Oasis is better than the Beatles. Even the Brits agree.

1235710

Comments

  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    Beatles = innovators

    Oasis = imitators




    .


    Ah, finally some wisdom.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • Well I know I don't like it in this case. Plus I am not a Radiohead fan, maybe my name made you assume that I was. However my name is not Radiohead related.
    i just referenced radiohead because they're involved in the thread.
    Come on pilgrim you know he loves you..

    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org

    Oh my, they dropped the leash.



    Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!

    "Make our day"
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    tglass6105 wrote:
    well. i hate to be the one to say it, but, i can't stand the beatles.


    Aren't you just the person to say it?
    Who was gonna say it for you?
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    i just referenced radiohead because they're involved in the thread.


    And you said this in reference to me because? I had said nothing about Radiohead, nor have I said anything that fits into your explanation. You just made clear that you said it because Radiohead fans are snobbish and don't want to try out stuff they think they don't like. I in fact did listen to Oasis so the whole Radiohead thing seems a bit weird to me. They were mentioned but that doesn't seem like a reason to reply with it to me. I mean I am snobbish but I hadn’t been on this thread when you implied that I was.
    Oh well nevermind.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    oh my god you're behaving like a bunch of kinders. listen to radiohead(i do) don't listen to radiohead. like oasis for the music or think they're a bunch of prats(i can do both). who cares what other people think.

    what i want to hear is eddie vedder singing baby one more time. (cheerleader outfit optional) :p
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    The Beatles are better than Oasis that is what this thread is about. Oh no wait there was a question about that wasn't there? No there can't have been.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    then to answer the question. no, oasis are not better than the beatles. cause that would make them bigger than jesus wouldn't it? and i do believe there's more jesus fans in the world than oasis fans.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    then to answer the question. no, oasis are not better than the beatles. cause that would make them bigger than jesus wouldn't it? and i do believe there's more jesus fans in the world than oasis fans.


    hahahahahahaha. That remark caused some trouble back then. And to think that he was actually right about it.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    hahahahahahaha. That remark caused some trouble back then. And to think that he was actually right about it.

    i don't know about that karma.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    i don't know about that karma.


    About what?
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    About what?


    that he was actually right about it.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • cobainkid
    cobainkid Posts: 17
    haha you've got to be kidding me... that's the dumbest thing i've ever read
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    that he was actually right about it.


    Sure he was. They were getting so big that it became absured. That was what he wanted to say. He wasn't saying The Beatles were better than Jesus. But everywhere youngsters were losing their religion. Rock was everywhere, it was becoming a new religion, and The Beatles were the biggest thing in rock at the time.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    he's not the messiah. he's a very naughty boy.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    he's not the messiah. he's a very naughty boy.


    He wasn't the messiah and he didn't say that he was. He knew it would fuck people up though. But he was right The Beatles were getting more populair than Christianity.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    paging monty python.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    paging monty python.


    Do they have a pagier?
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • then to answer the question. no, oasis are not better than the beatles. cause that would make them bigger than jesus wouldn't it? and i do believe there's more jesus fans in the world than oasis fans.
    No, no, no..... MORE POPULAR than Jesus. THAT'S what John said. :p And he certainly didn't mean it the way it was interpreted.
    "and he still gives his love, he just gives it away and the love he receives is the love that is saved,..."
  • Sure he was. They were getting so big that it became absured. That was what he wanted to say. He wasn't saying The Beatles were better than Jesus. But everywhere youngsters were losing their religion. Rock was everywhere, it was becoming a new religion, and The Beatles were the biggest thing in rock at the time.
    FINALLY another person who understands the mind of John Lennon! High five that!
    "and he still gives his love, he just gives it away and the love he receives is the love that is saved,..."
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    fanch75 wrote:
    Truthfully, I just got into Oasis in the last year & a half, two years or so (I have a habit of getting into stuff post-humously), and it (their attitude) was a part of their appeal to me. I dunno. I guess I dig it that they are unapologetic rockstars, just saying "fuck it, gimme a fuckin beer ya wanka" as opposed to trying to be all deep & meaningful all the time.

    exactly. i was so tired of everybody acting like being a great band was something to be ashamed of. all this false humility and whatnot was getting tired and im glad pearl jam grew out of it. everybody posing to be the deepest most sensitive and tortured artist around.

    oasis was a breath of fresh air. no pretension, no we're super deep and meaningful, no "we dont deserve this." they showed up writing great tunes and loving it. they play rock to rock the fuck out. they've got an attitude that was missing from rock. that "this is us and if you dont like it piss off" thing. in that sense they're more punk than 99% of punk bands out there. sure they're not innovators, but innovation is over-rated. ill take a band willing to be the best godamn arena rock band out there writing the catchiest songs out there over some artsy pretentious group that ends up turning out half assed unlistenable pieces of trash in the name of breaking new ground (im lookin at you radiohead) any day of the week.

    not that oasis is better than the beatles. the beatles are a tough act for anyone to follow. but the oasis bashing is stupid, esp when the only reason is "they're wankers." so were most of the original bad boys that made rock so popular. rock isn't SUPPOSED to be wholesome.