The Democratic Presidential Debates

1…4647495152…345

Comments

  • darwinstheory
    darwinstheory LaPorte, IN Posts: 7,362
    I believe it is at 8PM CST. Or approximately 3 hours from now. 
    "A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    Amy/Pete 2020
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,527
    This exchange was absolutely insane.


  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    pjl44 said:
    This exchange was absolutely insane.


    She was already on record with the release that she is claiming he said that her.  I think the moderator wanted to get Sanders on record before asking Warren what she thought about it.  We already knew Warren says it happened.  I don't see anything wrong with it, tbh. 
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    Sounds to me like somebody is lying.  I'd like to know who.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,388
    poor moderation.

    should have asked what was said after prefacing with its been reported......
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    mickeyrat said:
    poor moderation.

    should have asked what was said after prefacing with its been reported......

    My analog TV converter reception nixed any chance of watching.  Anything that stands out from this debate besides the Warren/Sanders spat?
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,388
    brianlux said:
    mickeyrat said:
    poor moderation.

    should have asked what was said after prefacing with its been reported......

    My analog TV converter reception nixed any chance of watching.  Anything that stands out from this debate besides the Warren/Sanders spat?
    dunno. have to ask soneone who watched. or have network news feed your their narrative....
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    edited January 2020
    mrussel1 said:
    pjl44 said:
    This exchange was absolutely insane.


    She was already on record with the release that she is claiming he said that her.  I think the moderator wanted to get Sanders on record before asking Warren what she thought about it.  We already knew Warren says it happened.  I don't see anything wrong with it, tbh. 
    Are you really "honest" saying that?

    It's a crummy way to word the question. Completely disregarding the answer to the question to Sanders that he gave. It reads like a SNL sketch.

    Why even ask Sanders? If his answer isn't even gonna affect and instead be disregarded for the follow up questions?

    I'd say it's even a crummy and shitty question to ask. When it is not known if it was said or not, asking her about how she feels about this thing that is not known to have existed is BS.

    It is one thing to ask "But Elisabeth Warren, you have stated that he did say it? And what do you believe would be the reason to?" or whatever.

    But asking "this thing we do not know happened but I will ask like it in fact happened - how did this thing make you feel?"


    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927

  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,297
    I don’t agree with Bernie on much, but i believe he is a sexist that doesn’t think a women can be POTUS about as much as I would believe Sanders being accused of using campaign funds to build an American Ninja training complex in his backyard. 

    Bonkers that this is the top story of the debate. 
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    edited January 2020
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    pjl44 said:
    This exchange was absolutely insane.


    She was already on record with the release that she is claiming he said that her.  I think the moderator wanted to get Sanders on record before asking Warren what she thought about it.  We already knew Warren says it happened.  I don't see anything wrong with it, tbh. 
    Are you really "honest" saying that?

    It's a crummy way to word the question. Completely disregarding the answer to the question to Sanders that he gave. It reads like a SNL sketch.

    Why even ask Sanders? If his answer isn't even gonna affect and instead be disregarded for the follow up questions?

    I'd say it's even a crummy and shitty question to ask. When it is not known if it was said or not, asking her about how she feels about this thing that is not known to have existed is BS.

    It is one thing to ask "But Elisabeth Warren, you have stated that he did say it? And what do you believe would be the reason to?" or whatever.

    But asking "this thing we do not know happened but I will ask like it in fact happened - how did this thing make you feel?"


    Am I being honest, I think so.   Why would I lie about it?  Im not saying it was an excellent construction of the question,  but  Warren is on record already.  Bernie's belief or non non belief is the issue,  not the moderator question. 
    Post edited by mrussel1 on
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    Dems continue to eat each other.  
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Jason P said:
    I don’t agree with Bernie on much, but i believe he is a sexist that doesn’t think a women can be POTUS about as much as I would believe Sanders being accused of using campaign funds to build an American Ninja training complex in his backyard. 

    Bonkers that this is the top story of the debate. 
    I think the debate was lame, leaving this the only thing of note to drive some clicks.  
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    pjl44 said:
    This exchange was absolutely insane.


    She was already on record with the release that she is claiming he said that her.  I think the moderator wanted to get Sanders on record before asking Warren what she thought about it.  We already knew Warren says it happened.  I don't see anything wrong with it, tbh. 
    Are you really "honest" saying that?

    It's a crummy way to word the question. Completely disregarding the answer to the question to Sanders that he gave. It reads like a SNL sketch.

    Why even ask Sanders? If his answer isn't even gonna affect and instead be disregarded for the follow up questions?

    I'd say it's even a crummy and shitty question to ask. When it is not known if it was said or not, asking her about how she feels about this thing that is not known to have existed is BS.

    It is one thing to ask "But Elisabeth Warren, you have stated that he did say it? And what do you believe would be the reason to?" or whatever.

    But asking "this thing we do not know happened but I will ask like it in fact happened - how did this thing make you feel?"


    Am I being honest, I think so.   Why would I lie about it?  Im not saying it was an excellent construction of the question,  but  Warren is on record already.  Bernie's belief or non non belief is the issue,  not the moderator question. 
    As long as it is up in the air if it a "belief or non on belief", the moderator should not frame it as being a fact it is a belief and ask Warren how she felt about this thing we do not if it being a belief or not a belief.

    It was a junk question, in how it was worded.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470

    ELISABETH IS A GOD DAMN LIAR



    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    Spiritual_Chaos said:

    ELISABETH IS A GOD DAMN LIAR



    right, but the election isn't for 10 months

    sit down yang, you were the one that was supposed to be good at math
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,860
    OnWis97 said:
    Dems continue to eat each other.  

    Can we just give trump his 4 more years and move on?
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,527
    mrussel1 said:
    pjl44 said:
    This exchange was absolutely insane.


    She was already on record with the release that she is claiming he said that her.  I think the moderator wanted to get Sanders on record before asking Warren what she thought about it.  We already knew Warren says it happened.  I don't see anything wrong with it, tbh. 
    1. One of those people is flat out lying and only one of them was asked directly about it on a nationally televised debate

    2. This exchange:
    CNN: “Sen. Sanders, I do want to be clear here, you’re saying that you never told senator Warren that a woman could not win the election?"
    SANDERS: "That is correct."
    CNN: “Sen. Warren, what did you think when senator Sanders told you a woman could not win the election?"

    I am by no means a Sanders supporter, but come on.
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,527
    Jason P said:
    I don’t agree with Bernie on much, but i believe he is a sexist that doesn’t think a women can be POTUS about as much as I would believe Sanders being accused of using campaign funds to build an American Ninja training complex in his backyard. 

    Bonkers that this is the top story of the debate. 
    I watched the first 90 minutes and there was nothing else noteworthy.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories