i actually meant you maturing karma, not the gallagher boys.
I didn't read it that way. You said "people mature". That's a pretty vague statement that can be taked many different ways. If you want your words to be interpreted correctly you need to be more specific. I knew someone once who told a friend "I had an attitude but I divorced it". Not only was I supposed to be listening to his conversation with someone else I was supposed to interpret it as meaning I had an attitude and he didn't like it.
Sorry to get of topic, but karma is right. A personal opinion was given and it is karma's right to have that opinion. I personally don't like Oasis at all...except the song Lyla. When they first released songs in North America I thought they were just a bunch of Beatles wanna-bees and they were failing miserably. My opinion. My right.
"and he still gives his love, he just gives it away and the love he receives is the love that is saved,..."
I didn't read it that way. You said "people mature". That's a pretty vague statement that can be taked many different ways. If you want your words to be interpreted correctly you need to be more specific.
and that is why i clarified what i meant with karma.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
You know, Sgt. Pepper's has so many bogus Paul McCartney songs on it that I might go for Definately Maybe being a better album. However, the White Album and Revolver are way way better than Oasis.
Everyone on here is saying how "noone will ever be as big or better than the beatles".
This is only because the beatles had been put on this huge pedistal many many years ago, and now people are just following the crowd by saying they were amazing, and that they were so talented...when in reality, they werent the most musically talented people, i think even they would admit that. its common knowledge that Ringo Star was one of the worst famous drummers of the time for god sake. What they beatles did was write great pop songs that worked at the time, thats what Oasis also do, but it just so happens they came a little later, and then would always be overshadowed by previous bands.
Also i think alot of you would find that Oasis are mega-influential in music...especially in brittish music just now, all these new indie bands coming out...alot of them are so oasis-esque. take the arctic monkeys for example, they are influenced by them not so much musically, but by the arrogance of the front man.
Also, saying one bands album is better than anothers, is in no way saying they are a better band in all, its jsut saying that they managed to make an albyum which is superier to the many great ones the other band made...
sorry for my spelling, i would go back and fix it but i just cant be arsed so...
Oasis and beatles, man a tough call, I could think of 500+ albums I would prefer to listen to and rate higher than anything by either.
Two of the most over rated british bands ever.
So when you say even the brits agree, dont take a poll's word as meaning the entire demographic of our nation.
oh yeah... i love the first two Oasis albums too. once in awhile, they are refreshing to hear. but i'm amused by their unstoppable popularity in Britain.
Comments
Sorry to get of topic, but karma is right. A personal opinion was given and it is karma's right to have that opinion. I personally don't like Oasis at all...except the song Lyla. When they first released songs in North America I thought they were just a bunch of Beatles wanna-bees and they were failing miserably. My opinion. My right.
and that is why i clarified what i meant with karma.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Everyone on here is saying how "noone will ever be as big or better than the beatles".
This is only because the beatles had been put on this huge pedistal many many years ago, and now people are just following the crowd by saying they were amazing, and that they were so talented...when in reality, they werent the most musically talented people, i think even they would admit that. its common knowledge that Ringo Star was one of the worst famous drummers of the time for god sake. What they beatles did was write great pop songs that worked at the time, thats what Oasis also do, but it just so happens they came a little later, and then would always be overshadowed by previous bands.
Also i think alot of you would find that Oasis are mega-influential in music...especially in brittish music just now, all these new indie bands coming out...alot of them are so oasis-esque. take the arctic monkeys for example, they are influenced by them not so much musically, but by the arrogance of the front man.
Also, saying one bands album is better than anothers, is in no way saying they are a better band in all, its jsut saying that they managed to make an albyum which is superier to the many great ones the other band made...
sorry for my spelling, i would go back and fix it but i just cant be arsed so...
cho
i was hoping this thread would die..
~it is shining it is shining~
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
and there are only a few bands that are even comparable to the beatles
oasis aint one, maybe after they put out ten more GOOD records
Two of the most over rated british bands ever.
So when you say even the brits agree, dont take a poll's word as meaning the entire demographic of our nation.