The coronavirus
Comments
-
Matts3221 said:HughFreakingDillon said:
being with family is not a first world problem, mike. it would crush the best of us. two weeks away from my kids, birthday or not, would be enough to do me in. stay strong. and don't feel guilty about being sad about it. he's your son.mcgruff10 said:First world problems I know but something just hit me hard: I won’t be able to my son on his birthday Thursday. My ex is a nurse practitioner in the trenches with all this. We agreed to keep him with her until this all this passes. Haven’t seen him in almost two weeks and I am cool with that but missing his birthday, god damn I am crushed.
I highly agree, missed my brother ( brother in law but I consider him a brother ) 40th birthday that was just him , my sister and their kids , missed my nephews 9th birthday a week ago.My mom is a cancer survivor with pre existing lung issues , we Facetime ever night but she is now on day 21 inside her apartment , I miss her more than I can say , I still get to see her but just wanted to hug her. I have a very close knit family and we at least had a plan in place , we take turns getting groceries for her. Place them at her door and say we love her. Once we leave she brings them in with plastic gloves on and throws away all the bags and wash's the cans and other food containers. I think some of our friends thought we were crazy a few weeks ago starting this but at this point at least my mom has not had contact with anyone for three weeks.
Cant wait to hug every person I know when I can.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Sorry, I thought you mean the link doesn't help. Sounds like you're saying the bill doesn't help you. I think people who own a small business and have taken the historic practice of a small salary while expensing lots of things back to the business will not be helped as much with this bill. People who lived off accurately reported and taxed salary numbers will be assisted.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?0 -
This excerpt breaks it down pretty good:DewieCox said:
I still don’t see where he gets the 2mil number from. Even with very liberal estimates it would be hard to imagine reaching half that.tbergs said:
If you read the article he explains where his projections come from. He is estimating 1 death for every 125 people infected and then extrapolating based on the reported number of deaths. He puts the death rate at .8 - 1.0%. Much lower than what many had believed at one point when it was closer to 4 and 5.DewieCox said:
Because it’s info that’s fairly easy to follow and updated regularly from a trusted source.CM189191 said:DewieCox said:
I think it would be better if everybody found an accurate source and stuck with it. Too many people clearly have trouble applying the info from these graphs to the situation. Having legitimate information has eased my anxiety on the situation quite a bit.pjl44 said:
It would be more helpful if they shared charts that measured per capita. Of course we're going to have more cases than most of those countries.CM189191 said:
Not sure how this data is easing anxiety.....it's terrifying information an should be treated as such
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hell-coming-mathematical-proof-185019616.html
"The attacks on 9/11 killed around 3000 people. We will be reporting a 9/11 every three days. That’s why we say “hell is coming”."Where are they getting the 2,000,000 number? Sounds like bad info from the first line."Our estimate for the fatality rate is 0.8%; this means for every death we have 125 infections. Since we have 205 total deaths, there must have been 205 times 125 total infections on February 25th. That’s 25,625 infected people. If you understand this part of the calculation, the rest of our analysis is pretty straightforward.
The number of infected people doubles every 3 days. So, on February 28th the number of infected people doubled to 51,250 (let’s round it down to 50,000). Three days later, on March 2nd, the number of infected people doubled again to 100,000.
Do you see start to see the gravity of the situation? There were 100K infected people on March 2nd in America. We know that 0.8% of these people will die by March 26th. That means our death toll will be 800 on March 26th [you can verify the accuracy of our model on March 26th by comparing the actual death toll to our estimate]."
That's how it gets to the 2 million infected number. And using the link you provided his estimates for March 26th will actually be much higher so he may be on the low end of the estimate or off on the death rate.
This is currently where that link you posted has the USA:
The 859 is deaths as of now.
*And just for clarity, he posted this article on March 20th, when the death total was at 205.Post edited by tbergs onIt's a hopeless situation...0 -
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...0 -
I think I get it. So making an educated guess on the actual death rate and working backwards from number of deaths to make up for lack of testing?tbergs said:
This excerpt breaks it down pretty good:DewieCox said:
I still don’t see where he gets the 2mil number from. Even with very liberal estimates it would be hard to imagine reaching half that.tbergs said:
If you read the article he explains where his projections come from. He is estimating 1 death for every 125 people infected and then extrapolating based on the reported number of deaths. He puts the death rate at .8 - 1.0%. Much lower than what many had believed at one point when it was closer to 4 and 5.DewieCox said:
Because it’s info that’s fairly easy to follow and updated regularly from a trusted source.CM189191 said:DewieCox said:
I think it would be better if everybody found an accurate source and stuck with it. Too many people clearly have trouble applying the info from these graphs to the situation. Having legitimate information has eased my anxiety on the situation quite a bit.pjl44 said:
It would be more helpful if they shared charts that measured per capita. Of course we're going to have more cases than most of those countries.CM189191 said:
Not sure how this data is easing anxiety.....it's terrifying information an should be treated as such
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hell-coming-mathematical-proof-185019616.html
"The attacks on 9/11 killed around 3000 people. We will be reporting a 9/11 every three days. That’s why we say “hell is coming”."Where are they getting the 2,000,000 number? Sounds like bad info from the first line."Our estimate for the fatality rate is 0.8%; this means for every death we have 125 infections. Since we have 205 total deaths, there must have been 205 times 125 total infections on February 25th. That’s 25,625 infected people. If you understand this part of the calculation, the rest of our analysis is pretty straightforward.
The number of infected people doubles every 3 days. So, on February 28th the number of infected people doubled to 51,250 (let’s round it down to 50,000). Three days later, on March 2nd, the number of infected people doubled again to 100,000.
Do you see start to see the gravity of the situation? There were 100K infected people on March 2nd in America. We know that 0.8% of these people will die by March 26th. That means our death toll will be 800 on March 26th [you can verify the accuracy of our model on March 26th by comparing the actual death toll to our estimate]."
That's how it gets to the 2 million infected number. And using the link you provided his estimates for March 26th will actually be much higher so he may be on the low end of the estimate or off on the death rate.
This is currently where that link you posted has the USA:
The 859 is deaths as of now.
*And just for clarity, he posted this article on March 20th, when the death total was at 205.0 -
Well that sucks. Has your work or pay been impacted by this at all yet? Based on what I read, my family will receive around $3400, but my job has not been impacted as of yet so while I don't mind the boost, I am not one of the people who most needs it.tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...It's a hopeless situation...0 -
DewieCox said:
I still don’t see where he gets the 2mil number from. Even with very liberal estimates it would be hard to imagine reaching half that.tbergs said:
If you read the article he explains where his projections come from. He is estimating 1 death for every 125 people infected and then extrapolating based on the reported number of deaths. He puts the death rate at .8 - 1.0%. Much lower than what many had believed at one point when it was closer to 4 and 5.DewieCox said:
Because it’s info that’s fairly easy to follow and updated regularly from a trusted source.CM189191 said:DewieCox said:
I think it would be better if everybody found an accurate source and stuck with it. Too many people clearly have trouble applying the info from these graphs to the situation. Having legitimate information has eased my anxiety on the situation quite a bit.pjl44 said:
It would be more helpful if they shared charts that measured per capita. Of course we're going to have more cases than most of those countries.CM189191 said:
Not sure how this data is easing anxiety.....it's terrifying information an should be treated as such
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hell-coming-mathematical-proof-185019616.html
"The attacks on 9/11 killed around 3000 people. We will be reporting a 9/11 every three days. That’s why we say “hell is coming”."Where are they getting the 2,000,000 number? Sounds like bad info from the first line.
Let's hope you're right. But the US put measures in place too slow. And don't have enough testing to get real, good numbers. Which I think is larger point of the article. We are underestimating the effect that is coming in the next couple weeks.
Some quick napkin math (disclaimer) I did with the countries who have the most cases. The US has a very high number of Deaths/1M, when compared to known Cases/1M. This leads the author to believe there are a lot of undiagnosed cases out there.
Essentially, we have a lot of catching up to do in the next couple weeks.0 -
That is correct. The lack of testing has really fucked up our ability to handle a response to this virus and made a lot of people drag their feet on how serious it is because so many are basing it just on who has been tested.DewieCox said:
I think I get it. So making an educated guess on the actual death rate and working backwards from number of deaths to make up for lack of testing?tbergs said:
This excerpt breaks it down pretty good:DewieCox said:
I still don’t see where he gets the 2mil number from. Even with very liberal estimates it would be hard to imagine reaching half that.tbergs said:
If you read the article he explains where his projections come from. He is estimating 1 death for every 125 people infected and then extrapolating based on the reported number of deaths. He puts the death rate at .8 - 1.0%. Much lower than what many had believed at one point when it was closer to 4 and 5.DewieCox said:
Because it’s info that’s fairly easy to follow and updated regularly from a trusted source.CM189191 said:DewieCox said:
I think it would be better if everybody found an accurate source and stuck with it. Too many people clearly have trouble applying the info from these graphs to the situation. Having legitimate information has eased my anxiety on the situation quite a bit.pjl44 said:
It would be more helpful if they shared charts that measured per capita. Of course we're going to have more cases than most of those countries.CM189191 said:
Not sure how this data is easing anxiety.....it's terrifying information an should be treated as such
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hell-coming-mathematical-proof-185019616.html
"The attacks on 9/11 killed around 3000 people. We will be reporting a 9/11 every three days. That’s why we say “hell is coming”."Where are they getting the 2,000,000 number? Sounds like bad info from the first line."Our estimate for the fatality rate is 0.8%; this means for every death we have 125 infections. Since we have 205 total deaths, there must have been 205 times 125 total infections on February 25th. That’s 25,625 infected people. If you understand this part of the calculation, the rest of our analysis is pretty straightforward.
The number of infected people doubles every 3 days. So, on February 28th the number of infected people doubled to 51,250 (let’s round it down to 50,000). Three days later, on March 2nd, the number of infected people doubled again to 100,000.
Do you see start to see the gravity of the situation? There were 100K infected people on March 2nd in America. We know that 0.8% of these people will die by March 26th. That means our death toll will be 800 on March 26th [you can verify the accuracy of our model on March 26th by comparing the actual death toll to our estimate]."
That's how it gets to the 2 million infected number. And using the link you provided his estimates for March 26th will actually be much higher so he may be on the low end of the estimate or off on the death rate.
This is currently where that link you posted has the USA:
The 859 is deaths as of now.
*And just for clarity, he posted this article on March 20th, when the death total was at 205.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
Wait, does everyone get this check or just unemployed?tbergs said:
Well that sucks. Has your work or pay been impacted by this at all yet? Based on what I read, my family will receive around $3400, but my job has not been impacted as of yet so while I don't mind the boost, I am not one of the people who most needs it.tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
*ding*DewieCox said:
I think I get it. So making an educated guess on the actual death rate and working backwards from number of deaths to make up for lack of testing?tbergs said:
This excerpt breaks it down pretty good:DewieCox said:
I still don’t see where he gets the 2mil number from. Even with very liberal estimates it would be hard to imagine reaching half that.tbergs said:
If you read the article he explains where his projections come from. He is estimating 1 death for every 125 people infected and then extrapolating based on the reported number of deaths. He puts the death rate at .8 - 1.0%. Much lower than what many had believed at one point when it was closer to 4 and 5.DewieCox said:
Because it’s info that’s fairly easy to follow and updated regularly from a trusted source.CM189191 said:DewieCox said:
I think it would be better if everybody found an accurate source and stuck with it. Too many people clearly have trouble applying the info from these graphs to the situation. Having legitimate information has eased my anxiety on the situation quite a bit.pjl44 said:
It would be more helpful if they shared charts that measured per capita. Of course we're going to have more cases than most of those countries.CM189191 said:
Not sure how this data is easing anxiety.....it's terrifying information an should be treated as such
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hell-coming-mathematical-proof-185019616.html
"The attacks on 9/11 killed around 3000 people. We will be reporting a 9/11 every three days. That’s why we say “hell is coming”."Where are they getting the 2,000,000 number? Sounds like bad info from the first line."Our estimate for the fatality rate is 0.8%; this means for every death we have 125 infections. Since we have 205 total deaths, there must have been 205 times 125 total infections on February 25th. That’s 25,625 infected people. If you understand this part of the calculation, the rest of our analysis is pretty straightforward.
The number of infected people doubles every 3 days. So, on February 28th the number of infected people doubled to 51,250 (let’s round it down to 50,000). Three days later, on March 2nd, the number of infected people doubled again to 100,000.
Do you see start to see the gravity of the situation? There were 100K infected people on March 2nd in America. We know that 0.8% of these people will die by March 26th. That means our death toll will be 800 on March 26th [you can verify the accuracy of our model on March 26th by comparing the actual death toll to our estimate]."
That's how it gets to the 2 million infected number. And using the link you provided his estimates for March 26th will actually be much higher so he may be on the low end of the estimate or off on the death rate.
This is currently where that link you posted has the USA:
The 859 is deaths as of now.
*And just for clarity, he posted this article on March 20th, when the death total was at 205.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
That sucks. Are you referring to the $1200 direct checks? You may still be able to draw unemployment or something at least? It looks like unemployment is supposed to be opened to an unprecedented number of new applicants like self employed, gig workers, etc, so hopefully you can find something. That’s where I am at which is not where I want to be. I would much prefer to be working and making my full pay rate but for now UE will get us through the lockdown. Hopefully there are still jobs on the other side.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
Everyone who made less than 75000 in 2018 or less than 150000 jointly is my understanding regardless of current employment status. Plus 500 per childmcgruff10 said:
Wait, does everyone get this check or just unemployed?tbergs said:
Well that sucks. Has your work or pay been impacted by this at all yet? Based on what I read, my family will receive around $3400, but my job has not been impacted as of yet so while I don't mind the boost, I am not one of the people who most needs it.tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
mcgruff10 said:
Wait, does everyone get this check or just unemployed?tbergs said:
Well that sucks. Has your work or pay been impacted by this at all yet? Based on what I read, my family will receive around $3400, but my job has not been impacted as of yet so while I don't mind the boost, I am not one of the people who most needs it.tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
Stimulus, so everyone who makes less than the amounts they list.That is absolutely one of the least important parts of this bill but will get the most noise...$1200 or even $3400 would not be a large help to a family w/o work for any period of time. Need to unroll what this means to businesses, for unemployment, etc...pretty long thing to read through.The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
static111 said:
Everyone who made less than 75000 in 2018 or less than 150000 jointly is my understanding regardless of current employment status. Plus 500 per childmcgruff10 said:
Wait, does everyone get this check or just unemployed?tbergs said:
Well that sucks. Has your work or pay been impacted by this at all yet? Based on what I read, my family will receive around $3400, but my job has not been impacted as of yet so while I don't mind the boost, I am not one of the people who most needs it.tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
A lesser amount if you made less than 100k or jointly 200k also...
Post edited by F Me In The Brain onThe love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
I am working, my live in GF won't be shortly. Anything I would have received would have went to her to pay the bills, now I will have to put out some more.static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
That sucks. Are you referring to the $1200 direct checks? You may still be able to draw unemployment or something at least? It looks like unemployment is supposed to be opened to an unprecedented number of new applicants like self employed, gig workers, etc, so hopefully you can find something. That’s where I am at which is not where I want to be. I would much prefer to be working and making my full pay rate but for now UE will get us through the lockdown. Hopefully there are still jobs on the other side.
Oh well...
0 -
Definitely not a lot but it well help. As of now I lost my spring coaching job (which carries us into summer) and my summer job is up in the air.F Me In The Brain said:mcgruff10 said:
Wait, does everyone get this check or just unemployed?tbergs said:
Well that sucks. Has your work or pay been impacted by this at all yet? Based on what I read, my family will receive around $3400, but my job has not been impacted as of yet so while I don't mind the boost, I am not one of the people who most needs it.tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
Stimulus, so everyone who makes less than the amounts they list.That is absolutely one of the least important parts of this bill but will get the most noise...$1200 or even $3400 would not be a large help to a family w/o work for any period of time. Need to unroll what this means to businesses, for unemployment, etc...pretty long thing to read through.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
You should be putting out more anyway. Stop being a cockblocker.tempo_n_groove said:
I am working, my live in GF won't be shortly. Anything I would have received would have went to her to pay the bills, now I will have to put out some more.static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
That sucks. Are you referring to the $1200 direct checks? You may still be able to draw unemployment or something at least? It looks like unemployment is supposed to be opened to an unprecedented number of new applicants like self employed, gig workers, etc, so hopefully you can find something. That’s where I am at which is not where I want to be. I would much prefer to be working and making my full pay rate but for now UE will get us through the lockdown. Hopefully there are still jobs on the other side.
Oh well...0 -
Ooh baby, behave!mrussel1 said:
You should be putting out more anyway. Stop being a cockblocker.tempo_n_groove said:
I am working, my live in GF won't be shortly. Anything I would have received would have went to her to pay the bills, now I will have to put out some more.static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:
If I am reading it right, I am over the annual salary exemption so I don't get anything.static111 said:
What do you need? Do you fall under self employment, or having a struggling business? Just wondering.....it really sucks that it won’t help you out. I wrote my idiot congressmen, not sure if it helped at all but it is good to get your specific needs out there to people crafting these bills.tempo_n_groove said:
Doesn't help me one bit. ThxHi! said:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/textF Me In The Brain said:wndowpayne said:If I heard correctly it even covers payroll for 4 months up to 100k per employee? is that right?Is there a link to this? I didn't see that listed in the stories I read but people are citing some specifics that would suggest the text of the bill is out there for review.Can someone share, if so?
Living in NY I get the short end of the stick a lot...
That sucks. Are you referring to the $1200 direct checks? You may still be able to draw unemployment or something at least? It looks like unemployment is supposed to be opened to an unprecedented number of new applicants like self employed, gig workers, etc, so hopefully you can find something. That’s where I am at which is not where I want to be. I would much prefer to be working and making my full pay rate but for now UE will get us through the lockdown. Hopefully there are still jobs on the other side.
Oh well...0 -
https://youtu.be/ZtSSpXLlVik
well it looks like Lindsey Graham is gonna play the republican bootstraps personal responsibility game and force people to go broke on principle because some people might get a little more in the short term. Meanwhile no problem giving billions to the airlines that don’t need it to actually survive. Well we were doomed from the start when the British stockholders decided to build a nation on genocide and slavery. In addition this is a temporary relief measure of four months...also you can’t draw unemployment if you quit your job only if you get laid off. He is telling a story that people are going to quit work and draw unemployment. Good luck it’s hard enough to get when you are laid off. These people and their bullshit personal political agendas right now....Post edited by static111 onScio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1242889514328219649?s=21
How can people just sit there and let assholes like this get away with saying stuff like this! Not sure what’s more shocking this idiots opinion or that the Baffoon has a bible teacher lol
jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help