Donald Trump

14404414434454462954

Comments

  • Pardons Arpaio. Wink wink white supremacists. trump has your back. 
    That guy is a scum bag. 

    He most assuredly deserves to be rotting in prison. He's a poor man's gestapo and his history- which includes arresting reporters covering his crimes up to a bizarre 'fake' assassination attempt- indicates he's psychotic.

    * The only thing missing from Trump's tweet was the picture of him going 'vroom vroom' in the big, red fire truck (it's another painful 'look at me I'm a big boy' tweet). Wow. We're so impressed with you Don. 
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Pardons Arpaio. Wink wink white supremacists. trump has your back. 
    That guy is a scum bag. 

    He most assuredly deserves to be rotting in prison. He's a poor man's gestapo and his history- which includes arresting reporters covering his crimes up to a bizarre 'fake' assassination attempt- indicates he's psychotic.

    * The only thing missing from Trump's tweet was the picture of him going 'vroom vroom' in the big, red fire truck (it's another painful 'look at me I'm a big boy' tweet). Wow. We're so impressed with you Don. 
    but he was a media darling for awhile there, what happened?
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    Remember when Trumpito said the Opiod crisis was a "disaster" back in Bedminster last week? Since there was no official "Declaration" (which bypasses Congress and almost immediately starts fixing the problem), just him RUNNING HIS MOUTH, nothing got done AGAIN. 
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Tiki said:
    Remember when Trumpito said the Opiod crisis was a "disaster" back in Bedminster last week? Since there was no official "Declaration" (which bypasses Congress and almost immediately starts fixing the problem), just him RUNNING HIS MOUTH, nothing got done AGAIN. 
    didn't that ship sail? the money was made, lives lost and families ruined
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    I dont think this will set you straight but these are my beliefs.

    You ran a terrible un-electable wobbly candidate that nobody liked that was really good at losing except outside of NY. Historically Hillary is much better at being appointed then being elected. 
    The democratic leadership and the DNC didnt have the guts to tell Hillary to go pound sand. She lost to a fresh faced Senator from Illinois 8 years prior. Did they think their base would pivot from Obama to Hillary? Excluding wars, he was everything she wasn't. If she wasnt good enough then what makes her good enough now? I guess there was really no one else, and thats speaks volumes about the democrats.
    Big shock, the voters rejected her in 08 and they rejected her again in 16! Wow, how could anyone see that coming.

    I will spare you with the rigging the primary details because it is a fact, undeniable that the dnc was fixed on Hilliary and come hell or high water she was going to be "appointed" the nominee one way or the other. If you dont believe this or choose to ignore it and think that it had nothing to do with the general election then the only stupid in the room is you.
    When people claim that the voters are stupid, I completely disagree, I think voters were smart enough to know a cheater when they see one, smart enough to know crooked (crooked hilliary!) when they see it, not dumb enough to not know all you've done (the most qualified candidate) for them but smart enough to know how little you actually did, smart enough to see thru the typical tired old negative campaign tactics of racist, sexist, bigot, nazi, etc etc and smart enough to see real collusion among the Hillary camp, the DNC and the MSM when it smacks them in the face, repeatedly.  AND THOSE VOTERS STAYED HOME!!!
    Believe it or not the voters were so sick of Hilliary they decided to live with the prospects of a Trump presidency them bring themselves to vote for Hilliary! (you really dont have to read any further, thats it)

    Remember the pied piper theory, that worked out well. The "elevate the pied piper candidate", had everything to do with the medias coverage of Trump during the primaries and general and it backfired, big time. Hillary and the DNC were so confident that they would landslide Trump, they begged for him (as did many many many on here) to be the nominee.
    She along with the colluding media totally underestimated Trump and how his message would motivate his voters. Go compare the rallys, assess the level of excitement at each. Except for when Hilliary trotted out Katy and Queen B, nobody showed up nobody was excited!
    Hillary never even bothered to campaign in some states, states that could offer a challenge. Did her camp and her democratic operatives somehow think that votes in Cal and NY would offset the votes in Michigan and Wisconsin?
    Seems a little over confident arrogant and cocky to me, traits that according to Hilliary resonate with voters.
    Didnt we get what Hillary and co along with the colluding media media wanted? TRUMP
    Remember the 24 hr Trump coverage, (elevate the pied piper) it was good for ratings, good for the bottom line maybe not so good for America. See why Im so confused as to the confusion of how did we get here.

    Hilliary ran a 100% negative, exclusionary campaign without any message other then, I'm with Her, and Her turn. It wasnt about sexism it was about not putting your finger on the pulse of the deciding voters. They didnt care about tax returns (except a few in here) nearly as much as she did. Simply put, deciding voters weren't buying what she was selling, period.
    Her messages were rooted in fear, vote for me or else its HIM.

    It was all Hilliary, plain and simple, not electoral system, not stupid voters and not Russia, she was the only candidate that could possibly lose to Trump with the help of a billion dollars.
    She had a trust issue, a likability issue, a perpetual war issue and status quo issue (if you bothered to read the Podesta emails) her camp and the DNC knew about it months before the election! What did they do? Run ads about little girls waking up in the middle of the night and running for the fallout shelter. Yeah, that will work, that will energize voters.

    Its not that difficult, next time bring issues to the struggling middle class, don't ignore them and call them super predators or deplorable, not once but twice.


  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,582
    I don't remember anyone saying it was a trump insurgency. 
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    I don't remember anyone saying it was a trump insurgency. 
    would you expect more racists to come out against Obama in 08 and 12 or for Trump 16?
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,582
    JC29856 said:
    I don't remember anyone saying it was a trump insurgency. 
    would you expect more racists to come out against Obama in 08 and 12 or for Trump 16?
    I'm sure the racist turnout is about the same each election. Most just vote R no matter what. This time they had one of their own to vote for. 
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,460


    Accepting of pardon is an admission of guilt and can be used in civil suits.
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762


    Accepting of pardon is an admission of guilt and can be used in civil suits.
    Yup. I'm surprised this hasn't been a bigger angle in the news. 
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,460
    edited August 2017


    Accepting of pardon is an admission of guilt and can be used in civil suits.
    Yup. I'm surprised this hasn't been a bigger angle in the news. 
    People are hopefully going to sue the crap out of that racist xenophobic white nationalist. 
    In this instance I'm referring to Arpaio
    Not tRump
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    How often do presidents pardon people this early into their term? I thought it was normally done at the end of their term.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    dignin said:
    How often do presidents pardon people this early into their term? I thought it was normally done at the end of their term.
    8 months in, rarely
  • Kev - Coat and Keys
    Kev - Coat and Keys Earth Posts: 357
    dignin said:
    How often do presidents pardon people this early into their term? I thought it was normally done at the end of their term.
    Maybe Trump likes golfin' more than presidentin' and this early into the term is also near the end?

  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited August 2017
    I can't wait until President Trump will discontinue the Pardoning of a turkey at Thanksgiving.  He has no time for that nonsense.

  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Trump capitalizes "pardon", so now you follow suit, huh? Eh, I guess we should all capitalize "Impeachment" or "Resignation", because they're going to be an event before too long. 
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    Trump capitalizes "pardon", so now you follow suit, huh? Eh, I guess we should all capitalize "Impeachment" or "Resignation", because they're going to be an event before too long. 
    No one will be able to Pardon him from Impeachment, Resignation or for being an Idiot.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • ^^^
    You forgot Nazi on your list.

This discussion has been closed.