Eddie believes in 911 inside job?

1…34689…14

Comments

  • MakingWaves
    MakingWaves Posts: 1,294
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    blow away in the wind....vaccum it up..... you're reasoning for alternatives is concerning....hope they use a hepa filter... yeah right...

    just use your eyes and look for evidence of what I meant for atomizing... I even provided a picture for you.....sigh....

    stuck on a word you are...

    rediculous..

    You said the building atomized. You need to use your eyes and look at the picture for what it is. Dust and debris from a huge fucking building. This is another problem I have with conspiracy theorists. When all the evidence and common sense points to dust and debris in a picture they hear a guy on you tube say it is atomizing and thats it. It is now fact and their mind can't be changed.

    rIdiculous.
    Seeing visions of falling up somehow.

    Pensacola '94
    New Orleans '95
    Birmingham '98
    New Orleans '00
    New Orleans '03
    Tampa '08
    New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
    New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
    Fenway Park '18
    St. Louis '22
  • nobody
    nobody Posts: 353
    MakingWaves wrote:
    You said the building atomized. You need to use your eyes and look at the picture for what it is. Dust and debris from a huge fucking building. This is another problem I have with conspiracy theorists. When all the evidence and common sense points to dust and debris in a picture they hear a guy on you tube say it is atomizing and thats it. It is now fact and their mind can't be changed.

    rIdiculous.


    first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...

    now he says that the word atomizing is not so important

    there is no arguing with this feller...
    it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(


    m.
    Godwin's Law:
    "As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
  • Flannel Shirt
    Flannel Shirt Posts: 1,021
    Who knows, maybe demolition teams have had it wrong all these years. Instead of carefully planting explosives in strategic places within buildings to take them down in a controlled fashion, maybe they just needed to start a fire at the top.
    All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
  • The Champ
    The Champ Posts: 4,063
    nobody wrote:
    first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...

    now he says that the word atomizing is not so important

    there is no arguing with this feller...
    it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(


    m.

    Wait for the link ;)..
    'I want to hurry home to you
    put on a slow, dumb show for you
    and crack you up
    so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
    god I'm very, very frightening
    and I'll overdo it'
  • dg1979us
    dg1979us Posts: 568
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    blow away in the wind....vaccum it up..... you're reasoning for alternatives is concerning....hope they use a hepa filter... yeah right...

    just use your eyes and look for evidence of what I meant for atomizing... I even provided a picture for you.....sigh....

    stuck on a word you are...

    rediculous..

    Why did you even feel the need to provide a definition of a particular word, then claim others are stuck on it? With all due respect you just got called on your BS and are trying anything to get out of it. If that particular word wasnt that important to your argument, then you wouldnt have felt the need to provide a definition of it. You are basically all over the place.
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,237
    nobody wrote:
    first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...

    now he says that the word atomizing is not so important

    there is no arguing with this feller...
    it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(


    m.

    Your best suggestion so far, lookout for yourself cause Lord's knows he could be right. :)

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • nobody
    nobody Posts: 353
    g under p wrote:
    Your best suggestion so far, lookout for yourself cause Lord's knows he could be right. :)

    Peace

    you better go and check the pentagon videos that you allege have never been released...while they have been released for quite a while now...

    see that's the difference between facts and opinions...

    opinion->no videos
    fact-> yes videos (of course you will state it is everything but a plane flying in there, but that is up to you)

    I was just here to disprove the claim/opinion that there are no videos because the government is holding them back...->turns out to be FALSE..

    now you can decide what you like to believe...

    m
    Godwin's Law:
    "As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    nobody wrote:
    you better go and check the pentagon videos that you allege have never been released...while they have been released for quite a while now...

    see that's the difference between facts and opinions...

    opinion->no videos
    fact-> yes videos (of course you will state it is everything but a plane flying in there, but that is up to you)

    I was just here to disprove the claim/opinion that there are no videos because the government is holding them back...->turns out to be FALSE..

    now you can decide what you like to believe...

    m
    your arguments have been shot down several times actually. check out your thread.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    dg1979us wrote:
    Why did you even feel the need to provide a definition of a particular word, then claim others are stuck on it? With all due respect you just got called on your BS and are trying anything to get out of it. If that particular word wasnt that important to your argument, then you wouldnt have felt the need to provide a definition of it. You are basically all over the place.


    you guys have to be kidding me....

    This is an english web site right?

    people have basic - average vocabulary skills here right?

    dear lord... when did this thread turn into an English class?

    nobody seems to understand english it seems.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Totally confusing word of the day: Atomizing...

    fucks people right up quick style...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • dg1979us
    dg1979us Posts: 568
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    you guys have to be kidding me....

    This is an english web site right?

    people have basic - average vocabulary skills here right?

    dear lord... when did this thread turn into an English class?

    nobody seems to understand english it seems.

    Yes its English and you used the wrong word to describe something, and then jump on others for pointing that out. Its not that big a deal, but the building didnt atomize. You got called on that, and then proceed to jump on others, when in fact you were the one who incorrectly used the term. Please dont degrade others basic english skills when it is quite clear you were the one using the wrong word.
  • dg1979us
    dg1979us Posts: 568
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Totally confusing word of the day: Atomizing...

    fucks people right up quick style...


    Its because you used it wrong. The building didnt atomize. And if it did, you are apparently the worlds leading authority on that since this thread is the first link when doing a google search on buildings atomizing. I guess congratulations are in order, perhaps you should write a book on buildings atomizing.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    dg1979us wrote:
    Yes its English and you used the wrong word to describe something, and then jump on others for pointing that out. Its not that big a deal, but the building didnt atomize. You got called on that, and then proceed to jump on others, when in fact you were the one who incorrectly used the term. Please dont degrade others basic english skills when it is quite clear you were the one using the wrong word.


    still not sure of how english works.?

    hmm

    again!?

    Atomize: "To reduce to tiny particles or a fine spray."

    Need to take some more English as a second language courses at night?

    holy shit...what is wrong with this place?!
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • dg1979us
    dg1979us Posts: 568
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    still not sure of how english works.?

    hmm

    again!?

    Atomize: "To reduce to tiny particles or a fine spray."

    Need to take some more English as a second language courses at night?

    holy shit...what is wrong with this place?!

    Which is not what happened. No building in the history of the world has ever atomized. Im sorry but that is not the word you are looking for no matter how much you claim it to be true. ANd your insults are doing nothing for your argument. I know what the word means, and I also know that the WTC didnt atomize.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    dg1979us wrote:
    Which is not what happened. No building in the history of the world has ever atomized. Im sorry but that is not the word you are looking for no matter how much you claim it to be true. ANd your insults are doing nothing for your argument. I know what the word means, and I also know that the WTC didnt atomize.


    guess you missed the concrete and much of contents of the building... *POOF*

    oh well...

    reading is your friend.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • dg1979us
    dg1979us Posts: 568
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    guess you missed the concrete and much of contents of the building... *POOF*

    oh well...

    reading is your friend.

    A collapsing building, on fire, with smoke and debris coming from it isnt atomization. ANd again, your insults dont bother me a bit and do little for your argument, so not sure why you have to keep with the little jabs. They arent clever.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    dg1979us wrote:
    A collapsing building, on fire, with smoke and debris coming from it isnt atomization. ANd again, your insults dont bother me a bit and do little for your argument, so not sure why you have to keep with the little jabs. They arent clever.


    reduced to fine particles or spray.

    uhm yes that happened...

    when the buildings collapsed the concrete atomized into a fine mist and so did much of the contents of the buildings...

    jeezuz...wtf already.

    abc...123
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • dg1979us
    dg1979us Posts: 568
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    reduced to fine particles or spray.

    uhm yes that happened...

    when the buildings collapsed the concrete atomized into a fine mist and so did much of the contents of the buildings...

    jeezuz...wtf already.

    abc...123


    No its not. Maybe in your Orwellian world of newspeak, but in reality, the building didnt atomize. Dust, air, smoke, etc flying from a building isnt atomization. But regardless, obviously no sense in arguing with you. Elementary insults and the inability to know what a word means before using it are going to do nothing but lower my IQ.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    dg1979us wrote:
    No its not. Maybe in your Orwellian world of newspeak, but in reality, the building didnt atomize. Dust, air, smoke, etc flying from a building isnt atomization. But regardless, obviously no sense in arguing with you. Elementary insults and the inability to know what a word means before using it are going to do nothing but lower my IQ.

    concrete reduced to fine particles or spray... whatever you say..

    yeah....dictionary.com good site.

    give er a rip sometime....don;t forget the www
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Having watched footage of the huge amounts of dust (aka tiny particles) and debris (tiny particles) blowing out from the WTC that day, and forever after, I think atomize is an accurate word.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!

Categories