Oasis is better than the Beatles. Even the Brits agree.

1356710

Comments

  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    I can't. Their attitude was the biggest reason for dumping them.

    that's shame then karma.
    all i care about is what's on the disc. i know they're possibly the biggest prats on earth but it's not like i have to live with them. besides they're older now. i'd like to think that they've matured somewhat.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Kryptos
    Kryptos Posts: 34
    Everyone one of the records in that top ten wipes the floor with oasis...it truly looks ridiculous w/ them at no.1. It's akin to putting a pumpkin on the top of a christmas tree. Oasis is crap...even Blur is better than they are.
  • pj_zombie
    pj_zombie Posts: 272
    I've never even heard an Oasis song before. Actually, I never even knew who they were before last year when I saw the picture of their new album.
    Pearl Jam Album Rankings
    ---
    1. Ten
    2. Vs.
    3. Pearl Jam
    4. Binaural
    5. No Code
    6. Riot Act
    7. Yield
    8. Vitalogy

    Pearl Jam Song Rankings
    ---
    1. Black
    2. Rearviewmirror
    3. Light Years
    4. Given to Fly
    5. Severed Hand
  • ... thus comfirming that society is de-volving.
    Come on pilgrim you know he loves you..

    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org

    Oh my, they dropped the leash.



    Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!

    "Make our day"
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    that's shame then karma.
    all i care about is what's on the disc. i know they're possibly the biggest prats on earth but it's not like i have to live with them. besides they're older now. i'd like to think that they've matured somewhat.


    Maybe.

    Mostly it is about the music. But I can't stand people with so little respect as they have. It is the same with The Smashing pumpkins, I can't hear it without thinking you're an asshole.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • Maybe.

    Mostly it is about the music. But I can't stand people with so little respect as they have. It is the same with The Smashing pumpkins, I can't hear it without thinking you're an asshole.
    i've never heard that about pumpkins fans... generally they (the real ones) seem to be pretty open.. very opinated.. but open..

    Radiohead fans on the other hand... (speaking as one..)
    Come on pilgrim you know he loves you..

    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org

    Oh my, they dropped the leash.



    Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!

    "Make our day"
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    i've never heard that about pumpkins fans... generally they (the real ones) seem to be pretty open.. very opinated.. but open..

    Radiohead fans on the other hand... (speaking as one..)


    Sorry I don't get it. I am not a real Radiohead fan, three albums that is it. And I am definetly no pumkins fan. Sorry but what do you mean?
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • Igottago wrote:
    Oasis have had a huge impact in British music...huge. The thing with Oasis is, they connect with the everyday brit..they're unpretentious and entertaining, and you can sing along with their songs. They are one of the best, if not the best, arena rock bands of the 1990's. They don't have the artistic credability of a Radiohead, but they aren't really about that. They are about drinking a few pints, and having some fun.

    .... Have you ever read or seen an interview with Liam Gallagher?
    "It's not British music, it's American music. Now c'mon." -Bob Dylan
  • By the way, you do all realize that rock 'n' roll probably would not have survived the 60s if it had not been for the Beatles, right?
    "It's not British music, it's American music. Now c'mon." -Bob Dylan
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    By the way, you do all realize that rock 'n' roll probably would not have survived the 60s if it had not been for the Beatles, right?

    excuse me, but that's just bullshit.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • excuse me, but that's just bullshit.

    Well, maybe I went a little too extreme on that statement, but there's a small amout of truth to it...

    Rock 'n' roll was on it's way out in the early 60s. Record companies weren't as eager to put their money behind rock as they had been during the 50s. It wasn't selling as well and they figured that Elvis was going to be as popular as it'd ever be.

    Then comes the Beatles; they sell tons more than Elvis and go on to revolutionize the rock genre.

    I think if the Beatles hadn't had that explosion it would've been harder for many of the bands of the late 60s to get signed. It's just my personal take.
    "It's not British music, it's American music. Now c'mon." -Bob Dylan
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    Well, maybe I went a little too extreme on that statement, but there's a small amout of truth to it...

    Rock 'n' roll was on it's way out in the early 60s. Record companies weren't as eager to put their money behind rock as they had been during the 50s. It wasn't selling as well and they figured that Elvis was going to be as popular as it'd ever be.

    Then comes the Beatles; they sell tons more than Elvis and go on to revolutionize the rock genre.

    I think if the Beatles hadn't had that explosion it would've been harder for many of the bands of the late 60s to get signed. It's just my personal take.

    and you are entitled to it. i find it very difficult to look at anything from an economic p.o.v. my personal take is that rock would have found away. it would never have died away. if you look, you'll see that much of our muisc survives despite the record companies. they are usualy the last ones to notice what the fuck is going on and then they swoop in and claim it as their own.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • fanch75
    fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    I can't. Their attitude was the biggest reason for dumping them.

    i think their attitude is funny. If it were another band, I'd hate it; but with Oasis, that shit cracks me up.

    i love Oasis.
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • karma defect
    karma defect Posts: 5,483
    fanch75 wrote:
    i think their attitude is funny. If it were another band, I'd hate it; but with Oasis, that shit cracks me up.

    i love Oasis.


    I understand that as well. You just accept it because you don't want to ditch your band. I could not defend it.
    « One man's glory is another man's hell.
    You’re on the outside, never bound by such a spell.
    Together in the darkness, alone in the light.
    I took it upon me to be yours, Timmy,
    I’ll lead your angels and demons at play tonight......»
  • Pery
    Pery Posts: 1,740
    I have listened Oasis....I don't like it at all...not one of their albums. I think there are many bands better than they...and deserve better too.

    I have listened The Beatles...and I'm still doing so.

    It's only a matter of what do you like.
    Buenos Aires 25 - 11 - 2005
    Buenos Aires 26 - 11 - 2005

    ********Proud 2 b Jammer!*******
  • eloesch1
    eloesch1 Posts: 42
    Q gave the new pearl jam 2 stars. Yeah the brits really know their
    music...
  • fanch75
    fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    I understand that as well. You just accept it because you don't want to ditch your band. I could not defend it.

    Truthfully, I just got into Oasis in the last year & a half, two years or so (I have a habit of getting into stuff post-humously), and it (their attitude) was a part of their appeal to me. I dunno. I guess I dig it that they are unapologetic rockstars, just saying "fuck it, gimme a fuckin beer ya wanka" as opposed to trying to be all deep & meaningful all the time.

    But like someone said, it's all opinion & personal preference. If I liked a Black Eyed Peas song, Id listen to teh damn thing (not that I like them, but yeah).
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • mrwalkerb
    mrwalkerb Posts: 1,015
    where the fuck is Prince on here?
    "I'm not suicidal, except when I drink. That's why we don't all drink at the same time, there'd be no-one alive to drive home..."
    Chris Cornell

    http://www.myspace.com/mrwalkerb
  • patw486
    patw486 Posts: 52
    Peatrical wrote:
    I don't like either band, simply because the beatles don't have the depth that entertains me, nor do I like Oasis. But I'd sya the Beatles are the superior band, but to me both seem like boring pop droll. Then again I was born in the 80's years after the Beatles had their huge popularity so that explains why I am not on the band wagon.

    you're probably basing your opinion on the beatles' early material. what's great about them is that their music is timeless. they will always be popular, regardless of when you were born. i was born in the 80s too, but just because they don't sound like the retarded musical fads that have emerged since then doesn't mean it's not worth listening to, or joining the "band wagon" as you put it.
  • NME was involved in this poll.

    I think that just sums it up really.