Donald Trump
Comments
-
Believe? This ain’t your precious P-Tape buddy. It is a certified fact. There’s your crime. Get ready for the blowback. Clearly you haven’t been humbled enough yet.Halifax2TheMax said:
Says the guy who still believes the Steele Dossier was the impetus for an investigation into Team Trump Treason and his campaign.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
0 -
BS, you’re living up to your screen name. That Faux News talking point has already been debunked. Maybe you remember poppadopealoss?BS44325 said:
Believe? This ain’t your precious P-Tape buddy. It is a certified fact. There’s your crime. Get ready for the blowback. Clearly you haven’t been humbled enough yet.Halifax2TheMax said:
Says the guy who still believes the Steele Dossier was the impetus for an investigation into Team Trump Treason and his campaign.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Thanks for explaining the full report and for answering my question regarding if this was the only investigation. I appreciate that. By "not an act" do you mean that you are Barr? Rosenstein? Mueller? Trump? I seriously doubt that.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
I can come to grips with a lot. You don't know me or know what I've been through in my life. What I can't come to grips with is the holier than thou attitude that some people have, including yourself.
I've accepted the fact that he is our current president, and that he probably won't be removed/impeached before the next election. I get it it because I know these things take time and I would rather the investigations be thorough than a rush to judgment. What I TRULY don't understand is how anyone in their right mind can support his actions, behavior, rhetoric and bullshit. If you can, that's your choice. I look forward to reading your viewpoints when ALL of the shit hits the fan.I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
Ledbetterman10 said:
I see. Well I doubt Barr would do that. And really, why bother? Trump is a walking obstruction of justice lol.oftenreading said:
From what's been released, Mueller did not find evidence that the campaign "conspired or co-ordinated" with Russia.Ledbetterman10 said:I'm confused as to how Mueller can find no evidence of a Trump/Russia conspiracy, yet won't exonerate him.
Mueller did not exonerate Trump from the completely different issue of obstruction of justice - i.e. whether he acted to interfere in the judicial process in some way. Apparently he saw some evidence for and some against, and leaves it to Barr to decide whether to proceed with obstruction charges.
I doubt he will as well.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Why do you think you're playing a character in a Fast and the Furious movie?BS44325 said:
Believe? This ain’t your precious P-Tape buddy. It is a certified fact. There’s your crime. Get ready for the blowback. Clearly you haven’t been humbled enough yet.Halifax2TheMax said:
Says the guy who still believes the Steele Dossier was the impetus for an investigation into Team Trump Treason and his campaign.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Oh I remember. His book is coming out this week. Get ready for that to blow up in your face too.Halifax2TheMax said:
BS, you’re living up to your screen name. That Faux News talking point has already been debunked. Maybe you remember poppadopealoss?BS44325 said:
Believe? This ain’t your precious P-Tape buddy. It is a certified fact. There’s your crime. Get ready for the blowback. Clearly you haven’t been humbled enough yet.Halifax2TheMax said:
Says the guy who still believes the Steele Dossier was the impetus for an investigation into Team Trump Treason and his campaign.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
0 -
Woah! Did Team Mueller indict Comey? Hillary? Obama? Absence of evidenceBS44325 said:
Believe? This ain’t your precious P-Tape buddy. It is a certified fact. There’s your crime. Get ready for the blowback. Clearly you haven’t been humbled enough yet.Halifax2TheMax said:
Says the guy who still believes the Steele Dossier was the impetus for an investigation into Team Trump Treason and his campaign.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
is not evidence of absence.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.0 -
BS44325 said:
Oh I completely understand. Barr and Rosenstein do as well. That is why they put in the report that having committed no crim the obstruction charge does not make sense. But please...all of you...continue. I hope it goes on forever. Bring on the Southern District of New York as well.oftenreading said:
But yet, you don't understand what obstruction means.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
Sadly for you, that's not what they said.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Page 3 last paragraph.oftenreading said:BS44325 said:
Oh I completely understand. Barr and Rosenstein do as well. That is why they put in the report that having committed no crim the obstruction charge does not make sense. But please...all of you...continue. I hope it goes on forever. Bring on the Southern District of New York as well.oftenreading said:
But yet, you don't understand what obstruction means.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
Sadly for you, that's not what they said.0 -
Not Mueller’s job. You are so impatient. Sheesh.Halifax2TheMax said:
Woah! Did Team Mueller indict Comey? Hillary? Obama? Absence of evidenceBS44325 said:
Believe? This ain’t your precious P-Tape buddy. It is a certified fact. There’s your crime. Get ready for the blowback. Clearly you haven’t been humbled enough yet.Halifax2TheMax said:
Says the guy who still believes the Steele Dossier was the impetus for an investigation into Team Trump Treason and his campaign.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.
is not evidence of absence.
0 -
To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Completely agree. Now we can focus on the anemic GDP growth as further proof that trickle down economics doesn't work. That will be the election albatross.mcgruff10 said:
To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.0 -
Amenmcgruff10 said:
To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
The biggest loss is that there is no way Eddie is taking it well. Massive TDS. This band is done.mcgruff10 said:
To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.0 -
not everything. you clearly don't know how obstruction of justice potentially works.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
MAYOR PETE
VS
DONALD J. TRUMP"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
You’re a plagiarist.HughFreakingDillon said:
not everything. you clearly don't know how obstruction of justice potentially works.BS44325 said:
I do know everything. It is not an act. At some point you will all need to come to grips with that.mfc2006 said:
You act like you know everything, so please enlighten us. Seriously. I can't take the Barr/Rosenstein summary as the end of the road...because everyone should understand that it is NOT the end of the road. Yet you seem to pounce and celebrate. If this is "winning"...I don't want to win.BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.
Again, please explain the full report to us when you get a chance. Oh wait...it hasn't been released yet. And chances are that it never will be fully released.
One follow up question....
Is this the only investigation? Just curious.0 -
The only dem candidate I likeSpiritual_Chaos said:MAYOR PETE
VS
DONALD J. TRUMP0 -
Haha. So naive.mcgruff10 said:
To me the win is not having a trial for the next two years. Instead of watergate/lewinsky 2.0 we can now go back to work and attempt to fix the many problems we have in the us.mrussel1 said:
Wait, what? How did you win? What did you have to do with anything?BS44325 said:
I look forward to watch people claim Trump obstructed an investigation into a crime he never committed. Please. Keep going. I want to spike more footballs. I am not yet sick of the winning.bootlegger10 said:
I took it to say that there was no findings of collusion with Russia, but that Trump may have obstructed the investigation but not enough to be charged. So, no Russia collusion but likely some lies by the President.Lerxst1992 said:bootlegger10 said:What a colossal failure of the media. We need to get away from the pundits and get back to news reporting. The “Jump to Conclusions” game from Office Space would sell out in New York and DC.
Trump is still a disgusting person, unfit to be President, and a crook, but the media got this Russia nonsense way wrong and just drives a bigger wedge in the country instead of just reporting the news. They played right into Trump’s Fake News rhetoric. Tough to disagree right now.
I wouldn't blame this on the media:
"The attorney general also stated that Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump committed any offenses relating to obstruction of justice."The Special Counsel states that 'while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,' " the letter reads."
Honestly, I don't know wtf that means. If he didn't commit a crime why is he not exonerated?
To me its the master of the Iran Contra coverup back to perform his magic.
So I took it that the investigation was whether there was collusion and the answer is a clear no.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help