Trump

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

Cliffy6745 said:

Not watching but apparently Trump is currently on a pro Russia rant right now and has basically asked them to keep hacking...

Also apparently said Tim Kaine represents New Jersey.

Manafort said today that he won't be releasing his taxes, while denying there is anything Russian related in them. I would LOVE it if he stays on the Russia issue. This is a bad, bad issue. I can guarantee you that these words will be played in Cleveland and Pitts over and over. These cities have heavy Ukrainian and Polish populations to this day. And a good Slavic will NEVER trust the Russian gov't.

This is setting the table for the exposure of all the Clinton Foundation emails. When the Giustra/Clinton connections showing how Russia got control of all that Uranium under Clinton's watch the campaign can say "It's not us that are dealing with the Russian!".

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/1100-donors-to-a-canadian-charity-tied-to-clinton-foundation-remain-secret/2015/04/28/c3c0f374-edbc-11e4-8666-a1d756d0218e_story.html

Look at the bird. Look at the bird.

So you think that the State department can approve uranium sales to a foreign power without the approval of the DOD, DHS and ultimately Obama? People keep trying to bubble this story but it ignores the natural checks and balances inherent in the cabinet positions.

It certainly is possible. You are making a lot of assumptions about who and what departments were involved in these checks and balances. If you read through the article below it will say that some of these items could be approved at the undersecretary level. So we don't actually have a paper trail of who was involved in the approval. What we do know is that many there are many career civil servants who at the request of Secretary of State Clinton would not hesitate to go along with her requests. We know this from the set-up of her server which, as per the inspectors general, clearly operated outside normal record keeping procedures. This doesn't mean these staff are push overs but if the Secretary made her wishes known they wouldn't likely push back on her request.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=1

I disagree with the premise. The career officers are far more likely to NOT go along with her 'wishes'. Regardless, the article specifically points out that several governmental agencies would have to sign off on such a deal, which supports what I am saying. So the State department does not have sole power. Admittedly, I only read aboutr 40% of the article, but please tell me where anything in this article is not just conjecture or seeks to point out the unique circumstances of the Clinton Foundation.

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

Cliffy6745 said:

Not watching but apparently Trump is currently on a pro Russia rant right now and has basically asked them to keep hacking...

Also apparently said Tim Kaine represents New Jersey.

Manafort said today that he won't be releasing his taxes, while denying there is anything Russian related in them. I would LOVE it if he stays on the Russia issue. This is a bad, bad issue. I can guarantee you that these words will be played in Cleveland and Pitts over and over. These cities have heavy Ukrainian and Polish populations to this day. And a good Slavic will NEVER trust the Russian gov't.

This is setting the table for the exposure of all the Clinton Foundation emails. When the Giustra/Clinton connections showing how Russia got control of all that Uranium under Clinton's watch the campaign can say "It's not us that are dealing with the Russian!".

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/1100-donors-to-a-canadian-charity-tied-to-clinton-foundation-remain-secret/2015/04/28/c3c0f374-edbc-11e4-8666-a1d756d0218e_story.html

Look at the bird. Look at the bird.

So you think that the State department can approve uranium sales to a foreign power without the approval of the DOD, DHS and ultimately Obama? People keep trying to bubble this story but it ignores the natural checks and balances inherent in the cabinet positions.

It certainly is possible. You are making a lot of assumptions about who and what departments were involved in these checks and balances. If you read through the article below it will say that some of these items could be approved at the undersecretary level. So we don't actually have a paper trail of who was involved in the approval. What we do know is that many there are many career civil servants who at the request of Secretary of State Clinton would not hesitate to go along with her requests. We know this from the set-up of her server which, as per the inspectors general, clearly operated outside normal record keeping procedures. This doesn't mean these staff are push overs but if the Secretary made her wishes known they wouldn't likely push back on her request.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=1

I disagree with the premise. The career officers are far more likely to NOT go along with her 'wishes'. Regardless, the article specifically points out that several governmental agencies would have to sign off on such a deal, which supports what I am saying. So the State department does not have sole power. Admittedly, I only read aboutr 40% of the article, but please tell me where anything in this article is not just conjecture or seeks to point out the unique circumstances of the Clinton Foundation.

Well on other issues, such as the server, career officers have demonstrated that they would go along with her wishes. The few officers who asked about the server were told not to discuss it ever again and were essentially pressured in to silence. We also know that the State Department didn't have an Inspector General until very late into Clinton's tenure so there wasn't any watch dog to keep an eye on things. Now as far as conjecture is concerned there certainly is a lot of that including in the statement "several government agencies would have to sign off on such a deal". The paper doesn't don't actually tell you which agencies and which staff. Did they even search for this information. Lastly I find it pretty amazing how you can brush this off as an article the "unique circumstances of the Clinton Foundation". There are major red flags here on corruption and pay to play. It shouldn't be brushed off as innocent happenstance brought on by a "unique" situation. There is far more smoke in this article then any article on Trump's connections to the Russians and yet nobody is afraid to make that insinuation. This story needs to be explored no matter where the facts lead. Don't let your backing of Hillary prevent you from recognizing this.

The Trump/Russia money connection-

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/27/the-trump-russia-money-question-in-24-steps/?tid=sm_tw

Friday13 said:

...from $19.4 trillion in debt to the loss of millions of high-paying jobs to the rise of ISIS.

a vote for corrked Hillary is a vote for a failed liberal agenda. A disaster for America.

Don't get taken advantage of anymore.

Vote for intellect, insight and tenacity.

DJ Trump in the house.

WOOT!

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

Friday13 said:

he will be all of our leader.

God Bless

WOOT

Is USAMAMASAN back with us, or did someone revive a ghost? Someone said he was banned.

Wtf??????

Things are gonna get interesting for sure!

Friday13 said:

Hillary,
Where's the press conference?

Thanks,

Woot

Wrong thread joker man.

Craig Mazin ‏@clmazin 9m9 minutes ago
Some of these Trumpers you're arguing with? Yeah, they're Russians being paid by Putin. - Business Insider

It looks like Russia hired internet trolls to pose as pro-Trump Americans
http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-i ... ump-2016-7