***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***
Comments
-
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
I think you meant “witch hunt.” And being paid in pumpkins doesn’t count.Spiritual_Chaos said:09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
This is 100% how I feel:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
Yup, spot on. This is just more spin from Mittens. Wonder what tRUmp told him at dinner...???
0 -
While Mittens appears ready to enjoy his scallops, perhaps with crab cakes, Toddler Team Trump Treason has pushed his away and opted for another serving of Fruit Loops.CM189191 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
Yup, spot on. This is just more spin from Mittens. Wonder what tRUmp told him at dinner...???09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with Trump?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
And the political process of impeachment is up to congress to decide on, and not Mueller through the report.
And isn't it a weird position to have "I don't want our country to be consumed by impeachment, so when a report point out the President acted in a impeachable way we should set the precedent for the future to not do jack-shit because of not being consumed by impeachment because of reasons"
And if you say the case is closed and no obstruction -- then I guess you didn't read the report but instead maybe got the jist of it from Sean Hannity after bumping into him during an elevator ride?Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected. Time to move on.oftenreading said:
Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
But still, and I'm swedish and you are from the US so you know this better - but you can't, by DoJ guidelines, prosecute a sitting president? You have to go through the political process of impeachment?mcgruff10 said:
Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected. Time to move on.oftenreading said:
Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
Or tell a poor swede how it works... so I can stand corrected.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
I read the New York Times, cnn and local news.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with Trump?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
And the political process of impeachment is up to congress to decide on, and not Mueller through the report.
And isn't it a weird position to have "I don't want our country to be consumed by impeachment, so when a report point out the President acted in a impeachable way we should set the precedent for the future to not do jack-shit because of not being consumed by impeachment because of reasons"
And if you say the case is closed and no obstruction -- then I guess you didn't read the report but instead maybe got the jist of it from Sean Hannity after bumping into him during an elevator ride?I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
2018
I agree one of the problems that needs fixing is to get this corrupt criminal out of office like today !mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
I watch CNN and haven't heard anyone on there come to the conclusion that there was no obstruction?mcgruff10 said:
I read the New York Times, cnn and local news.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with Trump?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
And the political process of impeachment is up to congress to decide on, and not Mueller through the report.
And isn't it a weird position to have "I don't want our country to be consumed by impeachment, so when a report point out the President acted in a impeachable way we should set the precedent for the future to not do jack-shit because of not being consumed by impeachment because of reasons"
And if you say the case is closed and no obstruction -- then I guess you didn't read the report but instead maybe got the jist of it from Sean Hannity after bumping into him during an elevator ride?
You didn't answer my other question:
Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with anyones view of Trump?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
2018Can’t let the idiot off the hook this sets a precedent for the next president and presidents going forward , if he can get away with it every president from now on should also get a pass ..jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
2017
Mueller certainly didn't come to that conclusion. "While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
And I'm not worried about our country being consumed with accountability and constitutionality for the next 2 years. Although the dems would probably be wiser to focus on the 2020 elections (pres & flip the senate), I would understand the desire to hold a President accountable to the laws of the land.
Trump will not be solving any of those problems you allude to in the next 2 years. He has already started his campaigning. It is what he lives for. He isn't interested in running the country or fixing problems. He is interested in rallies, and "winning"."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
Just stumbled upon this on youtube. Fitting. Haha:
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Time to move on the impeachment. Starting with tRUmp testifying in front of Congress.mcgruff10 said:
Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected. Time to move on.oftenreading said:
Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
Of course tRUmp could save us all the trouble and resign. Then we can unseal his indictment.
There is a chain of command in place. Dems are handing the GOP president pence on a silver fucking platter? Why are they too chicken shiat to take it?
I'll give you a hint, they're complicit. Who was the GOP finance chair again? No, the other one. No, not that one, the other other one.0 -
Let's not forget about this traitor.CM189191 said:
Time to move on the impeachment. Starting with tRUmp testifying in front of Congress.mcgruff10 said:
Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected. Time to move on.oftenreading said:
Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?mcgruff10 said:
I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country. To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on.Spiritual_Chaos said:
But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right?mcgruff10 said:This is 100% how I feel:
He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?
Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
Of course tRUmp could save us all the trouble and resign. Then we can unseal his indictment.
There is a chain of command in place. Dems are handing the GOP president pence on a silver fucking platter? Why are they too chicken shiat to take it?
I'll give you a hint, they're complicit. Who was the GOP finance chair again? No, the other one. No, not that one, the other other one.
0 -
2018If people are cheering this report because the Baffoon is not charged yet is pathetic , everyone including himself knows that he’s considered a cancer to this country not a hero but a cancer ! The report calls him a liar straight up ...jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help