North American Tour Odds
Comments
-
I want to get tickets to MSG- is it better to put down reserved as my first and only priority or best available?0
-
I think your ok as you would have to go through the 5 steps and punch in credit card info again.lfitzpatrick9 said:Here’s a question, every time I login to check the odds on the tickets today site does that void my ticket request that I got the email confirmation with. Or no it has no affect on my order so I can check it as many times as I please ?0 -
MSG is falling fast. 11% and 66% last I saw.MLPS: 6-30-98 ; East Troy: 10-8-00 ; St. Paul: 6-16-03 ; East Troy: 6-21-03 ; Camden: 7-5-03 ; Grand Rapids: 10-3-04 ; Thunder Bay: 9-9-05 ; East Rutherford: 6-1-06; East Rutherford: 6-3-06 ; St. Paul: 6-26-06 ; St. Paul: 6-27-06, Chicago 8/23/09, Chicago 8/24/09, EV MLPS 7-2-11, PJ20 Alpine Valley 9-3-11, PJ20 Alpine Valley 9-4-11; Wrigley 7-19-13, St Paul 10-19-14; Wrigley 8-22-16; Seattle 8-8-18, Seattle 8-10-18; EV NY 2-4-220
-
Yeah I hope so. 12 hours can’t come soon enough sojefft said:
I think your ok as you would have to go through the 5 steps and punch in credit card info again.lfitzpatrick9 said:Here’s a question, every time I login to check the odds on the tickets today site does that void my ticket request that I got the email confirmation with. Or no it has no affect on my order so I can check it as many times as I please ?
we know the final odds. I’m assuming MSG will go
down to 50% which would be in my opinion great since in 2016 it was like 17% haha0 -
YES! that's why I say don't sweat the odds, just ask for what you want and you'll be surprised. They don't tell the whole story, only that a lot of people are asking for certain shows, and not as much a few others.tdawe said:
Correct. They're useful/interesting information as far as it goes (mainly setting expectations) but they do not give you all the information you'd need to make perfectly rational choices.ecdanc said:
I agree, which--in combination with the rankings--makes the odds less than informative.NewfieintheUSA said:
I don't believe so, in the past the percentages were of all entriesoo712 said:So the percentage is only the percent of your first pick? Like if oakland is 46/99. I have a 46% chance of getting the floor if its my first choice? If its my second choice it's basically impossible to get the floor?0 -
Some of us don't like surprises!gotthebottle said:
YES! that's why I say don't sweat the odds, just ask for what you want and you'll be surprised. They don't tell the whole story, only that a lot of people are asking for certain shows, and not as much a few others.tdawe said:
Correct. They're useful/interesting information as far as it goes (mainly setting expectations) but they do not give you all the information you'd need to make perfectly rational choices.ecdanc said:
I agree, which--in combination with the rankings--makes the odds less than informative.NewfieintheUSA said:
I don't believe so, in the past the percentages were of all entriesoo712 said:So the percentage is only the percent of your first pick? Like if oakland is 46/99. I have a 46% chance of getting the floor if its my first choice? If its my second choice it's basically impossible to get the floor?0 -
ecdanc said:
Where did you find that quoted language?Lerxst1992 said:Mozzy said:
The reason I think you're saying the same thing is that 10C has told people they draw the lottery person by person from the lottery pool which would imply that if your name is drawn they go to your first choice that is available. So you if you have Baltimore GA ranked as your first choice and it is available, you get that. If your first choice is not available, they go to your second choice which would be Baltimore Reserved. If that's not available, they move down the list. People have won the lottery for 3rd or 4th choices which were lower odds and earlier shows than their 1st or 2nd choices which they lost, so it would seem to confirm that 10C goes by person-to-person rather than show by show. They have also stated that they consider GA to be best available over reserved seats.ricardofurriel said:
Can you elaborate please?Mozzy said:
I feel like you're both saying the same thingNewfieintheUSA said:
No, it would bericardofurriel said:
So I'm sorry if I'm being slow. I guess I'm getting old.PJNB said:
You do cities as priorities not sections for those cities.ricardofurriel said:
Buddy and I are thinking Baltimore GA as 1st choice. It’s the only show we have in common. It’s at 19% atm... I’m just concerned I’ll strike out in both if I go Baltimore GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2.gotthebottle said:
what's your first choice?ricardofurriel said:MSG at 13/74. Do you think NYC Reserved as a 2nd choice will strike me out?
In the "old" system", I would have done
1- Baltimore GA
2- NYC Reserved
3- Baltimore Reserved
In this new system, if I were to put best available for both shows, it would look something like this:
1- Baltimore GA
2- Baltimore Reserved
3- NYC GA
4- NYC Reserved
My concern is that if I put best available for Baltimore and don't get GA, I would get my "second choice" (by default) which is Baltimore Reserved. Let's say that someone has Quebec GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2. Would he/she/they have better odds than me to get NYC reserved?
I'm sorry if I'm making it more complicated than it is. Thank you.
1. Baltimore Best Available
2. NYC Best Available
If you are selected, they will check to see if there are GA tickets left, if so you get them, otherwise you get Reserved
So putting 1) Baltimore Best available would be no different than having 1) Baltimore GA and 2) Baltimore Best Available
A lot of confusing replies to this. I believe they are picking round by round. If you put NY GA as your first round pick (let's say those odds drop to 5%) there is a 95% chance you are not getting US tickets east of the mississippi.
"During the drawing, we will randomly draw members who have made that show their #1 priority. If any tickets remain, the system will randomly draw names of members who have chosen that show as their #2 priority"
If you really could see any show, picking NY first runs the risk of eliminating any chance at GA for every show.
It sorta looks like an older page but it says 2020 at top and "updated monday 13:05"
https://help.pearljam.com/hc/en-us/articles/205143590-Pre-sale-Drawing?mobile_site=true
0 -
Fascinating. Thank you. Even if it doesn't apply to this tour, it does explain why so many people stress about the rankings, etc. It never occurred to me they'd do it that way until I saw posts here. Definitely makes me reconsider my own rankings.Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:
Where did you find that quoted language?Lerxst1992 said:Mozzy said:
The reason I think you're saying the same thing is that 10C has told people they draw the lottery person by person from the lottery pool which would imply that if your name is drawn they go to your first choice that is available. So you if you have Baltimore GA ranked as your first choice and it is available, you get that. If your first choice is not available, they go to your second choice which would be Baltimore Reserved. If that's not available, they move down the list. People have won the lottery for 3rd or 4th choices which were lower odds and earlier shows than their 1st or 2nd choices which they lost, so it would seem to confirm that 10C goes by person-to-person rather than show by show. They have also stated that they consider GA to be best available over reserved seats.ricardofurriel said:
Can you elaborate please?Mozzy said:
I feel like you're both saying the same thingNewfieintheUSA said:
No, it would bericardofurriel said:
So I'm sorry if I'm being slow. I guess I'm getting old.PJNB said:
You do cities as priorities not sections for those cities.ricardofurriel said:
Buddy and I are thinking Baltimore GA as 1st choice. It’s the only show we have in common. It’s at 19% atm... I’m just concerned I’ll strike out in both if I go Baltimore GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2.gotthebottle said:
what's your first choice?ricardofurriel said:MSG at 13/74. Do you think NYC Reserved as a 2nd choice will strike me out?
In the "old" system", I would have done
1- Baltimore GA
2- NYC Reserved
3- Baltimore Reserved
In this new system, if I were to put best available for both shows, it would look something like this:
1- Baltimore GA
2- Baltimore Reserved
3- NYC GA
4- NYC Reserved
My concern is that if I put best available for Baltimore and don't get GA, I would get my "second choice" (by default) which is Baltimore Reserved. Let's say that someone has Quebec GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2. Would he/she/they have better odds than me to get NYC reserved?
I'm sorry if I'm making it more complicated than it is. Thank you.
1. Baltimore Best Available
2. NYC Best Available
If you are selected, they will check to see if there are GA tickets left, if so you get them, otherwise you get Reserved
So putting 1) Baltimore Best available would be no different than having 1) Baltimore GA and 2) Baltimore Best Available
A lot of confusing replies to this. I believe they are picking round by round. If you put NY GA as your first round pick (let's say those odds drop to 5%) there is a 95% chance you are not getting US tickets east of the mississippi.
"During the drawing, we will randomly draw members who have made that show their #1 priority. If any tickets remain, the system will randomly draw names of members who have chosen that show as their #2 priority"
If you really could see any show, picking NY first runs the risk of eliminating any chance at GA for every show.
It sorta looks like an older page but it says 2020 at top and "updated monday 13:05"
https://help.pearljam.com/hc/en-us/articles/205143590-Pre-sale-Drawing?mobile_site=true0 -
That's definitely old info from a 10C run lottery.Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:
Where did you find that quoted language?Lerxst1992 said:Mozzy said:
The reason I think you're saying the same thing is that 10C has told people they draw the lottery person by person from the lottery pool which would imply that if your name is drawn they go to your first choice that is available. So you if you have Baltimore GA ranked as your first choice and it is available, you get that. If your first choice is not available, they go to your second choice which would be Baltimore Reserved. If that's not available, they move down the list. People have won the lottery for 3rd or 4th choices which were lower odds and earlier shows than their 1st or 2nd choices which they lost, so it would seem to confirm that 10C goes by person-to-person rather than show by show. They have also stated that they consider GA to be best available over reserved seats.ricardofurriel said:
Can you elaborate please?Mozzy said:
I feel like you're both saying the same thingNewfieintheUSA said:
No, it would bericardofurriel said:
So I'm sorry if I'm being slow. I guess I'm getting old.PJNB said:
You do cities as priorities not sections for those cities.ricardofurriel said:
Buddy and I are thinking Baltimore GA as 1st choice. It’s the only show we have in common. It’s at 19% atm... I’m just concerned I’ll strike out in both if I go Baltimore GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2.gotthebottle said:
what's your first choice?ricardofurriel said:MSG at 13/74. Do you think NYC Reserved as a 2nd choice will strike me out?
In the "old" system", I would have done
1- Baltimore GA
2- NYC Reserved
3- Baltimore Reserved
In this new system, if I were to put best available for both shows, it would look something like this:
1- Baltimore GA
2- Baltimore Reserved
3- NYC GA
4- NYC Reserved
My concern is that if I put best available for Baltimore and don't get GA, I would get my "second choice" (by default) which is Baltimore Reserved. Let's say that someone has Quebec GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2. Would he/she/they have better odds than me to get NYC reserved?
I'm sorry if I'm making it more complicated than it is. Thank you.
1. Baltimore Best Available
2. NYC Best Available
If you are selected, they will check to see if there are GA tickets left, if so you get them, otherwise you get Reserved
So putting 1) Baltimore Best available would be no different than having 1) Baltimore GA and 2) Baltimore Best Available
A lot of confusing replies to this. I believe they are picking round by round. If you put NY GA as your first round pick (let's say those odds drop to 5%) there is a 95% chance you are not getting US tickets east of the mississippi.
"During the drawing, we will randomly draw members who have made that show their #1 priority. If any tickets remain, the system will randomly draw names of members who have chosen that show as their #2 priority"
If you really could see any show, picking NY first runs the risk of eliminating any chance at GA for every show.
It sorta looks like an older page but it says 2020 at top and "updated monday 13:05"
https://help.pearljam.com/hc/en-us/articles/205143590-Pre-sale-Drawing?mobile_site=true
Ticketmaster is running this one.
This weekend we rock Portland0 -
Only a few % points from the last time it was updated - I'm beyond shocked it's not even lower for MSG, one show etc.Bissy77 said:MSG is falling fast. 11% and 66% last I saw.or you can come to terms and realize
you're the only one who can forgive yourself oh yeah...
makes much more sense to live in the present tense...
1995: 7/11 (Chicago) 2009: 8/23, 8/24 (Chicago) 2010: 5/9 (Cleveland) 2013 7/19 (Chicago) 2016: 4/9 (Miami), 5/1 (NYC), 8/20 & 8/22 (Chicago)
2018: 8/18 (Chicago) & 8/20 (Chicago) 2022: 9/11 (NYC), 9/18 (STL) 2023: 9/5 (Chicago), 9/7 (Chicago) 2024: 8/29 (Chicago), 8/31 (Chicago)0 -
Yup - the only explanation that seems plausible is that they got a ton of seats. We shall see though.IlliniGuy76 said:
Only a few % points from the last time it was updated - I'm beyond shocked it's not even lower for MSG, one show etc.Bissy77 said:MSG is falling fast. 11% and 66% last I saw.Camden 2 2006, Newark 2010, Barclays 2 2013, Central Park 2015, MSG 2 2016, Wrigley 1 2016, Rome 2018, Prague 2018, Asbury Park 2021, EV & Earthlings NYC 1 2022, MSG 2022, Louisville 2022, Dublin 2024, MSG 1 2024, MSG 2 20240 -
From what I've read over the years what you put in priority 1 has always been the most important factor.
The way this leg shaped up its rough reading so many say "hey im from Antarctica maybe I'll throw in a chance for MSG "
If fans want a decent chance to see this band and dont live anywhere near MSG, that should be the last show they consider for this lottery. Especially GA. Especially this tour with so few shows in the east.0 -
Agree! Personally, I don’t see any other way of doing the odds without making the data meaningless. People who choose popular shows as low priority and thus having zero chance, would skew the numbers down. My guess is that the percentages actually ARE for people who choose that show as top priority. But I am not certain!ecdanc said:
I agree, which--in combination with the rankings--makes the odds less than informative.NewfieintheUSA said:
I don't believe so, in the past the percentages were of all entriesoo712 said:So the percentage is only the percent of your first pick? Like if oakland is 46/99. I have a 46% chance of getting the floor if its my first choice? If its my second choice it's basically impossible to get the floor?0 -
Why would you put them last if you want to travel?Lerxst1992 said:From what I've read over the years what you put in priority 1 has always been the most important factor.
The way this leg shaped up its rough reading so many say "hey im from Antarctica maybe I'll throw in a chance for MSG "
If fans want a decent chance to see this band and dont live anywhere near MSG, that should be the last show they consider for this lottery. Especially GA. Especially this tour with so few shows in the east.0 -
I know there are people who put MSG as like...their 6th choice as a "What the hell, i probably wont get it, but lets give it a shot"...for GA. That is messing with the odds.Turn this anger into
Nuclear fission0 -
Baltimore or bust!___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
Which is why odds should be for 1st priority only. Otherwise they are largely meaningless.Vedd Hedd said:I know there are people who put MSG as like...their 6th choice as a "What the hell, i probably wont get it, but lets give it a shot"...for GA. That is messing with the odds.0 -
Yeah, seems like a crummy/less fair way to run it because it reduces people chances of getting multiple shows and particularly if you live in NYC or other difficult to get shows. And would make it seem nearly impossible to get more than one show of GA tix. If you rank any of the GA options that are less than 50% below 1st choice (say MSG), you have a very limited chance of getting anything lower on your list because it'll be your 2nd or 3rd choice and all the GA tix will have gone to people who ranked it 1st choice. Now you've missed out on your 1st choice of MSG and it's virtually impossible to get anything below 1st choice for GA seats. That's a bummer, but with the reserved seats so high, I guess it's less painful. Seems like going round-by-round makes much more sense and is more fair, overall.ecdanc said:
Fascinating. Thank you. Even if it doesn't apply to this tour, it does explain why so many people stress about the rankings, etc. It never occurred to me they'd do it that way until I saw posts here. Definitely makes me reconsider my own rankings.Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:
Where did you find that quoted language?Lerxst1992 said:Mozzy said:
The reason I think you're saying the same thing is that 10C has told people they draw the lottery person by person from the lottery pool which would imply that if your name is drawn they go to your first choice that is available. So you if you have Baltimore GA ranked as your first choice and it is available, you get that. If your first choice is not available, they go to your second choice which would be Baltimore Reserved. If that's not available, they move down the list. People have won the lottery for 3rd or 4th choices which were lower odds and earlier shows than their 1st or 2nd choices which they lost, so it would seem to confirm that 10C goes by person-to-person rather than show by show. They have also stated that they consider GA to be best available over reserved seats.ricardofurriel said:
Can you elaborate please?Mozzy said:
I feel like you're both saying the same thingNewfieintheUSA said:
No, it would bericardofurriel said:
So I'm sorry if I'm being slow. I guess I'm getting old.PJNB said:
You do cities as priorities not sections for those cities.ricardofurriel said:
Buddy and I are thinking Baltimore GA as 1st choice. It’s the only show we have in common. It’s at 19% atm... I’m just concerned I’ll strike out in both if I go Baltimore GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2.gotthebottle said:
what's your first choice?ricardofurriel said:MSG at 13/74. Do you think NYC Reserved as a 2nd choice will strike me out?
In the "old" system", I would have done
1- Baltimore GA
2- NYC Reserved
3- Baltimore Reserved
In this new system, if I were to put best available for both shows, it would look something like this:
1- Baltimore GA
2- Baltimore Reserved
3- NYC GA
4- NYC Reserved
My concern is that if I put best available for Baltimore and don't get GA, I would get my "second choice" (by default) which is Baltimore Reserved. Let's say that someone has Quebec GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2. Would he/she/they have better odds than me to get NYC reserved?
I'm sorry if I'm making it more complicated than it is. Thank you.
1. Baltimore Best Available
2. NYC Best Available
If you are selected, they will check to see if there are GA tickets left, if so you get them, otherwise you get Reserved
So putting 1) Baltimore Best available would be no different than having 1) Baltimore GA and 2) Baltimore Best Available
A lot of confusing replies to this. I believe they are picking round by round. If you put NY GA as your first round pick (let's say those odds drop to 5%) there is a 95% chance you are not getting US tickets east of the mississippi.
"During the drawing, we will randomly draw members who have made that show their #1 priority. If any tickets remain, the system will randomly draw names of members who have chosen that show as their #2 priority"
If you really could see any show, picking NY first runs the risk of eliminating any chance at GA for every show.
It sorta looks like an older page but it says 2020 at top and "updated monday 13:05"
https://help.pearljam.com/hc/en-us/articles/205143590-Pre-sale-Drawing?mobile_site=true0 -
Yeah, it would be good to know your 1st priority is safe.Lostpawn said:
Which is why odds should be for 1st priority only. Otherwise they are largely meaningless.Vedd Hedd said:I know there are people who put MSG as like...their 6th choice as a "What the hell, i probably wont get it, but lets give it a shot"...for GA. That is messing with the odds.
That said...you can KINDA figure out a bit...if the odds are like...11%, if you put that in as your 5th choice, its probably not going to happen.Turn this anger into
Nuclear fission0 -
Old info or not, the email from TM/10c/whomever for this tour specifically states that logic and rules will be the same for this as they have always been for previous ten club lotteries, so it's still valid.Poncier said:
That's definitely old info from a 10C run lottery.Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:
Where did you find that quoted language?Lerxst1992 said:Mozzy said:
The reason I think you're saying the same thing is that 10C has told people they draw the lottery person by person from the lottery pool which would imply that if your name is drawn they go to your first choice that is available. So you if you have Baltimore GA ranked as your first choice and it is available, you get that. If your first choice is not available, they go to your second choice which would be Baltimore Reserved. If that's not available, they move down the list. People have won the lottery for 3rd or 4th choices which were lower odds and earlier shows than their 1st or 2nd choices which they lost, so it would seem to confirm that 10C goes by person-to-person rather than show by show. They have also stated that they consider GA to be best available over reserved seats.ricardofurriel said:
Can you elaborate please?Mozzy said:
I feel like you're both saying the same thingNewfieintheUSA said:
No, it would bericardofurriel said:
So I'm sorry if I'm being slow. I guess I'm getting old.PJNB said:
You do cities as priorities not sections for those cities.ricardofurriel said:
Buddy and I are thinking Baltimore GA as 1st choice. It’s the only show we have in common. It’s at 19% atm... I’m just concerned I’ll strike out in both if I go Baltimore GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2.gotthebottle said:
what's your first choice?ricardofurriel said:MSG at 13/74. Do you think NYC Reserved as a 2nd choice will strike me out?
In the "old" system", I would have done
1- Baltimore GA
2- NYC Reserved
3- Baltimore Reserved
In this new system, if I were to put best available for both shows, it would look something like this:
1- Baltimore GA
2- Baltimore Reserved
3- NYC GA
4- NYC Reserved
My concern is that if I put best available for Baltimore and don't get GA, I would get my "second choice" (by default) which is Baltimore Reserved. Let's say that someone has Quebec GA as option 1 and NYC Reserved option 2. Would he/she/they have better odds than me to get NYC reserved?
I'm sorry if I'm making it more complicated than it is. Thank you.
1. Baltimore Best Available
2. NYC Best Available
If you are selected, they will check to see if there are GA tickets left, if so you get them, otherwise you get Reserved
So putting 1) Baltimore Best available would be no different than having 1) Baltimore GA and 2) Baltimore Best Available
A lot of confusing replies to this. I believe they are picking round by round. If you put NY GA as your first round pick (let's say those odds drop to 5%) there is a 95% chance you are not getting US tickets east of the mississippi.
"During the drawing, we will randomly draw members who have made that show their #1 priority. If any tickets remain, the system will randomly draw names of members who have chosen that show as their #2 priority"
If you really could see any show, picking NY first runs the risk of eliminating any chance at GA for every show.
It sorta looks like an older page but it says 2020 at top and "updated monday 13:05"
https://help.pearljam.com/hc/en-us/articles/205143590-Pre-sale-Drawing?mobile_site=true
Ticketmaster is running this one.
2003 Clarkston MI #2 | 2004 Grand Rapids MI | 2013 London ON | 2014 Detroit MI | 2016 Toronto ON #1 | 2025 Nashville TN #20
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help










