U.S. embassy in Cairo apologizes

2456712

Comments

  • On cnn.com this is posted on the front page...

    "Islam film blamed for protests"

    Really? Really? Let's call it like it is religious nutjobs of the muslim faith acting irresponsibly, putting people's lives in danger because they are religious nutjobs of the muslim faith. Movie caused it? Really? Please.

    Don't be scared to tell it like it is. Honestly, I would pull out of the countries and stop ALL AID immediately. Goodbye shit world. You wanna live like animals, go ahead.

    It's pathetic that the US embassy has to release that statement about the movie. It should have read...

    "It's a fucking movie you nutjobs, get over it. You have more important things to worry about like why it's ok to abuse women and even kill them for what you refer to as "honor". Now you are critics of a movie? Really? Douchebags."
    hippiemom = goodness
  • whygohomewhygohome Posts: 2,305
    Misleading thread title. Pointless arguments where chest bumping opinions take precedence over facts.

    Someone please close this thread.
  • whygohome wrote:
    Misleading thread title. Pointless arguments where chest bumping opinions take precedence over facts.

    Someone please close this thread.

    Looks like we have a new moderator.

    I'm combining the Cairo events and the attack in Lybia because they have all been "due to" a movie.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    whygohome wrote:
    Misleading thread title. Pointless arguments where chest bumping opinions take precedence over facts.

    Someone please close this thread.

    Looks like we have a new moderator.

    I'm combining the Cairo events and the attack in Lybia because they have all been "due to" a movie.

    if the attacks weren't due to a movie, what where the reasons for the attacks...?
  • Areil seems alone on this one....

    Republican blowhards abandon Mitt in droves...

    Unless the Romney campaign has gamed this crisis out in some manner completely invisible to the Gang of 500, his doubling down on criticism of the President for the statement coming out of Cairo is likely to be seen as one of the most craven and ill-advised tactical moves in this entire campaign. - Mark Halpern

    "And just calling it a 'disgrace' doesnt really cut it. Not ready for prime time."

    "It revealed yet again that his foreign policy team is not ready for prime time," - David Rothkopf

    "They were just trying to score a cheap news cycle hit based on the embassy statement and now it’s just completely blown up," said a very senior Republican foreign policy hand, who called the statement an "utter disaster" and a "Lehman moment" — a parallel to the moment when John McCain, amid the 2008 financial crisis, failed to come across as a steady leader.

    "He's not doing himself any favors." - Peggy Noonan

    "I guess we see now that it is because they’re incompetent at talking effectively about foreign policy. This is just unbelievable — when they decide to play on it they completely bungle it." - Bill Kristol

    "Romney blew it and revealed how seriously maladroit he is when it comes to foreign affairs and national security. An attack on an Embassy, the murder of US officials including an Ambassador, is an attack on all Americans and the idea of America"

    "Romney gave terrorists what they want – a divided country still torn emotionally and politically by the events of 9-11. Romney talks of leadership but with his reckless commentary when events were fragile and still unfolding, he belly-flopped." - Steve Clemons, the founder of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/foreig ... romney-cai
  • inmytree wrote:
    whygohome wrote:
    Misleading thread title. Pointless arguments where chest bumping opinions take precedence over facts.

    Someone please close this thread.

    Looks like we have a new moderator.

    I'm combining the Cairo events and the attack in Lybia because they have all been "due to" a movie.

    if the attacks weren't due to a movie, what where the reasons for the attacks...?


    Like always, because their religion has messed up their heads. That;s the reason....their religion.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Like always, because their religion has messed up their heads. That;s the reason....their religion.

    It's why when someone pushes their own religion too far ahead of them, I never trust them
  • Areil seems alone on this one....

    Republican blowhards abandon Mitt in droves...

    Unless the Romney campaign has gamed this crisis out in some manner completely invisible to the Gang of 500, his doubling down on criticism of the President for the statement coming out of Cairo is likely to be seen as one of the most craven and ill-advised tactical moves in this entire campaign. - Mark Halpern

    "And just calling it a 'disgrace' doesnt really cut it. Not ready for prime time."

    "It revealed yet again that his foreign policy team is not ready for prime time," - David Rothkopf

    "They were just trying to score a cheap news cycle hit based on the embassy statement and now it’s just completely blown up," said a very senior Republican foreign policy hand, who called the statement an "utter disaster" and a "Lehman moment" — a parallel to the moment when John McCain, amid the 2008 financial crisis, failed to come across as a steady leader.

    "He's not doing himself any favors." - Peggy Noonan

    "I guess we see now that it is because they’re incompetent at talking effectively about foreign policy. This is just unbelievable — when they decide to play on it they completely bungle it." - Bill Kristol

    "Romney blew it and revealed how seriously maladroit he is when it comes to foreign affairs and national security. An attack on an Embassy, the murder of US officials including an Ambassador, is an attack on all Americans and the idea of America"

    "Romney gave terrorists what they want – a divided country still torn emotionally and politically by the events of 9-11. Romney talks of leadership but with his reckless commentary when events were fragile and still unfolding, he belly-flopped." - Steve Clemons, the founder of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/foreig ... romney-cai

    I'd agree. I'd also say that Obama's foreign policy has been .... lacking. It;s too bad we don;t have a strong leader that has a brain.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Like always, because their religion has messed up their heads. That;s the reason....their religion.

    It's why when someone pushes their own religion too far ahead of them, I never trust them


    Yep, and I certainly understand that other religions torment others...which is why I said all religions. ;)

    It's fine for it to be personal. But that is where it should stay.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741


    Like always, because their religion has messed up their heads. That;s the reason....their religion.

    I kinda agree, however I would make a blanket statement and say that religion in general was a major cause...
  • aerial wrote:
    How will Obama handle this.....Will he keep campaigning.....will he act as a Commander in chief?............Waiting........

    What do you think a quick nuke into Cairo so they can get the message that we ain't messing around ... :P
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Areil seems alone on this one....

    Republican blowhards abandon Mitt in droves...

    Unless the Romney campaign has gamed this crisis out in some manner completely invisible to the Gang of 500, his doubling down on criticism of the President for the statement coming out of Cairo is likely to be seen as one of the most craven and ill-advised tactical moves in this entire campaign. - Mark Halpern

    "And just calling it a 'disgrace' doesnt really cut it. Not ready for prime time."

    "It revealed yet again that his foreign policy team is not ready for prime time," - David Rothkopf

    "They were just trying to score a cheap news cycle hit based on the embassy statement and now it’s just completely blown up," said a very senior Republican foreign policy hand, who called the statement an "utter disaster" and a "Lehman moment" — a parallel to the moment when John McCain, amid the 2008 financial crisis, failed to come across as a steady leader.

    "He's not doing himself any favors." - Peggy Noonan

    "I guess we see now that it is because they’re incompetent at talking effectively about foreign policy. This is just unbelievable — when they decide to play on it they completely bungle it." - Bill Kristol

    "Romney blew it and revealed how seriously maladroit he is when it comes to foreign affairs and national security. An attack on an Embassy, the murder of US officials including an Ambassador, is an attack on all Americans and the idea of America"

    "Romney gave terrorists what they want – a divided country still torn emotionally and politically by the events of 9-11. Romney talks of leadership but with his reckless commentary when events were fragile and still unfolding, he belly-flopped." - Steve Clemons, the founder of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/foreig ... romney-cai

    I'd agree. I'd also say that Obama's foreign policy has been .... lacking. It;s too bad we don;t have a strong leader that has a brain.

    lacking...on what front...? anything specific he should have done...?

    I love how one hand you blame "their religion" then go on to blame Obama....

    I get the sense that you're pissed about this...I am too...but, come on, really...sometimes horrible shit happens....
  • inmytree wrote:


    Like always, because their religion has messed up their heads. That;s the reason....their religion.

    I kinda agree, however I would make a blanket statement and say that religion in general was a major cause...

    Definitely. But how you choose to respond is always up to you...therefore, I believe the majority of the reason this occurred is their religion, Islam. But I see your point.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Personally, I think the president has played this very well.

    He's not come out Gunz Blazin' which would just make a bad situation worse. He's shown us that the US will not sink to that level and he's managed to make steps to stop more from happening. All without assigning blame or appearing weak.
  • inmytree wrote:

    lacking...on what front...? anything specific he should have done...?

    I love how one hand you blame "their religion" then go on to blame Obama....

    I get the sense that you're pissed about this...I am too...but, come on, really...sometimes horrible shit happens....


    I'm not blaming him. I just don't think he's shown the leadership he needed to throughout Arab spring, Lybia, Syria...etc. Someone posted about Mitt's response, I just commented that I believe our president's response has been equally pathetic. US Embassy's is US soil...they killed an ambassador in Lybia.....

    And it hasn;t just been him, it's been the office of the president for a decent amount of time.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Personally, I think the president has played this very well.

    He's not come out Gunz Blazin' which would just make a bad situation worse. He's shown us that the US will not sink to that level and he's managed to make steps to stop more from happening. All without assigning blame or appearing weak.

    Not assigning blame? That is weak. Tell it like it is Mr. President.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    inmytree wrote:

    lacking...on what front...? anything specific he should have done...?

    I love how one hand you blame "their religion" then go on to blame Obama....

    I get the sense that you're pissed about this...I am too...but, come on, really...sometimes horrible shit happens....


    I'm not blaming him. I just don't think he's shown the leadership he needed to throughout Arab spring, Lybia, Syria...etc. Someone posted about Mitt's response, I just commented that I believe our president's response has been equally pathetic. US Embassy's is US soil...they killed an ambassador in Lybia.....

    And it hasn;t just been him, it's been the office of the president for a decent amount of time.

    fair enough...I don't agree, of course...but you know:

    hatersgonnahate.jpg

    :D
  • inmytree wrote:

    hatersgonnahate.jpg

    :D


    whatever

    It's always hate if you don't agree anymore :fp:
    hippiemom = goodness
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    inmytree wrote:

    hatersgonnahate.jpg

    :D


    whatever

    It's always hate if you don't agree anymore :fp:

    ha, I know that's how it was during the bush years...suddenly it's passe'... ;)

    anyhoo...it's super easy to say Obama didn't do enough...now the hard part: tell me what Obama should have done differently during the Arab spring...? what sort of leadership should he have displayed...?
  • lame? That is weak. Tell it like it is Mr. President.


    He's not a Fox "News" pundit. He's not Rush Limbaugh whose job it is to "tell it like it is" regardless of the consequences.

    He's the president and his role in this it to first of all ensure the safety of the people working over there, to try to defuse the situation and to not put any more people in any more harm.

    His job is not to tap dance for you. If you want that, Mitt Romney is currently throwing rocks at a hornet's nest and I'm sure you'll find that show more to your liking.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    President Obama made a statement on the killing of the American ambassador and three staffers in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya. Watch it here:

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308123-1
  • lame? That is weak. Tell it like it is Mr. President.


    He's not a Fox "News" pundit. He's not Rush Limbaugh whose job it is to "tell it like it is" regardless of the consequences.

    He's the president and his role in this it to first of all ensure the safety of the people working over there, to try to defuse the situation and to not put any more people in any more harm.

    His job is not to tap dance for you. If you want that, Mitt Romney is currently throwing rocks at a hornet's nest and I'm sure you'll find that show more to your liking.

    Yeah I get that. It is certainly a fine line.

    By the way, your tap dancing obama line is already old. Thought you should know before you use it again.

    Mitt Romney was an idiot for going after the president.

    "Throwing rocks in at the hornets nest"? Nah, but spraying that fucker with chemicals to kill every one of those hornets...sounds good. You don;t pretend the hornets nest doesn't exist or that it is there but you minimize how many hornets are actually inside.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • inmytree wrote:

    anyhoo...it's super easy to say Obama didn't do enough...now the hard part: tell me what Obama should have done differently during the Arab spring...? what sort of leadership should he have displayed...?


    He shouldn't have bee invisible. But really I don;t care, that's in the past.

    The point is now, Obama should say that attacking innocent people because of a YouTube movie is beyond ridiculous. The behavior is barbaric. And hiding behind their faith and using it to kill is barbaric. Their actions paint their religion as barbaric. If it is barbaric, then by all means, continue to kill over a youtube video, but know we will respond in kind. If it isn't barbaric, then take your religion back from the nutjobs. We support freedom of religion, but not the manipulation of religion to kill in the name of any God.

    It's a similar message the republicans need to hear about the religious right.

    EDIT: and to be fair, perhaps he will do this once people in the are are safe. So, I'm jumping the gun on his response probably. I'll wait and see.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    What we should do is obvious to me, lets look at history, 16 of the 18 terrorist from 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia, so we attacked Iraq, Brilliant, they never saw that coming. U.S. Embassy in Cairo gets attacked, we attack Iran!
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,156
    What we should do is obvious to me, lets look at history, 16 of the 18 terrorist from 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia, so we attacked Iraq, Brilliant, they never saw that coming. U.S. Embassy in Cairo gets attacked, we attack Iran!
    The obvious thing to me is to tell religious leaders to knock this shit off. Quit telling your followers it's OK to kill people when you get offended.

    If only the leader of a certain nation could send this message out clearly ...
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • rick1zoo2rick1zoo2 between a rock and a dumb place Posts: 12,632
    inmytree wrote:
    President Obama made a statement on the killing of the American ambassador and three staffers in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya. Watch it here:

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308123-1


    I would not be surprised that it is no coincedence that this attack was on 9/11, the protest could haev been cover for a planned attack
  • rick1zoo2 wrote:
    inmytree wrote:
    President Obama made a statement on the killing of the American ambassador and three staffers in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya. Watch it here:

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308123-1


    I would not be surprised that it is no coincedence that this attack was on 9/11, the protest could haev been cover for a planned attack


    You must read cnn.com. ;)

    I just read somewhere on there that a London thinktank with ties to Lybia says just the same thing you did.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • satansbedsatansbed Posts: 2,139
    rick1zoo2 wrote:
    inmytree wrote:
    President Obama made a statement on the killing of the American ambassador and three staffers in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya. Watch it here:

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308123-1


    I would not be surprised that it is no coincedence that this attack was on 9/11, the protest could haev been cover for a planned attack


    You must read cnn.com. ;)

    I just read somewhere on there that a London thinktank with ties to Lybia says just the same thing you did.

    Yeah I saw the same on twitter
  • whygohomewhygohome Posts: 2,305
    As usual, Carlin hits the nail on the head.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxj4kb3RubU
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    Jason P wrote:
    What we should do is obvious to me, lets look at history, 16 of the 18 terrorist from 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia, so we attacked Iraq, Brilliant, they never saw that coming. U.S. Embassy in Cairo gets attacked, we attack Iran!
    The obvious thing to me is to tell religious leaders to knock this shit off. Quit telling your followers it's OK to kill people when you get offended.

    If only the leader of a certain nation could send this message out clearly ...

    iranian_leader_350.jpg
    ?
Sign In or Register to comment.