President Elect Trump

JC29856

SpaceX and Tesla CEO, Uber CEO named to Trump’s economic advisory forum

Gern Blansten

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

Yes we should have complete faith in Comey and the FBI that everything is above board.

ledvedderman

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

JimmyV

The FBI and the CIA reach conclusions in different ways. The CIA makes assessments based on available intelligence and data. They don't always have the luxury of a clear x marking the spot. The FBI operates on an evidentiary standard. They too don't always have the luxury of an x marking the spot. That these two organizations don't agree something happened isn't really a strong indicator that it didn't happen.

And through all of this the fact remains we know only what we know. No one here has been given a classified intelligence briefing. We don't know what the CIA knows and may never know.

Degeneratefk

You people that voted voted for trump have no clue how fooled and naive you are. You people thought he would drain the swamp. No. You people thought he'd build a wall. No. You people thought he'd save jobs. No. You people thought he'd put his ego aside and learn the job. No. You thought he'd hire good, qualified people to surround himself with. No. And he hasn't been in office a day.

Trump has proved one thing: that smart people can be fooled easily.

Thirty Bills Unpaid

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Latest tweets.
Thank you Wisconsin! My Administration will be focused on three very important words: jobs, jobs, jobs! Watch:

.@BillGates and @JimBrownNFL32 in my Trump Tower office yesterday- two great guys!

He's name dropping.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

JC29856

Degeneratefk said:

You people that voted voted for trump have no clue how fooled and naive you are. You people thought he would drain the swamp. No. You people thought he'd build a wall. No. You people thought he'd save jobs. No. You people thought he'd put his ego aside and learn the job. No. You thought he'd hire good, qualified people to surround himself with. No. And he hasn't been in office a day.

Trump has proved one thing: that smart people can be fooled easily.

I don't disagree with you (yet) and I was never accused of being smart or intelligent but I know today is December 14, 2016.

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And its not biased to believe the FBI over the CIA? Triple, triple, triple speak. There are known knowns. There are known unknowns. And there are unknown unknowns.

Evidence in the form of a blog I imagine?

Degeneratefk

JC29856 said:

Degeneratefk said:

You people that voted voted for trump have no clue how fooled and naive you are. You people thought he would drain the swamp. No. You people thought he'd build a wall. No. You people thought he'd save jobs. No. You people thought he'd put his ego aside and learn the job. No. You thought he'd hire good, qualified people to surround himself with. No. And he hasn't been in office a day.

Trump has proved one thing: that smart people can be fooled easily.

I don't disagree with you (yet) and I was never accused of being smart or intelligent but I know today is December 14, 2016.

Typical response from a trump supporter. I didn't say anything about you or anyone else not being intelligent or smart.

JC29856

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And its not biased to believe the FBI over the CIA? Triple, triple, triple speak. There are known knowns. There are known unknowns. And there are unknown unknowns.

Evidence in the form of a blog I imagine?

You are IN THE KNOW!
Вы в курсе!

Halifax2TheMax

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And its not biased to believe the FBI over the CIA? Triple, triple, triple speak. There are known knowns. There are known unknowns. And there are unknown unknowns.

Evidence in the form of a blog I imagine?

You are IN THE KNOW!
Вы в курсе!

The TRUTH is out there. Go get 'em Mulder, Mulder, Mulder!!!

BS44325

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.

Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!

Blind, blind, blind!!!

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.

Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!

Blind, blind, blind!!!

Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.

JC29856

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.

Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!

Blind, blind, blind!!!

Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.

Solid 8.0 GERN-BERN score!

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.

Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!

Blind, blind, blind!!!

Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.

So who should lead the investigation, if not a special prosecutor? The Russians, Russians, Russians?

dignin

JC29856 said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.

Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!

Blind, blind, blind!!!

Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.

Solid 8.0 GERN-BERN score!

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

ledvedderman said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

my2hands said:

BS44325 said:

tbergs said:

Here's a theory, since Russia hacked both DNC and RNC, but only released DNC, one could presume that a deal was made with Russia by then republican nominee Trump and his team. They agreed to leak only DNC emails in efforts to help his chances of winning and in exchange Trump promised to appoint pro-Russia cabinet members so the RNC info wouldn't be released. They have already admitted to being in contact with Russia during the election, so this would be reasonable.

The RNC wasn't hacked

Sure it wasnt...

Anybody that thinks they aren't holding info on the republicans and this candidate for future use/exploitation is crazy

You could be right but until that time we'll have to just wait and see. The RNC was at odds with Trump for the bulk of the primaries so any related info would be of the "DNC must stop Bernie" variety. In terms of other republicans it is hard to know if any of them fell for the phishing scam that ensnared Podesta. Most 10 year olds know not to fall for those so the Republicans might just be ok. That being said every country tries to hack everybody so they certainly should be careful and the Trump administration should avoid the use of non-secure basement servers. After 8 years of a party that is being burned by it's own incompetence it is nice to see the entire AMT agrees on the need for better cybersecurity.

Waffles for breakfast or flip flops?

I always have evidence before breakfast.

Perhaps you'd like to serve some up?

There is no evidence of a successful RNC hack to serve. Just one word against another. If you choose to believe the CIA over the FBI that is your choice but it is one based on bias.

And you're as guilty as anyone else in choosing for your own bias.

I'm not choosing. On this point of evidence I'm calling it a wash...who am I to pick one agency over another? Both agencies have a history of getting things right and getting things wrong. Everybody on here is running with the scenario that fill's their own desires. I am all for an investigation but why even have one if everybody has determined the outcome already? Also...let's not forget that I am the neocon on these boards who has been calling for the most hawkish position on Russia from the beginning of time. My personal foreign policy lines up with Rubio and McCain far more then it lines up with Trump...if he even has one? I have my own concerns about what kind of relationship he will have with Russia but I find the concept of him being "Putin's Puppet" to be just plain infantile. So far his cabinet selections don't bother me and I am willing to wait and see how Tillerson does in confirmation hearings before passing judgement. People who never heard of Tillerson two weeks ago are all of the sudden pretending to be Tillerson experts because they have clicked the right link. It would be wise for people who are consistently wrong to get some more information before making grand pronouncements.

Have a blog, blog, blog you can point me to for salient information? That sound you hear is of knives being sharpened.

Because the "public" has made up its mind, lets not have an investigation? Special prosecutor should be appointed now!!!

Blind, blind, blind!!!

Clearly I wrote that I am all for an investigation although there doesn't seem to be the need for a special prosecutor. Once you develop better reading comprehension skills I shall personally forward you more blogs to read.

My third grade reading level is fully appropriate for the blogs you'll link me to. No need to go to skool. Please link me to Putin's Puppet or is it another one of your biases showing? Talk about reading comprehension. Love, love, love the assumptions from high on up in the Ivory Tower too, two, to.

my2hands

All I know is the President-Elect actually had time to meet with Kanye West yesterday

lol

dignin

Yet another red flag here.

"Look, I think that many things have to change, and I think that it's important that we look at all of those traditions that are great, but quite frankly, as you know, don't really make news," Priebus told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. "And you know, even looking at things like the daily White House briefing from the press secretary, I mean, there's a lot of different ways that things can be done, and I can assure you we're looking at that."

http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/14/media/reince-priebus-trump-administration-white-house-press/index.html