President Elect Trump
Comments
-
SpaceX and Tesla CEO, Uber CEO named to Trump’s economic advisory forum0
-
Yes we should have complete faith in Comey and the FBI that everything is above board.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazyRemember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy0 -
The FBI and the CIA reach conclusions in different ways. The CIA makes assessments based on available intelligence and data. They don't always have the luxury of a clear x marking the spot. The FBI operates on an evidentiary standard. They too don't always have the luxury of an x marking the spot. That these two organizations don't agree something happened isn't really a strong indicator that it didn't happen.
And through all of this the fact remains we know only what we know. No one here has been given a classified intelligence briefing. We don't know what the CIA knows and may never know.Post edited by JimmyV on___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
You people that voted voted for trump have no clue how fooled and naive you are. You people thought he would drain the swamp. No. You people thought he'd build a wall. No. You people thought he'd save jobs. No. You people thought he'd put his ego aside and learn the job. No. You thought he'd hire good, qualified people to surround himself with. No. And he hasn't been in office a day.
Trump has proved one thing: that smart people can be fooled easily.will myself to find a home, a home within myself
we will find a way, we will find our place0 -
He's name dropping.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Latest tweets.
Thank you Wisconsin! My Administration will be focused on three very important words: jobs, jobs, jobs! Watch:
.@BillGates and @JimBrownNFL32 in my Trump Tower office yesterday- two great guys!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
I don't disagree with you (yet) and I was never accused of being smart or intelligent but I know today is December 14, 2016.Degeneratefk said:You people that voted voted for trump have no clue how fooled and naive you are. You people thought he would drain the swamp. No. You people thought he'd build a wall. No. You people thought he'd save jobs. No. You people thought he'd put his ego aside and learn the job. No. You thought he'd hire good, qualified people to surround himself with. No. And he hasn't been in office a day.
Trump has proved one thing: that smart people can be fooled easily.0 -
And its not biased to believe the FBI over the CIA? Triple, triple, triple speak. There are known knowns. There are known unknowns. And there are unknown unknowns.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Evidence in the form of a blog I imagine?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Typical response from a trump supporter. I didn't say anything about you or anyone else not being intelligent or smart.JC29856 said:
I don't disagree with you (yet) and I was never accused of being smart or intelligent but I know today is December 14, 2016.Degeneratefk said:You people that voted voted for trump have no clue how fooled and naive you are. You people thought he would drain the swamp. No. You people thought he'd build a wall. No. You people thought he'd save jobs. No. You people thought he'd put his ego aside and learn the job. No. You thought he'd hire good, qualified people to surround himself with. No. And he hasn't been in office a day.
Trump has proved one thing: that smart people can be fooled easily.will myself to find a home, a home within myself
we will find a way, we will find our place0 -
You are IN THE KNOW!Halifax2TheMax said:
And its not biased to believe the FBI over the CIA? Triple, triple, triple speak. There are known knowns. There are known unknowns. And there are unknown unknowns.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Evidence in the form of a blog I imagine?
Вы в курсе!0 -
The TRUTH is out there. Go get 'em Mulder, Mulder, Mulder!!!JC29856 said:
You are IN THE KNOW!Halifax2TheMax said:
And its not biased to believe the FBI over the CIA? Triple, triple, triple speak. There are known knowns. There are known unknowns. And there are unknown unknowns.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Evidence in the form of a blog I imagine?
Вы в курсе!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy0 -
Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.BS44325 said:
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!
Blind, blind, blind!!!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.Halifax2TheMax said:
Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.BS44325 said:
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!
Blind, blind, blind!!!0 -
Solid 8.0 GERN-BERN score!BS44325 said:
Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.Halifax2TheMax said:
Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.BS44325 said:
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!
Blind, blind, blind!!!0 -
So who should lead the investigation, if not a special prosecutor? The Russians, Russians, Russians?BS44325 said:
Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.Halifax2TheMax said:
Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.BS44325 said:
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!
Blind, blind, blind!!!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
JC29856 said:
Solid 8.0 GERN-BERN score!BS44325 said:
Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.Halifax2TheMax said:
Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.BS44325 said:
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!
Blind, blind, blind!!!
0 -
My third grade reading level is fully appropriate for the blogs you'll link me to. No need to go to skool. Please link me to Putin's Puppet or is it another one of your biases showing? Talk about reading comprehension. Love, love, love the assumptions from high on up in the Ivory Tower too, two, to.BS44325 said:
Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.Halifax2TheMax said:
Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.BS44325 said:
I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.ledvedderman said:
And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.BS44325 said:
There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.Halifax2TheMax said:
Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?BS44325 said:
I always have evidence before breakfast.Halifax2TheMax said:
Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?BS44325 said:
You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.my2hands said:
Sure it wasnt...BS44325 said:
The RNC wasn't hackedtbergs said:Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.
Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy
Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!
Blind, blind, blind!!!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
All I know is the President-Elect actually had time to meet with Kanye West yesterday
lol0 -
Yet another red flag here.
"Look, I think that many things have to change, and I think that it's important that we look at all of those traditions that are great, but quite frankly, as you know, don't really make news," Priebus told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. "And you know, even looking at things like the daily White House briefing from the press secretary, I mean, there's a lot of different ways that things can be done, and I can assure you we're looking at that."
http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/14/media/reince-priebus-trump-administration-white-house-press/index.html0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help