New Terrorist Threat, political or real?

sliverstain

binauralsounds wrote:

Ok, you are RIGHT!!!!!! I APOLOGIZE for this. I am sorry!! I will be the bigger man and apologize for mistaken identity.

Really. So you spout off without any knowledge of what you are talking about?

A common theme in your posts. Hence, how can anybody ever take you seriously again?

I rest my cases.

sliverstain

Until further notice BA has halted all flights to and from the UK.





In an announcement earlier today BA stated "I ain't gettin on no plane you crazy fool"

sliverstain

binauralsounds wrote:

Whatever.. you know you did, and even complained about it being deleted. Please, just be a man about it and own up to it!
You haven't posted on that thread??? That's why you are quoted there? That's why the original text was deleted by the mods for name calling? Look, just stand by what you say!!

I always stand by what I say. And what I say is always supported by reason, fact, and research.

binauralsounds

sliverstain wrote:

Really. So you spout off without any knowledge of what you are talking about?

A common theme in your posts. Hence, how can anybody ever take you seriously again?

I rest my cases.

As said, I'll be the bigger man and admit it was the wrong poster. But you continue to bash and spout off at other and back pedal. Seriously, I have been here for years, and it's rare that one person as yourself can cause this much bashing back and forth between members. Your'e purpose here is becoming clear.

I rest my case..

jsand

sliverstain wrote:

So where's your apology??

I'm not apologizing. I asked you a simple question: how old are you?

sliverstain

binauralsounds wrote:

As said, I'll be the bigger man and admit it was the wrong poster. But you continue to bash and spout off at other and back pedal. Seriously, I have been here for years, and it's rare that one person as yourself can cause this much bashing back and forth between members. Your'e purpose here is becoming clear.

I rest my case..

Huh?

YOur case was what? And how did you rest it?

I proposed that your postings are irrelevant and inflammatory, and are based on biterness and hate instread of debate and fact.

I rested that case by showing you who called you a "Suicidal dumbfuck." You still insisted on me owning up and being a man. I proved you again how wrong you are. AND THEN you admitted it.

Hence, youre only purpose is to hijack the htread and spread vitriol and lies. Which you have.

Thank you for the apology though, meant alot. I mean..sliverstain...Pearl Jam on Toast...easy to get confused with those 2 names...

binauralsounds

sliverstain wrote:

Huh?

YOur case was what? And how did you rest it?

I proposed that your postings are irrelevant and inflammatory, and are based on biterness and hate instread of debate and fact.

I rested that case by showing you who called you a "Suicidal dumbfuck." You still insisted on me owning up and being a man. I proved you again how wrong you are. AND THEN you admitted it.

Hence, youre only purpose is to hijack the htread and spread vitriol and lies. Which you have.

Thank you for the apology though, meant alot. I mean..sliverstain...Pearl Jam on Toast...easy to get confused with those 2 names...

get over it son....

jsand

binauralsounds wrote:

get over it son....

You called him son! Where are the mods when you need them?

chopitdown

SoonForgotten2 wrote:

Okay, here's a question regardless of how true all this is or isn't. If this has been known about for awhile now- why the sudden change with airport security yesterday? What the hell was that about and why continue to prevent people from taking everyday items on board? Could there not have been a planned and though-out policy change to combat known plans?

I think the change with security yesterday was b/c it happened yesterday...yes they knew about it for a while and they had those guys under surveillance for months...it's prob a tough call. do you make instant changes or do you let them get far enough in the plan to really catch them? I don't know. I read a quote by the Brady (?) institute yesterday that said it's a good thing the shoe bomber didn't use his pants b/c who knows how security would work then. I'm happy they caught the guys who were planning this though.

binauralsounds

sliverstain wrote:

I always stand by what I say. And what I say is always supported by reason, fact, and research.

UHHH, WHAT??????????????

sliverstain wrote:

I state that Jsand, and Shiraz in particular, is lying, and aren't in a shelter, or maybe aren't even Israeli. Just making things up to suit your countries political needs.




__________________

sliverstain

binauralsounds wrote:

UHHH, WHAT??????????????

Yes. Unlike you.

http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=210861&page=11


I researched their posts, I reasoned it was all a bit too coincidental and convenient and blatantly one sided, then I coupled that with the FACT of the London Times's report, blended that Israeli GOvt spokemsan's thoughts on the matter, then came to my opinion.

Problem?

binauralsounds

sliverstain wrote:

Yes. Unlike you.

http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=210861&page=11


I researched their posts, I reasoned it was all a bit too coincidental and convenient and blatantly one sided, then I coupled that with the FACT of the London Times's report, blended that Israeli GOvt spokemsan's thoughts on the matter, then came to my opinion.

Problem?

I'm done with ya..

NCfan

sliverstain wrote:

A British intelligence official has told...

I stopped right there. Dont know about anybody else. I should have stopped at CNN, but I was decievd my big stupid brain into thinking there would be real reportage at the end of it...

Okay, since you think all of this is made up.... here it is in black and white from the Times of London. Enjoy!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2308063,00.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2307947,00.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2308059,00.html