How Many Here Have Even Read The Bible?
Comments
-
eden wrote:Are "most" divided into 66 books, written by over 40 men and spanned THOUSANDS of years in its completion from beginning to end??? Please, explain that away to me Collin. As you know - even non-believes know this to be fact and not conjecture or speculations. We have scientifically aged scrolls to prove the time frame of the writing of the Bible.
All those writers share the same faith, it's as simple as that.THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
eden wrote:Angelica,
I totally admire and look for your posts. I find you to be very enlightened.BUT- its OK to me that there are universal truths, that some things are black and white in this World, your theory FEELS really good but it doesnt answer concrete questions. Its too loosey-goosey for me.As an example - I could decide that I was going to defy the law of gravity and jump off a cliff because it would FEEL really good to fly and dammitt, Im not going to let anyone judge me, Im going to do as I see fit with no accountability to a higher law than myself. Ok, obviously I could choose to do that, but the result would be my death because as we know the law of Gravity is a higher law than my own personal feelings. Its the same to me with the principles and laws of the Bible.
Just yesterday, I said: "Either way we can't dodge the fact that we work around the natural rule--we can't rise above it""The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
eden wrote:Hello? The first half of the bible was written by Jews, the second half Christians.
You are just spouting off the top of your head and arent even making sense anymore.
Last time I checked, Jews believed in God and so did Christians.THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
angelica wrote:Thank-you.
I completely agree that some things are black and white--particularly the Universal Laws, or God's laws.
I agree 100 %. You may not have noticed, but in many of my posts in the past few days, I talk about that we have no choice but to follow Universal Law because we are immersed in it. It sounds like you have questions remaining regarding my approach. It's understandable that it takes time before we all understand each other, if complete understanding is at all possible.
Just yesterday, I said: "Either way we can't dodge the fact that we work around the natural rule--we can't rise above it"
Are you agnostic (a bit unsure either way)? Just wondering where you stand because your posts are very intelligent but dont really take a stand on either side. But is nice how the undercurrent of your posts is love and understanding of everyone.0 -
eden wrote:Are you agnostic (a bit unsure either way)? Just wondering where you stand because your posts are very intelligent but dont really take a stand on either side. But is nice how the undercurrent of your posts is love and understanding of everyone."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
Collin wrote:First time I agree with you 100% in this thread, eden"The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
eden wrote:You said "share the same faith".
If were talking Gods, well Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God, I dont see how that is relevant to the discussion.
The point is the bible was written by people who all have faith that god exists, obviously.
400 years BC there were atheists and there are atheists now, does that mean god doesn't exist, no. It doesn't mean anything, it means in the year 400 BC there were people who didn't believe god existed or people who had a lack of faith in god and you had people who believed in god...THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
eden wrote:Just admit that I won or at least that my counterpoints have validity!
Or maybe youre just getting tired like me..:D
Too bad youre not here, we could fall asleep together.
Well where I am, it's only 6 pm
I don't think we'll ever agree. Unless we say something like, to each his ownTHANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
yellowstripes wrote:Regret is a FEELING, an emotion, not a change of mind. A change of mind is to percieve something in a new way.
Thank-you eden, for your posts in this thread."Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 19630 -
dkst0426 wrote:How is a provident God evidence of God changing his mind?"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 19630
-
eden wrote:Thats a good point I think, what you said about regret being an emotion.
He has never changed his original purpose for human beings, yet, being an emotional God (thats where WE got our emotions from, as we were created in "his" image Genesis brings out) He has always dealt with humans with love and even considerd their feelings -I always remember when Lot asked him to spare Sodom and Gommorah if he could only find 100 good hearted people and he let himself be "reasoned with" by Lot all the way down to 10 good people.
On a sidenote - One of the things that doesnt satisfy me about the evolution theory is that it doesnt explain where we got these emotions from. Eddie said it best - "The Oceans made us, but who came up with love?".
Then there's Lot's otherwise "good" wife, who was turned into a pillar of salt for the seemingly small offense of turning around and taking a peek.
So incest and drunkenness and handing your kids over to a mob is ok, but turning around isn't. This is a loving God?!??!"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 19630 -
eden wrote:See, thats a perfect example of my argument here^^. You spout off like that with no logical evidence to back up what you just said.
Throughout the ENTIRE bible, God gave people so many "chances" before he brought some sort of destruction that it almost makes him seem like a masochist."Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 19630 -
eden wrote:Seriously....for instance, everyone always wants to know why organized religion can be so evil but if they actually read the Bible they would see that one of The main themes of it is to watch out for Bad men who would use it for unrighteous gain (war and money.)
Also everyone is down on Jesus yet HE was persecuted then killed by the religious leaders of the day (Pharisees).They were cruel to the commoners and he protected them.
They constantly mocked him for asscociating with prostitutes and criminals, but all he saw were peoples hearts. He only saw people at a heart level and that is so beautiful to me and how we should all strive to be.
That's all well and good, but was Jesus the first person to say and do these things? My point is, do we need the Bible to give us this enlightenment? And what of all the other parts of the Bible that don't make much sense, and are even quite insane?
If the Bible is the word of God, then God is a schizo.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help