THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES...

The Juggler

Cliffy6745 wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

Cliffy6745 wrote:

I take it McCoy is the new Ryan Howard.

do u hear this in the coffee shop also??? the bickering? how is sports radio??

I would imagine sports talk radio is exactly like this thread here. haha.

i think the people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time don't know what station sports talk is on...

Cliffy6745

The Juggler wrote:

i think the people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time don't know what station sports talk is on...

Fair enough

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

i think the people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time don't know what station sports talk is on...

i think people who talk about and/or listen to sports talk radio are neanderthal jersey wearing goons who can barely count to 100. sports talk radio is as relevant to sports as fantasy leagues. worthless pieces of garbage that non-athletic never actually stepped on a field douche's listen to and follow. to say anything about sports talk radio is really just sad and pathetic.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

i think the people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time don't know what station sports talk is on...

i think people who talk about and/or listen to sports talk radio are neanderthal jersey wearing goons who can barely count to 100. sports talk radio is as relevant to sports as fantasy leagues. worthless pieces of garbage that non-athletic never actually stepped on a field douche's listen to and follow. to say anything about sports talk radio is really just sad and pathetic.

wow. strong words.

i think people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time should spend time less time talking football.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

i think the people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time don't know what station sports talk is on...

i think people who talk about and/or listen to sports talk radio are neanderthal jersey wearing goons who can barely count to 100. sports talk radio is as relevant to sports as fantasy leagues. worthless pieces of garbage that non-athletic never actually stepped on a field douche's listen to and follow. to say anything about sports talk radio is really just sad and pathetic.

wow. strong words.

i think people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time should spend time less time talking football.

that's all you got for a rebuttal? simple minded jersey wearing folk i take it

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

i think people who talk about and/or listen to sports talk radio are neanderthal jersey wearing goons who can barely count to 100. sports talk radio is as relevant to sports as fantasy leagues. worthless pieces of garbage that non-athletic never actually stepped on a field douche's listen to and follow. to say anything about sports talk radio is really just sad and pathetic.

wow. strong words.

i think people who want to throw the ball 85% of the time should spend time less time talking football.

that's all you got for a rebuttal? simple minded jersey wearing folk i take it

i assume you're referring to 610? there's a lot of great sports talk on sirius and xm out there. regular radio blows for the most part.

anyway,

8 in the box!
yards per completion!
really interested in what new football jargon you learn for next weeks game.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

8 in the box!
yards per completion!
really interested in what new football jargon you learn for next weeks game.

it's a great day in philly for the purists. we ran the ball and gained a lot of yards on the ground. that's really important to a lot of people apparantly. ill take points and wins but hey i'm just a crazy older knucklehead who isn't a fantasy league or sabermatician guy and who actually spent an awful lot of time actually playing sports on fields and not the video game kind.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

8 in the box!
yards per completion!
really interested in what new football jargon you learn for next weeks game.

it's a great day in philly for the purists. we ran the ball and gained a lot of yards on the ground. that's really important to a lot of people apparantly. ill take points and wins but hey i'm just a crazy older knucklehead who isn't a fantasy league or sabermatician guy and who actually spent an awful lot of time actually playing sports on fields and not the video game kind.

i don't know you. but i'd be shocked if you played a lot of sports on the field. your whole football philosophy seems derived from a john madden football game or the arena league. 85% of the time go start a philadelphia soul thread dude.

and again--the winning team had a 50/50 pass/run ratio yesterday which set up some nice shots down the field.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

8 in the box!
yards per completion!
really interested in what new football jargon you learn for next weeks game.

it's a great day in philly for the purists. we ran the ball and gained a lot of yards on the ground. that's really important to a lot of people apparantly. ill take points and wins but hey i'm just a crazy older knucklehead who isn't a fantasy league or sabermatician guy and who actually spent an awful lot of time actually playing sports on fields and not the video game kind.

i don't know you. but i'd be shocked if you played a lot of sports on the field. your whole football philosophy seems derived from a john madden football game or the arena league. 85% of the time go start a philadelphia soul thread dude.

and again--the winning team had a 50/50 pass/run ratio yesterday which set up some nice shots down the field.

and the losing team ran the ball something like 57% of the time. i guess more passes were called for. maybe not 80% but sure as hell more than 43% would have been better.

as for me only played football in grade school but played a ton of basketball, baseball and fast pitch softball. hell even played a little soccer and street hockey. was damn good i might add

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

it's a great day in philly for the purists. we ran the ball and gained a lot of yards on the ground. that's really important to a lot of people apparantly. ill take points and wins but hey i'm just a crazy older knucklehead who isn't a fantasy league or sabermatician guy and who actually spent an awful lot of time actually playing sports on fields and not the video game kind.

i don't know you. but i'd be shocked if you played a lot of sports on the field. your whole football philosophy seems derived from a john madden football game or the arena league. 85% of the time go start a philadelphia soul thread dude.

and again--the winning team had a 50/50 pass/run ratio yesterday which set up some nice shots down the field.

and the losing team ran the ball something like 57% of the time. i guess more passes were called for. maybe not 80% but sure as hell more than 43% would have been better.

losing team also had 3 picks. but they should have taken a few shots down the field via play action like i've repeatedly said. as the giants proved, that's what those runs can open up for teams.

either way, we've got one of the best running backs in the game. sooner or later you'll realize this. the running game kept us in the game.

bad decision making by the coach and overall poor execution was why the eagles lost.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

losing team also had 3 picks. but they should have taken a few shots down the field via play action like i've repeatedly said. as the giants proved, that's what those runs can open up for teams.

either way, we've got one of the best running backs in the game. sooner or later you'll realize this. the running game kept us in the game.

bad decision making by the coach and overall poor execution was why the eagles lost.

not scoring touchdowns is why the lost. giving the ball to Owen Schmidt ever is a complete utter waste of an nfl play let alone 2x in the red zone. i know you think i'm fucking nuts but the bottom line is it is easier to score throwing the ball then running. and i do know mccoy is one of the best running backs in the league but it's just not a top priority position anymore. and where running backs are drafted these days shows you where they are listed in the positional hierarchy for teams. and a stud hall of fame level running back hasn't won a super bowl in what a decade.

The Fixer

pjhawks wrote:

as for me only played football in grade school but played a ton of basketball, baseball and fast pitch softball. hell even played a little soccer and street hockey. was damn good i might add

by far the best part of a philly thread...ever.

dude tries to rip people for not playing sports...then comes back with this. fast pitch softball and street hockey...hahahahaha

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

losing team also had 3 picks. but they should have taken a few shots down the field via play action like i've repeatedly said. as the giants proved, that's what those runs can open up for teams.

either way, we've got one of the best running backs in the game. sooner or later you'll realize this. the running game kept us in the game.

bad decision making by the coach and overall poor execution was why the eagles lost.

not scoring touchdowns is why the lost. giving the ball to Owen Schmidt ever is a complete utter waste of an nfl play let alone 2x in the red zone. i know you think i'm fucking nuts but the bottom line is it is easier to score throwing the ball then running. and i do know mccoy is one of the best running backs in the league but it's just not a top priority position anymore. and where running backs are drafted these days shows you where they are listed in the positional hierarchy for teams. and a stud hall of fame level running back hasn't won a super bowl in what a decade.

not scoring touchdowns is why they lost? wow. astute commentary yet again.

they scored one touchdown. running the ball. all those runs should have opened up more opportunities to throw the ball downfield but they never took advantage. and had andy reid given it to his best player instead of a guy who has only ran it 5 times in his career (seriously) TWICE at the goaline i can almost guarnatee they score a 2nd running touchdown and win the game. poor coaching.

nobody has ever disputed that it is a passing league. my neighbor's newborn can tell you that. over 80% of the time only works in the arena league and video games though. you will never, ever, see that happen in the nfl. ever. our running game kept us in it yesterday. shady is a beast.

The Fixer

I'm probably the biggest reid apologist here and even I can't defend the 3 plays from the 1 or going for it on 4th down. not the coaches best game yesterday.

they looked bad all around (except mccoy). lot of new faces (coaches and players). they will figure it out...reid coached teams usually get better as the season progresses.

like jeags said, it's only one game. brutal loss, but not the end of the world. just sucks it was to the giants...man I hate them

jamminpearls

You know ur wrong when me,jeags and the fixer are all on the same page. I have no clue how Hawks can't see who the best weapon is. The Pats yesterday are a perfect example of why passing too much is a bad thing. Up 21-0 and there genius coach has Brady throwing int after int instaed of giving BGE or Woodhead the ball. And before someone says see the Pats win throwing more then us THEY HAVE TOM FUCKING BRADY WE DONT!!!

pjhawks

The Fixer wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

as for me only played football in grade school but played a ton of basketball, baseball and fast pitch softball. hell even played a little soccer and street hockey. was damn good i might add

by far the best part of a philly thread...ever.

dude tries to rip people for not playing sports...then comes back with this. fast pitch softball and street hockey...hahahahaha

dude on our team and at least 2 others in our league threw in the 80s in modified fast pitch softball. you couldn't fucking hit it. not then, not now, not ever. but i'm sure you could have been fantastic betting on it and picking a fantasy team. :roll: :roll:

The Fixer's greatest hits:
1) phils are better off with ross gload at 1st base over ryan howard
2) phils will be lucky to win 90 fucking games with this offense
3) i'd rather have dan carcillo dress than jeff carter
4) ruben amaro is one of the worst gm's in baseball
5) flyers goaltending has been as good as Ryan Miller in this series
6) mayberry sucks and is a minor leaguer
7) joselio hanson is a beast and will help this team
8) shrugs off rape because a rapist played for his alma mater and his now in the NBA
9) the braves will be in 1st place by memorial day

pjhawks

jamminpearls wrote:

You know ur wrong when me,jeags and the fixer are all on the same page. I have no clue how Hawks can't see who the best weapon is. The Pats yesterday are a perfect example of why passing too much is a bad thing. Up 21-0 and there genius coach has Brady throwing int after int instaed of giving BGE or Woodhead the ball. And before someone says see the Pats win throwing more then us THEY HAVE TOM FUCKING BRADY WE DONT!!!

hmm let's see who should i trust more 3 guys on a pearl jam message board or every defensive coordinator who has played against the eagles for 2 seasons...hmmm let's see, wait for it. wait for it...........

i'll go with the guys who do the defensive coordinator's job for 60 or 70 hours per week over you 3.

jamminpearls

So Jackson is a better player then DJack is what ur telling me? DJack is a better home run hitter i'll give u that,but Mccoy is a better all around weapon.

pjhawks

jamminpearls wrote:

So Jackson is a better player then DJack is what ur telling me? DJack is a better home run hitter i'll give u that,but Mccoy is a better all around weapon.

mccoy never receives the ball more than 3 yards down the field. we never split him out and we never throw him the ball down the field like we did with westbrook. great at what he does but i wouldn't say 'all around'. we don't come close to doing the things with mccoy that we did with westbrook. i think mccoy is a better rusher than westbrook but jackson gets the ball in positons like we used to do with westbrook. mccoy gets the ball in 2 ways, rushing and screen passes. jackson, like westbrook, gets the ball in a multitude of ways including returning kicks, an occasional rush, screens, passes over the middle and out patterns and of course the home run ball. if you break the field down into sections jackson is a threat in all sections of the field.
being a threat on all parts of the field and not just the line of scrimmage makes jackson a better weapon. can you honestly say mccoy is a threat on all parts of the field like jackson is and like westbrook was before him?

cowboypjfan

All I know is that McCoy is scoring a ton of fantasy points for me this year!