Did Obama campaign bar two Muslim women from photo?

angelica

Rhinocerous Surprise wrote:

He's not the best candidate. Hell, he's not even legally entitled to run.
Rhino '08: He's got as many as 3 supporters!

I love your lack of legal entitlement...that makes it so much more interesting and fun!!! Plus, as we all know...a healthy dose of fault and fallacy makes a canditate more .........endearing......to some.....seemingly.....

Musician...comic strip writer/illustrator and.... apparent slogan writer!! Is there anything you don't do???!

angelica

Its Evolution Baby wrote:

I won't go that far but I think anyone who doesn't have a sense of humor regarding politics will drive themselves insane...

So true!

Rhinocerous Surprise

angelica wrote:

I love your lack of legal entitlement...that makes it so much more interesting and fun!!! Plus, as we all know...a healthy dose of fault and fallacy makes a canditate more .........endearing......to some.....seemingly.....

Musician...comic strip writer/illustrator and.... apparent slogan writer!! Is there anything you don't do???!

My honesty about my fault and fallacy creates a kind of vortex inside people's brains.

angelica

Rhinocerous Surprise wrote:

My honesty about my fault and fallacy creates a kind of vortex inside people's brains.

True!

Hey, who's your 3rd supporter??

Rhinocerous Surprise

angelica wrote:

True!

Hey, who's your 3rd supporter??

Bah - Commy used to be, but now the sig is Rhino-less. :(

Still, I'm sure someone out there is deluded out there to be my third supporter! We could make into a sweepstakes: the next person to hop on board the Rhino Train doesn't get a punch in the throat!

fuck

Rhinocerous Surprise wrote:

Bah - Commy used to be, but now the sig is Rhino-less. :(

Still, I'm sure someone out there is deluded out there to be my third supporter! We could make into a sweepstakes: the next person to hop on board the Rhino Train doesn't get a punch in the throat!

count me in

Rhinocerous Surprise

_outlaw wrote:

count me in

Get it in your sig, or boy, is your windpipe in for a punchin'.

Update: HOORAY!

Anon

Rhinocerous Surprise wrote:

Obama 2008: Because Settling's So Much Easier.[/b][/center]

I like this one much better....

Nader 2008: 'You won't ever have to worry about me getting laid in the Oval Office.'.

Abookamongstthemany

Pj_Gurl wrote:

I like this one much better....

Nader 2008: 'You won't ever have to worry about me getting laid in the Oval Office.'.

ummm, okay.

Anon

Abookamongstthemany wrote:

ummm, okay.

what?

BamaPJFan

_outlaw wrote:

The point is that it's not only this incident, but Obama has proven time and time again that he is not a worthy candidate to bring about... "change"

Oh, Obama will bring about "change" - you can bet your life on that. However, as far as I see it, the change will be bad change. When Obama takes office, taxes are going to skyrocket for everybody but the welfare queens.

I'm not a fan of McCain either, just for the record.

angelica

BamaPJFan wrote:

...welfare queens...

looks like someone's perspective is a little skewed by emotion, rather than balanced by knowledge. Even though you may have somewhat of a point.

BamaPJFan

angelica wrote:

looks like someone's perspective is a little skewed by emotion, rather than balanced by knowledge. Even though you may have somewhat of a point.

It's not emotion Angelica, it's common sense. I live in Montgomery, Alabama, right in the heart of welfare country. I've seen it every single day of my life.

angelica

BamaPJFan wrote:

It's not emotion Angelica, it's common sense. I live in Montgomery, Alabama, right in the heart of welfare country. I've seen it every single day of my life.

The distortion of degradation that you so willfully display gives away the lack of understanding of....understanding...and therefore of actual knowledge.

BamaPJFan

angelica wrote:

The distortion of degradation that you so willfully display gives away the lack of understanding of....understanding...and therefore of actual knowledge.

I have plenty of "actual knowledge". I worked for three years as an attorney for Legal Services Alabama where I represented both the working poor and non-working poor throughout Alabama's poor Blackbelt region. I have had my pulse completely on reality for quite some time.

angelica

BamaPJFan wrote:

I have plenty of "actual knowledge". I worked for three years as an attorney for Legal Services Alabama where I represented both the working poor and non-working poor throughout Alabama's poor Blackbelt region. I have had my pulse completely on reality for quite some time.

Knowledge is one thing...I refer to the degredation you express...that is about ignorance.

angelica

BamaPJFan wrote:

I have plenty of "actual knowledge". I worked for three years as an attorney for Legal Services Alabama where I represented both the working poor and non-working poor throughout Alabama's poor Blackbelt region. I have had my pulse completely on reality for quite some time.

Knowledge is one thing...I refer to the degredation you express...that is about ignorance. It doesn't diminish your knowledge...it merely shows your own distortions of your knowledge.

When you show you are on the uneven playing field by demeaning one, you show your imbalance.

Contrarily, when you are informative and reasonable, it is shown with reason, and information, not with emotion.

BamaPJFan

angelica wrote:

Knowledge is one thing...I refer to the degredation you express...that is about ignorance. It doesn't diminish your knowledge...it merely shows your own distortions of your knowledge.

When you show you are on the uneven playing field by demeaning one, you show your imbalance.

Contrarily, when you are informative and reasonable, it is shown with reason, and information, not with emotion.

My statements aren't made with emotion. They are based firmly in reason. Do you even know what type of organization Legal Services is?

Since you're from Canada you cannot relate to life in the Deep South of the U.S., so I realize that I would be wasting my time in trying to explain my viewpoint to you. (By the way, I just sent you a friend request on Myspace.)

Rhinocerous Surprise

Pj_Gurl wrote:

I like this one much better....

Nader 2008: 'You won't ever have to worry about me getting laid in the Oval Office.'.

Psh. That's far too long and unwieldy to be an effective campaign slogan.

angelica

BamaPJFan wrote:

My statements aren't made with emotion. They are based firmly in reason. Do you even know what type of organization Legal Services is?

the irrational cannot be justified rationally, because....it's not rational.

If you would like to associate an emotional personal view with the legal system, that's not about the legal system.

Since you're from Canada you cannot relate to life in the Deep South of the U.S., so I realize that I would be wasting my time in trying to explain my viewpoint to you. (By the way, I just sent you a friend request on Myspace.)

Ditto, associating your derogatory remarks with the deep south. The derogatory comments you choose are about you...not the deep south.



I welcome you as my myspace friend.