***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1…254255257259260…526

Comments

  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,675

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 43,311
    Spiritual_Chaos said:

    I think you meant “witch hunt.” And being paid in pumpkins doesn’t count.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,237
    This is 100% how I feel:

    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,675
    edited April 2019
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?


    Yup, spot on.  This is just more spin from Mittens.  Wonder what tRUmp told him at dinner...???




  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 43,311
    CM189191 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?


    Yup, spot on.  This is just more spin from Mittens.  Wonder what tRUmp told him at dinner...???




    While Mittens appears ready to enjoy his scallops, perhaps with crab cakes, Toddler Team Trump Treason has pushed his away and opted for another serving of Fruit Loops.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,237
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,675
    edited April 2019
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with Trump?

    And the political process of impeachment is up to congress to decide on, and not Mueller through the report.

    And isn't it a weird position to have "I don't want our country to be consumed by impeachment, so when a report point out the President acted in a impeachable way we should set the precedent for the future to not do jack-shit because of not being consumed by impeachment because of reasons"

    And if you say the case is closed and no obstruction -- then I guess you didn't read the report but instead maybe got the jist of it from Sean Hannity  after bumping into him during an elevator ride?
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,237
    oftenreading said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?
    Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected.  Time to move on.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,675
    edited April 2019
    mcgruff10 said:
    oftenreading said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?
    Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected.  Time to move on.  
    But still, and I'm swedish and you are from the US so you know this better  - but you can't, by DoJ guidelines, prosecute a sitting president? You have to go through the political process of impeachment? 

    Or tell a poor swede how it works... so I can stand corrected.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,237
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with Trump?

    And the political process of impeachment is up to congress to decide on, and not Mueller through the report.

    And isn't it a weird position to have "I don't want our country to be consumed by impeachment, so when a report point out the President acted in a impeachable way we should set the precedent for the future to not do jack-shit because of not being consumed by impeachment because of reasons"

    And if you say the case is closed and no obstruction -- then I guess you didn't read the report but instead maybe got the jist of it from Sean Hannity  after bumping into him during an elevator ride?
    I read the New York Times, cnn and local news. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 32,222
    2018
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    I agree one of the problems that needs fixing is to get this corrupt criminal out of office like today ! 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,675
    edited April 2019
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with Trump?

    And the political process of impeachment is up to congress to decide on, and not Mueller through the report.

    And isn't it a weird position to have "I don't want our country to be consumed by impeachment, so when a report point out the President acted in a impeachable way we should set the precedent for the future to not do jack-shit because of not being consumed by impeachment because of reasons"

    And if you say the case is closed and no obstruction -- then I guess you didn't read the report but instead maybe got the jist of it from Sean Hannity  after bumping into him during an elevator ride?
    I read the New York Times, cnn and local news. 
    I watch CNN and haven't heard anyone on there come to the conclusion that there was no obstruction?

    You didn't answer my other question:

    Saying there was insufficient evidence to charge the president when no one can charge a sitting president due to DoJ guidelines, would be factually wrong... wouldn't it? What has it do with anyones view of Trump?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 32,222
    2018
    Can’t let the idiot off the hook this sets a precedent for the next president and presidents going forward , if he can get away with it every president from now on should also get a pass ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • jeffbr
    jeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    2017
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Mueller certainly didn't come to that conclusion. "While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
    And I'm not worried about our country being consumed with accountability and constitutionality for the next 2 years. Although the dems would probably be wiser to focus on the 2020 elections (pres & flip the senate), I would understand the desire to hold a President accountable to the laws of the land.
    Trump will not be solving any of those problems you allude to in the next 2 years. He has already started his campaigning. It is what he lives for. He isn't interested in running the country or fixing problems. He is interested in rallies, and "winning".
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,675
    edited April 2019
    mcgruff10 said:

    To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Just stumbled upon this on youtube. Fitting. Haha:




    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    mcgruff10 said:
    oftenreading said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?
    Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected.  Time to move on.  
    Time to move on the impeachment.  Starting with tRUmp testifying in front of Congress.

    Of course tRUmp could save us all the trouble and resign.  Then we can unseal his indictment.

    There is a chain of command in place.  Dems are handing the GOP president pence on a silver fucking platter?  Why are they too chicken shiat to take it?

    I'll give you a hint, they're complicit.  Who was the GOP finance chair again?  No, the other one. No, not that one, the other other one. 
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    CM189191 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    oftenreading said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    This is 100% how I feel:

    But isn't Mitt factually wrong? In what way could it be it insufficient evidence to charge the president when Mueller or whoever even can't charge the president due to DoJ guidelines? Right? 

    He can only let congress decide from the evidence he put in the report - which he did put in the report of obstruction -- and that is why people are now calling for impeachment procedures?

    Or what am i missing Mitt Romney and @mcgruff10 ?
    I don’t think he is factually wrong but it all depends on your view of trump. I don’t like the guy but I don’t want our country to be consumed with impeachment for the next two years, There are way too many problems to solve in this country.  To me the case is closed. No obstruction, no collusion, time to move on. 
    Where did you get the “no obstruction” part from, other than Trump himself?
    Let me know when he is prosecuted for those charges and I will stand corrected.  Time to move on.  
    Time to move on the impeachment.  Starting with tRUmp testifying in front of Congress.

    Of course tRUmp could save us all the trouble and resign.  Then we can unseal his indictment.

    There is a chain of command in place.  Dems are handing the GOP president pence on a silver fucking platter?  Why are they too chicken shiat to take it?

    I'll give you a hint, they're complicit.  Who was the GOP finance chair again?  No, the other one. No, not that one, the other other one. 
    Let's not forget about this traitor.


  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 32,222
    2018
    If people are cheering this report because the Baffoon is not charged yet is pathetic , everyone including himself knows that he’s considered a cancer to this country not a hero but a cancer ! The report calls him a liar straight up ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....

Categories