DNC Leaks

18911131431

Comments

  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    I have a feeling Hillary has medical issues she may not even know about....sounds weird I know but we'll see.

    Godfather.
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    The Fixer said:

    I don't understand why Canadiens love American politics so much. We don't care about Canada. Esp your nhl teams who all suck

    this pretty much sums it up ... we care because uhhmerica fucks around all over the world being douchebags and you guys don't care about it ...

    so, ya - we pay attention ... but as Canadians we pay attention to not just you guys but other countries as well ... it just so happens you guys are next to us and the decisions you guys make impact us significantly ... so, forgive us for caring about your election ...

    as for the nhl teams ... that's about as weak as it gets ...
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    Kat said:

    lol, yes I think First Gentleman is the way to go too, Chelsea. I'm having a bit of a problem with FGOTUS though. :)
    http://www.today.com/news/chelsea-clinton-her-mom-i-couldn-t-imagine-better-president-t101244

    This is from another thread, go ahead read it. Especially this part. (Bentley and degenerate)
    (Chelsea) Clinton said she considers Ivanka a friend.
    You guys kill me with the wanting proof on everything. Meanwhile, we've seen WikiLeaks of emails, voicemails and we know the corruption that HRC's pulling w/ DWS, and the corruption going on at Democratic convention.

    Yet neither of you will respond on that. Then suddenly proof falls on deaf ears.

    Wait, so if they are in cahoots, where are the emails to prove it?
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    The Fixer said:

    The Fixer said:

    The Fixer said:

    the clintons give us something new every day! Just throwing this out there....

    http://blackbag.gawker.com/is-this-chelsea-clintons-real-father-1780376180

    1- This isn't new.

    2- Gawker? Seriously?
    If you want something new refer to her speech tonight. 'The Democratic Party is the working party'. Hahahahahajahaha
    Why does that make you laugh?
    Democrats are pro Union, pro big govt, and pro handout. Aka pro no work
    That doesn't even make sense. Have you ever worked in a union?
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    EM194007 said:


    Dude have you been paying attention ! Your boy has invited Russia to hack an American presidential nominee's emails wtf , he's getting killed for this ...

    No Trump fan, but how in the HELL can anyone hack her server now? She doesn't have it any more, the FBI tore the damn thing apart. The libs took the bait, hook, and the line and sinker, :rofl: Sorry, but the libs are the ones looking like fools over this, by trying to go after Trump.
    Hannity was ranting about this all day yesterday, it's a ridiculous line of thought, purely idiotic. It's just twisting and squirming to try and make it look like Trump is some mastermind, saying something that makes little sense so libs will look dumb by covering it from the only angle that makes any sense... It's a convoluted, pathetic attempt to cover yet another childish, ignorant statement that Drumpf squeezed out in a fit of diarrhea.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    FBI is looking into a suspected hack of the DCCC.

    Dems need to consider changing their passwords to something other then 12345
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    What are the odds that Hillary's private server emails hit the net a few weeks before the election?

    I say strong, like bear.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,190
    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    yes, it's so easy to lie to the public and make them believe.......

    Godfather.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,674
    edited July 2016
    brianlux said:

    Oh drat! I meant to post this here. So I'll do it anyway. Sue me! :lol:

    Why can't we just get straight answers any more? Did the DNC rig the election or didn't they? Try to find an answer. New Republic (supposedly a liberal media) say "no they didn't". The Slate, an offshoot of New Republic say the DNC doesn't even know how to rig an election. NY Observer says Wikileak proves they did. Zero Hedge, a business journal says they did. The Nation says they didn't. Indianapolis Star says they did.

    I'm beginning to think everything is rigged. The whole system is kaput. The more I read about Dems and Reps the more sane Green Party looks to me. Greens take stances and nobody says "yes they did!" or "no they didn't!" It's all there. It's plain to see. Take it or leave it. I'll take it. I'm tired of all the other rotten business. How can anyone support either of those two parties anymore? What on earth is in it for you?

    They didn't rig anything unless you are talking about the whole super-delegate arrangement (which would be a fair consideration). As far as the DNC emails go..... As far as I'm concerned that is just a bunch of people involved in politics who are playing politics. I actually can't figure out what the big deal is as far as that goes. What, did everybody think they were all completely objective within the party??? I don't understand the outrage. It seems like business as usual to me. If that is rigged, then yeah, it's always been rigged. Nothing to see here. The entire US election process is completely fucked, and that has nothing to do with anyone who is currently running specifically.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    edited July 2016

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot, because of the leaks?!?? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,674
    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    Oh shit, my bad. Someone call DWS and tell her there was a mistake made.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,674
    edited July 2016
    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    Oh shit, my bad. Someone call DWS and tell her there was a mistake made.
    I don't think there was a mistake made with DWS specifically. I'm talking about the public's reaction to emails that DWS didn't write.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,190
    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    Oh shit, my bad. Someone call DWS and tell her there was a mistake made.
    I don't think there was a mistake made with DWS specifically. I'm talking about the public's reaction to emails that DWS didn't write.
    Yeah none of the emails relate to a conspiracy. Some relate to being biased but that isn't criminal.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    Oh shit, my bad. Someone call DWS and tell her there was a mistake made.
    I don't think there was a mistake made with DWS specifically. I'm talking about the public's reaction to emails that DWS didn't write.
    Yeah none of the emails relate to a conspiracy. Some relate to being biased but that isn't criminal.
    I just love how people will take away what they want to see in something rather than what is written.

  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    Free said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    Oh shit, my bad. Someone call DWS and tell her there was a mistake made.
    I don't think there was a mistake made with DWS specifically. I'm talking about the public's reaction to emails that DWS didn't write.
    Yeah none of the emails relate to a conspiracy. Some relate to being biased but that isn't criminal.
    I just love how people will take away what they want to see in something rather than what is written.

    AHHHAHAHHAHHAHAHA yes sir !

    Godfather.

  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,190
    edited July 2016
    Free said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    At this point I think any email leaks can be refuted as fraudulent. It's easy to make shit up and publish fake emails.

    Wtf are you smoking bro?!? Did DWS not get fired? Did Harry r not say sanders got an unfair shot? I mean c'mon man stop trolling the boards
    I doubt they were fake. The problem with these emails is that many of them are being grievously taken out of context and misinterpreted and then those misinterpretations are being presented as fact.
    Oh shit, my bad. Someone call DWS and tell her there was a mistake made.
    I don't think there was a mistake made with DWS specifically. I'm talking about the public's reaction to emails that DWS didn't write.
    Yeah none of the emails relate to a conspiracy. Some relate to being biased but that isn't criminal.
    I just love how people will take away what they want to see in something rather than what is written.

    example? (meaning an email example that you are referring to please)
    Post edited by Gern Blansten on
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • The Fixer said:

    I don't understand why Canadiens love American politics so much. We don't care about Canada. Esp your nhl teams who all suck

    The fact that you asked this is the answer to your question.

    It's not a 'love' of American politics as much as it is an 'interest' in American politics. The 'interest' in your politics is directly tied to our fortunes which are somewhat intertwined with yours.

    Sooo... put another way... when a bunch of Cletuses all 'git together' strumming their banjos, blowing into their whiskey jugs, shooting their assault rifles into the air from the back if their pick up trucks (outfitted with old sofas) and promote a bona fide idiot as the person to run their country so closely linked to ours... we tend to get interested.

    I'll go have a Molson now. Have a nice day!
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    we should vote a RedNeck (Cletuse) into office LOL !
    interesting statement, I never looked at Canada much differently than the us except for the price of a pack of smokes....glad I quit, but I hade some cool times in Canada.

    Godfather.