The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
You misread. You thought he was referring to women voters, when he was referring to women candidates. I saw the misreading as it occurred. It’s not a big deal! So why does everyone have to pretend it didn’t happen?hedonist said:
I don’t believe I misread. And no, I am not calling SC a sexist. The comment could be taken that way though.ecdanc said:
Jesus Christ, people. She misread the post. It’s not a big deal, but do you really have to pretend it didn’t happen just because you dislike SC?mrussel1 said:
Only if we let it....cincybearcat said:
Get used to it, it’s the new norm around here.hedonist said:
Jesus, I feel like I'm in a bizarro world around here at times.ecdanc said:
Why are you assuming that only women would vote for someone because they’re a woman?hedonist said:
Actually, his further response validated my question.ecdanc said:
You’re willfully misreading SC’s posts even after he clarified. Or you are struggling with reading again. .mrussel1 said:
You're so woke that you get sexism more than Hedo... who's actually a woman. You probably understand racism better than MLK did too, that's how impressive you are.ecdanc said:
Just stopmrussel1 said:
That's kind of sexist, to believe that women vote primarily on gender.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Based on the candidates (Amy and Warren) being women.hedonist said:
Above, bolded. I don't think I misread your comment, but apologies if I did.Spiritual_Chaos said:
When did I say that?hedonist said:
What? Because women wouldn’t be capable of choosing their candidate regardless of gender?Spiritual_Chaos said:
From what I've seen, many vote based on personality, the candidate and other factors. So the whole "the moderate block" is bigger isn't completely failsafe.Lerxst1992 said:The problem is four candidates are similar to Amy and two similar to Bernie. Even if far fewer vote “socialist” Bernie wants to change the rules so he wins based on that simple math.
E.g. Saw somewhere that Warrens lost voters went to Buttagieg more than Bernie. And many Biden voters having Bernie as their second choice etc.
I would also guess many Amy voters and many Liz voters would go to eachother, based on them being women.
Why would I vote for anyone based solely (or even mostly) on what lies between their legs?
How you extrapolated that from what I said, I have no idea.
This is hilarious.0 -
Does someone want to insist this is an apple?
0 -
Hold the tip of your tongue and try to say Apple.ecdanc said:
Does someone want to insist this is an apple?Post edited by cincybearcat onhippiemom = goodness0 -
Activities from your job!! Fun!!!!cincybearcat said:
Hold the tip of your tongue and try to say Apple. It’s you.ecdanc said:
Does someone want to insist this is an apple?0 -
To get away from the condescending shit....
Sanders looks to have won Nevada pretty big. I guess maybe they should have focused on him vs Bloomberg in the debates, who would have thoughthippiemom = goodness0 -
Agnes? Is that you?ecdanc said:
Activities from your job!! Fun!!!!cincybearcat said:
Hold the tip of your tongue and try to say Apple. It’s you.ecdanc said:
Does someone want to insist this is an apple?The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
Lordy, I get it.I love how some channels are calling it “America’s Choice”. We’re talking just Nevada though, no?0
-
Fuck Bernie Bros. Just Trumpeters from the other side.The love he receives is the love that is saved0
-
Based on what? You personally wanting it to be that way?F Me In The Brain said:Fuck Bernie Bros. Just Trumpeters from the other side."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
With you drawing bizarre conclusions from my post - I must ask, what did you read then? And what in my clarification went straight over your head?hedonist said:
I don’t believe I misread. And no, I am not calling SC a sexist. The comment could be taken that way though.ecdanc said:
Jesus Christ, people. She misread the post. It’s not a big deal, but do you really have to pretend it didn’t happen just because you dislike SC?mrussel1 said:
Only if we let it....cincybearcat said:
Get used to it, it’s the new norm around here.hedonist said:
Jesus, I feel like I'm in a bizarro world around here at times.ecdanc said:
Why are you assuming that only women would vote for someone because they’re a woman?hedonist said:
Actually, his further response validated my question.ecdanc said:
You’re willfully misreading SC’s posts even after he clarified. Or you are struggling with reading again. .mrussel1 said:
You're so woke that you get sexism more than Hedo... who's actually a woman. You probably understand racism better than MLK did too, that's how impressive you are.ecdanc said:
Just stopmrussel1 said:
That's kind of sexist, to believe that women vote primarily on gender.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Based on the candidates (Amy and Warren) being women.hedonist said:
Above, bolded. I don't think I misread your comment, but apologies if I did.Spiritual_Chaos said:
When did I say that?hedonist said:
What? Because women wouldn’t be capable of choosing their candidate regardless of gender?Spiritual_Chaos said:
From what I've seen, many vote based on personality, the candidate and other factors. So the whole "the moderate block" is bigger isn't completely failsafe.Lerxst1992 said:The problem is four candidates are similar to Amy and two similar to Bernie. Even if far fewer vote “socialist” Bernie wants to change the rules so he wins based on that simple math.
E.g. Saw somewhere that Warrens lost voters went to Buttagieg more than Bernie. And many Biden voters having Bernie as their second choice etc.
I would also guess many Amy voters and many Liz voters would go to eachother, based on them being women.
Why would I vote for anyone based solely (or even mostly) on what lies between their legs?
How you extrapolated that from what I said, I have no idea.
This is hilarious.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
See here, how you don't care to respond to the actual point and content of ecdancs post but ignores it because it highlights you being wrong?mrussel1 said:
I like SC quite a bit. He's grown on me... other than the video spammingecdanc said:
Jesus Christ, people. She misread the post. It’s not a big deal, but do you really have to pretend it didn’t happen just because you dislike SC?mrussel1 said:
Only if we let it....cincybearcat said:
Get used to it, it’s the new norm around here.hedonist said:
Jesus, I feel like I'm in a bizarro world around here at times.ecdanc said:
Why are you assuming that only women would vote for someone because they’re a woman?hedonist said:
Actually, his further response validated my question.ecdanc said:
You’re willfully misreading SC’s posts even after he clarified. Or you are struggling with reading again. .mrussel1 said:
You're so woke that you get sexism more than Hedo... who's actually a woman. You probably understand racism better than MLK did too, that's how impressive you are.ecdanc said:
Just stopmrussel1 said:
That's kind of sexist, to believe that women vote primarily on gender.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Based on the candidates (Amy and Warren) being women.hedonist said:
Above, bolded. I don't think I misread your comment, but apologies if I did.Spiritual_Chaos said:
When did I say that?hedonist said:
What? Because women wouldn’t be capable of choosing their candidate regardless of gender?Spiritual_Chaos said:
From what I've seen, many vote based on personality, the candidate and other factors. So the whole "the moderate block" is bigger isn't completely failsafe.Lerxst1992 said:The problem is four candidates are similar to Amy and two similar to Bernie. Even if far fewer vote “socialist” Bernie wants to change the rules so he wins based on that simple math.
E.g. Saw somewhere that Warrens lost voters went to Buttagieg more than Bernie. And many Biden voters having Bernie as their second choice etc.
I would also guess many Amy voters and many Liz voters would go to eachother, based on them being women.
Why would I vote for anyone based solely (or even mostly) on what lies between their legs?
How you extrapolated that from what I said, I have no idea.
Do you often have problems admitting when you are wrong?
I mean, when @cincybearcat jumps in (who I would bet have not even read the string of posts related to the specific discussion but just want to oppose ecdanc) and is being completely wrong, you (and/or @hedonist) could have stepped in and said "chill out cincy, we were actually totally wrong and misread Mr Chaos post a while back", whether this wrong stems from nonchalance, problems with reading comprehension or sexism. I mean, I did clarify and asked you people to re-read the post instead of accusing me of sexism (ironically enough).
Instead it seems in an almost Trumpian way being wrong doesn't matter to you - and won't be acknowledged as long as you have people cheering you on when being wrong.
(The same with that "how to use quote marks" BS you tried to pull a few days ago, which @mcgruff10 jumped on - and that you (or mcgruff) never owned up to)
Just curious.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
The toxic Pete Pals. Just like the Trumpeters and also not far enough from the other side.
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
You muzzle a dog. I've never heard of that term being pointed at a particular race or sex. That's a reach.Spiritual_Chaos said:The toxic Pete Pals. Just like the Trumpeters and also not far enough from the other side.0 -
It's because everyone is past it.Spiritual_Chaos said:
See here, how you don't care to respond to the actual point and content of ecdancs post but ignores it because it highlights you being wrong?mrussel1 said:
I like SC quite a bit. He's grown on me... other than the video spammingecdanc said:
Jesus Christ, people. She misread the post. It’s not a big deal, but do you really have to pretend it didn’t happen just because you dislike SC?mrussel1 said:
Only if we let it....cincybearcat said:
Get used to it, it’s the new norm around here.hedonist said:
Jesus, I feel like I'm in a bizarro world around here at times.ecdanc said:
Why are you assuming that only women would vote for someone because they’re a woman?hedonist said:
Actually, his further response validated my question.ecdanc said:
You’re willfully misreading SC’s posts even after he clarified. Or you are struggling with reading again. .mrussel1 said:
You're so woke that you get sexism more than Hedo... who's actually a woman. You probably understand racism better than MLK did too, that's how impressive you are.ecdanc said:
Just stopmrussel1 said:
That's kind of sexist, to believe that women vote primarily on gender.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Based on the candidates (Amy and Warren) being women.hedonist said:
Above, bolded. I don't think I misread your comment, but apologies if I did.Spiritual_Chaos said:
When did I say that?hedonist said:
What? Because women wouldn’t be capable of choosing their candidate regardless of gender?Spiritual_Chaos said:
From what I've seen, many vote based on personality, the candidate and other factors. So the whole "the moderate block" is bigger isn't completely failsafe.Lerxst1992 said:The problem is four candidates are similar to Amy and two similar to Bernie. Even if far fewer vote “socialist” Bernie wants to change the rules so he wins based on that simple math.
E.g. Saw somewhere that Warrens lost voters went to Buttagieg more than Bernie. And many Biden voters having Bernie as their second choice etc.
I would also guess many Amy voters and many Liz voters would go to eachother, based on them being women.
Why would I vote for anyone based solely (or even mostly) on what lies between their legs?
How you extrapolated that from what I said, I have no idea.
Do you often have problems admitting when you are wrong?
I mean, when @cincybearcat jumps in (who I would bet have not even read the string of posts related to the specific discussion but just want to oppose ecdanc) and is being completely wrong, you (and/or @hedonist) could have stepped in and said "chill out cincy, we were actually totally wrong and misread Mr Chaos post a while back", whether this wrong stems from nonchalance, problems with reading comprehension or sexism. I mean, I did clarify and asked you people to re-read the post instead of accusing me of sexism (ironically enough).
Instead it seems in an almost Trumpian way being wrong doesn't matter to you - and won't be acknowledged as long as you have people cheering you on when being wrong.
(The same with that "how to use quote marks" BS you tried to pull a few days ago, which @mcgruff10 jumped on - and that you (or mcgruff) never owned up to)
Just curious.0 -
Can we stop with the people don’t read nonsense?
SC - you states that Amy and Warren voters would go to the other? Is that right?
You think so because they are women. Right?
So you think some people are only voting for them cause they are women? Or are you quoting a news source that stated this? Not agreeing or disagreeing just trying to understand why you said that?And yes i went back... I think far enough to look for it. But coulda accidentally scrolled passed it on my phone.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Clearly there's no history of referring to women--specifically--as dogs.mrussel1 said:
You muzzle a dog. I've never heard of that term being pointed at a particular race or sex. That's a reach.Spiritual_Chaos said:The toxic Pete Pals. Just like the Trumpeters and also not far enough from the other side.0 -
You have a tendency to move past things at the precise moment your mistakes/ignorance are exposed...mrussel1 said:
It's because everyone is past it.Spiritual_Chaos said:
See here, how you don't care to respond to the actual point and content of ecdancs post but ignores it because it highlights you being wrong?mrussel1 said:
I like SC quite a bit. He's grown on me... other than the video spammingecdanc said:
Jesus Christ, people. She misread the post. It’s not a big deal, but do you really have to pretend it didn’t happen just because you dislike SC?mrussel1 said:
Only if we let it....cincybearcat said:
Get used to it, it’s the new norm around here.hedonist said:
Jesus, I feel like I'm in a bizarro world around here at times.ecdanc said:
Why are you assuming that only women would vote for someone because they’re a woman?hedonist said:
Actually, his further response validated my question.ecdanc said:
You’re willfully misreading SC’s posts even after he clarified. Or you are struggling with reading again. .mrussel1 said:
You're so woke that you get sexism more than Hedo... who's actually a woman. You probably understand racism better than MLK did too, that's how impressive you are.ecdanc said:
Just stopmrussel1 said:
That's kind of sexist, to believe that women vote primarily on gender.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Based on the candidates (Amy and Warren) being women.hedonist said:
Above, bolded. I don't think I misread your comment, but apologies if I did.Spiritual_Chaos said:
When did I say that?hedonist said:
What? Because women wouldn’t be capable of choosing their candidate regardless of gender?Spiritual_Chaos said:
From what I've seen, many vote based on personality, the candidate and other factors. So the whole "the moderate block" is bigger isn't completely failsafe.Lerxst1992 said:The problem is four candidates are similar to Amy and two similar to Bernie. Even if far fewer vote “socialist” Bernie wants to change the rules so he wins based on that simple math.
E.g. Saw somewhere that Warrens lost voters went to Buttagieg more than Bernie. And many Biden voters having Bernie as their second choice etc.
I would also guess many Amy voters and many Liz voters would go to eachother, based on them being women.
Why would I vote for anyone based solely (or even mostly) on what lies between their legs?
How you extrapolated that from what I said, I have no idea.
Do you often have problems admitting when you are wrong?
I mean, when @cincybearcat jumps in (who I would bet have not even read the string of posts related to the specific discussion but just want to oppose ecdanc) and is being completely wrong, you (and/or @hedonist) could have stepped in and said "chill out cincy, we were actually totally wrong and misread Mr Chaos post a while back", whether this wrong stems from nonchalance, problems with reading comprehension or sexism. I mean, I did clarify and asked you people to re-read the post instead of accusing me of sexism (ironically enough).
Instead it seems in an almost Trumpian way being wrong doesn't matter to you - and won't be acknowledged as long as you have people cheering you on when being wrong.
(The same with that "how to use quote marks" BS you tried to pull a few days ago, which @mcgruff10 jumped on - and that you (or mcgruff) never owned up to)
Just curious.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help