PHILLY (Loosely Related to The Philadelphia Phillies)

1300301303305306845

Comments

  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Ha.
    I think they overpay and he signs in Philly.  Franco gets traded to someone for a box of old cleats and then puts it all together.  
    What constitutes an overpay?  10/300 seems like the base so is $350 overpay, $375?

  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,535
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
    But didn't ARod's include a plethora of player options? Or are we talking about the Rangers contract?

    I just get the feeling that neither player wants to really come here, it's not appealing at all, and the only way they come here is if they massively overpay in terms of AAV and years and/or giving a ton of control to the player in terms of options.
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,815
    Ha.
    I think they overpay and he signs in Philly.  Franco gets traded to someone for a box of old cleats and then puts it all together.  
    What constitutes an overpay?  10/300 seems like the base so is $350 overpay, $375?

    I think since there was the 'stupid' comments from leadership that they go 5 mill a year higher than anyone else and go 10 years.  I think your 350 is a good guess.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
    But didn't ARod's include a plethora of player options? Or are we talking about the Rangers contract?

    I just get the feeling that neither player wants to really come here, it's not appealing at all, and the only way they come here is if they massively overpay in terms of AAV and years and/or giving a ton of control to the player in terms of options.
    Yeah, the Rangers contract.  The one he opted out of then the Yankees gave him the bad 10 year contract.

    Yeah, I mean, I don't think it is a terribly attractive destination, but I think their options are somewhat limited by the market.  They player is going to have a ton of control with multiple opt outs, which honestly, could be the best thing if you get like the next 3 or 4 years then they opt out.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Ha.
    I think they overpay and he signs in Philly.  Franco gets traded to someone for a box of old cleats and then puts it all together.  
    What constitutes an overpay?  10/300 seems like the base so is $350 overpay, $375?

    I think since there was the 'stupid' comments from leadership that they go 5 mill a year higher than anyone else and go 10 years.  I think your 350 is a good guess.
    I think 10 and 350 would get it done for the Phillies and I would guess that you're probably right that that's about $50 mil above the next best offer, which yeah, anytime you're paying $50 mil more than the next offer, it's probably an overpay.

    We shall see. Gonna be an interesting couple weeks.

    That David Murphy dude (he still around?) predicted the Yanks would sign Machado for $395...lol, ain't happening dude.
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,535
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
    But didn't ARod's include a plethora of player options? Or are we talking about the Rangers contract?

    I just get the feeling that neither player wants to really come here, it's not appealing at all, and the only way they come here is if they massively overpay in terms of AAV and years and/or giving a ton of control to the player in terms of options.
    Yeah, the Rangers contract.  The one he opted out of then the Yankees gave him the bad 10 year contract.

    Yeah, I mean, I don't think it is a terribly attractive destination, but I think their options are somewhat limited by the market.  They player is going to have a ton of control with multiple opt outs, which honestly, could be the best thing if you get like the next 3 or 4 years then they opt out.
    Right - twist my arm. Hell, I'd be fine if they wanted to opt out after two years.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
    But didn't ARod's include a plethora of player options? Or are we talking about the Rangers contract?

    I just get the feeling that neither player wants to really come here, it's not appealing at all, and the only way they come here is if they massively overpay in terms of AAV and years and/or giving a ton of control to the player in terms of options.
    Yeah, the Rangers contract.  The one he opted out of then the Yankees gave him the bad 10 year contract.

    Yeah, I mean, I don't think it is a terribly attractive destination, but I think their options are somewhat limited by the market.  They player is going to have a ton of control with multiple opt outs, which honestly, could be the best thing if you get like the next 3 or 4 years then they opt out.
    Right - twist my arm. Hell, I'd be fine if they wanted to opt out after two years.
    Right? It's not going to happen, but it has been floated offering a 2 year $90 or $100 mil contract. I love the idea They get $100 mil, and get to do it all over again at 28 when most good players hit free agency and the team gets what should be two of their best years. Lotta risk on both sides, which is why it won't happen, but I love it.

    No long term commitment, but also if they have 1 bad year, you're screwed
    The player should be able to make a ton more than they'd make off just one contract, but injuries, bad year, etc...
    Gigantic AAV


  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    The hustling stuff is nonsense, but he is an absolutely infuriating player to watch play against your team, both because he is good and to F Me's point, because he is a gigantic baby.  There is a lot to this and there will be more than a handful of shaking your head times for whatever team signs him.

    https://theathletic.com/727149/2018/12/21/manny-machado-is-about-to-get-paid-a-lot-of-money-but-will-his-new-team-feel-good-about-the-purchase/
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,535
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
    Dude, that's insanity. .310 with 42 home runs!  So many steroids on this list

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1998.shtml#all_AL_MVP_voting



  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,894
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
    Dude, that's insanity. .310 with 42 home runs!  So many steroids on this list

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1998.shtml#all_AL_MVP_voting



    How in the hell does Jeter finish 3rd on that list. He should have been like 10th.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Poncier said:
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
    Dude, that's insanity. .310 with 42 home runs!  So many steroids on this list

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1998.shtml#all_AL_MVP_voting



    How in the hell does Jeter finish 3rd on that list. He should have been like 10th.
    Average was a lot more important then?
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,919
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
    But didn't ARod's include a plethora of player options? Or are we talking about the Rangers contract?

    I just get the feeling that neither player wants to really come here, it's not appealing at all, and the only way they come here is if they massively overpay in terms of AAV and years and/or giving a ton of control to the player in terms of options.
    Yeah, the Rangers contract.  The one he opted out of then the Yankees gave him the bad 10 year contract.

    Yeah, I mean, I don't think it is a terribly attractive destination, but I think their options are somewhat limited by the market.  They player is going to have a ton of control with multiple opt outs, which honestly, could be the best thing if you get like the next 3 or 4 years then they opt out.
    Right - twist my arm. Hell, I'd be fine if they wanted to opt out after two years.
    Right? It's not going to happen, but it has been floated offering a 2 year $90 or $100 mil contract. I love the idea They get $100 mil, and get to do it all over again at 28 when most good players hit free agency and the team gets what should be two of their best years. Lotta risk on both sides, which is why it won't happen, but I love it.

    No long term commitment, but also if they have 1 bad year, you're screwed
    The player should be able to make a ton more than they'd make off just one contract, but injuries, bad year, etc...
    Gigantic AAV


    If Machado signs here there is little chance he won't piss off the fan base at some point.  hope like hell you get 3-5 stud years from him then dump him to the yanks.
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,535
    Poncier said:
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
    Dude, that's insanity. .310 with 42 home runs!  So many steroids on this list

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1998.shtml#all_AL_MVP_voting



    How in the hell does Jeter finish 3rd on that list. He should have been like 10th.
    Average was a lot more important then?
    Yeah, I'd say ARod and Jeter should be flipped at the least. But ARod should be winning it that year, or coming in 2nd to his teammate Junior.

    42 homers and 46 steals. WHAT.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    pjhawks said:
    Haha, I'm actually coming around to the thought that the Phils sign neither. Bah. Humbug.
    10 year contracts are never a good idea.  Has there ever been a good one?  Arod's first is probably the best.  That said, these guys are younger than almost everyone who has hit free agency, so hopefully there's less risk.
    But didn't ARod's include a plethora of player options? Or are we talking about the Rangers contract?

    I just get the feeling that neither player wants to really come here, it's not appealing at all, and the only way they come here is if they massively overpay in terms of AAV and years and/or giving a ton of control to the player in terms of options.
    Yeah, the Rangers contract.  The one he opted out of then the Yankees gave him the bad 10 year contract.

    Yeah, I mean, I don't think it is a terribly attractive destination, but I think their options are somewhat limited by the market.  They player is going to have a ton of control with multiple opt outs, which honestly, could be the best thing if you get like the next 3 or 4 years then they opt out.
    Right - twist my arm. Hell, I'd be fine if they wanted to opt out after two years.
    Right? It's not going to happen, but it has been floated offering a 2 year $90 or $100 mil contract. I love the idea They get $100 mil, and get to do it all over again at 28 when most good players hit free agency and the team gets what should be two of their best years. Lotta risk on both sides, which is why it won't happen, but I love it.

    No long term commitment, but also if they have 1 bad year, you're screwed
    The player should be able to make a ton more than they'd make off just one contract, but injuries, bad year, etc...
    Gigantic AAV


    If Machado signs here there is little chance he won't piss off the fan base at some point.  hope like hell you get 3-5 stud years from him then dump him to the yanks.
    I don't think you are familiar with how the Yankees do business...pretty pretty sure if they won't give him 10 years to get the best years, they aren't taking the back end later on.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Poncier said:
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
    Dude, that's insanity. .310 with 42 home runs!  So many steroids on this list

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1998.shtml#all_AL_MVP_voting



    How in the hell does Jeter finish 3rd on that list. He should have been like 10th.
    Average was a lot more important then?
    Yeah, I'd say ARod and Jeter should be flipped at the least. But ARod should be winning it that year, or coming in 2nd to his teammate Junior.

    42 homers and 46 steals. WHAT.
    For sure.  Insanity.  Arod was so fucking good.
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,894
    Poncier said:
    The ARod talk got me curious and went back to look at his Baseball Reference page - I can't believe he didn't win the MVP in '98. Not only did he not win but he came in 9th! That's crazy.
    Dude, that's insanity. .310 with 42 home runs!  So many steroids on this list

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1998.shtml#all_AL_MVP_voting



    How in the hell does Jeter finish 3rd on that list. He should have been like 10th.
    Average was a lot more important then?
    There's 3 guys behind him with higher averages, 2 of them hit 40+ HR. All 3 more HR and RBI, all 3 at least 100 points higher OPS than Jeter. He must have serviced all the voters and sent them home with one of his patented Jeets gift baskets.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,597
    Gotta wait till 2019 now...
    www.myspace.com
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,028
    Gotta wait till 2019 now...
    So Harper to the dodgers. You guys are gonna offer machado approximately half a billion