Media Ignores Higher Black on White Crime Rate for PC Crap
CorporateWhore
Posts: 1,890
The execution-style murder of three African-American college students in Newark, N.J., forced to kneel and shot in the head -- allegedly by an illegal alien from Peru who was out on bail for the serial rape of a 5-year-old -- has the makings of a Willie Horton issue in 2008.
Newark, like New York, is a "sanctuary city," where cops are not to ask criminal suspects if they are in the country legally. Mitt Romney has been hammering Rudy Giuliani on the issue, trashing his tough-cop resume by painting the mayor as den mother of the Big Apple's playpen for illegal aliens.
The arrest of Jose Carranza in that Newark massacre, amid reports he had Hispanic accomplices and the murders may have been part of a gang initiation, has also elevated the issue of the black-brown war raging in U.S. big cities.
In the Aug. 10 Washington Post story that covered the Carranza arrest, the same page had two related articles. One was headlined, "Study: Almost Half of Murder Victims Black," the other, "Slaying of Popular Editor Stuns Blacks in Oakland."
The second headline reveals an ideological slant. One would assume that everyone in Oakland was stunned by the daylight execution of African-American editor Chauncey Bailey, allegedly by a teenage foot soldier at Your Black Muslim Bakery, which Bailey was investigating.
At Bailey's funeral, a mourner held up a sign reading, "Stop Black on Black Violence." That was the subject of the second Post story.
"Nearly half the people murdered in the United States are black," declared the opening paragraph, "part of a persistent pattern in which African Americans are disproportionately victimized by violent crime, according to a new Justice Department study."
Among other conclusions reported by the Post:
-- Blacks are more likely than whites or Hispanics to be victims of crime.
-- Blacks are more likely than any other group to be victims of "serious violent crime," such as rape, assault and robbery.
-- Blacks were more than twice as likely as whites to be confronted with a firearm during a crime.
"Overall, the new Justice findings jibe with previous studies," said the Post. "For example, a review of FBI data from 2004 by the Violence Policy Center, a liberal-leaning group that campaigns for stricter gun control laws, found that blacks accounted for about half of the nation's murder victims that year."
"Black victimization is a real problem, and it's often black on black," said David Harris, a law professor at the University of Toledo who studies crime statistics.
"Often"? Correction, Harris. As the Post reports and Justice concedes, in more than nine out of 10 cases, black victims are murdered by fellow blacks.
Utterly absent from the Post story and Justice Department stats is anything about white victims of crime. Not a word. Do white folks not count, though they are two-thirds of the population?
Yet, in "The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America," produced by the "right-leaning" New Century Foundation in 2005, using the same FBI and Justice surveys, startling facts emerge:
-- "Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks." Forty-five percent of the victims of violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent are black, 10 percent are Hispanic.
-- Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.
-- "Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery." (If decent black folks have trouble hailing a cab, and they do, these numbers may help explain it.)
-- Black-on-white rape is 115 times more common than the reverse.
Even the two most famous sexual assaults by white men on black women in the last two decades -- the Tawana Brawley and Duke rape cases -- turned out to be hoaxes.
What do these statistics tell us? A message the Post will not report. The real repository of racism in America -- manifest in violent interracial assault, rape and murder -- is to be found not in the white community, but the African-American community. In almost all interracial attacks, whites are the victims, not the victimizers.
Why does the Post not report such statistics? My guess: Because the stats would shatter the Post's cultivated image of America as a land where white racism is the great lurking malevolent monster. Stories that conform to the image get play. Stories that contradict it are buried.
But, if the Bush Justice Department is doing in-depth studies on black victims of crime and who is responsible, why not one on the victimization of Americans of all colors and who is responsible?
Or is that information we ought not know, and news not fit to print?
Why are these facts not being reported? Political correctness. You will never cease to hear about Black on Black crime and how awful it is. Yet, the Black on White crime rate is higher than Black on Black crime.
The color of crime is statistically dark-skinned. Perhaps the media should report that instead of sweeping it under the rug.
Newark, like New York, is a "sanctuary city," where cops are not to ask criminal suspects if they are in the country legally. Mitt Romney has been hammering Rudy Giuliani on the issue, trashing his tough-cop resume by painting the mayor as den mother of the Big Apple's playpen for illegal aliens.
The arrest of Jose Carranza in that Newark massacre, amid reports he had Hispanic accomplices and the murders may have been part of a gang initiation, has also elevated the issue of the black-brown war raging in U.S. big cities.
In the Aug. 10 Washington Post story that covered the Carranza arrest, the same page had two related articles. One was headlined, "Study: Almost Half of Murder Victims Black," the other, "Slaying of Popular Editor Stuns Blacks in Oakland."
The second headline reveals an ideological slant. One would assume that everyone in Oakland was stunned by the daylight execution of African-American editor Chauncey Bailey, allegedly by a teenage foot soldier at Your Black Muslim Bakery, which Bailey was investigating.
At Bailey's funeral, a mourner held up a sign reading, "Stop Black on Black Violence." That was the subject of the second Post story.
"Nearly half the people murdered in the United States are black," declared the opening paragraph, "part of a persistent pattern in which African Americans are disproportionately victimized by violent crime, according to a new Justice Department study."
Among other conclusions reported by the Post:
-- Blacks are more likely than whites or Hispanics to be victims of crime.
-- Blacks are more likely than any other group to be victims of "serious violent crime," such as rape, assault and robbery.
-- Blacks were more than twice as likely as whites to be confronted with a firearm during a crime.
"Overall, the new Justice findings jibe with previous studies," said the Post. "For example, a review of FBI data from 2004 by the Violence Policy Center, a liberal-leaning group that campaigns for stricter gun control laws, found that blacks accounted for about half of the nation's murder victims that year."
"Black victimization is a real problem, and it's often black on black," said David Harris, a law professor at the University of Toledo who studies crime statistics.
"Often"? Correction, Harris. As the Post reports and Justice concedes, in more than nine out of 10 cases, black victims are murdered by fellow blacks.
Utterly absent from the Post story and Justice Department stats is anything about white victims of crime. Not a word. Do white folks not count, though they are two-thirds of the population?
Yet, in "The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America," produced by the "right-leaning" New Century Foundation in 2005, using the same FBI and Justice surveys, startling facts emerge:
-- "Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks." Forty-five percent of the victims of violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent are black, 10 percent are Hispanic.
-- Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.
-- "Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery." (If decent black folks have trouble hailing a cab, and they do, these numbers may help explain it.)
-- Black-on-white rape is 115 times more common than the reverse.
Even the two most famous sexual assaults by white men on black women in the last two decades -- the Tawana Brawley and Duke rape cases -- turned out to be hoaxes.
What do these statistics tell us? A message the Post will not report. The real repository of racism in America -- manifest in violent interracial assault, rape and murder -- is to be found not in the white community, but the African-American community. In almost all interracial attacks, whites are the victims, not the victimizers.
Why does the Post not report such statistics? My guess: Because the stats would shatter the Post's cultivated image of America as a land where white racism is the great lurking malevolent monster. Stories that conform to the image get play. Stories that contradict it are buried.
But, if the Bush Justice Department is doing in-depth studies on black victims of crime and who is responsible, why not one on the victimization of Americans of all colors and who is responsible?
Or is that information we ought not know, and news not fit to print?
Why are these facts not being reported? Political correctness. You will never cease to hear about Black on Black crime and how awful it is. Yet, the Black on White crime rate is higher than Black on Black crime.
The color of crime is statistically dark-skinned. Perhaps the media should report that instead of sweeping it under the rug.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
-Enoch Powell
Post edited by Sea on
0
Comments
-
CorporateWhore wrote:The execution-style murder of three African-American college students in Newark, N.J., forced to kneel and shot in the head -- allegedly by an illegal alien from Peru who was out on bail for the serial rape of a 5-year-old -- has the makings of a Willie Horton issue in 2008.
Newark, like New York, is a "sanctuary city," where cops are not to ask criminal suspects if they are in the country legally. Mitt Romney has been hammering Rudy Giuliani on the issue, trashing his tough-cop resume by painting the mayor as den mother of the Big Apple's playpen for illegal aliens.
The arrest of Jose Carranza in that Newark massacre, amid reports he had Hispanic accomplices and the murders may have been part of a gang initiation, has also elevated the issue of the black-brown war raging in U.S. big cities.
In the Aug. 10 Washington Post story that covered the Carranza arrest, the same page had two related articles. One was headlined, "Study: Almost Half of Murder Victims Black," the other, "Slaying of Popular Editor Stuns Blacks in Oakland."
The second headline reveals an ideological slant. One would assume that everyone in Oakland was stunned by the daylight execution of African-American editor Chauncey Bailey, allegedly by a teenage foot soldier at Your Black Muslim Bakery, which Bailey was investigating.
At Bailey's funeral, a mourner held up a sign reading, "Stop Black on Black Violence." That was the subject of the second Post story.
"Nearly half the people murdered in the United States are black," declared the opening paragraph, "part of a persistent pattern in which African Americans are disproportionately victimized by violent crime, according to a new Justice Department study."
Among other conclusions reported by the Post:
-- Blacks are more likely than whites or Hispanics to be victims of crime.
-- Blacks are more likely than any other group to be victims of "serious violent crime," such as rape, assault and robbery.
-- Blacks were more than twice as likely as whites to be confronted with a firearm during a crime.
"Overall, the new Justice findings jibe with previous studies," said the Post. "For example, a review of FBI data from 2004 by the Violence Policy Center, a liberal-leaning group that campaigns for stricter gun control laws, found that blacks accounted for about half of the nation's murder victims that year."
"Black victimization is a real problem, and it's often black on black," said David Harris, a law professor at the University of Toledo who studies crime statistics.
"Often"? Correction, Harris. As the Post reports and Justice concedes, in more than nine out of 10 cases, black victims are murdered by fellow blacks.
Utterly absent from the Post story and Justice Department stats is anything about white victims of crime. Not a word. Do white folks not count, though they are two-thirds of the population?
Yet, in "The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America," produced by the "right-leaning" New Century Foundation in 2005, using the same FBI and Justice surveys, startling facts emerge:
-- "Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks." Forty-five percent of the victims of violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent are black, 10 percent are Hispanic.
-- Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.
-- "Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery." (If decent black folks have trouble hailing a cab, and they do, these numbers may help explain it.)
-- Black-on-white rape is 115 times more common than the reverse.
Even the two most famous sexual assaults by white men on black women in the last two decades -- the Tawana Brawley and Duke rape cases -- turned out to be hoaxes.
What do these statistics tell us? A message the Post will not report. The real repository of racism in America -- manifest in violent interracial assault, rape and murder -- is to be found not in the white community, but the African-American community. In almost all interracial attacks, whites are the victims, not the victimizers.
Why does the Post not report such statistics? My guess: Because the stats would shatter the Post's cultivated image of America as a land where white racism is the great lurking malevolent monster. Stories that conform to the image get play. Stories that contradict it are buried.
But, if the Bush Justice Department is doing in-depth studies on black victims of crime and who is responsible, why not one on the victimization of Americans of all colors and who is responsible?
Or is that information we ought not know, and news not fit to print?
Why are these facts not being reported? Political correctness. You will never cease to hear about Black on Black crime and how awful it is. Yet, the Black on White crime rate is higher than Black on Black crime.
The color of crime is statistically dark-skinned. Perhaps the media should report that instead of sweeping it under the rug.
LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you."When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."0 -
cornnifer wrote:LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you.
http://www.adl.org/learn/Ext_US/amren.asp?xpicked=5&item=amren"When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."0 -
cornnifer wrote:LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you.
Brilliant! CorporateWhore yewlooking goood.
Peace*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)0 -
Wow, I had no idea how bad blacks were. We should take away their right to vote and make them slaves again. Thats what you'd advocate, right?0
-
In case anyone questions me, here is more from CW's good buddies at The New Century Foundation. "American Renaissance" is apparently their main publication. Niiiiiiice.
Fucking sheesh.
http://www.amren.com/"When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."0 -
Man, that website just makes me so sad. Theres enough shit in the world as it is, why be a racist fuck? I think a lot of white racism these days comes from guilt and insecurity. People are concerned about minorities and certain whites think "why aren't they concerned about me? wahhhhhh" like fucking children. I have a feeling most people who read these sites had/have 1. Small Penises, 2. Bad mothers or 3. Not seen a womans vagina since birth0
-
cornnifer wrote:LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you.
i love it. well said."Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."
"Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore
"i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
~ed, 8/70 -
HAHHAHAAHAHAHA..... I wonder if he knows that.cornnifer wrote:LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you.
How's that line go? If it quacks like a duck......0 -
Sadly, regardless of who produced it or what website they have; the statistics are accurate. They were taken from the very same same FBI and Justice surveys.
Kill the messenger all you want (and I certainly have no love for any white supremacist organization, black supremacist organization or any racist organization, period. Regardless of what race they favor); but the facts are what they are.0 -
cornnifer wrote:LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you.
That's actually a Pat Buchanan article.
The New Century Foundation merely quotes statistical data from the FBI. Whether their motives are racist or not, it doesn't matter. The facts are true. Why do you immediately revert to "racist" when these statistics are stated? Why do you have absolutely nothing to oppose their essential truth?
Maybe it's because you're an ignuramous.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
cornnifer wrote:LOFL!
The New Century Foundation is a fucking white supremacist organization, you moron! Don't bring that weak shit here. Keep it in your fucking Klan rallies. Your rhetoric and your sources completely expose you.
Honestly, I think you exposed yourself, more than anything else.0 -
NMyTree wrote:Sadly, regardless of who produced it or what website they have; the statistics are accurate. They were taken from the very same same FBI and Justice surveys.
Kill the messenger all you want (and I certainly have no love for any white supremacist organization, black supremacist organization or any racist organization, period. Regardless of what race they favor); but the facts are what they are.
Thank you for supporting the facts.
I don't support most of what Jared Taylor and the New Century Foundation says. I do support facts.
Calling someone a racist does not change the fact that blacks have a higher crime rate against whites than against other blacks.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
I've never heard of this organization, but if they're a racist organization, ok, fine. but the bold part of the original post seems to quote statistics from an FBI survey. so my question would be, do any of you have any statistics to refute what was said?? because if you don't, if the statistics quoted are fact, then fact is fact whether or comes from a racist organization or from Mother Teresa.
edit: seems as though others were expressing the same sentiment as I was typing.0 -
I was thinking that maybe it was because you posted information from a white supremacist organization.CorporateWhore wrote:That's actually a Pat Buchanan article.
The New Century Foundation merely quotes statistical data from the FBI. Whether their motives are racist or not, it doesn't matter. The facts are true. Why do you immediately revert to "racist" when these statistics are stated? Why do you have absolutely nothing to oppose their essential truth?
Maybe it's because you're an ignuramous.0 -
Being a racist doesn't change facts either. Still doesn't mean we can't point and laugh.CorporateWhore wrote:Thank you for supporting the facts.
I don't support most of what Jared Taylor and the New Century Foundation says. I do support facts.
Calling someone a racist does not change the fact that blacks have a higher crime rate against whites than against other blacks.0 -
RainDog wrote:Being a racist doesn't change facts either. Still doesn't mean we can't point and laugh.
Still don't have anything to say about the statistics? Nope. You don't. Call me a racist some more and maybe you'll be able to prove me wrong. lolAll I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
CorporateWhore wrote:Thank you for supporting the facts.
I don't support most of what Jared Taylor and the New Century Foundation says. I do support facts.
Calling someone a racist does not change the fact that blacks have a higher crime rate against whites than against other blacks.
Apparently, facts are not important when it comes to applying them to the black community. Just the mere mention of a statistical fact, will earn one an outright verbal attack and accusations of "racism".
Which of course is an act of racism, to begin with.
When you defend one race at all costs, ignoring, dismissing and discounting all facts; you are a racist. Regardless of what race you may be.0 -
ok, let's say the stats are 100% correct...
what's the point...?0 -
How about this? Violent crime has more to do with poverty than with race. However, when you focus on the race aspect of it - and back it up with information from a racist organization - people draw conclusions. Logical ones at that.CorporateWhore wrote:Still don't have anything to say about the statistics? Nope. You don't. Call me a racist some more and maybe you'll be able to prove me wrong. lol0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help