Donald Trump
Comments
- 
            
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=21
 0
- 
            https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/white-house/435544-the-steele-mueller-nightmare-is-over-and-should-be%3famp
 Finally someone gets it.I'm like an opening band for your mom.0
- 
            
 Indeed. A Clinton man no less.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:0
- 
            
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=210
- 
            
 Nah, as usual you don't understand.BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=21William Barr Did What He Was Hired to DoHe summarized the Mueller Report in the most favorable light possible to the Trump administration*.
 There will be insufferable cock-a-doodle-doo'ing from the usual suspects for the next two years, and we all better get used to it. I suspect that both Barr and Mueller will get hauled before various congressional committees. In fact, the basic overriding result of Barr's summary is that the whole matter now has been dumped into the laps of a divided and hyper-partisan Congress in such a way as to guarantee that the Congress will be more divided and more hyper-partisan than ever before. The Democratic House will hold hearings and the Republican Senate will yell about Hillary Clinton. The Internet will be indiscriminately insane for the foreseeable future.
 https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/amp26921794/mueller-report-summary-willam-barr-donald-trump/
 0
- 
            
 Sorry but perp walks are necessary. The hold outs here and elsewhere makes it clear that this can’t end.mrussel1 said:
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=210
- 
            
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.0
- 
            
 How could that be? I paid less in taxes and made more.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.
 I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
- 
            
 Oh right, because you have some prosecutorial knowledge that the rest of us don't. You're actually H2M on the other side, except I give him far more credit. At least for him, there was a special counsel investigating. As of now you have.... Devin Nunes. Good luck with that joker as your source and advocate.BS44325 said:
 Sorry but perp walks are necessary. The hold outs here and elsewhere makes it clear that this can’t end.mrussel1 said:
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=210
- 
            
 I got hit hard too. No salt deduction sucks.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.0
- 
            mcgruff10 said:
 How could that be? I paid less in taxes and made more.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.
 I lost a huge SALT deduction while the tax rate decreased slightly, not nearly enough to offset the lost deduction.
 0
- 
            
 Got ya. I m sorry bud. Did you end up owing or just get less of a refund?Lerxst1992 said:mcgruff10 said:
 How could that be? I paid less in taxes and made more.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.
 I lost a huge SALT deduction while the tax rate decreased slightly, not nearly enough to offset the lost deduction.
 I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
- 
            
 You're in Jersey right? I'm surprised the salt didn't hurt you.mcgruff10 said:
 How could that be? I paid less in taxes and made more.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.0
- 
            
 My refund went down but I paid less in taxes and made more.mrussel1 said:
 You're in Jersey right? I'm surprised the salt didn't hurt you.mcgruff10 said:
 How could that be? I paid less in taxes and made more.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.
 I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
- 
            
 You want people in red states to continue subsidizing your services? Protest your Governor not your President.Lerxst1992 said:
 How about I am facing the biggest tax increase I ever faced in my life, a gift from a republican president and republican Congress .mrussel1 said:
 Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 Trump governs only to his 40% base that lives in red states, and his followers wonder why everyone else hates him.0
- 
            
 I’m not sure a special counsel will be required for this. The IG is on it. Barr can handle the rest. He isn’t conflicted.mrussel1 said:
 Oh right, because you have some prosecutorial knowledge that the rest of us don't. You're actually H2M on the other side, except I give him far more credit. At least for him, there was a special counsel investigating. As of now you have.... Devin Nunes. Good luck with that joker as your source and advocate.BS44325 said:
 Sorry but perp walks are necessary. The hold outs here and elsewhere makes it clear that this can’t end.mrussel1 said:
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=210
- 
            
 On well feel free to call it out when senior members of the justice department are indicted for advocating for the overthrow of the government. Until then, remember you and H2M are saying the same thing.BS44325 said:
 I’m not sure a special counsel will be required for this. The IG is on it. Barr can handle the rest. He isn’t conflicted.mrussel1 said:
 Oh right, because you have some prosecutorial knowledge that the rest of us don't. You're actually H2M on the other side, except I give him far more credit. At least for him, there was a special counsel investigating. As of now you have.... Devin Nunes. Good luck with that joker as your source and advocate.BS44325 said:
 Sorry but perp walks are necessary. The hold outs here and elsewhere makes it clear that this can’t end.mrussel1 said:
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=210
- 
            The president is not a stooge of the Kremlin, and you guys act like someone just stole your puppy...
 I'm pissed because this really hurts for 2020
 0
- 
            
 You seem to be forgetting the repubs held the house from 2010 on and still hold the senate and with it, they held investigative power. Where were the hearings on the FISA violations? What about the Deep State hearings? Oh, that’s right, they spent their time and energy on Benghazi and Hillary’s emails. Principles indeed.BS44325 said:
 I’m not sure a special counsel will be required for this. The IG is on it. Barr can handle the rest. He isn’t conflicted.mrussel1 said:
 Oh right, because you have some prosecutorial knowledge that the rest of us don't. You're actually H2M on the other side, except I give him far more credit. At least for him, there was a special counsel investigating. As of now you have.... Devin Nunes. Good luck with that joker as your source and advocate.BS44325 said:
 Sorry but perp walks are necessary. The hold outs here and elsewhere makes it clear that this can’t end.mrussel1 said:
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=21
 09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
 Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
 Brilliantati©0
- 
            
 That won’t be the charge...suggested use of 25th amendment story notwithstanding.mrussel1 said:
 On well feel free to call it out when senior members of the justice department are indicted for advocating for the overthrow of the government. Until then, remember you and H2M are saying the same thing.BS44325 said:
 I’m not sure a special counsel will be required for this. The IG is on it. Barr can handle the rest. He isn’t conflicted.mrussel1 said:
 Oh right, because you have some prosecutorial knowledge that the rest of us don't. You're actually H2M on the other side, except I give him far more credit. At least for him, there was a special counsel investigating. As of now you have.... Devin Nunes. Good luck with that joker as your source and advocate.BS44325 said:
 Sorry but perp walks are necessary. The hold outs here and elsewhere makes it clear that this can’t end.mrussel1 said:
 You can't keep the hypocrisy in check for one day?BS44325 said:
 Agreed. There will be a trial. Illegally spying on political opponents is not something that will be ignored.dignin said:
 Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
 To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
 Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
 I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
 I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
 Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
 I wouldn't blame this on the media:
 "The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads." Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated? To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic. 
 So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1109935894163787778?s=21
 0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help





