THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES...

1…215216218220221…345

Comments

  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    pjhawks wrote:
    81 wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:

    ..how'd that work out?

    obviously when you're getting blown out (as your juggler predicted) you're gonna throw and throw and throw. especially when your offensive coordinator is named mike martz. :lol:




    in other news adam shefter is saying he is hearing the eagles are saying they expect vick to play sunday :thumbup:


    but they were only down 3 late in the 3rd.....


    using facts instead of opinions is frowned upon in the philly threads :)

    .

    fact #1: : they lost by over 2 touchdowns playing that way.

    fact #2: the winning team threw it 24% less than your prescription for success.
    :crazy: :lol:
    www.myspace.com
  • neilybabes86
    neilybabes86 Posts: 16,057
    giants are gonna be head hunting vick...better be careful when he runs and the o line better show up
    i post on the board of a band that doesn't exsist anymore .......i need my head examined.......
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited September 2011
    so the casey mathews at middle lb experiment has come to an end after 2 weeks:

    mathews to the weak side.
    foku to sam.
    chaney back to the middle...where he should have been all along

    i guess this makes sense. not much else you can do at this point. chaney showed a lot of potential there last year. really not a fan of the other two guys.


    still amazes me how much andy reid has undervalued his linebackers for so long. i'll never understand it.
    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • Phantom Pain
    Phantom Pain Posts: 9,876
    The Juggler wrote:
    so the casey mathews at middle lb experiment has come to an end after 2 weeks:

    mathews to the weak side.
    foku to sam.
    chaney back to the middle...where he should have been all around.

    i guess this makes sense. not much else you can do at this point. chaney showed a lot of potential there last year. really not a fan of the other two guys.


    still amazes me how much andy reid has undervalued his linebackers for so long. i'll never understand it.

    How long did it take him to get good Receivers ?

    ;)
    My drinking team has a hockey problem

    The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill



    A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    Phantom Pain wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:
    so the casey mathews at middle lb experiment has come to an end after 2 weeks:

    mathews to the weak side.
    foku to sam.
    chaney back to the middle...where he should have been all around.

    i guess this makes sense. not much else you can do at this point. chaney showed a lot of potential there last year. really not a fan of the other two guys.


    still amazes me how much andy reid has undervalued his linebackers for so long. i'll never understand it.

    How long did it take him to get good Receivers ?

    ;)

    5 years...which is actually remarkably fast considering casey mathews is a starting lb in year 13. :roll:
    www.myspace.com
  • Phantom Pain
    Phantom Pain Posts: 9,876
    The Juggler wrote:
    Phantom Pain wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:
    so the casey mathews at middle lb experiment has come to an end after 2 weeks:

    mathews to the weak side.
    foku to sam.
    chaney back to the middle...where he should have been all around.

    i guess this makes sense. not much else you can do at this point. chaney showed a lot of potential there last year. really not a fan of the other two guys.


    still amazes me how much andy reid has undervalued his linebackers for so long. i'll never understand it.

    How long did it take him to get good Receivers ?

    ;)

    5 years...which is actually remarkably fast considering casey mathews is a starting lb in year 13. :roll:

    How about managing timeouts how much longer do we have to suffer ?

    :lol:
    My drinking team has a hockey problem

    The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill



    A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,912
    The Juggler wrote:
    fact #1: : they lost by over 2 touchdowns playing that way.

    fact #2: the winning team threw it 24% less than your prescription for success.
    :crazy: :lol:

    from ESPN.com - some stats and facts so far.
    "Passing yardage is up 62.3 yards a game (teams are averaging 492.8 passing yards per game) compared to last season. The average length of a completion is up 1.1 yards to a staggering 12.3 yards. Touchdown receptions are up 20.4 percent with 108 passing touchdowns in two weeks. The run-to-pass ratio is 41.2 to 58.8"

    take a look at the average yards per completion. even a 50% completion rate gets you a 1st down on every 2 average pass plays. and the league average for pass plays is almost 60%. moving on up......when around 20-25 years ago 63% of passes was considered 'outlandish' per juggler's stats of last week. it's evolution baby!!!
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited September 2011
    pjhawks wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:
    fact #1: : they lost by over 2 touchdowns playing that way.

    fact #2: the winning team threw it 24% less than your prescription for success.
    :crazy: :lol:

    from ESPN.com - some stats and facts so far.
    "Passing yardage is up 62.3 yards a game (teams are averaging 492.8 passing yards per game) compared to last season. The average length of a completion is up 1.1 yards to a staggering 12.3 yards. Touchdown receptions are up 20.4 percent with 108 passing touchdowns in two weeks. The run-to-pass ratio is 41.2 to 58.8"

    take a look at the average yards per completion. even a 50% completion rate gets you a 1st down on every 2 average pass plays. and the league average for pass plays is almost 60%. moving on up......when around 20-25 years ago 63% of passes was considered 'outlandish' per juggler's stats of last week. it's evolution baby!!!

    yards per completion? dude...did you just discover that stat?
    you can say that about ypc for every year. even in 1990 the league average was 12.5 yards per completion. you have to look at yards per attempt.

    average yards per pass this year is 7.1. average yards per rush attempt is 4.1.

    on the eagles: vick averages 7.15 yards per attempt. mccoy averages 6.6 yards per run.


    there was also a record set for sacks in week 1.

    in this example bears example, jay cutler was sacked 6 times sunday. 11 through 2 weeks. mike martz even said yesterday that he fucked up by calling so many passes and if it continues, cutler probably won't make it through the season.
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -coaching/

    sorry dude...your "innovative" video game dream of throwing over 80% of the time will never, ever, ever, become a reality.
    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    vick cleared by independent doc. :thumbup:

    nfln is showing miracle at the meadowlands 2 on saturday (might just wanna fast forward to the last 10 minutes) :mrgreen:
    www.myspace.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    birds favored by 7.5. wow, that's a big number.

    i was thinking maybe 4 or 5......hmmmm. birds in a blowout maybe? :eh:
    www.myspace.com
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    The Juggler wrote:
    birds favored by 7.5. wow, that's a big number.

    i was thinking maybe 4 or 5......hmmmm. birds in a blowout maybe? :eh:

    I love the eagles this week. 38-20
  • RW81233
    RW81233 Posts: 2,393
    wow a divisional game blowout with a sore Vick and Kafka? The Gmen really must suck ha!
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    The Fixer wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:
    birds favored by 7.5. wow, that's a big number.

    i was thinking maybe 4 or 5......hmmmm. birds in a blowout maybe? :eh:

    I love the eagles this week. 38-20


    might be the best game of the week the more i think about it...

    o/v on eli picks? i'm putting it at 2.5

    :lol:
    www.myspace.com
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    RW81233 wrote:
    wow a divisional game blowout with a sore Vick and Kafka? The Gmen really must suck ha!

    I said before the season started that they would finish last in the division and coughlin would be fired around turkey day.

    I was looking forward to seeing kafka start. mainly because I hate vick
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    The Juggler wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:
    birds favored by 7.5. wow, that's a big number.

    i was thinking maybe 4 or 5......hmmmm. birds in a blowout maybe? :eh:

    I love the eagles this week. 38-20


    might be the best game of the week the more i think about it...

    o/v on eli picks? i'm putting it at 2.5

    :lol:

    yeah, I don't like many NFL games this week. I like a few totals, but the games are tough. I'll be on the birds. also like buffalo a little bit, I think they're for real
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    The Fixer wrote:
    The Juggler wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    I love the eagles this week. 38-20


    might be the best game of the week the more i think about it...

    o/v on eli picks? i'm putting it at 2.5

    :lol:

    yeah, I don't like many NFL games this week. I like a few totals, but the games are tough. I'll be on the birds. also like buffalo a little bit, I think they're for real

    i've yet to figure out if they are for real for real or if they are this year's 2010 chiefs. sunday will tell a lot.

    they're fun to watch...and their old school uniforms are tits.
    www.myspace.com
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    The Juggler wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    yeah, I don't like many NFL games this week. I like a few totals, but the games are tough. I'll be on the birds. also like buffalo a little bit, I think they're for real

    i've yet to figure out if they are for real for real or if they are this year's 2010 chiefs. sunday will tell a lot.

    they're fun to watch...and their old school uniforms are tits.

    I was saying how awesome the bills helmets were on sunday.

    Their offense is good. not sure about the defense. I think they'll be competitive this year is probably what I should have said. THey might be more like the texans from last year than the chiefs
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    and away we go....beers set to be cracked in about an hour.



    GO BIRDS!!!
    www.myspace.com
  • Flagg
    Flagg Posts: 5,856
    This squad has more issues than y'all think. That defense. Yikes.
    DAL-7/5/98,10/17/00,6/9/03,11/15/13
    BOS-9/28/04,9/29/04,6/28/08,6/30/08, 9/5/16, 9/7/16, 9/2/18
    MTL-9/15/05, OTT-9/16/05
    PHL-5/27/06,5/28/06,10/30/09,10/31/09
    CHI-8/2/07,8/5/07,8/23/09,8/24/09
    HTFD-6/27/08
    ATX-10/4/09, 10/12/14
    KC-5/3/2010,STL-5/4/2010
    Bridge School-10/23/2010,10/24/2010
    PJ20-9/3/2011,9/4/2011
    OKC-11/16/13
    SEA-12/6/13
    TUL-10/8/14
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    Flagg wrote:
    This squad has more issues than y'all think. That defense. Yikes.

    the defense and the qb are garbage

    just give the ball to mccoy. what a beast. by far their best player
This discussion has been closed.

Categories