The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
cincybearcat said:F Me In The Brain said:I'm sure there will be at least tw KI o people to shit on that, or at least on some level about it's whiteness or some other sort of bs.
Good story, much better than fake Bernie website or Marxist bullshit.
I'm guessing it was an honest mistake, no reason to think otherwise....but it was presented here as a Bernie site, which would make it fake.
The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
A bona fide fake Bernie site? You don’t say?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mcgruff10 said:pjl44 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
this is why the US wont reach the very baseline of a humane society.
because: me me me
fuck the climate AM I RITE"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:
If you were a lower income person and voted for Trump you'd get scolded for stupidly voting against your interests. Since you're considering voting for Trump and in your interest, you're scolded for being a heartless monster. It's futile to even engage.
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.No, wait, back up. I said I thought pjl44 was being hyperbolic. pjl44 did not say you were hyperbolic.LOL, this place is funny. Someone is accused of saying some else one is "heartless monster". Someone else says that might be a bit hyperbolic. Someone else says "I'm not being hyperbolic".It gets tangled when the words are misconstrued or not carefully read. I can only come to one conclusion:"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:
If you were a lower income person and voted for Trump you'd get scolded for stupidly voting against your interests. Since you're considering voting for Trump and in your interest, you're scolded for being a heartless monster. It's futile to even engage.
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.No, wait, back up. I said I thought pjl44 was being hyperbolic. pjl44 did not say you were hyperbolic.LOL, this place is funny. Someone is accused of saying some else one is "heartless monster". Someone else says that might be a bit hyperbolic. Someone else says "I'm not being hyperbolic".It gets tangled when the words are misconstrued or not carefully read. I can only come to one conclusion:https://youtu.be/HIOnDL_NsuU
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Marianne Williamson endorses Bernie Sanders for president
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/23/politics/marianne-williamson-bernie-sanders-2020/index.html
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
So tell me all you political professionals - So, she's a classic old school social democrat(?)
Has Sanders said he doesn't believe in society having markets? Does he want to rid the US of the market economy altogether? Than I'm close to jumping over to team Warren. Or is Warren just selling Bernie short here.
Wikipedia puts a = betwen Social democracy and Democratic socialism:
The United Nations World Happiness Report shows that the happiest nations are concentrated in Northern Europe, where the Nordic model (which democratic socialists want to strengthen against austerity and neoliberalism)[497] is employed, with the list being topped by Denmark, where the Social Democrats led their first government in 1924 and governed Denmark for most of the 20th century. The Norwegian Labour Party, the Swedish Social Democratic Party and the Social Democratic Party of Finland also led the majority of governments and were the most popular political parties in their respective countries during the 20th century. While not as popular like its counterparts, the Icelandic Social Democratic Party and the Social Democratic Alliance have also led several governments and have been part of numerous coalitions. This success is at times attributed to the Nordic model in the region, where the aforementioned democratic socialist, labourist and social democratic political parties have dominated the political scene and laid the ground to universalistic welfare states in the 20th century.[498][499]
Never heard of a Social democrat/Democratic Socialist not believing in markets.
I mean famed Social Democrat Olof Palme also puts a = between the two:Mr Fälldin has been nagging me to explain why I am a socialist. I am a democratic socialist, with pride and with joy. I became one when travelling India seeing its terrible poverty blended with pockets of immense wealth; when travelling the United States and seeing an in some respects even more humiliating poverty; when, as a young man, I came eye to eye with Communist enslavement and the oppression and inhuman persecution in the Communist states. And when I came to the Nazi concentration camps and saw the death lists of social democrats and trade-unionists.
So is she being phony here? Like wit her other panicridden digs against Bernie lately.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
F Me In The Brain said:cincybearcat said:F Me In The Brain said:I'm sure there will be at least tw KI o people to shit on that, or at least on some level about it's whiteness or some other sort of bs.
Good story, much better than fake Bernie website or Marxist bullshit.
I'm guessing it was an honest mistake, no reason to think otherwise....but it was presented here as a Bernie site, which would make it fake.0 -
Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:Lerxst1992 said:ecdanc said:Lerxst1992 said:pjl44 said:A federal judge ruled stop and frisk unconstitutional in 2013 but yes let's continue to advocate for its efficacy in 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-practice-violated-rights-judge-rules.htmlA federal judge ruled but the appeal was dropped and the decision was actually sent back for admin review. Because Bloomberg decided to stop changing the law to add new terms to his administration the case was dropped. Had he went for a fourth term, do you really believe the USSC would overturn Henry? That’s the historical decision letting cops sidestep the fourth amendment. That decision is still valid.
and it was funny, not sure who but someone claimed I was to the right of the national review. Which is kinda silly as they are libertarians who are not technically right or left (That would be a long and boring analysis). Long story short, 4a is sacrosanct to libertarians, not conservatives imo.You should have stuck with the racism accusations.
as I said this would be long and boring dude-
“ Libertarianism (from Latin: libertas, meaning "freedom"), or libertarism (from French: libertaire, meaning "libertarian"), is a collection of political philosophiesand movements that uphold liberty as a core principle.[1] Libertarians seek to maximize political freedom and autonomy, emphasizing freedom of choice, voluntary association and individual judgement.[2] Libertarians share a skepticism of authority and state power, but they diverge on the scope of their opposition to existing economic and political systems. Various schools of libertarian thought offer a range of views regarding the legitimate functions of state and private power, often calling for the restriction or dissolution of coercive social institutions. Different categorizations have been used to distinguish various forms of libertarianism.[3][4] This is done to distinguish libertarian views on the nature of property and capital, usually along left–right or socialist–capitalist lines.[5]Libertarianism originated as a form of left-wing politics such as anti-authoritarian and anti-state socialists like anarchists,[6] especially social anarchists,[7] but more generally libertarian communists/Marxists and libertarian socialists.[8][9] These libertarians seek to abolish capitalism and private ownership of the means of production, or else to restrict their purview or effects to usufruct property norms, in favor of common or cooperative ownership and management, viewing private property as a barrier to freedom and liberty.
Well that makes two awkward answers on that topic. Must be that red state water, or maybe the red state wine?.
What are you even saying here? You responded to a bona fide expert with a Wikipedia page. .lol bona fide. Love the language. Enjoy the preexisting conditions.
the exact reason I’d pull Wikipedia is to get as impartial wording as possible, as I usually enjoy what experts have to say about political theory in an entirely different manner.0 -
brianlux said:Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:
If you were a lower income person and voted for Trump you'd get scolded for stupidly voting against your interests. Since you're considering voting for Trump and in your interest, you're scolded for being a heartless monster. It's futile to even engage.
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.No, wait, back up. I said I thought pjl44 was being hyperbolic. pjl44 did not say you were hyperbolic.LOL, this place is funny. Someone is accused of saying some else one is "heartless monster". Someone else says that might be a bit hyperbolic. Someone else says "I'm not being hyperbolic".It gets tangled when the words are misconstrued or not carefully read. I can only come to one conclusion:0 -
F Me In The Brain said:cincybearcat said:F Me In The Brain said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
https://berniesanders.com/issues/free-college-cancel-debt/
I think people are looking at the short term instead of looking at the future. Which is normal. When we think of earning less each fiscal year, there's an immediate reaction to oppose it. But college has become a tremendous burden on most families. Paying more taxes of a few grand each year is nothing compared to the cost of putting several kids through college.
It clearly states that there is no affiliation with Bernie Sanders.
It also appears to be a site that has not been updated in half a year.
Smells rotten to me.
No way, nor care, to substantiate that feeling....but I think that we all live in a day and age when we need to be careful with accepting something that looks like shit as something that is real.
Hell, we live in a world where we should question what actually looks good.
Hate to say it....being a Never Trumper....but this smells like #fakenews.
Certainly is fake news that this is Bernie's site.
C'mon people!
😂0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.
I think it's in whatever the next tier down is with things like food and housing. Even as a libertarian, I'm fine with some government inefficiency in developing programs for assistance. I'd want them at the state level and with good oversight.
There are certainly issues with the healthcare system here, but the elderly (Medicare) and indigent (Medicaid) are generally pretty well supported. The biggest barrier in those cases is education. There are many, many uncovered people who are eligible for a variety of programs but it's harder than you might think to get the word out. But that could be another thread entirely.0 -
eddiec said:F Me In The Brain said:cincybearcat said:F Me In The Brain said:I'm sure there will be at least tw KI o people to shit on that, or at least on some level about it's whiteness or some other sort of bs.
Good story, much better than fake Bernie website or Marxist bullshit.
I'm guessing it was an honest mistake, no reason to think otherwise....but it was presented here as a Bernie site, which would make it fake.hippiemom = goodness0 -
pjl44 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.
I think it's in whatever the next tier down is with things like food and housing. Even as a libertarian, I'm fine with some government inefficiency in developing programs for assistance. I'd want them at the state level and with good oversight.
There are certainly issues with the healthcare system here, but the elderly (Medicare) and indigent (Medicaid) are generally pretty well supported. The biggest barrier in those cases is education. There are many, many uncovered people who are eligible for a variety of programs but it's harder than you might think to get the word out. But that could be another thread entirely.0 -
mrussel1 said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
https://berniesanders.com/issues/free-college-cancel-debt/
I think people are looking at the short term instead of looking at the future. Which is normal. When we think of earning less each fiscal year, there's an immediate reaction to oppose it. But college has become a tremendous burden on most families. Paying more taxes of a few grand each year is nothing compared to the cost of putting several kids through college.0 -
pjl44 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.
I think it's in whatever the next tier down is with things like food and housing. Even as a libertarian, I'm fine with some government inefficiency in developing programs for assistance. I'd want them at the state level and with good oversight.
There are certainly issues with the healthcare system here, but the elderly (Medicare) and indigent (Medicaid) are generally pretty well supported. The biggest barrier in those cases is education. There are many, many uncovered people who are eligible for a variety of programs but it's harder than you might think to get the word out. But that could be another thread entirely.
My point still stand."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:pjl44 said:brianlux said:pjl44 said:mcgruff10 said:what dreams said:eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:Gern Blansten said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:Halifax2TheMax said:dignin said:Everyone better get used to the idea of Bernie Sanders as the democratic nominee. Its looking very likely. All the belly aching isn't going to change it.
Unless of course your want another 4 years of Trump, if so, carry on.
https://www.bernietax.com/#0;0;s
This is hyperbole, is it not? No one here has called McG or you a "heartless monster". if you are going to make up things that have not been said then, yes, the discussion if futile.
i am not being hyperbolic.
And with every major country but one having it, it seems its not very controversial either.
But please, prove me wrong. Inam open to change.
I think it's in whatever the next tier down is with things like food and housing. Even as a libertarian, I'm fine with some government inefficiency in developing programs for assistance. I'd want them at the state level and with good oversight.
There are certainly issues with the healthcare system here, but the elderly (Medicare) and indigent (Medicaid) are generally pretty well supported. The biggest barrier in those cases is education. There are many, many uncovered people who are eligible for a variety of programs but it's harder than you might think to get the word out. But that could be another thread entirely.
My point still stand.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help