No Smoking in Bars.....

1568101120

Comments

  • RockinInCanada
    RockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    Enacted into law in my home province a few years ago...best thing ever had done...PLUS....it went against the common perception that bar/restaurant owners always say..."we will lose business"....sorry folks once again stats from they very same business owners showed over a period a year following a few months of decreased attendance....the amount of business went up....its a good law and should be enforced everywhere IMHO.....
  • dunkman
    dunkman Posts: 19,646
    To say that a bar is a "public place" is to say that everyone has a right to the property in that bar. Tell me, do you think you should be able to walk into a bar, grab a glass, and drink your fill? Is that your right?


    so when you use 'public transport' does that give me the right to get on for free... and then remove the wheels once i have reached my destination?

    what a strange concept of the word 'public' you must have :confused:
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    dunkman wrote:
    so when you use 'public transport' does that give me the right to get on for free... and then remove the wheels once i have reached my destination?

    what a strange concept of the word 'public' you must have :confused:


    He's goofy that way. That's his trademark.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Derrick wrote:
    These are the times when it would be cool to be able to fart on demand.

    I kid I kid. And yes this is stupid. Some people cake that shit on so it will last the whole day. My company has a perfume policy in the office and a general smell policy (thank god). If you reek of perfume you are asked to wash some of it off or go home for the day. As well, if you stink of BO, HR will give you a mini-deodorant stick to use or will send you home for the day. They also will then make you attend a session on proper business etiquette in terms of attire and personal presentation. This is actually very helpful for some of the landed immigrant workers or even the development/tech guys.

    I was handed a razor at my workplace a couple of times. Clean-shaven was policy, and I had to go to the bathroom and do the deed. Fucking government!

    And that is government, FFG.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • floyd1975
    floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    gue_barium wrote:
    I was handed a razor at my workplace a couple of times. Clean-shaven was policy, and I had to go to the bathroom and do the deed. Fucking government!

    And that is government, FFG.

    Could you have quit?
  • kdpjam
    kdpjam Posts: 2,303
    a bar isn't a library. so glad i moved to newport. as long as there is a place, outside or proper ventilation, smoke it !!!!!!
    lay down all thoughts; surrender to the void
    ~it is shining it is shining~
  • floyd1975
    floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    Enacted into law in my home province a few years ago...best thing ever had done...PLUS....it went against the common perception that bar/restaurant owners always say..."we will lose business"....sorry folks once again stats from they very same business owners showed over a period a year following a few months of decreased attendance....the amount of business went up....its a good law and should be enforced everywhere IMHO.....

    Banning loud obnoxious people from the bars would be a good law too. So would banning perfume and cologne since some people may have asthma attacks from the stench.

    I don't agree with these statements. I am just carrying on the "good law" logic.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    I was handed a razor at my workplace a couple of times. Clean-shaven was policy, and I had to go to the bathroom and do the deed. Fucking government!

    And that is government, FFG.

    It certainly is a form of government.

    Now, what would have happened if you didn't shave?
  • Kushikushun
    Kushikushun Posts: 1,263
    I have asthma and I like to go out with my friends or attend PJ concerts...and it just is fucked up to tell you the truth. I do not understand why people say I should not go to a bar if I dont want to inhale smoke...where does that leave my freedom? Should I just sit on a couch every day? I do go out and dont complain to anyone about it, but it takes me about a week to get my longues sorted again.
    I know its not your fault, but can you be helpful, social and compassionate maybe...just maybe?

    Here in Holland you can smoke in all bars and restaurants and indoor concerts and stuff. So I guess I just do not have a choice then...?!!

    I really wish people wouldnt smoke on concerts, it makes it so much harder for me to enjoy it fully bc I feel sick. I wish Ed would set an example...but hee then he would have to stop handing the wine bottle over too. So, I'll just sit it out in June and recover in July :(

    Derrick wrote:
    Oddly enough, if you go to a restaurant or bingo hall on a Native Reserve, they allow smoking.

    Why is that odd?? Are native people not like other people...?
    Why not be mediocre and be the best at it that you can be?
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    seems that sooner or later this will be a law enacted across the country. how do people feel about his? is it this a freedom issue? health issue?

    other boards have long debates about this. I tend to smoke when I drink so its kinda tough to not be able to at a bar. but I very much encourage this law for the simple fact that second hand smoke does kill. but this is also another thing the government is telling us we cant do. and thoughts?

    Ultimately it's a health issue, mainly because the people who are addicted to smoking are not themselves free. They are trapped in a lethal embrace to an addictive substance.

    I used to smoke for many years. Now that I'm finally free from it, even the faintest smell of it makes me feel physically ill.

    I also now notice how stupid and foolish people look from a distance when they are smoking i.e. either in their cars or walking down the street puffing away.

    It's a really disgusting thing to do to yourself if you truly stop and think about it.

    It's a curse.

    .
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Ultimately it's a health issue, mainly because the people who are addicted to smoking are not themselves free. They are trapped in a lethal embrace to an addictive substance.

    I used to smoke for many years. Now that I'm finally free from it, even the faintest smell of it makes me feel physically ill.

    I also now notice how stupid and foolish people look from a distance when they are smoking i.e. either in their cars or walking down the street puffing away.

    It's a really disgusting thing to do to yourself if you truly stop and think about it.

    It's a curse.

    .

    nicotine is worse then crack
  • martina78
    martina78 Posts: 29
    even flow? wrote:
    So explain to me why you can't smoke on an outdoor patio at the bar. Those with the smoke free lungs can't handle it outside either? Silly rule if you ask me. If the gov't is making huge bucks on making death sticks, people should be able to use them where they want. Bottom line from me.

    And yes to smoke filled bars without people complaining about it.
    Look, I don't agree with people smoking indoors in an enclosed space, but I'm not anti-smoking, and if you want to smoke I don't care as long as it doesn't affect me. Like I said, here in Ireland most pubs provide sheltered areas where people can smoke and everyone seems ok with that. As for the gov't, I know most politicians are arseholes, but maybe sometimes they are actually doing something for the good of most people.
  • callen
    callen Posts: 6,388
    I would agree.

    Nearly all the bars and restaurants in my town are non-smoking by choice, not by government fiat. When I smoked, this didn't bug me in the least bit. The forced ban, however, does.

    generally no bar wants to be the first...so won't happen unless its legislated....where do you live???
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • floyd1975
    floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    martina78 wrote:
    Look, I don't agree with people smoking indoors in an enclosed space, but I'm not anti-smoking, and if you want to smoke I don't care as long as it doesn't affect me. Like I said, here in Ireland most pubs provide sheltered areas where people can smoke and everyone seems ok with that. As for the gov't, I know most politicians are arseholes, but maybe sometimes they are actually doing something for the good of most people.

    I don't care if you want to listen to shitty techno music either, as long as it doesn't affect me. I still don't support legislation against deafening music that I hate though. I also don't care if you want to bathe in cologne before going out. I will find another place if there are too many smelly people in a bar. The fact of the matter is, in any of these situations, it is a personal choice as to whether I patronize the business and it is their choice as to whether the want to target me as a customer.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    callen wrote:
    generally no bar wants to be the first...so won't happen unless its legislated....where do you live???

    Chapel Hill/Carrboro in North Carolina. The vast majority of restaurants here are non-smoking only. The bars are probably 60/40 non-smoking to smoking.

    This "no bar wants to be the first" logic is ludicrous. If that logic had any merit, there wouldn't be any bars.
  • zstillings wrote:
    I hope they ban perfume and cologne next.


    It'll probably be chewing gum first.
  • callen
    callen Posts: 6,388
    Chapel Hill/Carrboro in North Carolina. The vast majority of restaurants here are non-smoking only. The bars are probably 60/40 non-smoking to smoking.

    This "no bar wants to be the first" logic is ludicrous. If that logic had any merit, there wouldn't be any bars.

    theres not one bar in thousands in Houston that are smoke free..none...and its simply because owners don't want to alienate smokers and risk losing business
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • RockinInCanada
    RockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    zstillings wrote:
    Banning loud obnoxious people from the bars would be a good law too. So would banning perfume and cologne since some people may have asthma attacks from the stench.

    I don't agree with these statements. I am just carrying on the "good law" logic.

    Obnoxious people however do not lead to a slow death...unless you have stress issues :)....as for perfume/cologne I see what you are getting at let me see the evidence saying it leads to the death of people then I will be for it....my point is that it is a health issue...one that has been proven it leads to the illness of those not wishing to partake in the activity....
  • RockinInCanada
    RockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    callen wrote:
    theres not one bar in thousands in Houston that are smoke free..none...and its simply because owners don't want to alienate smokers and risk losing business

    Which is the biggest faux arguement out there...."lose business"....you would be surprised how many smokers no matter how much they initially hate the law learn to not mind it....at least all my smoker friends love the law....at first not but once you get used to it and a nice smoke free bar without a fucking haze hovering around and the fact when you get home your clothes do not stink like smokes....
  • floyd1975
    floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    Which is the biggest faux arguement out there...."lose business"....you would be surprised how many smokers no matter how much they initially hate the law learn to not mind it....at least all my smoker friends love the law....at first not but once you get used to it and a nice smoke free bar without a fucking haze hovering around and the fact when you get home your clothes do not stink like smokes....

    I have no problem with non smoking establishments at all. I support that choice as well.