Hillary won more votes for President

1…130131133135136…488

Comments

  • Posts: 30,883
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    show previous quotes
    But the radlibs sure make those true facts connect to explain why Trump should not be POTUS.
    But not in the same sentence, like this lazy ass hack writer.
  • Posts: 12,885
    ^^^
    Still does not absolve you if you agree or not with the article.
  • Posts: 30,883
    First, I can answer whatever the fuck I do or don't want to answer. You are not the granter of penance or absolution. Second, I already answered. Go back and read more carefully.
  • Posts: 12,885
    mrussel1 said:

    First, I can answer whatever the fuck I do or don't want to answer. You are not the granter of penance or absolution. Second, I already answered. Go back and read more carefully.

    Totally forgot we are in a Hillary thread.
    No wonder clear answers aren't given.
    My bad.
  • Posts: 30,883
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    show previous quotes
    Totally forgot we are in a Hillary thread.
    No wonder clear answers aren't given.
    My bad.
    Sorry the sentence was too complex. I thought it was pretty straightforward. Let me know if you have any other Rupert Murdoch douchebags to read.
  • Posts: 12,885
    Hillary is angry.
  • Posts: 30,883
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    Hillary is angry.

    I like Turtles. Hillary probably does too.
  • Posts: 24,524
    mrussel1 said:

    First, I can answer whatever the fuck I do or don't want to answer. You are not the granter of penance or absolution. Second, I already answered. Go back and read more carefully.

    Rock the fuck ON, mrussel :)
  • Posts: 30,883
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    Hillary is angry.

    Honestly PJFan, if you want some good conservative writing to read, go to amconmag.com That's a good publication. Reason.com is also pretty solid most of the time too. You start pulling articles from there, I'm more likely to have a discussion with you where I get less agitated.
  • Posts: 12,885
    mrussel1 said:

    show previous quotes
    Honestly PJFan, if you want some good conservative writing to read, go to amconmag.com That's a good publication. Reason.com is also pretty solid most of the time too. You start pulling articles from there, I'm more likely to have a discussion with you where I get less agitated.
    Honestly I looked up both the websites that I've never heard of thanks to you.
    And I can honestly say that as a Trump supporter I don't even need the press to make you feel agitated.
  • Posts: 30,883
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    show previous quotes
    Honestly I looked up both the websites that I've never heard of thanks to you.
    And I can honestly say that as a Trump supporter I don't even need the press to make you feel agitated.
    I know you don't. You do an excellent job on your own. I'm just suggesting some higher brow reading than the Toronto Sun or any other Sun/Post publication.
  • Posts: 12,885
    mrussel1 said:

    show previous quotes
    I know you don't. You do an excellent job on your own. I'm just suggesting some higher brow reading than the Toronto Sun or any other Sun/Post publication.
    The Toronto Sun is just one publication that tries to feed the masses.
    One must read all to grasp the concept.
    Unlike when Hillary speaks.
  • Posts: 30,883
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    show previous quotes
    The Toronto Sun is just one publication that tries to feed the masses.
    One must read all to grasp the concept.
    Unlike when Hillary speaks.
    Then start quoting from some better ones. Throw the Economist in the mix too, although that's fairly centrist.
  • Posts: 12,885
    mrussel1 said:

    show previous quotes
    Then start quoting from some better ones. Throw the Economist in the mix too, although that's fairly centrist.
    Better to whom?
    There is a difference between well read and the Economist.
  • Posts: 30,883
    edited July 2016
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    show previous quotes
    Better to whom?
    There is a difference between well read and the Economist.
    Better arguments in general, better reasoning and more thorough.

    I don't get your statement on the Economist.
  • Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    Careful, mrussel and PJF, we may need to Photoshop the two of you into this (watch your bandwidths!!):

    https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6Zt4AjGfhbdMpsrK/giphy.gif
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Posts: 30,883
    brianlux said:

    Careful, mrussel and PJF, we may need to Photoshop the two of you into this (watch your bandwidths!!):

    https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6Zt4AjGfhbdMpsrK/giphy.gif

    That just cost me 100 gigs of data, Brian. Great.
  • Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    mrussel1 said:

    show previous quotes
    That just cost me 100 gigs of data, Brian. Great.
    Oh man, I'm sorry! But wasn't it fun!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Posts: 30,883
    brianlux said:

    show previous quotes
    Oh man, I'm sorry! But wasn't it fun!
    Totally worth it. But now I'll have to sign off for the rest of the month. Free will be crushed.
  • Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,427
    mrussel1 said:

    show previous quotes
    Totally worth it. But now I'll have to sign off for the rest of the month. Free will be crushed.
    You should have gone to someplace like Starbucks and used the free wi-fi and let the evil giant multi-national corporation pay for it!
This discussion has been closed.

Quick Links

Categories