Sports Betting Thread
Comments
-
The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:coming into this season:
Vince Young is 27-12 as a starter (25-14 against the spread)
I'm sure trent dilfer's numbers as a ravens starter were good too. that doesn't make him a good QB either.
vince young sucks
well then why would bet on a team who has a qb you think sucks?
not sure about dilfer. but i'd bet they didn't cover 64% of the time over a 3 year stretch. young's not a great qb by any stretch of the imagination. but the guy wins football games and covers the spread....without having the one of the greatest defenses of alltime. you can't argue with those numbers.
teams can cover without a good qb. see jets yesterday...and steelers...and rams...and lions0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:
I'm sure trent dilfer's numbers as a ravens starter were good too. that doesn't make him a good QB either.
vince young sucks
well then why would bet on a team who has a qb you think sucks?
not sure about dilfer. but i'd bet they didn't cover 64% of the time over a 3 year stretch. young's not a great qb by any stretch of the imagination. but the guy wins football games and covers the spread....without having the one of the greatest defenses of alltime. you can't argue with those numbers.
teams can cover without a good qb. see jets yesterday...and steelers...and rams...and lions
sanchez had 3 touchdowns and was ontarget all day yesterday budi post on the board of a band that doesn't exsist anymore .......i need my head examined.......0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:I'm sure trent dilfer's numbers as a ravens starter were good too. that doesn't make him a good QB either.
vince young sucks
well then why would bet on a team who has a qb you think sucks?
not sure about dilfer. but i'd bet they didn't cover 64% of the time over a 3 year stretch. young's not a great qb by any stretch of the imagination. but the guy wins football games and covers the spread....without having the one of the greatest defenses of alltime. you can't argue with those numbers.
teams can cover without a good qb. see jets yesterday...and steelers...and rams...and lions
64% of the time....a trend that spans multiple years....use this info if you'd like. if not, that is fine too...just trying to help.
go birds.www.myspace.com0 -
neilybabes86 wrote:The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:
well then why would bet on a team who has a qb you think sucks?
not sure about dilfer. but i'd bet they didn't cover 64% of the time over a 3 year stretch. young's not a great qb by any stretch of the imagination. but the guy wins football games and covers the spread....without having the one of the greatest defenses of alltime. you can't argue with those numbers.
teams can cover without a good qb. see jets yesterday...and steelers...and rams...and lions
sanchez had 3 touchdowns and was ontarget all day yesterday bud
the dirty sanchez will be fine. you guys were freaking out way to early on him. he gets his #1 wideout in a couple weeks too....www.myspace.com0 -
neilybabes86 wrote:
sanchez had 3 touchdowns and was ontarget all day yesterday bud
he had a good game. he still sucks0 -
The Jeagler wrote:
64% of the time....a trend that spans multiple years....use this info if you'd like. if not, that is fine too...just trying to help.
go birds.
I don't use trends like that. NFL teams are different from year to year. Those kind of facts are useless for gambling purposes.0 -
The Jeagler wrote:neilybabes86 wrote:
sanchez had 3 touchdowns and was ontarget all day yesterday bud
the dirty sanchez will be fine. you guys were freaking out way to early on him. he gets his #1 wideout in a couple weeks too....
IN the hard knocks thread I said the jets were finishing 3rd in their division. miami, NE, jets. the jets offense is like a pee wee team. I think sanchez blows0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:
64% of the time....a trend that spans multiple years....use this info if you'd like. if not, that is fine too...just trying to help.
go birds.
I don't use trends like that. NFL teams are different from year to year. Those kind of facts are useless for gambling purposes.
maybe thats why you say you do better in college than the pros. i dunno...
to each his own. just saying the titans have won this guy a lot fo $ over the last few years.www.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:
64% of the time....a trend that spans multiple years....use this info if you'd like. if not, that is fine too...just trying to help.
go birds.
I don't use trends like that. NFL teams are different from year to year. Those kind of facts are useless for gambling purposes.
maybe thats why you say you do better in college than the pros. i dunno...
to each his own. just saying the titans have won this guy a lot fo $ over the last few years.
college is easier because there are so many more games to pick from. I've done fine in the NFL. paid for most of my honeymoon to hawaii a couple of years ago with gambling money. My system works just fine for me in NFL and college.0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:I don't use trends like that. NFL teams are different from year to year. Those kind of facts are useless for gambling purposes.
maybe thats why you say you do better in college than the pros. i dunno...
to each his own. just saying the titans have won this guy a lot fo $ over the last few years.
college is easier because there are so many more games to pick from. I've done fine in the NFL. paid for most of my honeymoon to hawaii a couple of years ago with gambling money. My system works just fine for me in NFL and college.
:thumbup:www.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:
truth. you can use the help based on your picks in the first 2 weeks0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:
truth. you can use the help based on your picks in the first 2 weeks
i think you need the saints tonight just to tie me for this week...
and i was laughing because i think this is about the 5th time you've felt the need to reference your honeymoon or something like you have to prove something to us. what year was that anyway?www.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:
truth. you can use the help based on your picks in the first 2 weeks
i think you need the saints tonight just to tie me for this week...
and i was laughing because i think this is about the 5th time you've felt the need to reference your honeymoon or something like you have to prove something to us. what year was that anyway?
2009. I'm proud of my gambling successes. I have to admit that I am good at picking games. My system has been money.
Hawaii is awesome.0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:
i think you need the saints tonight just to tie me for this week...
and i was laughing because i think this is about the 5th time you've felt the need to reference your honeymoon or something like you have to prove something to us. what year was that anyway?
2009. I'm proud of my gambling successes. I have to admit that I am good at picking games. My system has been money.
Hawaii is awesome.
you should write a book on your system.
i thought you were gonna say 2005. i could have paid for 2 honeymoons that year. it was awesome. me and my friends refer to that season as our glory days for betting. it was uncannywww.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:
you should write a book on your system.
i thought you were gonna say 2005. i could have paid for 2 honeymoons that year. it was awesome. me and my friends refer to that season as our glory days for betting. it was uncanny
I'm too lazy to write a book. I have read a bunch of books about sports handicapping though. Most people overanalyze the games. My system revolves mostly around the law of averages.0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:
you should write a book on your system.
i thought you were gonna say 2005. i could have paid for 2 honeymoons that year. it was awesome. me and my friends refer to that season as our glory days for betting. it was uncanny
I'm too lazy to write a book. I have read a bunch of books about sports handicapping though. Most people overanalyze the games. My system revolves mostly around the law of averages.
totally agree with people overanalyzing games.
i like next week's lines.
god bless footballwww.myspace.com0 -
I think the chances of me winning this saints bet are slim and none. brees' noodle arm can't throw in this wind0
-
The Fixer wrote:I think the chances of me winning this saints bet are slim and none. brees' noodle arm can't throw in this wind
did they miss an extra point or something?www.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:I think the chances of me winning this saints bet are slim and none. brees' noodle arm can't throw in this wind
did they miss an extra point or something?
safety in the first qtr. center snapped the ball 10' over smith's head and he knocked ball out of end zone.
Saints have done absolutely nothing on offense. they're extremely lucky to be in this game0 -
y-t-d
17-13
nutin great
locks=
mia-4
tcu-18
iowa-28
air force-13
ala-7
stanford-4.5
nev-3
idaho-7.5
baylor-7.5
nfl-
cincy-3.5
was-3.5
nyj+1.5The whole world will be different soon... - EV
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-130
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help