Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
I don't remember any First Lady before this having such an impact as a speaker/surrogate. That's in part due to the direction of this campaign, but also Michelle Obama is just that good.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
.
Ha! Want to see the GOP really implode? Follow our first Black President, with a the first Female President, with the first Black Female President.my2hands said:
and could be setting up her own run in 2024...JimmyV said:I don't remember any First Lady before this having such an impact as a speaker/surrogate. That's in part due to the direction of this campaign, but also Michelle Obama is just that good.
0 -
And 538 has her slightly over 87% chance to win. Is 90% or 95% possible?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
26 days left for trump's spiral to head even further downward.Halifax2TheMax said:And 538 has her slightly over 87% chance to win. Is 90% or 95% possible?
but also 26 days left for clinton to slip up. that would be one epic fuckup, wouldn't it?By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
If you think that was criticizing you should double check the definition.Halifax2TheMax said:
Wow, criticized if I read them, criticized if I don't. I do have a pretty good sense of how political campaigns work but my education and experience wouldn't prevent me from considering other sources of information. Unfortunately, you don't share the same view. Ignorance is indeed bliss.JC29856 said:
If you have a good feel for the inter workings of campaigns then no need to read the campaign emails.Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, kind of like how I feel about internal campaign emails but I've been reading them anyway. I'm not asking because I expect you to change your mind but I think it gives a good description of Hillary's flaws. But ignorance is bliss I guess.JC29856 said:
No, I stay away from endorsements. I never really understood why they mattered, whether from a publication or a person.Halifax2TheMax said:
Did you read the WaPo editorial endorsement of Hillary?JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.0 -
The blood in your eyes is effecting your comprehension and/or vision, do not operate heavy equipment or operate a motor vehicle.mrussel1 said:
What do you mean? Where the electors refuse to cast for Hillary? No way. Won't happen.JC29856 said:
I wouldn't be least bit surprised if electoral college went against vote! That would make for a real shit show.JC29856 said:
6 is fair, 400 ev and 4M popular is what I expect.mrussel1 said:
What is close to you? The country is polarized. If she wins by 6 points, that's a landslide. If she gets 330 EV, that's a landslide, I would say.JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.
I also expect the republicans to launch impeachment proceedings shortly after inauguration. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the first day possible, wherever that would be.
No way on 400 either. I'd have to do the math, but you would have to flip some really, really red states to make that happen.0 -
Warning: The blood in your eyes is effecting your comprehension and/or vision, do not operate heavy equipment or operate a motor vehicle.Gern Blansten said:
That's not going to happen.JC29856 said:
I wouldn't be least bit surprised if electoral college went against vote! That would make for a real shit show.JC29856 said:
6 is fair, 400 ev and 4M popular is what I expect.mrussel1 said:
What is close to you? The country is polarized. If she wins by 6 points, that's a landslide. If she gets 330 EV, that's a landslide, I would say.JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.
I also expect the republicans to launch impeachment proceedings shortly after inauguration. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the first day possible, wherever that would be.0 -
Yeah we'll seeRemember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
So, all of those Wiki emails you're posting are really all about increasing your post count? You made an assumption about me, see the bolded part, and followed it with a judgment. How is that not critical? What if I had no knowledge of inter workings of campaigns or an exceptional knowledge or some level of knowledge in between? Why would you suggest that I not read the emails or that there was no need for me to do so?JC29856 said:
If you think that was criticizing you should double check the definition.Halifax2TheMax said:
Wow, criticized if I read them, criticized if I don't. I do have a pretty good sense of how political campaigns work but my education and experience wouldn't prevent me from considering other sources of information. Unfortunately, you don't share the same view. Ignorance is indeed bliss.JC29856 said:
If you have a good feel for the inter workings of campaigns then no need to read the campaign emails.Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, kind of like how I feel about internal campaign emails but I've been reading them anyway. I'm not asking because I expect you to change your mind but I think it gives a good description of Hillary's flaws. But ignorance is bliss I guess.JC29856 said:
No, I stay away from endorsements. I never really understood why they mattered, whether from a publication or a person.Halifax2TheMax said:
Did you read the WaPo editorial endorsement of Hillary?JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Your right but you mind showing me the bold and the assumption made? It could be my phone acting up. Appreciate the discussion?Halifax2TheMax said:
So, all of those Wiki emails you're posting are really all about increasing your post count? You made an assumption about me, see the bolded part, and followed it with a judgment. How is that not critical? What if I had no knowledge of inter workings of campaigns or an exceptional knowledge or some level of knowledge in between? Why would you suggest that I not read the emails or that there was no need for me to do so?JC29856 said:
If you think that was criticizing you should double check the definition.Halifax2TheMax said:
Wow, criticized if I read them, criticized if I don't. I do have a pretty good sense of how political campaigns work but my education and experience wouldn't prevent me from considering other sources of information. Unfortunately, you don't share the same view. Ignorance is indeed bliss.JC29856 said:
If you have a good feel for the inter workings of campaigns then no need to read the campaign emails.Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, kind of like how I feel about internal campaign emails but I've been reading them anyway. I'm not asking because I expect you to change your mind but I think it gives a good description of Hillary's flaws. But ignorance is bliss I guess.JC29856 said:
No, I stay away from endorsements. I never really understood why they mattered, whether from a publication or a person.Halifax2TheMax said:
Did you read the WaPo editorial endorsement of Hillary?JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.0 -
You guys aren't changing each other's mind... your efforts may be better used elsewhere?0
-
I notice it too now. The quote feature is acting up it seems. On my desk top i had to click on "show previous quotes" to see that I quoted you and bolded it. On my phone I don't see anything.JC29856 said:
Your right but you mind showing me the bold and the assumption made? It could be my phone acting up. Appreciate the discussion?Halifax2TheMax said:
So, all of those Wiki emails you're posting are really all about increasing your post count? You made an assumption about me, see the bolded part, and followed it with a judgment. How is that not critical? What if I had no knowledge of inter workings of campaigns or an exceptional knowledge or some level of knowledge in between? Why would you suggest that I not read the emails or that there was no need for me to do so?JC29856 said:
If you think that was criticizing you should double check the definition.Halifax2TheMax said:
Wow, criticized if I read them, criticized if I don't. I do have a pretty good sense of how political campaigns work but my education and experience wouldn't prevent me from considering other sources of information. Unfortunately, you don't share the same view. Ignorance is indeed bliss.JC29856 said:
If you have a good feel for the inter workings of campaigns then no need to read the campaign emails.Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, kind of like how I feel about internal campaign emails but I've been reading them anyway. I'm not asking because I expect you to change your mind but I think it gives a good description of Hillary's flaws. But ignorance is bliss I guess.JC29856 said:
No, I stay away from endorsements. I never really understood why they mattered, whether from a publication or a person.Halifax2TheMax said:
Did you read the WaPo editorial endorsement of Hillary?JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.
Anyway, I find reading the emails fascinating but not bothersome while wondering why you'd criticize me or dismiss my reading of them? I'm puzzled? And I know I'm not changing any minds nor will mine be changed. It's all good political debate theater.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I don't try to change anyone's mind and I don't tell others what to post or what not to. I created a separate thread for the Podesta emails, I could have just posted in the Hilliary thread to be a dick, I didn't. If you don't give a fuck about the leaks then don't click (this is not at you) the thread. It's a information thread, I don't care if nobody reads them or if 1000s do.Halifax2TheMax said:
I notice it too now. The quote feature is acting up it seems. On my desk top i had to click on "show previous quotes" to see that I quoted you and bolded it. On my phone I don't see anything.JC29856 said:
Your right but you mind showing me the bold and the assumption made? It could be my phone acting up. Appreciate the discussion?Halifax2TheMax said:
So, all of those Wiki emails you're posting are really all about increasing your post count? You made an assumption about me, see the bolded part, and followed it with a judgment. How is that not critical? What if I had no knowledge of inter workings of campaigns or an exceptional knowledge or some level of knowledge in between? Why would you suggest that I not read the emails or that there was no need for me to do so?JC29856 said:
If you think that was criticizing you should double check the definition.Halifax2TheMax said:
Wow, criticized if I read them, criticized if I don't. I do have a pretty good sense of how political campaigns work but my education and experience wouldn't prevent me from considering other sources of information. Unfortunately, you don't share the same view. Ignorance is indeed bliss.JC29856 said:
If you have a good feel for the inter workings of campaigns then no need to read the campaign emails.Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, kind of like how I feel about internal campaign emails but I've been reading them anyway. I'm not asking because I expect you to change your mind but I think it gives a good description of Hillary's flaws. But ignorance is bliss I guess.JC29856 said:
No, I stay away from endorsements. I never really understood why they mattered, whether from a publication or a person.Halifax2TheMax said:
Did you read the WaPo editorial endorsement of Hillary?JC29856 said:I'm starting to wonder why from all things I know and am learning about Hilliary and all the things put into motion years ago for her to win the presidency (which she will as I've stated numerous times) why she isn't up 50 points?
I kinda wondered the same thing about Gore 2000. Which of the 2 ran a more disastrous campaign?
Shouldn't Hilliary landslide trump (like Gore should have landslided bush)? She has the unprecedented support of even the staunchest republicans. If her margin of victory or the popular vote margin is anywhere near close, then you have to assume Trump is probably the only candidate she would have beat.
I wouldn't want to be a down ticket democrat this year, that's for sure.
Anyway, I find reading the emails fascinating but not bothersome while wondering why you'd criticize me or dismiss my reading of them? I'm puzzled? And I know I'm not changing any minds nor will mine be changed. It's all good political debate theater.0 -
That right would be some funny stuff. Lol, I wonder what the odds would be for that all to come true. Their worst nightmare.CM189191 said:.
Ha! Want to see the GOP really implode? Follow our first Black President, with a the first Female President, with the first Black Female President.my2hands said:
and could be setting up her own run in 2024...JimmyV said:I don't remember any First Lady before this having such an impact as a speaker/surrogate. That's in part due to the direction of this campaign, but also Michelle Obama is just that good.
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)0 -
I'm not so sure about that give there hold on congress Senate and governorships. Plus I'm betting they move to impeach.g under p said:
That right would be some funny stuff. Lol, I wonder what the odds would be for that all to come true. Their worst nightmare.CM189191 said:.
Ha! Want to see the GOP really implode? Follow our first Black President, with a the first Female President, with the first Black Female President.my2hands said:
and could be setting up her own run in 2024...JimmyV said:I don't remember any First Lady before this having such an impact as a speaker/surrogate. That's in part due to the direction of this campaign, but also Michelle Obama is just that good.
Peace0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Actually it does. The US cares about Kim K and who is putting it to her this week.mrussel1 said:
He forgot about Vince Foster, Bill Clinton fostering a child from a prostitute, etc.tonifig8 said:Hey Matt, you mentioned that clown Hannity yesterday, or I did, one of us did...anyhow here he is again:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/12/hannity_wikileaks_proves_everything_that_conspiracy_theorists_said_was_true.html
I don't remember anyone ever giving a shit about advocacy groups and the Catholic church.
Who didn't know Saudi was funding ISIS? How is that a Clinton conspiracy?
Again, this is right wing masturbation shit. The real world doesn't care.
The Clinton Foundation has something in common with ISIS, both funded by the Saudis.0 -
I was under the impression we had laws about aiding add abetting terrorists?unsung said:
Actually it does. The US cares about Kim K and who is putting it to her this week.mrussel1 said:
He forgot about Vince Foster, Bill Clinton fostering a child from a prostitute, etc.tonifig8 said:Hey Matt, you mentioned that clown Hannity yesterday, or I did, one of us did...anyhow here he is again:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/12/hannity_wikileaks_proves_everything_that_conspiracy_theorists_said_was_true.html
I don't remember anyone ever giving a shit about advocacy groups and the Catholic church.
Who didn't know Saudi was funding ISIS? How is that a Clinton conspiracy?
Again, this is right wing masturbation shit. The real world doesn't care.
The Clinton Foundation has something in common with ISIS, both funded by the Saudis.
A dim wit with 4th grade reading level skypes with someone from Afghanistan gets his door kicked in harshly interrogated and spends months in jail while the US government sends $10M to isis thru Saudis.0 -
It's Nice that the Saudis are paying for child vaccines around the world. At least it's going to good use.unsung said:
Actually it does. The US cares about Kim K and who is putting it to her this week.mrussel1 said:
He forgot about Vince Foster, Bill Clinton fostering a child from a prostitute, etc.tonifig8 said:Hey Matt, you mentioned that clown Hannity yesterday, or I did, one of us did...anyhow here he is again:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/12/hannity_wikileaks_proves_everything_that_conspiracy_theorists_said_was_true.html
I don't remember anyone ever giving a shit about advocacy groups and the Catholic church.
Who didn't know Saudi was funding ISIS? How is that a Clinton conspiracy?
Again, this is right wing masturbation shit. The real world doesn't care.
The Clinton Foundation has something in common with ISIS, both funded by the Saudis.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help