" artists who speak up "against" Israel, get over yourselves. Israel is about as far from perfect as the US is, and we're in bed with each other. Ed is anti war, anti needless killing, anti living in fear.

    Live and let live, and yet people can't figure this out. "They don't get our taxes to drop bombs on children". Ed can be saying that to numerous militaries and governments. Oh but god forbid it can be said about Israel (which is killing children the same way Palestinians are, lets not overlook that fact). Hey, pro-Israeli folks (I can be in that camp sometimes) - GET OVER YOURSELVES. You are not special and neither is your country. Israel is as much a victim as it is a perpetrator. Neither side is "right". So stop with the whole "I'm going to boycott every artist who says anything at all that paints Israel in a less-than-flattering light". Guess what? The world is sick of the shit going down in the middle east...not just "liberal artists". Grow up and join the real world.

    ONCE AGAIN

    image
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Options
    hedonisthedonist standing on the edge of forever Posts: 24,524
    So dimi...you disagree with BinFrog or what?
  • Options
    its_okits_ok Posts: 198
    Have you people read the comments under the article?? I can't help but laugh, damn the world is full of lunatics.
    PJ
    2000 Roskilde, 2006 Barcelona, 2007 London, Copenhagen, 2008 New York 1, New York 2, 2009 Berlin, 2010 Dublin, Belfast, 2012 Amsterdam 1, Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhagen, 2013 Brooklyn 1, Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014 Milan, Trieste, Berlin, Stockholm, Milton Keynes

    EV
    2012 Manchester, London 1, London 2
  • Options
    boyo79boyo79 Warrington, UK Posts: 6,525
    BinFrog said:

    The only people calling out Eddie's speech as being anti-Israel are...Jews and people from Israel who are just so freaking uptight about anyone having anything to say about the situation that doesn't paint them in a favorable light.

    (My last name is Horwitz, so take that for what it is worth).

    Here is what he said, let's break it down, shall we?

    "“What the fuck? We have this many people having a peaceful time, we can have modern technology, we can reach our friends, they know what we’re thinking it. The advertisers know what we’re thinking before we’re thinking it. We have technology, all of this in our hand. But at the same time as something this positive is happening, at the same fucking time, not even that far away, dropping bombs on each other. What the fucking fuck? And I get if war is the last resort, you don’t want to be in that situation. But I swear to fucking God, there are some people out there looking for a reason to kill. They’re looking for a reason to go across borders and take over land that doesn't belong to them. They should get the fuck out, and mind their own fucking business!

    He added, “Eat, procreate, draw a painting, make some art, listen to music, fuck some more, have another baby, eat, work, eat, work, love, love, love. Everyone’s the fucking same, so why are people at war? Stop the fucking shit now! Now! Now! We don’t want to give them our money! They don’t get our taxes to drop bombs on children! No! No more!”"


    Ok. We live in a time where so much is possible and there is so much to be amazed with. Then we have to deal with: Israel and the Palestinians, Russia invading the Ukraine, North Korea waving their missile dicks, the US butting in where they are not wanted/needed. And on and on. He is as much talking about Israel as he is talking about his OWN FUCKING COUNTRY. So all you blowhards who love ripping those "liberal" artists who speak up "against" Israel, get over yourselves. Israel is about as far from perfect as the US is, and we're in bed with each other. Ed is anti war, anti needless killing, anti living in fear.

    Live and let live, and yet people can't figure this out. "They don't get our taxes to drop bombs on children". Ed can be saying that to numerous militaries and governments. Oh but god forbid it can be said about Israel (which is killing children the same way Palestinians are, lets not overlook that fact). Hey, pro-Israeli folks (I can be in that camp sometimes) - GET OVER YOURSELVES. You are not special and neither is your country. Israel is as much a victim as it is a perpetrator. Neither side is "right". So stop with the whole "I'm going to boycott every artist who says anything at all that paints Israel in a less-than-flattering light". Guess what? The world is sick of the shit going down in the middle east...not just "liberal artists". Grow up and join the real world.



    =D> =D> =D>

    Well said. It's amazing how many people are missing the point of Ed's speech. Does it matter which conflict he could be referring too? Surely what's more important is stopping war in the first place?
    2000: Manchester
    2006: Dublin; Leeds; Arnhem
    2007: London
    2009: Manchester
    2012: Manchester I & II : EV Manchester : Soundgarden Shepherds Bush
    2013: Brad Manchester : Soundgarden Manchester
    2014: Amsterdam I & II; Berlin; Leeds; Milton Keynes
    2018: Berlin; London II; Boston II

    Bootleg Reviews: http://pjbootlegreviews.blogspot.com/
  • Options
    CROJAM95CROJAM95 Posts: 9,267

    CROJAM95 said:

    As an American I too don't want my country to have anything to do with the Middle East period

    Let them figure it out

    which country sell them guns??your country is the first has to do with the whole..
    no shit....I know I'm dreaming, but thats where I'd like the policy to go

  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,970



    I disagree….as I mentioned, the Palestinian solidarity camp also thinks this was about Israel. So unless he wants to clarify his words by saying he did NOT mean to single out Israel, this is how it will be viewed by everyone who is personally invested in the ‘conflict’ (read: occupation). On the contrary, the only people I’ve seen who DO view this as simply an anti-war rant, are the people who don’t want him to pick a side because they don’t want to either, and a few Israelis who are in denial about the whole thing.
    I personally hope he is willing to speak further on it, but I think he will keep his mouth shut and hope this dies out. We can see the shit storm it caused to say anything that could even possibly be interpreted as criticizing Israel ….if he decides to clarify and make it clear that that is what he meant, his life will be turned inside out. He may even be in danger, after reading the jpost facebook comments. I hope reading these comments was an eye opener who those who view the conflict as being peace loving Israeli’s vs extremist arabs – plenty of hate to go around on both sides. When it comes to celebs, it takes a special kind of person to speak out against Israeli aggression.

    I don't really care what "side" he picks, and I do view it as an anti-war rant. Picking sides is an overly simplistic way of looking at a complex issue. I'm against the occupation and Israel's current tactics, but I am also against the kidnap and murder of children. I'm against Israeli airstrikes, but I am also against Palestinian rocket and mortar attacks. So what "side" does that put me on?

    If he wanted to single Israel out, he would have. He didn't, and there is nothing in what he did say to indicate he was speaking solely or even specifically about Israel.

    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    lbpeltzlbpeltz Posts: 98
    I never get the idea that EV is really informed on political issues. Maybe he's intentionally uninformed or underinformed, but to view him in any higher light than a pot smoking hippie yelling, "peace dude" is to do an injustice.
  • Options
    benjsbenjs Toronto, ON Posts: 8,942
    JimmyV said:



    I disagree….as I mentioned, the Palestinian solidarity camp also thinks this was about Israel. So unless he wants to clarify his words by saying he did NOT mean to single out Israel, this is how it will be viewed by everyone who is personally invested in the ‘conflict’ (read: occupation). On the contrary, the only people I’ve seen who DO view this as simply an anti-war rant, are the people who don’t want him to pick a side because they don’t want to either, and a few Israelis who are in denial about the whole thing.
    I personally hope he is willing to speak further on it, but I think he will keep his mouth shut and hope this dies out. We can see the shit storm it caused to say anything that could even possibly be interpreted as criticizing Israel ….if he decides to clarify and make it clear that that is what he meant, his life will be turned inside out. He may even be in danger, after reading the jpost facebook comments. I hope reading these comments was an eye opener who those who view the conflict as being peace loving Israeli’s vs extremist arabs – plenty of hate to go around on both sides. When it comes to celebs, it takes a special kind of person to speak out against Israeli aggression.

    I don't really care what "side" he picks, and I do view it as an anti-war rant. Picking sides is an overly simplistic way of looking at a complex issue. I'm against the occupation and Israel's current tactics, but I am also against the kidnap and murder of children. I'm against Israeli airstrikes, but I am also against Palestinian rocket and mortar attacks. So what "side" does that put me on?

    If he wanted to single Israel out, he would have. He didn't, and there is nothing in what he did say to indicate he was speaking solely or even specifically about Israel.

    Your standpoint puts you in what I'm pretty sure is Eddie's side: the human side that cares for the preservation for human life and the quality of life which should inherently come with it, regardless of what borders you live within.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Options
    CROJAM95CROJAM95 Posts: 9,267
    lbpeltz said:

    I never get the idea that EV is really informed on political issues. Maybe he's intentionally uninformed or underinformed, but to view him in any higher light than a pot smoking hippie yelling, "peace dude" is to do an injustice.

    let me guess, you know more than him? Or thats what you would like to think

    Isnt that what causes these arguments/wars...you think you know, he thinks he knows.....boom conflict

    oh if it were so black n white....

  • Options
    dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam NINUNINOPRO Posts: 139,314
    hedonist said:

    So dimi...you disagree with BinFrog or what?

    its so CLEAR I AGREE 100000000000%%%%%
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Options
    SpagsSpags Leigh-on-Sea, UK Posts: 2,957
    Boom conflict? Don't drag him into this too...
    Nature drunk and High
  • Options
    Markiemark70Markiemark70 Posts: 103
    I haven't read all 6 pages of comments, but is it possible he was talking about the Ukraine/Russia conflict? Or Both? Conflict over land in general?

    I think people are reading a lot into a few words from a rock star.
  • Options
    CROJAM95CROJAM95 Posts: 9,267
    Spags said:

    Boom conflict? Don't drag him into this too...

    haha I had a feeling i'd get that response

    Boom would give the region some of his secret stash and calm everyone the fuck down

  • Options
    SpagsSpags Leigh-on-Sea, UK Posts: 2,957
    Time to break out Boom's stash.
    Nature drunk and High
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,970
    Pro HAMAS now? #-o
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,970

    Five pages and the debates are all respectful. Nice job everyone!

    Ah, the good old days...

    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    JimmyV said:



    I disagree….as I mentioned, the Palestinian solidarity camp also thinks this was about Israel. So unless he wants to clarify his words by saying he did NOT mean to single out Israel, this is how it will be viewed by everyone who is personally invested in the ‘conflict’ (read: occupation). On the contrary, the only people I’ve seen who DO view this as simply an anti-war rant, are the people who don’t want him to pick a side because they don’t want to either, and a few Israelis who are in denial about the whole thing.
    I personally hope he is willing to speak further on it, but I think he will keep his mouth shut and hope this dies out. We can see the shit storm it caused to say anything that could even possibly be interpreted as criticizing Israel ….if he decides to clarify and make it clear that that is what he meant, his life will be turned inside out. He may even be in danger, after reading the jpost facebook comments. I hope reading these comments was an eye opener who those who view the conflict as being peace loving Israeli’s vs extremist arabs – plenty of hate to go around on both sides. When it comes to celebs, it takes a special kind of person to speak out against Israeli aggression.

    I don't really care what "side" he picks, and I do view it as an anti-war rant. Picking sides is an overly simplistic way of looking at a complex issue. I'm against the occupation and Israel's current tactics, but I am also against the kidnap and murder of children. I'm against Israeli airstrikes, but I am also against Palestinian rocket and mortar attacks. So what "side" does that put me on?
    I agree that it is a simplistic approach, I just wasn’t sure how to otherwise word my statement. Still, look at what you’re saying here:

    You’re equating Israeli airstrikes and ‘current tactics’ to Palestinian rocket attacks. They are so far from equal. There have been 29 deaths from rockets from Gaza in TEN YEARS. Zero in this one. In contrast – in the same time period, on average, Israel has killed one CHILD every THREE DAYS – 6000 CHILDREN since the second intifada. This doesn’t include adults and/or militants.

    You’re equating a military occupation to the kidnapping of three teens. I want to expand on that a bit. Hamas has denied any involvement in that incident. Terrorist groups usually confess to their atrocities, no? Israel has provided no proof that Hamas was involved. The Times of Israel is reporting that a new jihadist group, with ties to ISIL (a group fighting in Syria, who has been aided at times by Israel), HAS confessed to the killings. So it is hardly clear that it was Hamas that perpetrated this crime. Even if it was, it is no excuse to collectively punish the entire population of Gaza by bombing civilian areas. Next, the propaganda tells us that Hamas is using their people as human shields – another claim with zero proof that was echoed during Cast Lead, investigated by human rights orgs, and found to be the opposite in truth (Israel was using Palestinians as shields). To pile on – the kidnapping of the teens happened after two Palestinian teens were shot dead, ON CAMERA, by IDF snipers (no lack of proof here), just a week or two before the kidnappings. The soldier responsible was given a suspension for firing without permission.
    So….with the lack of proof in the kidnapping case, and overwhelming proof in the shootings, how can we call the kidnappings the starting point of this conflict, or in any way comparable to the occupation?
    So now. Airstrikes killing thousands, from the fourth most powerful military in the world, vs largely symbolic rocket attacks. Military occupation vs three untried murders. If you honestly think that by being equally against all of these things, you are not taking sides…. think again. Thinking these things are equally wrong is what is allowing the status quo to continue. The status quo overwhelmingly favours Israel. So like it or not, you’ve found yourself a side. One side is the oppressor, the other oppressed. It is plain as day.
    JimmyV said:


    If he wanted to single Israel out, he would have. He didn't, and there is nothing in what he did say to indicate he was speaking solely or even specifically about Israel.

    Don't be so sure. Like I said, look at this shit storm, without even calling anyone by name. If he had, it would be international headlines.
  • Options
    CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via Chicago Posts: 6,793
    edited July 2014
    benjs said:

    Five pages and the debates are all respectful. Nice job everyone!

    Agreed :) There seems to be a critical shift from anti- this or that, to a pro-peace mentality.
    Let's hope the conversation on both sides moves from finger-pointing and blame-game to actually finding a resolution.

    The status quo isn't working, and it hasn't for a long time. Let's stop treating the symptoms, and focus on the curing the disease.
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020 AT 07/07/2020
  • Options
    SpagsSpags Leigh-on-Sea, UK Posts: 2,957
    JimmyV said:

    Pro HAMAS now? #-o

    Hamas? Ed thought they said 'hummus' and signed up!
    Nature drunk and High
  • Options
    dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam NINUNINOPRO Posts: 139,314
    Spags said:

    JimmyV said:

    Pro HAMAS now? #-o

    Hamas? Ed thought they said 'hummus' and signed up!
    Spags,seriously dude,your posts are epic!!!!!!
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Options
    nicknyr15nicknyr15 Posts: 7,872
    This is sad. Eds been making comments like this fir over 2 decades. Get over it. Enjoy the music. Isn't that what's most important? The music? Whether I agree with him or not is irelevant and would never affect my opinion of him.
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,970

    JimmyV said:



    I disagree….as I mentioned, the Palestinian solidarity camp also thinks this was about Israel. So unless he wants to clarify his words by saying he did NOT mean to single out Israel, this is how it will be viewed by everyone who is personally invested in the ‘conflict’ (read: occupation). On the contrary, the only people I’ve seen who DO view this as simply an anti-war rant, are the people who don’t want him to pick a side because they don’t want to either, and a few Israelis who are in denial about the whole thing.
    I personally hope he is willing to speak further on it, but I think he will keep his mouth shut and hope this dies out. We can see the shit storm it caused to say anything that could even possibly be interpreted as criticizing Israel ….if he decides to clarify and make it clear that that is what he meant, his life will be turned inside out. He may even be in danger, after reading the jpost facebook comments. I hope reading these comments was an eye opener who those who view the conflict as being peace loving Israeli’s vs extremist arabs – plenty of hate to go around on both sides. When it comes to celebs, it takes a special kind of person to speak out against Israeli aggression.

    I don't really care what "side" he picks, and I do view it as an anti-war rant. Picking sides is an overly simplistic way of looking at a complex issue. I'm against the occupation and Israel's current tactics, but I am also against the kidnap and murder of children. I'm against Israeli airstrikes, but I am also against Palestinian rocket and mortar attacks. So what "side" does that put me on?
    I agree that it is a simplistic approach, I just wasn’t sure how to otherwise word my statement. Still, look at what you’re saying here:

    You’re equating Israeli airstrikes and ‘current tactics’ to Palestinian rocket attacks. They are so far from equal. There have been 29 deaths from rockets from Gaza in TEN YEARS. Zero in this one. In contrast – in the same time period, on average, Israel has killed one CHILD every THREE DAYS – 6000 CHILDREN since the second intifada. This doesn’t include adults and/or militants.

    You’re equating a military occupation to the kidnapping of three teens. I want to expand on that a bit. Hamas has denied any involvement in that incident. Terrorist groups usually confess to their atrocities, no? Israel has provided no proof that Hamas was involved. The Times of Israel is reporting that a new jihadist group, with ties to ISIL (a group fighting in Syria, who has been aided at times by Israel), HAS confessed to the killings. So it is hardly clear that it was Hamas that perpetrated this crime. Even if it was, it is no excuse to collectively punish the entire population of Gaza by bombing civilian areas. Next, the propaganda tells us that Hamas is using their people as human shields – another claim with zero proof that was echoed during Cast Lead, investigated by human rights orgs, and found to be the opposite in truth (Israel was using Palestinians as shields). To pile on – the kidnapping of the teens happened after two Palestinian teens were shot dead, ON CAMERA, by IDF snipers (no lack of proof here), just a week or two before the kidnappings. The soldier responsible was given a suspension for firing without permission.
    So….with the lack of proof in the kidnapping case, and overwhelming proof in the shootings, how can we call the kidnappings the starting point of this conflict, or in any way comparable to the occupation?
    So now. Airstrikes killing thousands, from the fourth most powerful military in the world, vs largely symbolic rocket attacks. Military occupation vs three untried murders. If you honestly think that by being equally against all of these things, you are not taking sides…. think again. Thinking these things are equally wrong is what is allowing the status quo to continue. The status quo overwhelmingly favours Israel. So like it or not, you’ve found yourself a side. One side is the oppressor, the other oppressed. It is plain as day.
    JimmyV said:


    If he wanted to single Israel out, he would have. He didn't, and there is nothing in what he did say to indicate he was speaking solely or even specifically about Israel.

    Don't be so sure. Like I said, look at this shit storm, without even calling anyone by name. If he had, it would be international headlines.
    I wasn't equating anything, I was illustrating how overly simplistic the "picking sides" comment was. You acknowledge that it was but then return to it at the end of your post. So, again, my views are deeper than just a question of which "side" am I on. If you need to think in those terms, have at it, but understand that others may disagree.

    I was at the Hartford show last year. That was the last time Eddie went on a rant that stirred up controversy and press attention. He could not have been more clear who and what he was talking about that night. This time, despite being incredibly passionate about the issue, he named no one, not a single nation, organization or group. I would argue that he had less control this time around than last, because in Hartford he was soft spoken and collected. This time he was anything but...and he STILL did not name Israel. All the anger, all the vitriol, all the "fucks"...and not a single country named. You can read those words and hear Israel if you wish, but the evidence does not back that conclusion up. Not solely or specifically.

    Hope the thread didn't get locked while I was typing this...

    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    Faithful_1Faithful_1 Glasgow Posts: 172
    I think Eddie has been making comments like this for two decades I believe he was broadly speaking generally, but there's an obvious subtext to what he's saying. Good for him. It had to be said and I'm glad he said it.

    FYI, for those getting on their high horse: being critical of aggressive zionism does not make you anti-Semitic.

    Get over it, support peace and love the music.
    SECC - Jun 03, 2000
    Leeds Festival - Aug 25, 2006
    Reading Festival - Aug 27, 2006
    Wembley Arena - Jun 18, 2007
    ISS Dome - Jun 21, 2007
    MEN - Aug 17, 2009
    Odyssey - Jun 23, 2010
    Wuhlheide - Jun 30, 2010
    MEN - Jun 20, 2012
    MEN - Jun 21, 2012
    Leeds - Jul 8, 2014
  • Options
    Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    edited July 2014
    JimmyV said:



    I wasn't equating anything,

    If you say so. They were concurrent examples of attrocities, from both sides, and used as examples of why both sides are wrong, and to frame a question (which side am I on), to which the response you were likely hoping to elicit was "you're not on either side". I happen to think your examples are just more proof of who needs our help and who needs our criticism.
    JimmyV said:


    I was at the Hartford show last year. That was the last time Eddie went on a rant that stirred up controversy and press attention. He could not have been more clear who and what he was talking about that night. This time, despite being incredibly passionate about the issue, he named no one, not a single nation, organization or group. I would argue that he had less control this time around than last, because in Hartford he was soft spoken and collected. This time he was anything but...and he STILL did not name Israel. All the anger, all the vitriol, all the "fucks"...and not a single country named. You can read those words and hear Israel if you wish, but the evidence does not back that conclusion up. Not solely or specifically.

    Hope the thread didn't get locked while I was typing this...

    I have a feeling Ed doesn't associate with, or play for, many NRA types, so pissing them off didn't matter to him in the least. I'd speculate that he has a lot of zionist, jewish friends and fans for whom he tried to maintain some diplomacy while getting his point across.
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,970
    I can't speak to his associates, but have you ever read through a gun thread on AMT? He plays for more NRA types than you would think.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    Faithful_1Faithful_1 Glasgow Posts: 172

    I have a feeling Ed doesn't associate with, or play for, many NRA types, so pissing them off didn't matter to him in the least. I'd speculate that he has a lot of zionist, jewish friends and fans for whom he tried to maintain some diplomacy while getting his point across.

    This is how I read it....that's why I think it was a subtext rather than being overtly critical.
    SECC - Jun 03, 2000
    Leeds Festival - Aug 25, 2006
    Reading Festival - Aug 27, 2006
    Wembley Arena - Jun 18, 2007
    ISS Dome - Jun 21, 2007
    MEN - Aug 17, 2009
    Odyssey - Jun 23, 2010
    Wuhlheide - Jun 30, 2010
    MEN - Jun 20, 2012
    MEN - Jun 21, 2012
    Leeds - Jul 8, 2014
  • Options
    Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    Ya, I don't know...at this point I can only put words in his mouth and I don't want to do that.
    And no...I steer clear of the gun control threads lol...it's mainly a domestic issue for a country in which I don't reside.
  • Options
    lolobugglolobugg BLUE RDGE MTNS Posts: 8,192
    BinFrog said:

    The only people calling out Eddie's speech as being anti-Israel are...Jews and people from Israel who are just so freaking uptight about anyone having anything to say about the situation that doesn't paint them in a favorable light.

    (My last name is Horwitz, so take that for what it is worth).

    Here is what he said, let's break it down, shall we?

    "“What the fuck? We have this many people having a peaceful time, we can have modern technology, we can reach our friends, they know what we’re thinking it. The advertisers know what we’re thinking before we’re thinking it. We have technology, all of this in our hand. But at the same time as something this positive is happening, at the same fucking time, not even that far away, dropping bombs on each other. What the fucking fuck? And I get if war is the last resort, you don’t want to be in that situation. But I swear to fucking God, there are some people out there looking for a reason to kill. They’re looking for a reason to go across borders and take over land that doesn't belong to them. They should get the fuck out, and mind their own fucking business!

    He added, “Eat, procreate, draw a painting, make some art, listen to music, fuck some more, have another baby, eat, work, eat, work, love, love, love. Everyone’s the fucking same, so why are people at war? Stop the fucking shit now! Now! Now! We don’t want to give them our money! They don’t get our taxes to drop bombs on children! No! No more!”"


    Ok. We live in a time where so much is possible and there is so much to be amazed with. Then we have to deal with: Israel and the Palestinians, Russia invading the Ukraine, North Korea waving their missile dicks, the US butting in where they are not wanted/needed. And on and on. He is as much talking about Israel as he is talking about his OWN FUCKING COUNTRY. So all you blowhards who love ripping those "liberal" artists who speak up "against" Israel, get over yourselves. Israel is about as far from perfect as the US is, and we're in bed with each other. Ed is anti war, anti needless killing, anti living in fear.

    Live and let live, and yet people can't figure this out. "They don't get our taxes to drop bombs on children". Ed can be saying that to numerous militaries and governments. Oh but god forbid it can be said about Israel (which is killing children the same way Palestinians are, lets not overlook that fact). Hey, pro-Israeli folks (I can be in that camp sometimes) - GET OVER YOURSELVES. You are not special and neither is your country. Israel is as much a victim as it is a perpetrator. Neither side is "right". So stop with the whole "I'm going to boycott every artist who says anything at all that paints Israel in a less-than-flattering light". Guess what? The world is sick of the shit going down in the middle east...not just "liberal artists". Grow up and join the real world.

    =D> Bravo, man.
    I can't believe that people still don't know Ed's politics... why are people so shocked that he is anti-war. If people are that asleep then it's no wonder that their governments have them under control.

    and one thing I can almost guarantee... after reading some of those posts on the newspaper site,
    Pearl Jam will NEVER play Israel. sorry, the extremists fucked it up for everyone again.

    Just ask Long Island and Denver and hell.... most of us in the Red South.

    livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446

    1995- New Orleans, LA  : New Orleans, LA

    1996- Charleston, SC

    1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN

    2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN

    2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA

    2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)

    2006- Cincinnati, OH

    2008- Columbia, SC

    2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2

    2010- Bristow, VA

    2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL

    2012- Atlanta, GA

    2013- Charlotte, NC

    2014- Cincinnati, OH

    2015- New York, NY

    2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA

    2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY

    2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2

    2020- Nashville, TN 

    2022- Smashville 

    2023- Austin, TX x2

    2024- Baltimore

  • Options
    RiotZactRiotZact Posts: 6,211

    JimmyV said:



    I wasn't equating anything,

    If you say so. They were concurrent examples of attrocities, from both sides, and used as examples of why both sides are wrong, and to frame a question (which side am I on), to which the response you were likely hoping to elicit was "you're not on either side". I happen to think your examples are just more proof of who needs our help and who needs our criticism.
    JimmyV said:


    I was at the Hartford show last year. That was the last time Eddie went on a rant that stirred up controversy and press attention. He could not have been more clear who and what he was talking about that night. This time, despite being incredibly passionate about the issue, he named no one, not a single nation, organization or group. I would argue that he had less control this time around than last, because in Hartford he was soft spoken and collected. This time he was anything but...and he STILL did not name Israel. All the anger, all the vitriol, all the "fucks"...and not a single country named. You can read those words and hear Israel if you wish, but the evidence does not back that conclusion up. Not solely or specifically.

    Hope the thread didn't get locked while I was typing this...

    I have a feeling Ed doesn't associate with, or play for, many NRA types, so pissing them off didn't matter to him in the least. I'd speculate that he has a lot of zionist, jewish friends and fans for whom he tried to maintain some diplomacy while getting his point across.
    I've only been to pearl jam concerts with 3 people. My dad, my uncle and my cousin. All 3 of them are HUGE gun advocates that would defend their right to own a gun to the death. And with that being said they all are set to see pearl jam again and can't wait to do so.

    And for the record I'm mostly anti-gun.
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,970
    edited July 2014
    Go watch the VH1 Storytellers episode that they were featured on back in 2006. I couldn't find the particular clip (it starts around the 36 minute mark below) but Eddie was asked point-blank how he responds to fans who do not share his political views. His response?

    "Fuck 'em". (Followed by some "do your own thinking type lip service.)

    http://youtu.be/GDj3bmnO-g0

    This isn't a guy who is going to edit what he said in hopes of not offending people. I continue to believe he said exactly what he intended to. If Israel fits that bill, that is Israel's problem. As others have said, there are instances where the US fits that bill, too. It needs to be said and no one should be offended by it.
    Post edited by JimmyV on
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
This discussion has been closed.