The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.0 -
To answer the question, you have to be able to put yourself in the position to make the decision.mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Come again?Spiritual_Chaos said:
To answer the question, you have to be able to put yourself in the position to make the decision.mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.0 -
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.0 -
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.0 -
mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.0 -
Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.
0 -
Who is the other one?ecdanc said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Sherrod Brown?oftenreading said:
Who is the other one?ecdanc said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
Certainly not me.oftenreading said:
Who is the other one?ecdanc said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.0 -
Where does this notion come from?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
Me! It comes from me!rgambs said:
Where does this notion come from?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.0 -
Without reading through all posts, what are thoughts on Bloomberg?
Charlottesville 2013
Hampton 20160 -
Would be pretty low on my list. Authoritarian who's trying to buy the nomination.wndowpayne said:Without reading through all posts, what are thoughts on Bloomberg?0 -
I feel it too.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.0 -
rgambs said:
Where does this notion come from?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
That's the beauty of policy. There's almost always a third, fourth, or fifth way.ecdanc said:
And if you did?mrussel1 said:
Pete offers a choice, as does Biden. I don't have to make that decision.ecdanc said:
Would you give up your choice if it meant everyone had healthcare?mrussel1 said:
Exactly.. it's very frustrating.. and when a candidate like Pete offers a real choice for us, he gets smeared from the left because Bernie and his crew knows what's best for me. I can't be trusted to make such an important decision for my family.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
This is so rational and the argument I've made for quite a while. If medicare offers comparable services at a better cost, it will choke out private insurance OR force private to lower its premiums. It's a great strategy and proof of concept. M4A presumes that every American prefers that gov't driven insurance. I support choice.cincybearcat said:
Have you watched the debates?Spiritual_Chaos said:
He has said he thinks it's the best option...but...not everyone wants it AND Bernie can;t pay for it. He said in the last debate that a medicare for all who want it plan would first and foremost ensure everyone has coverage (which is the important part no?) and create the public option. And if it's as good as bernie says and he thinks, people will choose it over time.
Stuck between no choice Republicans and no choice democratic socialists.Not to the Bernie gang. They’d rather run on no choice and watch the Supreme Court go conservative for the next fifty years.
democrats are in the middle of the dumbest policy debate right now. Do we give everybody the option of Medicare or ram it down their throats with socialism, while the gop is galvanizing their base with the Court motivating them to show up.
which leads us to the bigger picture, we risk this election with socialism, the court that ends up as a result of this loss would never allow the govt to seize the assets of all the insurance companies and allow a full mandate until at least 2112. Hell, the current court might strike down the Obamacare mandate, let alone forced socialism.
Bernie is on a collision course to decimate our party and country. I definitely feel the burn.Bernies plan, word for word:Create a Medicare for All, single-payer, national health insurance program.
so what happens with all the other insurance companies?
im ok with it, I but don’t think 270 electors would be.0 -
pjl44 said:
Would be pretty low on my list. Authoritarian who's trying to buy the nomination.wndowpayne said:Without reading through all posts, what are thoughts on Bloomberg?Until we pass a constitutional amendment limiting campaign spending, this is our system.
democrats can either play this game or watch from the sidelines.
The majority of New York is low crime. High crime does exist but is centered in very specific neighborhoods. You need to put the cops where the crime occurs. Unfortunately Bloomberg made disparaging comments about alleged criminals and focused his comments towards race instead of location. But in no way did I support stop and frisk. It went too far.0 -
Lerxst1992 said:pjl44 said:
Would be pretty low on my list. Authoritarian who's trying to buy the nomination.wndowpayne said:Without reading through all posts, what are thoughts on Bloomberg?Until we pass a constitutional amendment limiting campaign spending, this is our system.
democrats can either play this game or watch from the sidelines.
The majority of New York is low crime. High crime does exist but is centered in very specific neighborhoods. You need to put the cops where the crime occurs. Unfortunately Bloomberg made disparaging comments about alleged criminals and focused his comments towards race instead of location. But in no way did I support stop and frisk. It went too far.
You're definitely preaching to the choir on campaign spending. He's not doing anything illegal but it's obnoxious to watch and one more reason for me to not like the guy.
Stop and frisk is a big part of it for me. And his deference to China and wrangling a third term. If you look at his record, it's easy to see how he was a Republican. I'm surprised how much he's being embraced.0 -
Crime occurs where you put the cops.Lerxst1992 said:pjl44 said:
Would be pretty low on my list. Authoritarian who's trying to buy the nomination.wndowpayne said:Without reading through all posts, what are thoughts on Bloomberg?Until we pass a constitutional amendment limiting campaign spending, this is our system.
democrats can either play this game or watch from the sidelines.
The majority of New York is low crime. High crime does exist but is centered in very specific neighborhoods. You need to put the cops where the crime occurs. Unfortunately Bloomberg made disparaging comments about alleged criminals and focused his comments towards race instead of location. But in no way did I support stop and frisk. It went too far.0 -
Sure, socioeconomic conditions are irrelevant. In fact, before there was such a thing as a police force, it was like Eden.ecdanc said:
Crime occurs where you put the cops.Lerxst1992 said:pjl44 said:
Would be pretty low on my list. Authoritarian who's trying to buy the nomination.wndowpayne said:Without reading through all posts, what are thoughts on Bloomberg?Until we pass a constitutional amendment limiting campaign spending, this is our system.
democrats can either play this game or watch from the sidelines.
The majority of New York is low crime. High crime does exist but is centered in very specific neighborhoods. You need to put the cops where the crime occurs. Unfortunately Bloomberg made disparaging comments about alleged criminals and focused his comments towards race instead of location. But in no way did I support stop and frisk. It went too far.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help