All things Transgender related
Comments
-
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision."California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?"That sounds barbaric to me. If I'm off on this, maybe someone can explain why it's OK, although I have a hard time imagining I could be in favor of something like that."Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision."That sounds very sensible."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
People: How can you give hormone replacement therapy to young children?
But at the same time: Lets mutilate and cut off a bit of a young child's genitals!Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
I can't find anything about such a case beyond some right wing and christian news sources trying to raise controversy over providing gender affirming health care and mental health care for children 12 and older who are foster care or about parents allowing their __ year old child to transition, but not with any physical changes or hormones.oftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
That was all I could find, too, though I’ll admit I didn’t go beyond about three pages in google.tbergs said:
I can't find anything about such a case beyond some right wing and christian news sources trying to raise controversy over providing gender affirming health care and mental health care for children 12 and older who are foster care or about parents allowing their __ year old child to transition, but not with any physical changes or hormones.oftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
closest as I could find from a source I know... from 2012
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.0 -
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Probably, but we know that controversy sells, so he has an incentive to misrepresent things. I don't know Rogan's work, but I'm stating that broadly.mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.0 -
Rogan?mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
heard any stance on this since this was posted coming up on EIGHT YEARS AGO.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Rogan?mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
You make a good point, but anyone who makes that statement and their source material is Breitbart, doesn't get a pass from me, unless this was a form of sarcasm. Hard to tell with these types of post and no context around it.mickeyrat said:
heard any stance on this since this was posted coming up on EIGHT YEARS AGO.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Rogan?mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
It's a hopeless situation...0 -
true. ine fact not mentioned before now here, rogan is a major stoner. his stoned late night surfing may leave him susceptible to conspiracy. but to his credit, he will call himself out for dumb shit he once thought that he evolved from.tbergs said:
You make a good point, but anyone who makes that statement and their source material is Breitbart, doesn't get a pass from me, unless this was a form of sarcasm. Hard to tell with these types of post and no context around it.mickeyrat said:
heard any stance on this since this was posted coming up on EIGHT YEARS AGO.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Rogan?mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
one thing I've noticed since bernie posted that clip is every guest on the podcast since has been mma .......mickeyrat said:
true. ine fact not mentioned before now here, rogan is a major stoner. his stoned late night surfing may leave him susceptible to conspiracy. but to his credit, he will call himself out for dumb shit he once thought that he evolved from.tbergs said:
You make a good point, but anyone who makes that statement and their source material is Breitbart, doesn't get a pass from me, unless this was a form of sarcasm. Hard to tell with these types of post and no context around it.mickeyrat said:
heard any stance on this since this was posted coming up on EIGHT YEARS AGO.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Rogan?mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
We've come full circle back to Joe Rogan!!mickeyrat said:
one thing I've noticed since bernie posted that clip is every guest on the podcast since has been mma .......mickeyrat said:
true. ine fact not mentioned before now here, rogan is a major stoner. his stoned late night surfing may leave him susceptible to conspiracy. but to his credit, he will call himself out for dumb shit he once thought that he evolved from.tbergs said:
You make a good point, but anyone who makes that statement and their source material is Breitbart, doesn't get a pass from me, unless this was a form of sarcasm. Hard to tell with these types of post and no context around it.mickeyrat said:
heard any stance on this since this was posted coming up on EIGHT YEARS AGO.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Rogan?mickeyrat said:
possible but I think he is more internet savvy than that.tempo_n_groove said:
Or a rumored news story spirals through social media and is regarded as fact? Happens all the time.mickeyrat said:
couldnt find it either, so as sometimes happens with rogan he misunderstood the transition and perhaps took it to medical intervention erroneouslyoftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
0 -
no on the medical intervention. it would be "if you still feel strongly and you want to do that when you are 18". The human brain and body do not reach full maturity until the age of 25. I encourage the child to use what they have and dress the way they want, but accept their human body. Maybe it would work, maybe it would not work, once a child is an adult they will do what they want.mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.
Amy The Great #74594
New Orleans LA 7/4/95 reschedule 9/17/95
Chicago IL 1998, 10/9/00, 06/18/03, 05/16/06, 05/17/06
08/23/09, 08/24/09, Lolla 08/05/07
Champaign IL 4/23/03
Grand Rapids MI VFC 10/03/04
Grand Rapids MI 19May06
Noblesville IN 05/07/10 Cleveland OH 05/09/10
PJ 20 2011
Baltimore MD, Charlottesville VA, Seattle WA 2013
St. Louis MO, Milwaukee WI 2014
Tampa FL, Chicago IL, Lexington KY 2016
Missoula MT 20180 -
https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2019/transgender-custody-statementtbergs said:
I can't find anything about such a case beyond some right wing and christian news sources trying to raise controversy over providing gender affirming health care and mental health care for children 12 and older who are foster care or about parents allowing their __ year old child to transition, but not with any physical changes or hormones.oftenreading said:mickeyrat said:brianlux said:
"hormone replacement in young children"? Is that even legal?mickeyrat said:amethgr8 said:As parents, you have to make decisions for your children. Formula or breast milk, meat or no meat, TV or music, etc it goes on for years before children make their own conscious choices. as long as you give children love, support and acceptance, maybe a bit of how to overcome potential obstacles they will most likey be okay with what they choose.
i think by default a parent that has overcome the social boxes they were brought up in, will naturally elimate those same boxes for their own children.
i never appreciated gender roles much, but they are a big part of any society.
i think it's ironic for a person that does not want to be gender labeled, dress in an attire that is clearly gender based, that is confusing to me.do you think such parental choices should include medical intervention i.e. hormone replacement in young children?to reference kinda what started all this here from the dem thread and joe rogans supposed endorsement bernie put up on his site.California case.... 3 yr old I think? as of last year?Rogans point is, if these kids are in fact trans. great. love nuture support. let them grow first. they can decide for themselves once grown and able to make an informed decision.
Link to that please? Because using hormone therapy in a child that young is both contrary to the existing treatment guidelines, which specify the child being old enough to provide informed consent and which is typically considered 16, and also pretty much pointless, as the influence of sex hormones in children that young is minimal in their development. There are of course effects on in utero development, and then significant effects once puberty starts rolling, but in between gonadal hormonal levels are very low.
I'm guessing that you're actually referring to "social transitioning", not medical.
"Claims that a transgender child would receive surgical or irreversible hormonal treatment do not reflect the reality of medical practice."0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help






