This is what I don't understand about official story people. Look at the building...
just look at it....and then try to understand how the forces of gravity alone could cause that.
atomizing turning into a vast pile of dust...
no way...
well, maybe you should not just look at one picture...but the countless of other pictures which show a bit more than "atomized" stuff...
has it ever occured to you, that under this dust cloud, there might actually still be "a few bits and pieces" if you might call them that way...
the buildings were filled with countless fires fueled by all kinds of materials...
if at one point where the planes crashed some floors collapsed and the others on top fell down on what is essentially a builing filled with air...then yes...it can collapse pretty quickly...not at free fall (cause it didn't) but close to it...
ever heard a story about a conspiracy theorist disapearing by the way?...you might want to think the conspiracy has an interest in shutting the advocates of truth up...yet that architect that you keep linking and others like him keep travelling the country effortlessly...cashing in everytime he delivers his "science"...
m.
Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
well, maybe you should not just look at one picture...but the countless of other pictures which show a bit more than "atomized" stuff...
has it ever occured to you, that under this dust cloud, there might actually still be "a few bits and pieces" if you might call them that way...
the buildings were filled with countless fires fueled by all kinds of materials...
if at one point where the planes crashed some floors collapsed and the others on top fell down on what is essentially a builing filled with air...then yes...it can collapse pretty quickly...not at free fall (cause it didn't) but close to it...
ever heard a story about a conspiracy theorist disapearing by the way?...you might want to thing the conspiracy has an interest in shutting the advocates of truth up...yet that architect that you keep linking and others like him keep travelling the country effortlessly...cashing in everytime he delivers his "science"...
m.
Aside from steel beams cut into mostly manageable pieces for quick removal....no...there wasn't any large chunks to be found as in what a gravitational collapse would produce.
look into it for yourself.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Atomizing? Well the building is collapsing but I wouldn't go so far as to say it is atomizing. I don't see how you see that but what one of those pictures that i posted shows to me is during the collapse of the building the smaller pieces of debris are falling at the speed of gravity while the building is collapsing behind it at a slower rate. Therefore debunking your theory that the buildings fell at the speed of gravity. Look at all the pictures.
Your picture shows a large plume of dust and debris in the air which is what you would get when a building collapses. This is the problem i have with the conspiracy people. A simple picture like you posted all of a sudden turns into proof of atomizing? Its a picture of a building collapsing..nothing more, nothing less.
leave him alone. He obviously has a phD in physics. Or building demolition. At any rate, he knows a building atomizing when he sees it, dammit!
everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do
leave him alone. He obviously has a phD in physics. Or building demolition. At any rate, he knows a building atomizing when he sees it, dammit!
You don't need a phd in anything to be able to understand that steel buildings don't fall down like a house of cards because of fire.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I know what atomizing means smart ass. A fucking huge building collapses and you say there is no way it causes a huge cloud of dust. Look at the rest of the pictures available. Then say the building was atomized. That just might be the dumbest arguement I have ever heard. If it had been truly atomized they could have fucking vacuumed up the sight or just let it blow away with the wind, not taken months to remove the debris. And people wonder why the conspiracy people are not taken seriously by mainstream media and the majority of people.
You could also use atomize in a sentence like, "The large group of conspiracy nut jobs atomized into many groups that desperatly need to get a grip on reality."
Seeing visions of falling up somehow.
Pensacola '94 New Orleans '95 Birmingham '98 New Orleans '00 New Orleans '03 Tampa '08 New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest Fenway Park '18 St. Louis '22
I know what atomizing means smart ass. A fucking huge building collapses and you say there is no way it causes a huge cloud of dust. Look at the rest of the pictures available. Then say the building was atomized. That just might be the dumbest arguement I have ever heard. If it had been truly atomized they could have fucking vacuumed up the sight or just let it blow away with the wind, not taken months to remove the debris. And people wonder why the conspiracy people are not taken seriously by mainstream media and the majority of people.
You could also use atomize in a sentence like, "The large group of conspiracy nut jobs atomized into many groups that desperatly need to get a grip on reality."
Why ask pointless questions then if you already understand the implications of the terminology being used...hmm
It's right in front of your face and you can't see it...
Follow the path of least resistance.
The official story is a farce...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I know what atomizing means smart ass. A fucking huge building collapses and you say there is no way it causes a huge cloud of dust. Look at the rest of the pictures available. Then say the building was atomized. That just might be the dumbest arguement I have ever heard. If it had been truly atomized they could have fucking vacuumed up the sight or just let it blow away with the wind, not taken months to remove the debris. And people wonder why the conspiracy people are not taken seriously by mainstream media and the majority of people.
You could also use atomize in a sentence like, "The large group of conspiracy nut jobs atomized into many groups that desperatly need to get a grip on reality."
blow away in the wind....vaccum it up..... you're reasoning for alternatives is concerning....hope they use a hepa filter... yeah right...
just use your eyes and look for evidence of what I meant for atomizing... I even provided a picture for you.....sigh....
stuck on a word you are...
rediculous..
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Atomizing? Well the building is collapsing but I wouldn't go so far as to say it is atomizing. I don't see how you see that but what one of those pictures that i posted shows to me is during the collapse of the building the smaller pieces of debris are falling at the speed of gravity while the building is collapsing behind it at a slower rate. Therefore debunking your theory that the buildings fell at the speed of gravity. Look at all the pictures.
Your picture shows a large plume of dust and debris in the air which is what you would get when a building collapses. This is the problem i have with the conspiracy people. A simple picture like you posted all of a sudden turns into proof of atomizing? Its a picture of a building collapsing..nothing more, nothing less.
that's exactly how I see it too... anytime I've seen a building being demolished, it looked like that... only to a much smaller extent so I've never understood where the atomising thing came from
The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
Verona??? it's all surmountable
Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
Wembley? We all believe!
Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
Chicago 07? And love
What a different life
Had I not found this love with you
The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
Verona??? it's all surmountable
Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
Wembley? We all believe!
Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
Chicago 07? And love
What a different life
Had I not found this love with you
blow away in the wind....vaccum it up..... you're reasoning for alternatives is concerning....hope they use a hepa filter... yeah right...
just use your eyes and look for evidence of what I meant for atomizing... I even provided a picture for you.....sigh....
stuck on a word you are...
rediculous..
You said the building atomized. You need to use your eyes and look at the picture for what it is. Dust and debris from a huge fucking building. This is another problem I have with conspiracy theorists. When all the evidence and common sense points to dust and debris in a picture they hear a guy on you tube say it is atomizing and thats it. It is now fact and their mind can't be changed.
rIdiculous.
Seeing visions of falling up somehow.
Pensacola '94 New Orleans '95 Birmingham '98 New Orleans '00 New Orleans '03 Tampa '08 New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest Fenway Park '18 St. Louis '22
You said the building atomized. You need to use your eyes and look at the picture for what it is. Dust and debris from a huge fucking building. This is another problem I have with conspiracy theorists. When all the evidence and common sense points to dust and debris in a picture they hear a guy on you tube say it is atomizing and thats it. It is now fact and their mind can't be changed.
rIdiculous.
first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...
now he says that the word atomizing is not so important
there is no arguing with this feller...
it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(
m.
Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Who knows, maybe demolition teams have had it wrong all these years. Instead of carefully planting explosives in strategic places within buildings to take them down in a controlled fashion, maybe they just needed to start a fire at the top.
All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...
now he says that the word atomizing is not so important
there is no arguing with this feller...
it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(
m.
Wait for the link ..
'I want to hurry home to you
put on a slow, dumb show for you
and crack you up
so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
god I'm very, very frightening
and I'll overdo it'
blow away in the wind....vaccum it up..... you're reasoning for alternatives is concerning....hope they use a hepa filter... yeah right...
just use your eyes and look for evidence of what I meant for atomizing... I even provided a picture for you.....sigh....
stuck on a word you are...
rediculous..
Why did you even feel the need to provide a definition of a particular word, then claim others are stuck on it? With all due respect you just got called on your BS and are trying anything to get out of it. If that particular word wasnt that important to your argument, then you wouldnt have felt the need to provide a definition of it. You are basically all over the place.
0
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...
now he says that the word atomizing is not so important
there is no arguing with this feller...
it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(
m.
Your best suggestion so far, lookout for yourself cause Lord's knows he could be right.
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Why did you even feel the need to provide a definition of a particular word, then claim others are stuck on it? With all due respect you just got called on your BS and are trying anything to get out of it. If that particular word wasnt that important to your argument, then you wouldnt have felt the need to provide a definition of it. You are basically all over the place.
you guys have to be kidding me....
This is an english web site right?
people have basic - average vocabulary skills here right?
dear lord... when did this thread turn into an English class?
nobody seems to understand english it seems.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
people have basic - average vocabulary skills here right?
dear lord... when did this thread turn into an English class?
nobody seems to understand english it seems.
Yes its English and you used the wrong word to describe something, and then jump on others for pointing that out. Its not that big a deal, but the building didnt atomize. You got called on that, and then proceed to jump on others, when in fact you were the one who incorrectly used the term. Please dont degrade others basic english skills when it is quite clear you were the one using the wrong word.
Its because you used it wrong. The building didnt atomize. And if it did, you are apparently the worlds leading authority on that since this thread is the first link when doing a google search on buildings atomizing. I guess congratulations are in order, perhaps you should write a book on buildings atomizing.
Yes its English and you used the wrong word to describe something, and then jump on others for pointing that out. Its not that big a deal, but the building didnt atomize. You got called on that, and then proceed to jump on others, when in fact you were the one who incorrectly used the term. Please dont degrade others basic english skills when it is quite clear you were the one using the wrong word.
still not sure of how english works.?
hmm
again!?
Atomize: "To reduce to tiny particles or a fine spray."
Need to take some more English as a second language courses at night?
holy shit...what is wrong with this place?!
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Atomize: "To reduce to tiny particles or a fine spray."
Need to take some more English as a second language courses at night?
holy shit...what is wrong with this place?!
Which is not what happened. No building in the history of the world has ever atomized. Im sorry but that is not the word you are looking for no matter how much you claim it to be true. ANd your insults are doing nothing for your argument. I know what the word means, and I also know that the WTC didnt atomize.
Which is not what happened. No building in the history of the world has ever atomized. Im sorry but that is not the word you are looking for no matter how much you claim it to be true. ANd your insults are doing nothing for your argument. I know what the word means, and I also know that the WTC didnt atomize.
guess you missed the concrete and much of contents of the building... *POOF*
oh well...
reading is your friend.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
guess you missed the concrete and much of contents of the building... *POOF*
oh well...
reading is your friend.
A collapsing building, on fire, with smoke and debris coming from it isnt atomization. ANd again, your insults dont bother me a bit and do little for your argument, so not sure why you have to keep with the little jabs. They arent clever.
A collapsing building, on fire, with smoke and debris coming from it isnt atomization. ANd again, your insults dont bother me a bit and do little for your argument, so not sure why you have to keep with the little jabs. They arent clever.
reduced to fine particles or spray.
uhm yes that happened...
when the buildings collapsed the concrete atomized into a fine mist and so did much of the contents of the buildings...
jeezuz...wtf already.
abc...123
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
when the buildings collapsed the concrete atomized into a fine mist and so did much of the contents of the buildings...
jeezuz...wtf already.
abc...123
No its not. Maybe in your Orwellian world of newspeak, but in reality, the building didnt atomize. Dust, air, smoke, etc flying from a building isnt atomization. But regardless, obviously no sense in arguing with you. Elementary insults and the inability to know what a word means before using it are going to do nothing but lower my IQ.
No its not. Maybe in your Orwellian world of newspeak, but in reality, the building didnt atomize. Dust, air, smoke, etc flying from a building isnt atomization. But regardless, obviously no sense in arguing with you. Elementary insults and the inability to know what a word means before using it are going to do nothing but lower my IQ.
concrete reduced to fine particles or spray... whatever you say..
yeah....dictionary.com good site.
give er a rip sometime....don;t forget the www
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Having watched footage of the huge amounts of dust (aka tiny particles) and debris (tiny particles) blowing out from the WTC that day, and forever after, I think atomize is an accurate word.
"The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
Comments
well, maybe you should not just look at one picture...but the countless of other pictures which show a bit more than "atomized" stuff...
has it ever occured to you, that under this dust cloud, there might actually still be "a few bits and pieces" if you might call them that way...
the buildings were filled with countless fires fueled by all kinds of materials...
if at one point where the planes crashed some floors collapsed and the others on top fell down on what is essentially a builing filled with air...then yes...it can collapse pretty quickly...not at free fall (cause it didn't) but close to it...
ever heard a story about a conspiracy theorist disapearing by the way?...you might want to think the conspiracy has an interest in shutting the advocates of truth up...yet that architect that you keep linking and others like him keep travelling the country effortlessly...cashing in everytime he delivers his "science"...
m.
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Aside from steel beams cut into mostly manageable pieces for quick removal....no...there wasn't any large chunks to be found as in what a gravitational collapse would produce.
look into it for yourself.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
leave him alone. He obviously has a phD in physics. Or building demolition. At any rate, he knows a building atomizing when he sees it, dammit!
for the least they could possibly do
You don't need a phd in anything to be able to understand that steel buildings don't fall down like a house of cards because of fire.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=atomized&x=0&y=0
(no charge for the vocabulary lesson)
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I know what atomizing means smart ass. A fucking huge building collapses and you say there is no way it causes a huge cloud of dust. Look at the rest of the pictures available. Then say the building was atomized. That just might be the dumbest arguement I have ever heard. If it had been truly atomized they could have fucking vacuumed up the sight or just let it blow away with the wind, not taken months to remove the debris. And people wonder why the conspiracy people are not taken seriously by mainstream media and the majority of people.
You could also use atomize in a sentence like, "The large group of conspiracy nut jobs atomized into many groups that desperatly need to get a grip on reality."
Pensacola '94
New Orleans '95
Birmingham '98
New Orleans '00
New Orleans '03
Tampa '08
New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
Fenway Park '18
St. Louis '22
Why ask pointless questions then if you already understand the implications of the terminology being used...hmm
It's right in front of your face and you can't see it...
Follow the path of least resistance.
The official story is a farce...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
blow away in the wind....vaccum it up..... you're reasoning for alternatives is concerning....hope they use a hepa filter... yeah right...
just use your eyes and look for evidence of what I meant for atomizing... I even provided a picture for you.....sigh....
stuck on a word you are...
rediculous..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Verona??? it's all surmountable
Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
Wembley? We all believe!
Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
Chicago 07? And love
What a different life
Had I not found this love with you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJYc6yGklkw&feature=related
Verona??? it's all surmountable
Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
Wembley? We all believe!
Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
Chicago 07? And love
What a different life
Had I not found this love with you
You said the building atomized. You need to use your eyes and look at the picture for what it is. Dust and debris from a huge fucking building. This is another problem I have with conspiracy theorists. When all the evidence and common sense points to dust and debris in a picture they hear a guy on you tube say it is atomizing and thats it. It is now fact and their mind can't be changed.
rIdiculous.
Pensacola '94
New Orleans '95
Birmingham '98
New Orleans '00
New Orleans '03
Tampa '08
New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
Fenway Park '18
St. Louis '22
first he claimed it was textbook/dictionairy atomized...
now he says that the word atomizing is not so important
there is no arguing with this feller...
it's a waste of time...and I really should be studying for my final exams...:(
m.
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Wait for the link
put on a slow, dumb show for you
and crack you up
so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
god I'm very, very frightening
and I'll overdo it'
Why did you even feel the need to provide a definition of a particular word, then claim others are stuck on it? With all due respect you just got called on your BS and are trying anything to get out of it. If that particular word wasnt that important to your argument, then you wouldnt have felt the need to provide a definition of it. You are basically all over the place.
Your best suggestion so far, lookout for yourself cause Lord's knows he could be right.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
you better go and check the pentagon videos that you allege have never been released...while they have been released for quite a while now...
see that's the difference between facts and opinions...
opinion->no videos
fact-> yes videos (of course you will state it is everything but a plane flying in there, but that is up to you)
I was just here to disprove the claim/opinion that there are no videos because the government is holding them back...->turns out to be FALSE..
now you can decide what you like to believe...
m
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
you guys have to be kidding me....
This is an english web site right?
people have basic - average vocabulary skills here right?
dear lord... when did this thread turn into an English class?
nobody seems to understand english it seems.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
fucks people right up quick style...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Yes its English and you used the wrong word to describe something, and then jump on others for pointing that out. Its not that big a deal, but the building didnt atomize. You got called on that, and then proceed to jump on others, when in fact you were the one who incorrectly used the term. Please dont degrade others basic english skills when it is quite clear you were the one using the wrong word.
Its because you used it wrong. The building didnt atomize. And if it did, you are apparently the worlds leading authority on that since this thread is the first link when doing a google search on buildings atomizing. I guess congratulations are in order, perhaps you should write a book on buildings atomizing.
still not sure of how english works.?
hmm
again!?
Atomize: "To reduce to tiny particles or a fine spray."
Need to take some more English as a second language courses at night?
holy shit...what is wrong with this place?!
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Which is not what happened. No building in the history of the world has ever atomized. Im sorry but that is not the word you are looking for no matter how much you claim it to be true. ANd your insults are doing nothing for your argument. I know what the word means, and I also know that the WTC didnt atomize.
guess you missed the concrete and much of contents of the building... *POOF*
oh well...
reading is your friend.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
A collapsing building, on fire, with smoke and debris coming from it isnt atomization. ANd again, your insults dont bother me a bit and do little for your argument, so not sure why you have to keep with the little jabs. They arent clever.
reduced to fine particles or spray.
uhm yes that happened...
when the buildings collapsed the concrete atomized into a fine mist and so did much of the contents of the buildings...
jeezuz...wtf already.
abc...123
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
No its not. Maybe in your Orwellian world of newspeak, but in reality, the building didnt atomize. Dust, air, smoke, etc flying from a building isnt atomization. But regardless, obviously no sense in arguing with you. Elementary insults and the inability to know what a word means before using it are going to do nothing but lower my IQ.
concrete reduced to fine particles or spray... whatever you say..
yeah....dictionary.com good site.
give er a rip sometime....don;t forget the www
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!