i prefer people to be responsible. i have no desire to preach to them about what they should do with their lives in regards to drug usage(if i did id be a hypocrite). if they want to use drugs then thats their call not mine... however they need to be responsible for any actions that result from that use.
Much agree with this.
And this? -
"so why not smoke a bowl and macrame your arse into the couch???"
i prefer people to be responsible. i have no desire to preach to them about what they should do with their lives in regards to drug usage(if i did id be a hypocrite). if they want to use drugs then thats their call not mine... however they need to be responsible for any actions that result from that use.
Much agree with this.
And this? -
"so why not smoke a bowl and macrame your arse into the couch???"
Is it a bias when it proves to be true time and again. Social conservatives say, I want the gov't out of my personal life...they also say, I want the government to put limits on other people's personal lives. By definition alone that is hypocrisy, but I know that definitions don't mean much.
So you have decided then...a few more drug addicts in the US are worth more to you than the thousands and thousands and thousands that die and end up in prison for 20 years because the drugs are illegal. good to know where you stand.
But it is all for the children
The government isn't society
Where I stand...
Life is important to me. Children are important to me. A healthy young person falling prey
to a parasite drug dealer and getting hooked and turning into a zombie
is important to me. That life and all the lives that touch that one child are important to me.
Laws are made by you and I. We call upon our representatives, like now,
in the death of these two young boys who lost their lives on a local lake,
to make changes to protect the innocent.
To help make those who are irresponsible aware hopefully before tragedy hits.
We are society, we are connected all together in our actions and reactions.
We do not stand alone.
There are no limits I am suggesting on others lives except that which will endanger another. Allowing all drugs to be legal will endanger our children. It will endanger society.
It sends the message that the use of hard drugs is acceptable.
That is not the right message.
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
As I'm living my life I'm touched by events and people, I am not alone....
like the aching family and this boy lost in the water,
while his brother waits to be buried with him.
This pain and loss senseless and avoidable but for one thoughtless person's
irresponsible actions.
phew! here I thought it might have had something to do with being ultra-contrarian....but hey, youre entitled to an evolving opinion
My opinion on legalizing weed is taking a bit of a turn.
The extremists who want to legalize all drugs, who do not see how all people
here on the earth are connected, that we are never our bodies alone,
that we have responsibility to society, to each other, to younger generations,
this by way of what we teach them, by our examples, by what is acceptable.
This has very much effected how I feel on the subject.
Some would say that a responsible society wouldn't take our young, poor, and minority peoples and lock them up, burden them with a criminal record and/or legal fees, deprive them of an education, and confiscate their property to punish non-violent, and victimless crimes.
believe where pot is now is a good place ... prescribed by doctors,
used in the privacy of one's home. This new Chicago law attempts to stay
within these boundaries but the effects may be quite different.
Do you have any way of supporting this position or is it just a hunch?
Do you really think the stat BinauralJam posted earlier: "the U.S.A. has 5% of the world population and 25% of the world prisoners", is acceptable? As of 2004 - of those prisoners, over 50% of federal, and nearly a quarter of state prisoners are in jail for drug offenses. Broken down further - nearly 13% of ALL prisoners are in jail for MJ related offenses alone. That's nearly 50,000 people serving time for a plant that year, and the rates have since increased. This is not indicative of a 'good place'. You also contradict yourself later in the thread by admitting you already can't house violent offenders....yet you support jailing marijuana users. makes no sense.
My opinion on ticketing is a cop should never come in contact with a person
under the influence because in most cases, with too high of a probability for me, they are because the smoker is behind the wheel.
More will choose to drive thinking ticket alone. And we see, this is after the fact,
often after a tragedy..
You can't make statements of fact with the disclaimer 'for me'. It either is or isn't true, this doesn't change for you. Yes, a lot of MJ arrests probably occur in traffic stops. But unless you can show me that there will be a big spike in use (as I said in my last post, precedents set in other countries show otherwise), saying more people will drive stoned doesn't hold water. As for people choosing to drive because it's only a ticket....another hunch. People who are responsible about impaired driving won't change their minds based on the law. Those who aren't responsible won't either. Drug laws are not deterrents to use or behaviour, we've been proving this for nearly half a century now......
The thing about both alcohol and pot it removes good common sense and effects
good decision making for many people. It is all about fun
but we see how fun turns tragic too often and hindsight is 20/20.
This conservative thinking comes to some with age. It comes from seeing the young
die, seeing their families living hell. I personally want to be careful that the law
continues to discourage use and protects those who are bound to act
irresponsibly in the name of fun.
I would think that most people with experience with both MJ and alcohol would disagree with anyone lumping their effects on decision making together. MJ tends to make most people analytical, cautious, and borderline paranoid. Alcohol makes people reckless, careless, and way too brave.
As I mentioned earlier - drug laws do not deter use or behaviour...but education does. Anyone supporting reduced use should support drug war funding going to educators instead of the for-profit prison system.
I find the 'conservatism comes with age' statement pretty condescending....as if we just can't see the wisdom in your statements cause we're not old enough yet.
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,426
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
Pandora, the fact is there will always be drugs. There will always be junkies and coke sniffers and glue sniffers and potheads and alcoholics. That being the case (we do agree on that, right?) doesn't it make sense to stop wasting time and money trying to eliminate drugs and spend more time teaching people to be responsible about either not doing drugs or doing them safely? That seems more real than wishful to me. Trying to eliminate drugs? That's purely make believe.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
I care if someone is an addict even if they don't. I want to teach future generations
not to use drugs, not legalize all drugs with the huge message that they are ok to use.
There is no way around that. That is the message and it will increase use.
Ludicrous the idea to throw more lives away to this junk
by saying society supports the use of drugs.
You can keep repeating these lies all you want, it doesn't make them true.
There is no science behind your increased use theory, only an incorrect opinion.
And your opinion of what message is sent by leglization is also misguided. The focus in that scenario will be on harm reduction, rehabilitation, and education. How does that not make sense? :crazy: It doesn't say it's ok. It says 'we will help you, not throw you in jail and destroy any hope for a successful future'. But it seems you think punishment is the only way to get thru to an addict.
hmmm yes the guy who killed the two young boys boating with their grandfather
yes he is responsible. Big fucking deal...
that is after the fact when so many lives are ruined.
This why we have laws to protect the innocent, not preach, protect, to
try to teach, not preach to those who may be irresponsible and all about fun at the
expense of others lives.
why are you not campaigning for alcohol prohibition, pandora? If you're concerned about impaired driving, and support prohibition of MJ to prevent it.....it's a slam dunk that you'd want to outlaw alcohol, right?
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
Pandora, the fact is there will always be drugs. There will always be junkies and coke sniffers and glue sniffers and potheads and alcoholics. That being the case (we do agree on that, right?) doesn't it make sense to stop wasting time and money trying to eliminate drugs and spend more time teaching people to be responsible about either not doing drugs or doing them safely? That seems more real than wishful to me. Trying to eliminate drugs? That's purely make believe.
exactly.....telling people to 'get real', while simultaneously suggesting that prohibition has a positive effect on eliminating drugs? hmmmm
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
So you argue that more government legislation is the answer? The wise sages of the government know how to live responsibly?
Make drinking and driving/smoking and driving a mandatory minimum of 5 years with no license at which point you start over with your learners permit. I don't know why we're not doing this already.
See, the science behind impairment testing has to develop a bit before I'd support anything like that.
This is a tricky topic....but....the fact is, MJ only causes any noticeable impairment for about 30-45 minutes. After that, the 'burnout' is more a tired feeling than anything....but nobody is on a soapbox to ban tired drivers. Nobody is campaigning to ban people from driving on ativan, or percs or any script drugs, or supplements which affect your alertness.
Testing for a MJ high is sketchy at best....it's in your system for months, and levels are hard to measure with any relation to impairment. Another factor is the tolerance of the user. A daily smoker probably barely notices being high after about 15 minutes, just has a slight buzz.....while someone who has only smoked a few times will probably have a serious buzz for much longer.
Like I keep repeating, it's been shown that impairment levels are less than someone who blows a .08 blood alcohol So unless you support a 5 year ban for a glass of wine with dinner, you're way over the top with your five year ban for MJ smokers (esp if there's no way of telling if they're high or it's just in their system!).
Now....what SHOULD happen, imo, is that there should be more tech focused on the vehicle itself. Why don't all vehicles have those blower things? Spend some money on R&D to simplify the process to make it more convenient, then make it mandatory in all vehicles. I read a long time ago that car companies were working on technology for sensors that could measure your eyelids for excessive blinking and droopiness - the car could sense if you were too tired to be driving (could probably tweak that to include monitoring how alert you are, periord).....this stuff can be done, but it doesn't seem to be a priority. People are more worried about imposing their moral stance than finding solutions that don't discriminate.
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
So you argue that more government legislation is the answer? The wise sages of the government know how to live responsibly?
is always amuses me that people call for a smaller govt and more govt intervention. small govt. big govt... it cant be both. and i will not have the govt telling me that getting high is a criminal act.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
Pandora, the fact is there will always be drugs. There will always be junkies and coke sniffers and glue sniffers and potheads and alcoholics. That being the case (we do agree on that, right?) doesn't it make sense to stop wasting time and money trying to eliminate drugs and spend more time teaching people to be responsible about either not doing drugs or doing them safely? That seems more real than wishful to me. Trying to eliminate drugs? That's purely make believe.
There will always be murderers too shouldn't we stop spending so much time and money
trying to eliminate those who prey on others then? That is ridiculous,
I feel the same about legalizing all drugs... ridiculous.
By legalizing all drugs society is accepting drug use .... period.
That is in direct conflict with discouraging use.
As we have seen with abortion.
Since it has been legalized the amount of abortions have sky rocketed,
even used as a birth control measure for some... having multiple abortions.
The same will happen with drug use.
Now we have the dangerous legalized gas station synthetic cocaine and pot....
bath salts.
It has killed a few kids here and also put some users in prison or mental wards.
Some experience paranoia to a psychotic point and are viciously aggressive.
When the ingredients are outlawed new ones are created with very dangerous results.
Common sense tells a person don't take that shit yet people are. :?
More readily because it is legal, convenient etc.
Getting real is keeping drugs illegal, educating the young, having help readily available
for those addicted so they can get their lives back. That is what drugs do
they take away lives.
Yes, of course there will always be drug use but with the message...
it is a very bad way to live, drugs destroy lives and they kill.
For many they get physically hooked without that ever being part of the plan
and by then it is too late.
"I want to be a drug addict when I grow up" do we think anyone has ever wanted that? :fp:
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
So you argue that more government legislation is the answer? The wise sages of the government know how to live responsibly?
So you do not think there should be laws protecting society from dangerous things? :?
Is there ONE PERSON on this board, who truly has a hard time, obtaining their pot? Seriously? I am sure each and every single one of you, just has to make 1 or 2 phone calls, and POOF there it is! Right?
You can pick up your dope at any time...
You can sit in your house and get stoned all day long...
So why does it need to be "legalized"?
How is "legalizing" pot going to change anything for you people as individuals?
Take me piece by piece..... Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
So I'm kinda late to this thread so if this has been said before, well, I was just too lazy to go back through all 18 or so pages to check If we legalize drugs (and really, I'm thinking stuff like marijuana not necessarily "hard" stuff like cocaine - although I'm still not entirely sure where I stand on the hard drugs) then what we are doing is decriminalizing drug use. Right now, we have alot of people in prison because they were using drugs, not selling or distributing but using. That just seems ridiculous to me that we are putting people in prison because they smoked a joint, because they are addicted, maybe they need therapy and recovery not a prison sentence. Why not focus our resources (local police, DEA, etc) on catching large scale distributors instead of continuing to wage a war on drug users? Drug users are the victims but yet we are punishing them? Reagan started this nonsense and we have never and will never be able to "win" this war. Decriminalize drug use and go after the distributors.
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
So you argue that more government legislation is the answer? The wise sages of the government know how to live responsibly?
So you do not think there should be laws protecting society from dangerous things? :?
You are right...government intervention is the only way to protect people. It has been working this long, so we should continue it. Fuck all those other people who are crippled and killed simply by the drug war, fuck them. A few kids need to be protected by the government because their parents and community are so inept that they could never possibly make the decision to not use drugs without them being illegal.
Fuck illegal drugs anyway...the legal ones are SO much better
that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
- Joe Rogan
By legalizing all drugs society is accepting drug use .... period.
I respectfully disagree. (btw, I'm not so sure about making all drugs legal, but definitely decriminalizing many of them.) But I think you're speaking for yourself when you say that we are accepting drug use if we make it legal. Cigarettes are legal, but there are age limits. Drinking is legal but there are limits. You can be arrested for public intoxication. I think the majority of people who smoke cigarettes are do it despite the knowledge of the dangers. Our society frowns upon cigarettes for the most part. Just because its legal, you dont see the govt telling everybody they should smoke cigs...in fact, I believe they've banned certain advertisements. Legalizing something doesn't equate with accepting the abuse of a product.
Is there ONE PERSON on this board, who truly has a hard time, obtaining their pot? Seriously? I am sure each and every single one of you, just has to make 1 or 2 phone calls, and POOF there it is! Right?
You can pick up your dope at any time...
You can sit in your house and get stoned all day long...
So why does it need to be "legalized"?
How is "legalizing" pot going to change anything for you people as individuals?
We would no longer have to live in fear of the police fining us/taking us to jail for doing something that isn't harming others.
For those who say they prefer people to be responsible :wtf:
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
So you argue that more government legislation is the answer? The wise sages of the government know how to live responsibly?
So you do not think there should be laws protecting society from dangerous things? :?
No, I just don't think people are inherently stupid.
Is there ONE PERSON on this board, who truly has a hard time, obtaining their pot? Seriously? I am sure each and every single one of you, just has to make 1 or 2 phone calls, and POOF there it is! Right?
You can pick up your dope at any time...
You can sit in your house and get stoned all day long...
So why does it need to be "legalized"?
How is "legalizing" pot going to change anything for you people as individuals?
We would no longer have to live in fear of the police fining us/taking us to jail for doing something that isn't harming others.
When was the last time YOU or ANY of your friends were fined, our thrown in jail, for smoking dope?
Take me piece by piece..... Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
You are right...government intervention is the only way to protect people. It has been working this long, so we should continue it. Fuck all those other people who are crippled and killed simply by the drug war, fuck them. A few kids need to be protected by the government because their parents and community are so inept that they could never possibly make the decision to not use drugs without them being illegal.
Fuck illegal drugs anyway...the legal ones are SO much better
Is there ONE PERSON on this board, who truly has a hard time, obtaining their pot? Seriously? I am sure each and every single one of you, just has to make 1 or 2 phone calls, and POOF there it is! Right?
You can pick up your dope at any time...
You can sit in your house and get stoned all day long...
So why does it need to be "legalized"?
How is "legalizing" pot going to change anything for you people as individuals?
We would no longer have to live in fear of the police fining us/taking us to jail for doing something that isn't harming others.
When was the last time YOU or ANY of your friends were fined, our thrown in jail, for smoking dope?
Last year... my buddy was pulled over, searched, taken to jail, and fined.
Edit: and taken to court, too
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,426
I want to know this: Why was it legal (several years ago) for doctors to push me to increase my prescriptions for Xanax and Prozac to the point where I became addicted to Xanax and the result of taking too much Prozac was for me to almost completely stop eating and sleeping and getting out of bed for over a month and yet if I smoke a joint (a much better way to treat depression) I'm breaking the law?
And I want to know this: Why is it legal for my town to hold an annual Brew Fest where, by the end of the evening, Main Street is full of 20-something people staggering around drunk while the local sheriff's department and CHP wait on hand to take in people for public drunkenness and driving and make money for the county and yet medical marijuana dispensaries are still shut down from time to time?
Drug laws are a joke. A bad joke.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
I want to know this: Why was it legal (several years ago) for doctors to push me to increase my prescriptions for Xanax and Prozac to the point where I became addicted to Xanax and the result of taking too much Prozac was for me to almost completely stop eating and sleeping and getting out of bed for over a month and yet if I smoke a joint (a much better way to treat depression) I'm breaking the law?
And I want to know this: Why is it legal for my town to hold an annual Brew Fest where, by the end of the evening, Main Street is full of 20-something people staggering around drunk while the local sheriff's department and CHP wait on hand to take in people for public drunkenness and driving and make money for the county and yet medical marijuana dispensaries are still shut down from time to time?
Drug laws are a joke. A bad joke.
It's messed up, Brian, to say the least. As long as we have big pharma pumping funds to our politicians, little will change. They keep making pills that turn us into zombies... I'm sorry you had those problems... You are not alone, Sir.
So you do not think there should be laws protecting society from dangerous things? :?
No, I just don't think people are inherently stupid.
So you do believe there should be laws protecting people from dangerous things ...
me too.
And no it is not stupidity that gets a kid hooked on meth
although some might say lack of good common sense.
But some kids hardly stand a chance.
Then add the fact that the human brain doesn't understand consequence until 25 years of age
and many kids think they are bulletproof until after the fact ...
we have a recipe for a lost life.
I was all for decriminalizing pot until the all drugs legal thing started.
I have found I am not alone. Time to rethink.
Pot isn't the gateway drug but it is the gateway to legalizing all drugs unfortunately.
All drugs legal = a crazy bad idea. :fp:
Is it just me... or do the people who argue against legalizing pot always sound like the people who really should smoke pot?
You know, to loosen up their tight asses.
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
By legalizing all drugs society is accepting drug use .... period.
I respectfully disagree. (btw, I'm not so sure about making all drugs legal, but definitely decriminalizing many of them.) But I think you're speaking for yourself when you say that we are accepting drug use if we make it legal. Cigarettes are legal, but there are age limits. Drinking is legal but there are limits. You can be arrested for public intoxication. I think the majority of people who smoke cigarettes are do it despite the knowledge of the dangers. Our society frowns upon cigarettes for the most part. Just because its legal, you dont see the govt telling everybody they should smoke cigs...in fact, I believe they've banned certain advertisements. Legalizing something doesn't equate with accepting the abuse of a product.
As we have seen with abortion.
Since it has been legalized the amount of abortions have sky rocketed,
...And, the amount of people dying from illegal abortions was probably reduced greatly!
So is there abuse of cigarettes? Are people dying?
This is why we are passing laws to limit
smokers and keep areas safe for non smokers. More laws.
When something is legal it sends the message it is ok to do.
How do kids learn right from wrong?
They are punished when they do something that endangers themselves
or another. It is very basic.
Like the young man stopped for pot... bet he learned to keep it at home.
Is that so bad? Pot doesn't belong out on the streets. In cars etc. just what we need
more DUI.
And yes that is the reason abortion was legalized to allow a safe procedure.
I am pro choice for this reason
but the point is when it was legalized it become common practice to the point
of where we are now 40 years later. If it had stayed illegal to protect the unborn life
we would not have the numbers of babies killed as we do now, no where near.
Something that is illegal is discouraged .... period ... and rightfully so with hard drugs.
Too dangerous, too many hurt, too many dying, too many lives ruined.
Just heard of another case on the news, minutes ago ...
it took 4 big cops with tasers to subdue one small guy on bath salts.
The taser did not even effect him. He was crazy violent...
do we think maybe eat somebody's face :shock: good lord and that's legal!
Is it just me... or do the people who argue against legalizing pot always sound like the people who really should smoke pot?
You know, to loosen up their tight asses.
So you do not think there should be laws protecting society from dangerous things? :?
You are right...government intervention is the only way to protect people. It has been working this long, so we should continue it. Fuck all those other people who are crippled and killed simply by the drug war, fuck them. A few kids need to be protected by the government because their parents and community are so inept that they could never possibly make the decision to not use drugs without them being illegal.
Fuck illegal drugs anyway...the legal ones are SO much better
A few kids ... um :?
don't get me started on big pharm and the abuse of the american people in the name of greed
news flash.... put that prescription down ya don't need it!
Comments
and its high time society realised that and acted accordingly.. cause fuck knows the govt isnt.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
And this? -
"so why not smoke a bowl and macrame your arse into the couch???"
Love it! Part of my weekend plan
Hey! Great minds think alike!
Where I stand...
Life is important to me. Children are important to me. A healthy young person falling prey
to a parasite drug dealer and getting hooked and turning into a zombie
is important to me. That life and all the lives that touch that one child are important to me.
Laws are made by you and I. We call upon our representatives, like now,
in the death of these two young boys who lost their lives on a local lake,
to make changes to protect the innocent.
To help make those who are irresponsible aware hopefully before tragedy hits.
We are society, we are connected all together in our actions and reactions.
We do not stand alone.
There are no limits I am suggesting on others lives except that which will endanger another.
Allowing all drugs to be legal will endanger our children. It will endanger society.
It sends the message that the use of hard drugs is acceptable.
That is not the right message.
We would all love a world where everyone was responsible, their actions not for themselves
but for the regard of others. How many live their lives like that?
We are so far from that I'm not sure how anyone can even make a statement
like that. I guess one can keep wishing or one can get real.
Some would say that a responsible society wouldn't take our young, poor, and minority peoples and lock them up, burden them with a criminal record and/or legal fees, deprive them of an education, and confiscate their property to punish non-violent, and victimless crimes.
Do you have any way of supporting this position or is it just a hunch?
Do you really think the stat BinauralJam posted earlier: "the U.S.A. has 5% of the world population and 25% of the world prisoners", is acceptable? As of 2004 - of those prisoners, over 50% of federal, and nearly a quarter of state prisoners are in jail for drug offenses. Broken down further - nearly 13% of ALL prisoners are in jail for MJ related offenses alone. That's nearly 50,000 people serving time for a plant that year, and the rates have since increased. This is not indicative of a 'good place'. You also contradict yourself later in the thread by admitting you already can't house violent offenders....yet you support jailing marijuana users. makes no sense.
You can't make statements of fact with the disclaimer 'for me'. It either is or isn't true, this doesn't change for you. Yes, a lot of MJ arrests probably occur in traffic stops. But unless you can show me that there will be a big spike in use (as I said in my last post, precedents set in other countries show otherwise), saying more people will drive stoned doesn't hold water. As for people choosing to drive because it's only a ticket....another hunch. People who are responsible about impaired driving won't change their minds based on the law. Those who aren't responsible won't either. Drug laws are not deterrents to use or behaviour, we've been proving this for nearly half a century now......
I would think that most people with experience with both MJ and alcohol would disagree with anyone lumping their effects on decision making together. MJ tends to make most people analytical, cautious, and borderline paranoid. Alcohol makes people reckless, careless, and way too brave.
As I mentioned earlier - drug laws do not deter use or behaviour...but education does. Anyone supporting reduced use should support drug war funding going to educators instead of the for-profit prison system.
I find the 'conservatism comes with age' statement pretty condescending....as if we just can't see the wisdom in your statements cause we're not old enough yet.
Pandora, the fact is there will always be drugs. There will always be junkies and coke sniffers and glue sniffers and potheads and alcoholics. That being the case (we do agree on that, right?) doesn't it make sense to stop wasting time and money trying to eliminate drugs and spend more time teaching people to be responsible about either not doing drugs or doing them safely? That seems more real than wishful to me. Trying to eliminate drugs? That's purely make believe.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
There is no science behind your increased use theory, only an incorrect opinion.
And your opinion of what message is sent by leglization is also misguided. The focus in that scenario will be on harm reduction, rehabilitation, and education. How does that not make sense? :crazy: It doesn't say it's ok. It says 'we will help you, not throw you in jail and destroy any hope for a successful future'. But it seems you think punishment is the only way to get thru to an addict.
why are you not campaigning for alcohol prohibition, pandora? If you're concerned about impaired driving, and support prohibition of MJ to prevent it.....it's a slam dunk that you'd want to outlaw alcohol, right?
So you argue that more government legislation is the answer? The wise sages of the government know how to live responsibly?
This is a tricky topic....but....the fact is, MJ only causes any noticeable impairment for about 30-45 minutes. After that, the 'burnout' is more a tired feeling than anything....but nobody is on a soapbox to ban tired drivers. Nobody is campaigning to ban people from driving on ativan, or percs or any script drugs, or supplements which affect your alertness.
Testing for a MJ high is sketchy at best....it's in your system for months, and levels are hard to measure with any relation to impairment. Another factor is the tolerance of the user. A daily smoker probably barely notices being high after about 15 minutes, just has a slight buzz.....while someone who has only smoked a few times will probably have a serious buzz for much longer.
Like I keep repeating, it's been shown that impairment levels are less than someone who blows a .08 blood alcohol So unless you support a 5 year ban for a glass of wine with dinner, you're way over the top with your five year ban for MJ smokers (esp if there's no way of telling if they're high or it's just in their system!).
Now....what SHOULD happen, imo, is that there should be more tech focused on the vehicle itself. Why don't all vehicles have those blower things? Spend some money on R&D to simplify the process to make it more convenient, then make it mandatory in all vehicles. I read a long time ago that car companies were working on technology for sensors that could measure your eyelids for excessive blinking and droopiness - the car could sense if you were too tired to be driving (could probably tweak that to include monitoring how alert you are, periord).....this stuff can be done, but it doesn't seem to be a priority. People are more worried about imposing their moral stance than finding solutions that don't discriminate.
is always amuses me that people call for a smaller govt and more govt intervention. small govt. big govt... it cant be both. and i will not have the govt telling me that getting high is a criminal act.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
trying to eliminate those who prey on others then? That is ridiculous,
I feel the same about legalizing all drugs... ridiculous.
By legalizing all drugs society is accepting drug use .... period.
That is in direct conflict with discouraging use.
As we have seen with abortion.
Since it has been legalized the amount of abortions have sky rocketed,
even used as a birth control measure for some... having multiple abortions.
The same will happen with drug use.
Now we have the dangerous legalized gas station synthetic cocaine and pot....
bath salts.
It has killed a few kids here and also put some users in prison or mental wards.
Some experience paranoia to a psychotic point and are viciously aggressive.
When the ingredients are outlawed new ones are created with very dangerous results.
Common sense tells a person don't take that shit yet people are. :?
More readily because it is legal, convenient etc.
Getting real is keeping drugs illegal, educating the young, having help readily available
for those addicted so they can get their lives back. That is what drugs do
they take away lives.
Yes, of course there will always be drug use but with the message...
it is a very bad way to live, drugs destroy lives and they kill.
For many they get physically hooked without that ever being part of the plan
and by then it is too late.
"I want to be a drug addict when I grow up" do we think anyone has ever wanted that? :fp:
Is there ONE PERSON on this board, who truly has a hard time, obtaining their pot? Seriously? I am sure each and every single one of you, just has to make 1 or 2 phone calls, and POOF there it is! Right?
You can pick up your dope at any time...
You can sit in your house and get stoned all day long...
So why does it need to be "legalized"?
How is "legalizing" pot going to change anything for you people as individuals?
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Here's a map about heroin production and cocaine flows:
http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/drug-trafficking/index.html
Seems like a large proportion of heroin and cocaine is going to the US. War on drugs isn't working.
Seems my preconceptions are what should have been burned...
I AM MINE
You are right...government intervention is the only way to protect people. It has been working this long, so we should continue it. Fuck all those other people who are crippled and killed simply by the drug war, fuck them. A few kids need to be protected by the government because their parents and community are so inept that they could never possibly make the decision to not use drugs without them being illegal.
Fuck illegal drugs anyway...the legal ones are SO much better
It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
- Joe Rogan
I respectfully disagree. (btw, I'm not so sure about making all drugs legal, but definitely decriminalizing many of them.) But I think you're speaking for yourself when you say that we are accepting drug use if we make it legal. Cigarettes are legal, but there are age limits. Drinking is legal but there are limits. You can be arrested for public intoxication. I think the majority of people who smoke cigarettes are do it despite the knowledge of the dangers. Our society frowns upon cigarettes for the most part. Just because its legal, you dont see the govt telling everybody they should smoke cigs...in fact, I believe they've banned certain advertisements. Legalizing something doesn't equate with accepting the abuse of a product.
...And, the amount of people dying from illegal abortions was probably reduced greatly!
We would no longer have to live in fear of the police fining us/taking us to jail for doing something that isn't harming others.
No, I just don't think people are inherently stupid.
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Just wanted to give a :thumbup: to this!
Last year... my buddy was pulled over, searched, taken to jail, and fined.
Edit: and taken to court, too
And I want to know this: Why is it legal for my town to hold an annual Brew Fest where, by the end of the evening, Main Street is full of 20-something people staggering around drunk while the local sheriff's department and CHP wait on hand to take in people for public drunkenness and driving and make money for the county and yet medical marijuana dispensaries are still shut down from time to time?
Drug laws are a joke. A bad joke.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
It's messed up, Brian, to say the least. As long as we have big pharma pumping funds to our politicians, little will change. They keep making pills that turn us into zombies... I'm sorry you had those problems... You are not alone, Sir.
me too.
And no it is not stupidity that gets a kid hooked on meth
although some might say lack of good common sense.
But some kids hardly stand a chance.
Then add the fact that the human brain doesn't understand consequence until 25 years of age
and many kids think they are bulletproof until after the fact ...
we have a recipe for a lost life.
I was all for decriminalizing pot until the all drugs legal thing started.
I have found I am not alone. Time to rethink.
Pot isn't the gateway drug but it is the gateway to legalizing all drugs unfortunately.
All drugs legal = a crazy bad idea. :fp:
You know, to loosen up their tight asses.
Hail, Hail!!!
This is why we are passing laws to limit
smokers and keep areas safe for non smokers. More laws.
When something is legal it sends the message it is ok to do.
How do kids learn right from wrong?
They are punished when they do something that endangers themselves
or another. It is very basic.
Like the young man stopped for pot... bet he learned to keep it at home.
Is that so bad? Pot doesn't belong out on the streets. In cars etc. just what we need
more DUI.
And yes that is the reason abortion was legalized to allow a safe procedure.
I am pro choice for this reason
but the point is when it was legalized it become common practice to the point
of where we are now 40 years later. If it had stayed illegal to protect the unborn life
we would not have the numbers of babies killed as we do now, no where near.
Something that is illegal is discouraged .... period ... and rightfully so with hard drugs.
Too dangerous, too many hurt, too many dying, too many lives ruined.
Just heard of another case on the news, minutes ago ...
it took 4 big cops with tasers to subdue one small guy on bath salts.
The taser did not even effect him. He was crazy violent...
do we think maybe eat somebody's face :shock: good lord and that's legal!
don't get me started on big pharm and the abuse of the american people in the name of greed
news flash.... put that prescription down ya don't need it!