Mircales Exposed!
Ahnimus
Posts: 10,560
Despite the traditional wording used in English texts of Exodus, the 'Red Sea' is not actually referred to in the Hebrew text. The Hebrew refers to 'Yam suph', Sea of Reeds or Reed Sea, which was a significantly smaller, marshy body of swampwater to the north of the Red Sea. This suggests a less traumatic event than is traditionally envisioned. If the Jewish people were chased through the Sea of Reeds, the Egyptians could have either lost track of them through the swamp or, as the second link below suggests, their chariots or horses could have been bogged down in the mud.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passage_of_the_Red_Sea
Anyone else have one?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passage_of_the_Red_Sea
Anyone else have one?
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Our research pointed in the direction of use of some self-igniting material, that ignites spontaneously when in contact with the air. An appropriate candidate for such use would appear to be white phosphorus.
But how could this spontaneous ignition be delayed in order to take place in the appropriate time? Simply, if phosphorus is dissolved in an appropriate organic solvent, self-ignition is delayed, until the solvent has almost completely evaporated. Repeated experiments showed that the ignition can be delayed for half an hour or more, depending on density of the solution and the solvent employed.
We repeatedly demonstrated the technique on live satellite TV in the presence of representatives of the Eastern orthodox Church, igniting spontaneously a number of candles, to their amazement.
http://www.greatlie.com/en/
When the �bush� was dry, it was placed in a simple fire, where the wax melted and flowed out of the bush from the base, leaving an internal passage for the gas rising from the base of the �bush� to the exit vents (holes) on the branches. Finally I connected the base of the construction to an input of natural flammable gas (propane used for cooking) with the final result:http://www.greatlie.com/en/
(plague 1—water turned into blood, fish died)
The redness in the Nile could have actually been pollution caused by volcanic activity, which, due to the color of Nile silt, could make the Nile turn blood red, and would also render it undrinkable. Heavy rains in the red-soiled area of Lake Victoria could have caused reddened water to wash downstream.
Alternatively, a red toxic algal bloom (red tide) could have produced large quantities of toxins that would kill fish.
Earthquakes could have caused an limnic eruption the same way it happened at Lake Nyos.
(plague 2—frogs) Any blight on the water that killed fish also would have caused frogs to leave the river and, probably, die.
(plagues 3 and 4—biting insects and flies) The lack of frogs in the river would have let insect populations, normally kept in check by the frogs, increase massively.
(plagues 5 and 6— livestock disease and boils) There are biting flies in the region which transmit livestock diseases; a sudden increase in their number could spark epidemics.
(plague 7—hail) Volcanic activity not only brings with it ash, but brimstone, and also alters the weather system, occasionally producing hail. Hail could also have occurred as a completely independent natural weather event.
(plague 8—locusts) The weight of hail will destroy most crops, leaving several insects and other animals without a normal food source. The remaining crops therefore would become targeted heavily, and thus be destroyed by swarms of locusts which would otherwise be distributed rather thinly. Or the locusts could have increased due to a lack of predators. Even without these explanations, swarms of locusts are not uncommon today.
(plague 9—darkness) There could be several causes for unusual darkness: a solar eclipse, a sandstorm, volcanic ash, or simply swarms of locusts large enough to block out the sun.
(plague 10—death of the firstborn)
If the last plague indeed selectively tended to affect the firstborn, it could be due to food polluted during the time of darkness, either by locusts or by the black mold Cladosporium. When people emerged after the darkness, the firstborn would be given priority, as was usual, and would consequently be more likely to be affected by any toxin or disease carried by the food.
The word we know as "firstborn" may have meant the higher social class rather than literally the eldest sons, but the same argument applies.
In the 2006 documentary Exodus Decoded, Jewish Canadian filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici hypothesised the selectiveness of the tenth plague was under the circumstances similar to the 1986 disaster of Lake Nyos that is related to geological activities that caused the previous plagues in a related chain of events. The hypothesis was that the plagues took place shortly after the eruption of Thera (now known as Santorini), which is thought to have happened some time between 1450 BCE and 1650 BCE. The eruption sets off a chain of events resulting in the plagues and eventually the killing of the first born. Jacobovici suggests that the first borns in ancient Egypt had the privilege to sleep close to the floor while other children slept on higher ground or even on roofs. Like in Lake Nyos, when carbon dioxide or other toxic gases escape the surface tension of a nearby waterbody either due to geological activity or over satuation, the gas being heavier than air, "flooded" the nearby area displacing oxygen and killing those who were in its path. Jewish households escaped the fate because they were told to observe their first Passover rituals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Plagues#Natural_explanations
And think, if the writer were dyslexic? It may very well have been the Deer Sea.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Or, maybe the translators of the Bible didn't know it, but had come across a spiritual letter, written by Moses that, in fact, says "Dear Sea". Moses was inquiring about Ten Club membership. Thus, the 10 "commandments" really meant 10 "club".
Holy Moses!
We've got a whole new ballgame, folks.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
The scientific debunking of the miracles does not change the essence of their impact--to dwell on that kinda misses the point. Besides, the Old and New Testaments are verified through various ancient historical sources, including non-Christian historians, most notably Plutarch.
It all depends on whom you want to believe.
Just out of curiosity, and in the name of balance, how much effort are you going to put into debunking other religions, like Islam, Hinduism, Wicca, etc. etc.?
Perhaps.
What is the impact?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Islam is based on the same Judeo-Christian scriptures.
Open up the Qu'ran and the first story is that of Abraham.
It's not irrelevant, if there are no Miracles, then there is no divine intervention. Without divine intervention, there is no God.
I wonder what Quran students and scholars would think of that first assertion.
What? Like Hindus feeding milk to statues? Or drinking sewage water because it tastes different than normal water?
I don't see any miracles there.
From my understanding now Sea precedes Abraham in the geneology of Biblical descendancy. Some people interpret this as evolution disguised, i.e.; a tricky way of saying we mammals originated from the ocean, however, most scholars do agree on one thing: Eve wasn't Dama.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Just because something can be scientifically explained does not make it any less a demonstration of divine intervention. Even IF it were a chance physical happening, what are the odds of whatever explanation is put forth happening? And what are the odds of the occasions you've detailed happening at those exact moments, with the events surrounding them all conspiring to happen at the same time?
I see where you're coming from. It's sort of the Mircaleous philosophy brought down with the 14th century highlanders of Scotland. They were a good, Christian people. They won Scotland's independence.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
What are the odds of us two people having this conversation?
Well, let's see...
There are approximately 7 billion people in the world.
There are approximately 65 million registered internet domains.
There are approximately 801 million people with internet access.
What do you think the odds are?
Wait just a minute.
You're using empirical methodology and applying that to a metaphysical discussion?
If you have issues with the faith/the faithful, that's one thing, and I can understand that, because believers have those issues too. However, please don't insult my or anyone else's intelligence like that. It's so clear what you're trying to do, and masking it in all the eager-to-disprove-Scripture lingo you want isn't going to hide it.
I truly and sincerely am sorry that I cannot express myself more graciously, but the truth of the matter is that as a believer, I don't have too much patience for this kind of attempts at disproving my faith and more often than not going on to mocking it. If this utter contempt for the Christian faith you have is a result of some horrendously negative experience with someone/some people who claimed to be believers, I hurt for you and apologize on account of trying to extend Christ's grace as I/we have been called to.
All I can do is pray for you.
Dude, they walked across a grassy marsh, there is no miracle.
I'm not discussing metaphysics, walking across a grassy marsh isn't metaphysical.
You're assuming Ahnimus has discounted those things he's seen in his life that are somewhat unexplainable, mysterious. We all have those. Sometimes, probably most times, it's best to keep those sort of things to oneself. Maybe that's why they are there in the first place.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
That's a crock!
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!