Another shooting at a school.

1679111217

Comments

  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,401
    staying out of the above argument ^^^^^

    this is absolutely horrific. what the fuck is wrong with people? :cry:

    our culture is a bit to blame.....if it makes money, more than a few are willing to demean others and cheapen life in music, video games and movies....
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,793
    who will have the balls to post the onion article?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,760
    mickeyrat wrote:
    who will have the balls to post the onion article?
    http://www.theonion.com/articles/fuck-e ... rts,30743/
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    I thought Obama's words were appropriate, genuine, and didnt bring in politics.
    Its just a sad, sad day in our nation, and its good to hear his words...
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • it's the fucking president's job to address the nation during or after a tragedy.

    DUH.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • stickfig13
    stickfig13 Posts: 1,532
    Sacramento 10-30-00, Bridge School 10-20 and 10-21-01, Bridge School 10-25 and 10-26-01, Irvine 06-02-03, Irvine 06-03-03, San Diego 06-05-03, San Diego 07-07-06, Los Angeles 07-09-06, Santa Barbara 07-13-06, London UK 06-18-07, San Diego 10-9-09, San Diego 2013, LA 1 2013
  • I thought Obama's words were appropriate, genuine, and didnt bring in politics.
    Its just a sad, sad day in our nation, and its good to hear his words...

    actually despite his trailing statement, "regardless of politics", this phrase IS political:
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    What "meaningful action" do you think he is referring to?
    i'm not being a dick. i'm just making an observation.
    do you think he is talking about getting back to puritan morals,
    installing metal detectors in every school in the country,
    or do you think he is very obliquely suggesting federal regulations?
    REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS that are SURE to crop up after such a suggestion?

    I know i'm reading between lines here, but give me ANY alternative interpretation.
    any alternative interpretation for MEANINGFUL action that will need to happen REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS ... ie ... this action is going to STIR UP A BUNCH OF POLITICS ...
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,760
    stickfig13 wrote:
    It blows my mind that people can buy guns in department and big box stores in America. Talk about normalizing deadly weaponry.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,760
    I thought Obama's words were appropriate, genuine, and didnt bring in politics.
    Its just a sad, sad day in our nation, and its good to hear his words...

    actually despite his trailing statement, "regardless of politics", this phrase IS political:
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    What "meaningful action" do you think he is referring to?
    i'm not being a dick. i'm just making an observation.
    do you think he is talking about getting back to puritan morals,
    installing metal detectors in every school in the country,
    or do you think he is very obliquely suggesting federal regulations?
    REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS that are SURE to crop up after such a suggestion?

    I know i'm reading between lines here, but give me ANY alternative interpretation.
    any alternative interpretation for MEANINGFUL action that will need to happen REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS ... ie ... this action is going to STIR UP A BUNCH OF POLITICS ...
    I do not understand your motivation in perusing this line of debate here. You're basically trying to take a shit on Obama making a statement about a national tragedy. That makes no sense to me.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    i get what you're saying Drifting ... i think it's gonna be hard for some to objectively hear what you are saying ... there's a lot of sadness but there is a lot of anger too right now ...

    let's wait for the dust to settle to not only take hold of what happened and why but also how the POTUS acted ...
  • stickfig13
    stickfig13 Posts: 1,532
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    stickfig13 wrote:
    It blows my mind that people can buy guns in department and big box stores in America. Talk about normalizing deadly weaponry.


    Guns made for war. Available everywhere.

    The 2nd amendment never intended folks to have these. Last time I checked it was hard to rob someone at musket point.
    Sacramento 10-30-00, Bridge School 10-20 and 10-21-01, Bridge School 10-25 and 10-26-01, Irvine 06-02-03, Irvine 06-03-03, San Diego 06-05-03, San Diego 07-07-06, Los Angeles 07-09-06, Santa Barbara 07-13-06, London UK 06-18-07, San Diego 10-9-09, San Diego 2013, LA 1 2013
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,674
    Sad, terrible, tragic. Every time something like this happens it sends out a message but have we learned anything? Will we ever learn anything?

    Very sad.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • stickfig13 wrote:

    wow...fucking disgusting.

    I'll tell you, I've been diagnosed as bi-polar I and I would not sell someone with a mental disability like myself a gun. I would never hurt a fly, but to me that's just common sense.
  • PJ_Soul wrote:
    I thought Obama's words were appropriate, genuine, and didnt bring in politics.
    Its just a sad, sad day in our nation, and its good to hear his words...

    actually despite his trailing statement, "regardless of politics", this phrase IS political:
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    What "meaningful action" do you think he is referring to?
    i'm not being a dick. i'm just making an observation.
    do you think he is talking about getting back to puritan morals,
    installing metal detectors in every school in the country,
    or do you think he is very obliquely suggesting federal regulations?
    REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS that are SURE to crop up after such a suggestion?

    I know i'm reading between lines here, but give me ANY alternative interpretation.
    any alternative interpretation for MEANINGFUL action that will need to happen REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS ... ie ... this action is going to STIR UP A BUNCH OF POLITICS ...
    I do not understand your motivation in perusing this line of debate here. You're basically trying to take a shit on Obama making a statement about a national tragedy. That makes no sense to me.

    i'm pursuing this line of debate because i don't NECESSARILY take what ANY president says at face value, particularly one whose former chief of staff talks about "letting no good crisis go to waste".

    I've gotten a bunch of "DUHS!" "You @#@#$" and blatant non-mental pure emotional hate spewed towards me ... and no one is even bothering to pause and consider what implications the president may be bringing up, albeit through a verbal back door.

    Its the job of citizens of this country to not just be sad about national tragedies, but to use their brains too.

    After 911, everyone was sad as fuck, and very few were thinking (the ones that WERE thinking were categorically called idiots, conspiracy theorists, and america haters) ... the ones that were purely emotional are the ones that ended up de facto allowing Bush to enter us in to a pure war of opportunity with a country that was in no way involved in the actual crime.

    So, before people start running away with their emotions down the "we have to do this, we have to do that train" , sit back calm-and-collected for a moment and THINK. (instead of calling me a fuck).

    Look at what the president said.
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    what do YOU think the implication there is?
    Like i said, give me ANY thing that isn't 2nd amendment related, and maybe you can talk me down off my crazy-train.
    stickfig13 wrote:
    The 2nd amendment never intended folks to have these. Last time I checked it was hard to rob someone at musket point.
    What? The 2nd amendment intended for the citizens to have whatever weaponry they needed to STAND UP TO THE GOVERNMENT.
    If you want to argue the obsolescence of that point, then fine. But this is just disingenuous.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,760
    polaris_x wrote:
    i get what you're saying Drifting ... i think it's gonna be hard for some to objectively hear what you are saying ... there's a lot of sadness but there is a lot of anger too right now ...

    let's wait for the dust to settle to not only take hold of what happened and why but also how the POTUS acted ...
    Yes, how dare he act like a normal person. :roll: Sorry, I just don't think there just isn't any fuel for that fire.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,760
    PJ_Soul wrote:

    actually despite his trailing statement, "regardless of politics", this phrase IS political:
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    What "meaningful action" do you think he is referring to?
    i'm not being a dick. i'm just making an observation.
    do you think he is talking about getting back to puritan morals,
    installing metal detectors in every school in the country,
    or do you think he is very obliquely suggesting federal regulations?
    REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS that are SURE to crop up after such a suggestion?

    I know i'm reading between lines here, but give me ANY alternative interpretation.
    any alternative interpretation for MEANINGFUL action that will need to happen REGARDLESS OF THE POLITICS ... ie ... this action is going to STIR UP A BUNCH OF POLITICS ...
    I do not understand your motivation in perusing this line of debate here. You're basically trying to take a shit on Obama making a statement about a national tragedy. That makes no sense to me.

    i'm pursuing this line of debate because i don't NECESSARILY take what ANY president says at face value, particularly one whose former chief of staff talks about "letting no good crisis go to waste".

    I've gotten a bunch of "DUHS!" "You @#@#$" and blatant non-mental pure emotional hate spewed towards me ... and no one is even bothering to pause and consider what implications the president may be bringing up, albeit through a verbal back door.

    Its the job of citizens of this country to not just be sad about national tragedies, but to use their brains too.

    After 911, everyone was sad as fuck, and very few were thinking (the ones that WERE thinking were categorically called idiots, conspiracy theorists, and america haters) ... the ones that were purely emotional are the ones that ended up de facto allowing Bush to enter us in to a pure war of opportunity with a country that was in no way involved in the actual crime.

    So, before people start running away with their emotions down the "we have to do this, we have to do that train" , sit back calm-and-collected for a moment and THINK. (instead of calling me a fuck).

    Look at what the president said.
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    what do YOU think the implication there is?
    Like i said, give me ANY thing that isn't 2nd amendment related, and maybe you can talk me down off my crazy-train.
    stickfig13 wrote:
    The 2nd amendment never intended folks to have these. Last time I checked it was hard to rob someone at musket point.
    What? The 2nd amendment intended for the citizens to have whatever weaponry they needed to STAND UP TO THE GOVERNMENT.
    If you want to argue the obsolescence of that point, then fine. But this is just disingenuous.
    I don't necessarily take what any politician has to say about anything either... It's just that there is NOTHING here to pounce on. Nothing. Yet you are pouncing anyway. I don't get it.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,793
    i'm pursuing this line of debate because i don't NECESSARILY take what ANY president says at face value, particularly one whose former chief of staff talks about "letting no good crisis go to waste".

    I've gotten a bunch of "DUHS!" "You @#@#$" and blatant non-mental pure emotional hate spewed towards me ... and no one is even bothering to pause and consider what implications the president may be bringing up, albeit through a verbal back door.

    Its the job of citizens of this country to not just be sad about national tragedies, but to use their brains too.

    After 911, everyone was sad as fuck, and very few were thinking (the ones that WERE thinking were categorically called idiots, conspiracy theorists, and america haters) ... the ones that were purely emotional are the ones that ended up de facto allowing Bush to enter us in to a pure war of opportunity with a country that was in no way involved in the actual crime.

    So, before people start running away with their emotions down the "we have to do this, we have to do that train" , sit back calm-and-collected for a moment and THINK. (instead of calling me a fuck).

    Look at what the president said.
    "we are going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent tragedies like this, regardless of the politics...."

    what do YOU think the implication there is?
    Like i said, give me ANY thing that isn't 2nd amendment related, and maybe you can talk me down off my crazy-train.
    stickfig13 wrote:
    The 2nd amendment never intended folks to have these. Last time I checked it was hard to rob someone at musket point.
    What? The 2nd amendment intended for the citizens to have whatever weaponry they needed to STAND UP TO THE GOVERNMENT.
    If you want to argue the obsolescence of that point, then fine. But this is just disingenuous.
    any start should begin with the best understanding that we can get from studying the events of the last what 10 years? See if there are areas of similarity in the shooters lives? Perhaps begin to address thos eissues found if any?

    My argument still stands, if there are constituional limits to speech then the same should apply to these kinds of weapons. Jump through more hoops if you MUST have these, but damn, the assualt rifle he had in his car is available cheaper at fucking walmart than a gun shop.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Who Princess
    Who Princess out here in the fields Posts: 7,305
    I'm home sick today and just got up about an hour ago. I am heartbroken. Like Norm said, I don't have children but all of you who do, please hug them and let them know how precious they are.

    The thought that these kids will never grow up, that they lost their lives in this way, is beyond my comprehension.
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • stickfig13
    stickfig13 Posts: 1,532
    stickfig13 wrote:
    The 2nd amendment never intended folks to have these. Last time I checked it was hard to rob someone at musket point.
    What? The 2nd amendment intended for the citizens to have whatever weaponry they needed to STAND UP TO THE GOVERNMENT.
    If you want to argue the obsolescence of that point, then fine. But this is just disingenuous.[/quote]


    That was a different world. We now have people buying guns made for war at Walmart in the name of the 2nd amendment. I don't think I want anyone with that kind of paranoia owning a weapon that can wipe an entire fucking room.
    Sacramento 10-30-00, Bridge School 10-20 and 10-21-01, Bridge School 10-25 and 10-26-01, Irvine 06-02-03, Irvine 06-03-03, San Diego 06-05-03, San Diego 07-07-06, Los Angeles 07-09-06, Santa Barbara 07-13-06, London UK 06-18-07, San Diego 10-9-09, San Diego 2013, LA 1 2013
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    polaris_x wrote:
    :cry:

    i think we need to let the dust settle ... today and this holiday season may just be about being appreciative of the time you have with loved ones ...
    Much agreed, polaris. What a catalyst for that.

    So fucking sad all around. Actually, the word "sad" doesn't even come close.

    I'm not sure any words do, right now.
This discussion has been closed.