as per merriam webster
1: to treat as made up of many discrete units
2: to reduce to minute particles or to a fine spray
but you know...if it isn't perfectly exact for some people...it's a complete brain malfunction altogether.
*note to self* always include an incredibly descriptive series pictures for those who need 100% identification with a concept or all hell breaks loose on an intellectual level.
aye-carumba...
the sheer anality of it all....
frightening...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
concrete reduced to fine particles or spray... whatever you say..
yeah....dictionary.com good site.
give er a rip sometime....don;t forget the www
It wasnt reduced to fine particles or spray. Examples of atomized spray would be things coming out of an aerosol can, not dust or concrete falling apart.
It wasnt reduced to fine particles or spray. Examples of atomized spray would be things coming out of an aerosol can, not dust or concrete falling apart.
Yet...the entire concept still eludes you of what I am saying?
uhh....in the realms of humanity...how?
Or are you just out for a being the winner of a 100% anal competition?
..you already won it a few posts ago...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Yet...the entire concept still eludes you of what I am saying?
uhh....in the realms of humanity...how?
Or are you just out for a being the winner of a 100% anal competition?
..you already won it a few posts ago...
No, the concept I get, never said otherwise. The word isnt accurate though. ANd to be honest, if not for your childish way of debating with elementary insults, I wouldnt have felt the need to call you on it. But, if you are going to be an ass, expect the same in return.
And yes, Im %100 anal. I forgot I was arguing with myself and you werent partaking in his debate at all. Must be my inability to understand English again, which you so eloquantly pointed out earlier. Good day.
No, the concept I get, never said otherwise. The word isnt accurate though. ANd to be honest, if not for your childish way of debating with elementary insults, I wouldnt have felt the need to call you on it. But, if you are going to be an ass, expect the same in return.
And yes, Im %100 anal. I forgot I was arguing with myself and you werent partaking in his debate at all. Must be my inability to understand English again, which you so eloquantly pointed out earlier. Good day.
I don't get along well with superficial anal types.
sorry... It's just how I ride.
what I said made sense to those who want to understand. Bottom line.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I don't get along well with superficial anal types.
sorry... It's just how I ride.
what I said made sense to those who want to understand. Bottom line.
Well I would hardly consider the correct usage and meaning of a word as superficial, but regardless, nice to know.
But to be honest, what you said impacted your argument. If the building truly atomized, then yes, obviously there was something more than just a plane hitting it. But that isnt what happened and if anyone is going to have an honest debate with you, or anyone, then such discrepancies need to be called out. That way the debate doesnt turn into a debate about inaccurate information, in which neither side gains any worthwhile knowledge. So sorry that I feel the need to make a debate and discussion as factually correct and accurate as possible. But thats just how I ride. Im sure there are plenty of people who will let you peddle your bullshit too them, and will take it as face value. So all isnt lost.
Well I would hardly consider the correct usage and meaning of a word as superficial, but regardless, nice to know.
But to be honest, what you said impacted your argument. If the building truly atomized, then yes, obviously there was something more than just a plane hitting it. But that isnt what happened and if anyone is going to have an honest debate with you, or anyone, then such discrepancies need to be called out. That way the debate doesnt turn into a debate about inaccurate information, in which neither side gains any worthwhile knowledge. So sorry that I feel the need to make a debate and discussion as factually correct and accurate as possible. But thats just how I ride.
Atomized....vaporized...Turned to dust...poof... whatever.... It's really just splitting hairs now is't it?
Of course it is.
Follow the path of least resistance. It's not straight down through the center of the
buildings at free fall speed. That is the path of greatest resistance.
You get that part right?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
But to be honest, what you said impacted your argument. If the building truly atomized, then yes, obviously there was something more than just a plane hitting it. But that isnt what happened and if anyone is going to have an honest debate with you, or anyone, then such discrepancies need to be called out. That way the debate doesnt turn into a debate about inaccurate information, in which neither side gains any worthwhile knowledge. So sorry that I feel the need to make a debate and discussion as factually correct and accurate as possible. But thats just how I ride. Im sure there are plenty of people who will let you peddle your bullshit too, and will take it as face value. So all isnt lost.
I wish I could say things like that...kudos!
sometimes...details matter...especially if they are central to one's argument...
m.
Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Atomized....vaporized...Turned to dust...poof... whatever.... It's really just splitting hairs now is't it?
Of course it is.
Follow the path of least resistance. It's not straight down through the center of the
buildings at free fall speed. That is the path of greatest resistance.
You get that part right?
Yes. The only part I argued with you about was the use of the word atomize, which was wrong. Again, its no big deal, but it does change the meaning of your argument, so it should be brought up. You have debated with me, as much as I have you with in regards to this. So dont play the "anal" game with me. Regardless, I have things to do, so good day.
that is also a little detail that you keep getting wrong...
it didn't fall at free fall speed...
but that's probably because I always take the path of least resistance...
m.
Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Yes. The only part I argued with you about was the use of the word atomize, which was wrong. Again, its no big deal, but it does change the meaning of your argument, so it should be brought up. You have debated with me, as much as I have you with in regards to this. So dont play the "anal" game with me. Regardless, I have things to do, so good day.
Please explain exactly how the use of the word "Atomization" , and how it changes the meaning of my argument in the context I have provided .
I could still use some clarification apparently?
thanks.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
that is also a little detail that you keep getting wrong...
it didn't fall at free fall speed...
but that's probably because I always take the path of least resistance...
m.
Ok, how much longer than free fall? Several hours or never would be typical of steel frame buildings.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Please explain exactly how the use of the word "Atomization" , and how it changes the meaning of my argument in the context I have provided .
I could still use some clarification apparently?
thanks.
Quite frankly because it didnt atomise. If anything atomised in the situation, it was the planes, not the buildings. If the building truly did atomise, then it was clearly more than even a controlled demolition. It would be more more on the lines of a nuclear bomb going off in it. But again, that didnt happen. Watch the planes when they hit the buildings and basically disappear. That is what would be considered atomization. The building didnt do that. The building just crumbled and dust and smoke flew from it. But that isnt atomization.
People said Hamilton hit balls to the fucking moon the other night. That didnt REALLY happen, but we get the jist of what was meant. Arguing over semantics is stupid. Fun, but stupid.
the building crumbled, really fast. faster than it should have according to some. it appeared as if it turned to dust.
can we move on? this has become a roadblock.
All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
People said Hamilton hit balls to the fucking moon the other night. That didnt REALLY happen, but we get the jist of what was meant. Arguing over semantics is stupid. Fun, but stupid.
the building crumbled, really fast. faster than it should have according to some. it appeared as if it turned to dust.
can we move on? this has become a roadblock.
We can move on, but when a word changes the argument then it isnt arguing semantics. I see nothing wrong with respecting the proper meaning of a word, particularly when it changes the mean of what is being said.
Saying Hamilton hit balls to the moon is a figure of speech not meant to be taken literally. Maybe he didnt mean for people to take the word atomize literally, but it seemed like he did to me. But words and their meanings do matter in a discussion, Im sorry, but they do.
0
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
you better go and check the pentagon videos that you allege have never been released...while they have been released for quite a while now...
see that's the difference between facts and opinions...
opinion->no videos
fact-> yes videos (of course you will state it is everything but a plane flying in there, but that is up to you)
I was just here to disprove the claim/opinion that there are no videos because the government is holding them back...->turns out to be FALSE..
now you can decide what you like to believe...
m
I think you should go study really. Now pay attention, I live here in this DC Metropolis area and since you may not know the layout of this Northern VA area I'll scope you a bit more. The videos I'm refering too is not that idiotic Pentagon so called crash in which you can't tell a damn thing, I'm talking about the high rises, gas stations and other local businesses whom had video cameras aimed in the direction of the Pentagon.
They could have given clear detail of whatever hit the Pentagon. For whatever reason the FBI and other government officials seized those tapes and they've held unto them ever since.
Now that's the videos I'm refering too, now please go and study no need to waste time here and get a failing grade.
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
I think you should go study really. Now pay attention, I live here in this DC Metropolis area and since you may not know the layout of this Northern VA area I'll scope you a bit more. The videos I'm refering too is not that idiotic Pentagon so called crash in which you can't tell a damn thing, I'm talking about the high rises, gas stations and other local businesses whom had video cameras aimed in the direction of the Pentagon.
They could have given clear detail of whatever hit the Pentagon. For whatever reason the FBI and other government officials seized those tapes and they've held unto them ever since.
Now that's the videos I'm refering too, now please go and study no need to waste time here and get a failing grade.
Peace
now I know that you meant some of the videos haven't been released...not all...
and don't worry...I won't fail...:)
m.
Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
0
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
now I know that you meant some of the videos haven't been released...not all...
and don't worry...I won't fail...:)
m.
Great.....then why post that you may need to go study?
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
We can move on, but when a word changes the argument then it isnt arguing semantics. I see nothing wrong with respecting the proper meaning of a word, particularly when it changes the mean of what is being said.
Saying Hamilton hit balls to the moon is a figure of speech not meant to be taken literally. Maybe he didnt mean for people to take the word atomize literally, but it seemed like he did to me. But words and their meanings do matter in a discussion, Im sorry, but they do.
maybe dude did mean it literally. i thought he was using atomizing as a figure of speech as well. the buildings did turn to dust to the naked eye so to speak and crumbled unto themselves. it looked like they were made of sand and it just gave way.
he did say
"Atomized....vaporized...Turned to dust...poof... whatever.... It's really just splitting hairs now is't it?
Of course it is.
Follow the path of least resistance. It's not straight down through the center of the
buildings at free fall speed. That is the path of greatest resistance.
You get that part right?"
All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
Great.....then why post that you may need to go study?
Peace
because it is more fruitful...you know...I don't only study for grades...
but it got too late anyway and I'm preparing to go to bed...in case you are interested...
good night...
m.
Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
maybe dude did mean it literally. i thought he was using atomizing as a figure of speech as well. the buildings did turn to dust to the naked eye so to speak and crumbled unto themselves. it looked like they were made of sand and it just gave way.
he did say
"Atomized....vaporized...Turned to dust...poof... whatever.... It's really just splitting hairs now is't it?
Of course it is.
Follow the path of least resistance. It's not straight down through the center of the
buildings at free fall speed. That is the path of greatest resistance.
You get that part right?"
Yes, he said that, but after we had already discussed the issue for several posts. Regardless, I think we get what he meant now, so its no big deal and Ill let the thread get back on track. But again, I do say that words and their meanings matter when having a serious discussion. We all make typos, use a word wrong, make gramatical mistakes, etc. But when it does have a level of impact on the discussion, then that word does need to be clarified. If not, then the debate has little to no chance of being worthwhile, since different people might be arguing different things without even knowing it. But I really do have to get back to work now, so have a good day.
I know what atomizing means smart ass. A fucking huge building collapses and you say there is no way it causes a huge cloud of dust. Look at the rest of the pictures available. Then say the building was atomized. That just might be the dumbest arguement I have ever heard. If it had been truly atomized they could have fucking vacuumed up the sight or just let it blow away with the wind, not taken months to remove the debris. And people wonder why the conspiracy people are not taken seriously by mainstream media and the majority of people.
You could also use atomize in a sentence like, "The large group of conspiracy nut jobs atomized into many groups that desperatly need to get a grip on reality."
This is true Roland, it would have been much easier to vacuum up the shit had it not been for the debris..
'I want to hurry home to you
put on a slow, dumb show for you
and crack you up
so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
god I'm very, very frightening
and I'll overdo it'
Quite frankly because it didnt atomise. If anything atomised in the situation, it was the planes, not the buildings. If the building truly did atomise, then it was clearly more than even a controlled demolition. It would be more more on the lines of a nuclear bomb going off in it. But again, that didnt happen. Watch the planes when they hit the buildings and basically disappear. That is what would be considered atomization. The building didnt do that. The building just crumbled and dust and smoke flew from it. But that isnt atomization.
Ok, British spelling now.
What about the balls of iron precipitate found to be everywhere in the dust by the EPA? amongst others)
You present yourself like a 9/11 aficionado, but I'm not convinced.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
What about the balls of iron precipitate found to be everywhere in the dust by the EPA? amongst others)
You present yourself like a 9/11 aficionado, but I'm not convinced.
I present myself like I know what the fuck it means to "atomize", nothing more, nothing less. I havent said anything about 9/11, other than the WTC didnt atomize. So, how I am presenting myself as a 9/11 aficionado is beyond me. Not only did you use the word wrong, now you are basically resorting to just making shit up.
I present myself like I know what the fuck it means to "atomize", nothing more, nothing less. I havent said anything about 9/11, other than the WTC didnt atomize. So, how I am presenting myself as a 9/11 aficionado is beyond me. Not only did you use the word wrong, now you are basically resorting to just making shit up.
I didn't ask you to blather, I asked you if you knew about the EPA's findings of iron precipitate in the WTC debris. It was also collected from the balcony of a nearby apartment building.
In that sense, yes atomize/atomise is most definitely correct. Big picture...you know how it goes eh?
thank you and good morning.
mind the door on this one.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
because it is more fruitful...you know...I don't only study for grades...
but it got too late anyway and I'm preparing to go to bed...in case you are interested...
good night...
m.
I agree it would be more fruitful....where are if you're going to bed already, England? Sleep tight.
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
I didn't ask you to blather, I asked you if you knew about the EPA's findings of iron precipitate in the WTC debris. It was also collected from the balcony of a nearby apartment building.
In that sense, yes atomize/atomise is most definitely correct. Big picture...you know how it goes eh?
thank you and good morning.
mind the door on this one.
I didnt blather, you made a claim about me that I pointed out was strictly not true. If calling you on your childish bullshit is blather, then so be it. You have noticed how nobody is defending on you this dont you? Get a hint buddy, nobody is defending you because you are clearly wrong. Big deal, they found iron precipitate, that doesnt mean the building atomized. It didnt. When something crumbles and comes apart you are going to find elements of its make up in the surrounding areas. That is a pretty common sense thought. That doesnt mean the iron and building essentially vaporized, it didnt. It means its crumbled, burned, and collapsed. The planes, you can argue atomized, as they at least appeared to have done that. THe building did not. Argue until your blue in the face. I promise you are not correct, and I promise you are not winning any points from anyone on the perceived intelligence factor scale.
I didnt blather, you made a claim about me that I pointed out was strictly not true. If calling you on your childish bullshit is blather, then so be it. You have noticed how nobody is defending on you this dont you? Get a hint buddy, nobody is defending you because you are clearly wrong. Big deal, they found iron precipitate, that doesnt mean the building atomized. It didnt. When something crumbles and comes apart you are going to find elements of its make up in the surrounding areas. That is a pretty common sense thought. That doesnt mean the iron and building essentially vaporized, it didnt. It means its crumbled, burned, and collapsed. The planes, you can argue atomized, as they at least appeared to have done that. THe building did not. Argue until your blue in the face. I promise you are not correct, and I promise you are not winning any points from anyone on the perceived intelligence factor scale.
Whoa dude...you need to get over it already...
it's DEEP inside your head....
it's warping you out...from the inside out...
I'll keep defending myself, because it;s pretty clear what I mean.
but hey, ride on with your relentless vendetta on the word Atomize......this was Thursday July 17, 2008 for you and this word. Dear diary.
lol...
strange and funny shit bro...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I'll keep defending myself, because it;s pretty clear what I mean.
but hey, ride on with your relentless vendetta on the word Atomize......this was Thursday July 17, 2008 for you and this word. Dear diary.
lol...
strange and funny shit bro...
Are you kidding me dude? Like I have been debating myself. Last I checked, you were here too. Or was that just my imagination? But whatever, I will bow out at this point. There are some good posters on this board like abook, kabong, etc, that even when I dont agree with them, can have a worthwhile discussion. Remind me to cross you off that list. Debating with the use of constant insult is not constructive or intelligent. And in your diary you can write about getting your ass handed to you on the moving train because you are either too prideful or insecure to admit you are wrong on occasion.
0
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
I find this 9/11 Inside Job question so fascinating in that it gathers so many varying points of views. I moderate another music site and this same question was posed there and it brought out the similiar reponses.
One of my first posts around this time last year was *9/11 Mysteries* left for work and 9 hours later they were 7 or 8 pages of reponses. I couldn't believe it and I went through and read each and responded to as many as I could.
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Comments
1: to treat as made up of many discrete units
2: to reduce to minute particles or to a fine spray
but you know...if it isn't perfectly exact for some people...it's a complete brain malfunction altogether.
*note to self* always include an incredibly descriptive series pictures for those who need 100% identification with a concept or all hell breaks loose on an intellectual level.
aye-carumba...
the sheer anality of it all....
frightening...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
It wasnt reduced to fine particles or spray. Examples of atomized spray would be things coming out of an aerosol can, not dust or concrete falling apart.
Yet...the entire concept still eludes you of what I am saying?
uhh....in the realms of humanity...how?
Or are you just out for a being the winner of a 100% anal competition?
..you already won it a few posts ago...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
No, the concept I get, never said otherwise. The word isnt accurate though. ANd to be honest, if not for your childish way of debating with elementary insults, I wouldnt have felt the need to call you on it. But, if you are going to be an ass, expect the same in return.
And yes, Im %100 anal. I forgot I was arguing with myself and you werent partaking in his debate at all. Must be my inability to understand English again, which you so eloquantly pointed out earlier. Good day.
I don't get along well with superficial anal types.
sorry... It's just how I ride.
what I said made sense to those who want to understand. Bottom line.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Well I would hardly consider the correct usage and meaning of a word as superficial, but regardless, nice to know.
But to be honest, what you said impacted your argument. If the building truly atomized, then yes, obviously there was something more than just a plane hitting it. But that isnt what happened and if anyone is going to have an honest debate with you, or anyone, then such discrepancies need to be called out. That way the debate doesnt turn into a debate about inaccurate information, in which neither side gains any worthwhile knowledge. So sorry that I feel the need to make a debate and discussion as factually correct and accurate as possible. But thats just how I ride. Im sure there are plenty of people who will let you peddle your bullshit too them, and will take it as face value. So all isnt lost.
Atomized....vaporized...Turned to dust...poof... whatever.... It's really just splitting hairs now is't it?
Of course it is.
Follow the path of least resistance. It's not straight down through the center of the
buildings at free fall speed. That is the path of greatest resistance.
You get that part right?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I wish I could say things like that...kudos!
sometimes...details matter...especially if they are central to one's argument...
m.
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Yes. The only part I argued with you about was the use of the word atomize, which was wrong. Again, its no big deal, but it does change the meaning of your argument, so it should be brought up. You have debated with me, as much as I have you with in regards to this. So dont play the "anal" game with me. Regardless, I have things to do, so good day.
that is also a little detail that you keep getting wrong...
it didn't fall at free fall speed...
but that's probably because I always take the path of least resistance...
m.
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Please explain exactly how the use of the word "Atomization" , and how it changes the meaning of my argument in the context I have provided .
I could still use some clarification apparently?
thanks.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Ok, how much longer than free fall? Several hours or never would be typical of steel frame buildings.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Quite frankly because it didnt atomise. If anything atomised in the situation, it was the planes, not the buildings. If the building truly did atomise, then it was clearly more than even a controlled demolition. It would be more more on the lines of a nuclear bomb going off in it. But again, that didnt happen. Watch the planes when they hit the buildings and basically disappear. That is what would be considered atomization. The building didnt do that. The building just crumbled and dust and smoke flew from it. But that isnt atomization.
the building crumbled, really fast. faster than it should have according to some. it appeared as if it turned to dust.
can we move on? this has become a roadblock.
We can move on, but when a word changes the argument then it isnt arguing semantics. I see nothing wrong with respecting the proper meaning of a word, particularly when it changes the mean of what is being said.
Saying Hamilton hit balls to the moon is a figure of speech not meant to be taken literally. Maybe he didnt mean for people to take the word atomize literally, but it seemed like he did to me. But words and their meanings do matter in a discussion, Im sorry, but they do.
I think you should go study really. Now pay attention, I live here in this DC Metropolis area and since you may not know the layout of this Northern VA area I'll scope you a bit more. The videos I'm refering too is not that idiotic Pentagon so called crash in which you can't tell a damn thing, I'm talking about the high rises, gas stations and other local businesses whom had video cameras aimed in the direction of the Pentagon.
They could have given clear detail of whatever hit the Pentagon. For whatever reason the FBI and other government officials seized those tapes and they've held unto them ever since.
Now that's the videos I'm refering too, now please go and study no need to waste time here and get a failing grade.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
now I know that you meant some of the videos haven't been released...not all...
and don't worry...I won't fail...:)
m.
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Great.....then why post that you may need to go study?
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
he did say
"Atomized....vaporized...Turned to dust...poof... whatever.... It's really just splitting hairs now is't it?
Of course it is.
Follow the path of least resistance. It's not straight down through the center of the
buildings at free fall speed. That is the path of greatest resistance.
You get that part right?"
because it is more fruitful...you know...I don't only study for grades...
but it got too late anyway and I'm preparing to go to bed...in case you are interested...
good night...
m.
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Yes, he said that, but after we had already discussed the issue for several posts. Regardless, I think we get what he meant now, so its no big deal and Ill let the thread get back on track. But again, I do say that words and their meanings matter when having a serious discussion. We all make typos, use a word wrong, make gramatical mistakes, etc. But when it does have a level of impact on the discussion, then that word does need to be clarified. If not, then the debate has little to no chance of being worthwhile, since different people might be arguing different things without even knowing it. But I really do have to get back to work now, so have a good day.
This is true Roland, it would have been much easier to vacuum up the shit had it not been for the debris..
put on a slow, dumb show for you
and crack you up
so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
god I'm very, very frightening
and I'll overdo it'
Ok, British spelling now.
What about the balls of iron precipitate found to be everywhere in the dust by the EPA? amongst others)
You present yourself like a 9/11 aficionado, but I'm not convinced.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I present myself like I know what the fuck it means to "atomize", nothing more, nothing less. I havent said anything about 9/11, other than the WTC didnt atomize. So, how I am presenting myself as a 9/11 aficionado is beyond me. Not only did you use the word wrong, now you are basically resorting to just making shit up.
I didn't ask you to blather, I asked you if you knew about the EPA's findings of iron precipitate in the WTC debris. It was also collected from the balcony of a nearby apartment building.
In that sense, yes atomize/atomise is most definitely correct. Big picture...you know how it goes eh?
thank you and good morning.
mind the door on this one.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I agree it would be more fruitful....where are if you're going to bed already, England? Sleep tight.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
I didnt blather, you made a claim about me that I pointed out was strictly not true. If calling you on your childish bullshit is blather, then so be it. You have noticed how nobody is defending on you this dont you? Get a hint buddy, nobody is defending you because you are clearly wrong. Big deal, they found iron precipitate, that doesnt mean the building atomized. It didnt. When something crumbles and comes apart you are going to find elements of its make up in the surrounding areas. That is a pretty common sense thought. That doesnt mean the iron and building essentially vaporized, it didnt. It means its crumbled, burned, and collapsed. The planes, you can argue atomized, as they at least appeared to have done that. THe building did not. Argue until your blue in the face. I promise you are not correct, and I promise you are not winning any points from anyone on the perceived intelligence factor scale.
Whoa dude...you need to get over it already...
it's DEEP inside your head....
it's warping you out...from the inside out...
I'll keep defending myself, because it;s pretty clear what I mean.
but hey, ride on with your relentless vendetta on the word Atomize......this was Thursday July 17, 2008 for you and this word. Dear diary.
lol...
strange and funny shit bro...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Are you kidding me dude? Like I have been debating myself. Last I checked, you were here too. Or was that just my imagination? But whatever, I will bow out at this point. There are some good posters on this board like abook, kabong, etc, that even when I dont agree with them, can have a worthwhile discussion. Remind me to cross you off that list. Debating with the use of constant insult is not constructive or intelligent. And in your diary you can write about getting your ass handed to you on the moving train because you are either too prideful or insecure to admit you are wrong on occasion.
One of my first posts around this time last year was *9/11 Mysteries* left for work and 9 hours later they were 7 or 8 pages of reponses. I couldn't believe it and I went through and read each and responded to as many as I could.
Here's some from StayHuman.org ......Was 9/11 An Inside Job?
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)