Religious Beliefs

1101113151634

Comments

  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    Yesterday when i went home i decided that i didn't want to do my errand that i had plan because i was thinking about looking at definition. I decided to go back to my old philosophy books because i remember i theory that maybe of interest in this thread. in philosophy terms this is called an ontological argument. I won;t get into all of the background but basically what it tried to do is prove god's existence. the first principle is that we first really define what we mean by god.

    the definition that Anselm (who is the philosopher who came up with this idea) uses is that "god" is that "which nothing greater can be conceived"

    the argument goes on for a while but i am really more interested in its definition. this definition really follows the line of thought that I have seen posted here. it makes god characteristics subjective while at the same time as proving "gods" existence. with this definition, god, can be a "religious god" " a "big bang theory" "crack" "beer". anything that can be conceived as the greatest.

    I have some issues with this theory but wondering what other think about it?
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    The ontological argument is an interesting one but one that I find flawed (listen to me... tackling the big philosophers!). Though again, depending on the defintion of god, the argument is different. Anselm's definition is very different to say, Descartes. Descartes' god is perfection (though he was also into this argument). Perfection can be many things, not just 'god' (as most people here would understand a god). Anyway, whatever definition of god, I feel that this argument uses the 'absence of evidence' theory - it's a priori. Starting off with Anselm's definition of god, ("which nothing greater can be conceived"), he works on the fact that if you can't conceive anything greater, then it must exist. No research, no nothing. Layman's words to explain my thoughts, I'm afraid.
  • EmBleveEmBleve Posts: 3,019
    EmBleve wrote:
    Re: the waiting trophy man:

    did not address the issue of proof."

    ***Lastly, I said faith was ignorance and that believing in an outdated concept and in a superior being that controls our destiny was foolishness. I did think about it before I said it and after I said it I didn't regret having said it - and I still don't. *** :o

    I was paying attention, I know what you said, and I can post comments anywhere I like just as you can. Essentially you called anyone that has 'faith' (in accordance with your definition) ignorant, and you assumed that anyone with said faith believes in a superior being that 'controls our destiny' (which is not part of my personal beliefs, and is not part of my definition of 'faith'-I take responsibility for my own destiny) is foolish. I'm not dealing with you anymore because you are a drag.
  • EmBleveEmBleve Posts: 3,019
    pandora wrote:
    God is personal no wonder we don't all have the same version!

    Fear the number one killer of love. Lets put them away and learn to love each other
    and try to understand we are not really different at all.

    yes. :) And the Golden Rule are certainly words to aspire to.
  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    redrock wrote:
    The ontological argument is an interesting one but one that I find flawed (listen to me... tackling the big philosophers!). Though again, depending on the defintion of god, the argument is different. Anselm's definition is very different to say, Descartes. Descartes' god is perfection (though he was also into this argument). Perfection can be many things, not just 'god' (as most people here would understand a god). Anyway, whatever definition of god, I feel that this argument uses the 'absence of evidence' theory - it's a priori. Starting off with Anselm's definition of god, ("which nothing greater can be conceived"), he works on the fact that if you can't conceive anything greater, then it must exist. No research, no nothing. Layman's words to explain my thoughts, I'm afraid.

    While I agree that the argument is not great. i do find some faults in your posting. the first issue is around your statement around " perfection can be many things, not just "god" (as most people here would understand a god)" I agree that many people here (and when i say here ,I mean the world not the board) do not follow this line or thought but i am not looking to prove that people believe of god is the right one. I am trying to prove god existence.

    the second issue i have is your assertion that " he works on the fact that if you can't conceive anything greater, than it must exist" in reality, would you not say that existence is greater than non-existence? is 1 million dollar in reality not better than 1 million dollars in your imagination? I would.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    fife wrote:
    While I agree that the argument is not great. i do find some faults in your posting. the first issue is around your statement around " perfection can be many things, not just "god" (as most people here would understand a god)" I agree that many people here (and when i say here ,I mean the world not the board) do not follow this line or thought but i am not looking to prove that people believe of god is the right one. I am trying to prove god existence.

    .

    Before you can prove god's existence, you need to agree what god is/which god it is and why you are calling it god. Or you make your own assumption and you start your investigation based on this assumption (which many philosophers have done with different starting points). But then your investigation will only be valid for your base assumption. If you take Decartes (and others) and his 'perfection' argument. What is perfection? What are the criteria? Can anything deemed perfect be a god? If, potentially, ALL agree that something is perfect, then I think one could possibly prove that 'god' does exist in this 'something' . But there are way too many assumptions to be made and what are the chances that all are in agreement? . Infinite parameters, really. Then one works on probabilities. At the moment, it would seem there is evidence of absence when it comes to god, but this is the god as in christian religion/teachings, whatever. So really, doesn't prove/disprove anything as it hasn't been universally agreed that this entity as described is 'the' god.
    fife wrote:
    the second issue i have is your assertion that " he works on the fact that if you can't conceive anything greater, than it must exist" in reality, would you not say that existence is greater than non-existence? is 1 million dollar in reality not better than 1 million dollars in your imagination? I would.
    [/quote]
    Definitely - primacy of existence!
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    By the time most of you find the answers to Gods existence it may be to late, Gods love is free so why wouldn't everybody want it ? is it pride or are some people just so smart that they can only believe what they have decided is the truth , it's everyones own choice to make so roll the dice if thats your game.
    Imagine standing in front of our Lord and Savior on judgment day and knowing up to that very second you didn't believe, pretty scary thought.

    Godfather.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    Godfather. wrote:
    By the time most of you find the answers to Gods existence it may be to late, Gods love is free so why wouldn't everybody want it ? is it pride or are some people just so smart that they can only believe what they have decided is the truth , it's everyones own choice to make so roll the dice if thats your game.
    Imagine standing in front of our Lord and Savior on judgment day and knowing up to that very second you didn't believe, pretty scary thought.

    Godfather.

    Scary to you, maybe. But for those who don't believe in a judgmental and punishing/rewarding god who will decide if you live an afterlife in bliss or oblivion, it really doesn't matter. It's your fears brought on by your beliefs. You say god's love is free - so is his wrath.
  • ed243421ed243421 Posts: 7,667
    Godfather. wrote:
    By the time most of you find the answers to Gods existence it may be to late, Gods love is free so why wouldn't everybody want it ? is it pride or are some people just so smart that they can only believe what they have decided is the truth , it's everyones own choice to make so roll the dice if thats your game.
    Imagine standing in front of our Lord and Savior on judgment day and knowing up to that very second you didn't believe, pretty scary thought.

    Godfather.

    bout as scary as santa not getting me a gift for the last 30 years

    if god's love is free
    how could it ever be to late to find him?
    interesting how his love expires upon your death
    The whole world will be different soon... - EV
    RED ROCKS 6-19-95
    AUGUSTA 9-26-96
    MANSFIELD 9-15-98
    BOSTON 9-29-04
    BOSTON 5-25-06
    MANSFIELD 6-30-08
    EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
    BOSTON 5-17-10
    EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
    PJ20 9-3-11
    PJ20 9-4-11
    WRIGLEY 7-19-13
    WORCESTER 10-15-13
    WORCESTER 10-16-13
    HARTFORD 10-25-13









  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    ed243421 wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    By the time most of you find the answers to Gods existence it may be to late, Gods love is free so why wouldn't everybody want it ? is it pride or are some people just so smart that they can only believe what they have decided is the truth , it's everyones own choice to make so roll the dice if thats your game.
    Imagine standing in front of our Lord and Savior on judgment day and knowing up to that very second you didn't believe, pretty scary thought.

    Godfather.

    bout as scary as santa not getting me a gift for the last 30 years

    if god's love is free
    how could it ever be to late to find him?
    interesting how his love expires upon your death

    odd coming from you Ed, gifts don't always come in box's with bows Ed you know that ;)
    if you're waiting for Santa to bring you the gift you've been waiting for you're in the wrong line. :lol:

    Godfather.
  • The Waiting Trophy ManThe Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    edited March 2011
    EmBleve wrote:
    I'm not dealing with you anymore because you are a drag.

    Thank god, lol. You can be a real fruit loop.
    Post edited by The Waiting Trophy Man on
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    redrock wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    By the time most of you find the answers to Gods existence it may be to late, Gods love is free so why wouldn't everybody want it ? is it pride or are some people just so smart that they can only believe what they have decided is the truth , it's everyones own choice to make so roll the dice if thats your game.
    Imagine standing in front of our Lord and Savior on judgment day and knowing up to that very second you didn't believe, pretty scary thought.

    Godfather.

    Scary to you, maybe. But for those who don't believe in a judgmental and punishing/rewarding god who will decide if you live an afterlife in bliss or oblivion, it really doesn't matter. It's your fears brought on by your beliefs. You say god's love is free - so is his wrath.

    as you wish.

    Godfather.
  • EmBleveEmBleve Posts: 3,019
    EmBleve wrote:
    I'm not dealing with you anymore because you are a drag.

    Thank god, lol. You can be a real fruit loop.

    And proud of it! :lol: That's why my friends and family love me. Thanks.
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    EmBleve wrote:
    EmBleve wrote:
    I'm not dealing with you anymore because you are a drag.

    Thank god, lol. You can be a real fruit loop.

    And proud of it! :lol: That's why my friends and family love me. Thanks.
    I was just thinking the same thing! :clap: Bravo for fruit loops.... the colorful, imaginative, endearing,
    and way sweet one in the bunch! :D
  • The Waiting Trophy ManThe Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    Looks like the religious nuts are running the asylum!
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    Looks like the religious nuts are running the asylum!
    your avatar looks like the mad scientist ;):lol:
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    Paul David wrote:
    Paul David wrote:
    I think we're all just a big alien ant farm of a much superior race. that would make aliens our god. which makes Fox Mulder our saviour.


    Even if we were, and my own beliefs are closer to this than i'll go into, wouldn't God still be God?

    I seriously want to know what you mean. I'm interested.


    Oh Boy, i stuck my foot in it this time, O.K. then: I think the Universe is filled with intelligent life and Earth has been visited continuously be various alien lifeforms. I think there is a missing link in evolution because aliens took the one animal (Chimp) that came closest to a genetic match to there own and added/created a new race of being's (us), i don't mean modern humans but smart monkey's that began to use tools and develope speech and over the course of time became us. As we began to write things down and keep records we developed religon, we were probably already praying to God but until we tried to define God it didn't mean a whole lot. But then we went Apeshit with religon and started letting it rule our existence so they stepped in again (probably after much debate amonst themselves) and kidnapped a young women in Eygpt in the middle of the night and inpregnated her with a half alien kid that would grow up to do some miraculous things and pass along the idea of Peace, Love and Understanding. Good Plan, but it backfired, we killed the poor dude!
    So they went and got his body and went back to the drawing board, in the meantime we developed a new religon based on this guy's teachings and the aliens thought "Not a complete loss" until that religon got so big it decided everyone in the world would be better off if they beleived in it too, whether they wanted to or not. Fast Foward to the 1940's, we developed Nuclear weapons waaaaaay before they anticipated (because Albert Einstein was a genetic anomaly, his brain was bigger than your average man) and the aliens got very concerned and started visiting much more often to determine if we were about to blow the shit out of ourselves, which would explain the increase of UFO sightings around the world. (it's Not Hollywood's fault)

    But what this all has to do with God is, God created the Universe or Multiverse and the seeds of life and then that life evolved and started to create it's own life, us. But just because we were not created in God's image, doesn't take away from that fact that God is God. Even if we have no concept of what that is/means.

    Which is why i'm Agnostic and why i pray to God. I don't need the Dogma and i dont need a middle man, but if i had to choose a middle man i would choose Carl Sagan, he's intelligent, articulate and has a hypnotic voice that would even catch God's attention.

    Did i mention i'm a big fan of Star Trek :D
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    Paul David wrote:
    Even if we were, and my own beliefs are closer to this than i'll go into, wouldn't God still be God?

    I seriously want to know what you mean. I'm interested.


    Oh Boy, i stuck my foot in it this time, O.K. then: I think the Universe is filled with intelligent life and Earth has been visited continuously be various alien lifeforms. I think there is a missing link in evolution because aliens took the one animal (Chimp) that came closest to a genetic match to there own and added/created a new race of being's (us), i don't mean modern humans but smart monkey's that began to use tools and develope speech and over the course of time became us. As we began to write things down and keep records we developed religon, we were probably already praying to God but until we tried to define God it didn't mean a whole lot. But then we went Apeshit with religon and started letting it rule our existence so they stepped in again (probably after much debate amonst themselves) and kidnapped a young women in Eygpt in the middle of the night and inpregnated her with a half alien kid that would grow up to do some miraculous things and pass along the idea of Peace, Love and Understanding. Good Plan, but it backfired, we killed the poor dude!
    So they went and got his body and went back to the drawing board, in the meantime we developed a new religon based on this guy's teachings and the aliens thought "Not a complete loss" until that religon got so big it decided everyone in the world would be better off if they beleived in it too, whether they wanted to or not. Fast Foward to the 1940's, we developed Nuclear weapons waaaaaay before they anticipated (because Albert Einstein was a genetic anomaly, his brain was bigger than your average man) and the aliens got very concerned and started visiting much more often to determine if we were about to blow the shit out of ourselves, which would explain the increase of UFO sightings around the world. (it's Not Hollywood's fault)

    But what this all has to do with God is, God created the Universe or Multiverse and the seeds of life and then that life evolved and started to create it's own life, us. But just because we were not created in God's image, doesn't take away from that fact that God is God. Even if we have no concept of what that is/means.

    Which is why i'm Agnostic and why i pray to God. I don't need the Dogma and i dont need a middle man, but if i had to choose a middle man i would choose Carl Sagan, he's intelligent, articulate and has a hypnotic voice that would even catch God's attention.

    Did i mention i'm a big fan of Star Trek :D

    you can get a "fuck yeah" from me on that one.
    :clap:
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    Nice, Thanks Johnny!
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    .... but if i had to choose a middle man i would choose Carl Sagan,.

    Sagan would be an unfortunate (or not really useful middle man) as he did not believe in a god! :mrgreen:
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    redrock wrote:
    .... but if i had to choose a middle man i would choose Carl Sagan,.

    Sagan would be an unfortunate (or not really useful middle man) as he did not believe in a god! :mrgreen:


    Really? :lol: This explains alot!

    I'll have to start Praying to:Bill+Hicks.jpg
  • The Waiting Trophy ManThe Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    pandora wrote:
    Looks like the religious nuts are running the asylum!
    your avatar looks like the mad scientist ;):lol:

    That's D.S. Burton from the Vitalogy booklet. "An inveterate victim of the vice." Handsome fellow, isn't he? And yes, he looks a bit mad.
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • Which is why i'm Agnostic and why i pray to God. I don't need the Dogma and i dont need a middle man, but if i had to choose a middle man i would choose Carl Sagan, he's intelligent, articulate and has a hypnotic voice that would even catch God's attention.

    Did i mention i'm a big fan of Star Trek :D

    that's fantastic. I love it. However, you lost me at the part "I'm agnostic and I pray to God". How can you be agnostic and pray to a god? can you sit on the fence and have your feet on both lawns?
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • JR8805JR8805 Posts: 169
    Heaven is here. Hell is here. We tend to bounce between them. I am agnostic. Either everything I see points to a creator or none of it does. I can't decide what I'm looking at. However, I will say that the universe that we can see seems to be very much a conglomeration of replicating patterns. Mechanistic to me. It seems to be following a "program," and just does as instructed. I think we probably do, too, as we are not different from the universe, just a tiny, tiny part of it. Earth has rewards. Heaven is our conception of eternal reward. Earth has its punishments. Hell is just an extension of a one-time occurrence to an endless one. "Vengeance is mine, says the Lord." Well, not really. Vengeance, eternal vengeance is ours when we picture it. Kinda just too handy to me. Just because something is imaginable doesn't make it possible. Heaven and hell are acts of imagination--something people seem to have no shortage of. Thank goodness, a lot of the time. And, quite a pity a larger portion of the time than I'd like to see. No good without evil. No heaven without hell. Everything is part of the spectrum. "So if there were no angels would there be no sin?" Vedder
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    Paul David wrote:
    Which is why i'm Agnostic and why i pray to God. I don't need the Dogma and i dont need a middle man, but if i had to choose a middle man i would choose Carl Sagan, he's intelligent, articulate and has a hypnotic voice that would even catch God's attention.

    Did i mention i'm a big fan of Star Trek :D

    that's fantastic. I love it. However, you lost me at the part "I'm agnostic and I pray to God". How can you be agnostic and pray to a god? can you sit on the fence and have your feet on both lawns?


    i thought agnostic ment you beleive in God, but accept that you have no idea what God is? atleast thats the thought i've been going on. Am i wrong?
  • Random_WookieRandom_Wookie Posts: 1,099
    The only difference between religion and a cult is that religion has been around longer. I was bought up catholic I think, baptized and the other crap that comes with it.

    Though I would say most people who believe in a religion do so, to make sense of the meaningless and pointlessness of our fragile existences. To me I don't care what people believe, as long as they play nice with others and leave me to my own existence.
    Rod Laver Arena - Feb 18, 2003
    Rod Laver Arena - Nov 13, 2006
    Adelaide Oval - Nov 17, 2009
    Etihad Stadium - Nov 20, 2009
    BDO Melbourne - Jan 24, 2014
    New York - May 02 - 2016

    Powered by Pearl Jam
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    i thought agnostic ment you beleive in God, but accept that you have no idea what God is? atleast thats the thought i've been going on. Am i wrong?

    Agnostic is when you don't know if there is a god or not - whatever it may be.
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    redrock wrote:
    i thought agnostic ment you beleive in God, but accept that you have no idea what God is? atleast thats the thought i've been going on. Am i wrong?

    Agnostic is when you don't know if there is a god or not - whatever it may be.

    Shit, what the hell am i?
  • Random_WookieRandom_Wookie Posts: 1,099
    Shit, what the hell am i?

    what ever you want to be, currently I am sitting :roll:
    Rod Laver Arena - Feb 18, 2003
    Rod Laver Arena - Nov 13, 2006
    Adelaide Oval - Nov 17, 2009
    Etihad Stadium - Nov 20, 2009
    BDO Melbourne - Jan 24, 2014
    New York - May 02 - 2016

    Powered by Pearl Jam
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    Shit, what the hell am i?

    what ever you want to be, currently I am sitting :roll:


    :lol: i don't mind being labeled but i'd like to adopt the right one.
Sign In or Register to comment.