Biden vs Trump 2020 - vote now and discuss!

dankind · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

CM189191 said:

show previous quotes

JimmyV said:

So we can really only mute 5 people at a time? Asking for a friend.

I recommend starting here:

This place has been great for me since these folks decided their opinions didn't matter anymore.

No one's opinion matters.

Spiritual_Chaos · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

Halifax2TheMax said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Halifax2TheMax · April 2020

Spiritual_Chaos said:

show previous quotes

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

Spiritual_Chaos · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

Halifax2TheMax said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Halifax2TheMax · April 2020

Spiritual_Chaos said:

show previous quotes

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

Spiritual_Chaos · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

Halifax2TheMax said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the "The T-1000 in the helicopter chasing after John, Sarah and Uncle Bob in the SWAT truck"-chase.

Halifax2TheMax · April 2020

Spiritual_Chaos said:

show previous quotes

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

mfc2006 · April 2020

Biden

JimmyV said:

So we can really only mute 5 people at a time? Asking for a friend.

I totally forgot we could do this. Time to make a change! Thanks!

Spiritual_Chaos · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

Halifax2TheMax said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

Halifax2TheMax · April 2020

Spiritual_Chaos said:

show previous quotes

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

No more than you expressing adulation for Aaaaaaaaaahnold the Impregnator.

gimmesometruth27 · April 2020

Biden

Spiritual_Chaos said:

show previous quotes

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

sorry, but at this time in history, in america we do not have time for your purity test. we either vote biden, or trump wins again. i do not see what is so difficult to comprehend. you can't vote here, so do not shame the rest of us for trying to improve our country.

mfc2006 · April 2020

Biden

gimmesometruth27 said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

sorry, but at this time in history, in america we do not have time for your purity test. we either vote biden, or trump wins again. i do not see what is so difficult to comprehend. you can't vote here, so do not shame the rest of us for trying to improve our country.

Exactly. Well said.

Spiritual_Chaos · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

gimmesometruth27 said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

sorry, but at this time in history, in america we do not have time for your purity test. we either vote biden, or trump wins again. i do not see what is so difficult to comprehend. you can't vote here, so do not shame the rest of us for trying to improve our country.

When did I ever put up a purity test?

Spiritual_Chaos · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

Halifax2TheMax said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

No more than you expressing adulation for Aaaaaaaaaahnold the Impregnator.

Again, are you deflecting?

My question stands:

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

gimmesometruth27 · April 2020

Biden

Spiritual_Chaos said:

show previous quotes

gimmesometruth27 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Kat and @Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

sorry, but at this time in history, in america we do not have time for your purity test. we either vote biden, or trump wins again. i do not see what is so difficult to comprehend. you can't vote here, so do not shame the rest of us for trying to improve our country.

When did I ever put up a purity test?

that is all you are doing. questioning us about voting for biden due to allegations against him. you are trying to impose some purity test on a potential leader of a country that you do not live in. you are trying to call us hypocrites. you can opine all you want, but our priority is to get trump out of office. period.

Kat · April 2020

Biden

Closed for review.

pjl44 · April 2020

I'm sitting this one out

gimmesometruth27 said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

sorry, but at this time in history, in america we do not have time for your purity test. we either vote biden, or trump wins again. i do not see what is so difficult to comprehend. you can't vote here, so do not shame the rest of us for trying to improve our country.

By calling it a purity test, are you saying you'd still vote for Biden if it turns out to be true?

brianlux · April 2020

Biden

At worst we would survive a Biden presidency. At best, we would suffer untold horrors under a second Trump term. The decision on who to vote for is easy.

JimmyV · April 2020

Biden

Have the Democrats officially cancelled their convention due to COVID?

The Juggler · April 2020

Biden

gimmesometruth27 said:

show previous quotes

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

https://twitter.com/johnjcook/status/1254812469916295170?s=20

@Halifax2TheMax - you still stand by these posts?

@mrussel1 you still stand by Biden in this and that her accusations could just be about touching her neck?

I said yesterday that this was the strongest corroboration, but it's still not evidence. Second, I don't understand how she respects him if he raped her. I asked you that twice and you haven't helped me square that

Her mother said "out of respect for" and not "because she respects him".

Or am I wrong?

And I don't feel the need to go some "The T-800 before they turn on the switch that makes him being able to learn human behavior" level and question why and how a sexual assault victim did not behave in the way, you or I find "logical".

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why? A naked Arnold, before entering the bar and getting clothes, boots and a motorcycle would not understand that.

But an Arnold switch to learn how humans work, I reckon would.

Should be noted again that YOU M. Ruseel yourself has said that at this time in history being a woman and being called "nothing but an oral sex machine" or whatever Bloomberg had said to women around him during the late 80s/early 90s -- but was anything out of the ordinary. That is how men were joking, or whatever you defended him with.

Now delve into that culture a bit more, and put yourself in a woman's shoes being in that world. Just look at Anita Hill. Then look at Biden during the Anita Hill hearings. Then back at Anita Hill again.

1. "out of respect for the senator" means she respects the senator. It's the same statement. In English, there isn't a different, it's just a sentence construct.

Seems there is.

Not to go inside Taras head and trying to figure out what happened between her telling her mom and mom talking and perheps condensing things about it on the phone with Larry King -- but out of respect for, I could imagine could be about destroying his life, destroying his job as a senator, causing problems for him and his family etc.

And also, you did not respond:

My friends teenage sister got sexually assaulted at a party, and decided not to file charges because it would stir things up among their group of friends and she felt she would be responsible for causing a lot of problems for everyone involved -- even with her being a victim. Now tell me - why?

What’s changed? From the Julian Assange thread:

Not seeing the point you are trying to make.

Point out anyone saying he (Biden) has been found guilty in court? Was that really too difficult for you to understand?

You are still not making sense.

Why should I point out anyone saying Biden has been found guilty in court?

Because you did for Julian Asstrange who was "credibly" accused of rape. What has changed in the past year for you?

I don't see how anything has changed?

Neither has been found guilty in court to my knowledge.

What is your point?

Please make sense. Or I will have to mute you (1 out of the limit of 5). This takes time. Cut to the chase.

Only if you promise to stop posting gifs and referencing that slime ball Aaaaaaahnold?

Because a year ago, you were opposed to trying Julian Asstrange on social media for the very credible allegation of rape. Now that its Sleepy Woke Joe, you're trying to hang him without any semblance of due process. I'm asking you why one and not the other?

And you still haven't answered my question about whether I could walk into a police station in Stockholm or anywhere else in Sweden and make an allegation of sexual assault, 8, 12 or 27 years after the alleged incident.

1. When have I opposed anything against Julian Assange?

2. I don't know the statute of limitation on sexual assault in Sweden.

My question to you is - how much shame should a person feel for carrying water on internet forum for and "if the glove don't fit acquit-defending a person who's by all probable accounts is a "slime ball" and sexual assaulter instead of just admitting it is highly probable but seeing reasons to vote for the slime ball sexual assaulter anyway?

sorry, but at this time in history, in america we do not have time for your purity test. we either vote biden, or trump wins again. i do not see what is so difficult to comprehend. you can't vote here, so do not shame the rest of us for trying to improve our country.

yeeeeeup.

Biden vs Trump 2020 - vote now and discuss!

Comments

Welcome!

Quick Links

Categories