The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
This race needs to get down to Pete vs Warren/sanders vs Bloomberg fast
hippiemom = goodness0 -
I don't want any combo of Pete, Bloom, Biden in the mix. They just cannibalize each other. I know that's not on the cards anytime soon.cincybearcat said:This race needs to get down to Pete vs Warren/sanders vs Bloomberg fast
0 -
Bloomberg won’t last long if Pete gains traction from iowa. If he doesn’t, he fills the void. Cause Biden sucks and someone needs to defeat Berniemrussel1 said:
I don't want any combo of Pete, Bloom, Biden in the mix. They just cannibalize each other. I know that's not on the cards anytime soon.cincybearcat said:This race needs to get down to Pete vs Warren/sanders vs Bloomberg fast
hippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat said:
They never should report first tally. Doesn’t mean a thing.mickeyrat said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
pete though!cincybearcat said:
According to the slim sample I had...a few people at districts and then watching a bunch of others on TV...biden didnt have a lot of support in many areas. Even in some areas that had an older caucus goer... We will see but I think the results will be very bad for him.pjl44 said:
The word is he may have done *very* poorlyLedbetterman10 said:
Interesting. Surprising to see Biden do so poorly.cincybearcat said:
Honestly it'll be Bernie with slim shot at Pete. Pete did very well, especially after non-viable candidates had to have voters move. My guess is bernie wins but Pete and Amy beat expectations.Ledbetterman10 said:
So you seem to be following this closely. Who do you anticipate the winner of the caucus being?cincybearcat said:
The campaigns are pissed because:pjl44 said:
Yeah probably. The campaigns were all pretty pissed, though, and it does make the DNC look silly. The test will be whether any of the candidates call the results into question.cincybearcat said:
Honestly I have no idea what the huge deal is. Reporting happened, some issues, they are looking back at the hard votes and data to ensure they get it right. Just cause you don’t get the info instantaneously doesn’t mean it’s bad.pjl44 said:
They developed a new reporting app that didn't work. Chaos ensues.Spiritual_Chaos said:What happened in Iowa? In one sentence? Voting didn't work as planned?
1) Biden wants to down play his big loss
2) Pete and Amy missing chance to gain traction quickly
How come with all the talk about Trump not accepting election results, it always seems like it the Dems? Even when a primary? Sickening. I think the country's only hope is to have Biden and Bernie have to drop out cause they are old farts.
interesting. yeah its not the full count, but look at the differences between first and final counts.And the campaigns want to rush......
and Bernie releasing this makes me like him less. What an ass. 40%? Just let them count you old asshat.
You must be young0 -
Ummm nope. Just ain’t almost 80.Lerxst1992 said:cincybearcat said:
They never should report first tally. Doesn’t mean a thing.mickeyrat said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
pete though!cincybearcat said:
According to the slim sample I had...a few people at districts and then watching a bunch of others on TV...biden didnt have a lot of support in many areas. Even in some areas that had an older caucus goer... We will see but I think the results will be very bad for him.pjl44 said:
The word is he may have done *very* poorlyLedbetterman10 said:
Interesting. Surprising to see Biden do so poorly.cincybearcat said:
Honestly it'll be Bernie with slim shot at Pete. Pete did very well, especially after non-viable candidates had to have voters move. My guess is bernie wins but Pete and Amy beat expectations.Ledbetterman10 said:
So you seem to be following this closely. Who do you anticipate the winner of the caucus being?cincybearcat said:
The campaigns are pissed because:pjl44 said:
Yeah probably. The campaigns were all pretty pissed, though, and it does make the DNC look silly. The test will be whether any of the candidates call the results into question.cincybearcat said:
Honestly I have no idea what the huge deal is. Reporting happened, some issues, they are looking back at the hard votes and data to ensure they get it right. Just cause you don’t get the info instantaneously doesn’t mean it’s bad.pjl44 said:
They developed a new reporting app that didn't work. Chaos ensues.Spiritual_Chaos said:What happened in Iowa? In one sentence? Voting didn't work as planned?
1) Biden wants to down play his big loss
2) Pete and Amy missing chance to gain traction quickly
How come with all the talk about Trump not accepting election results, it always seems like it the Dems? Even when a primary? Sickening. I think the country's only hope is to have Biden and Bernie have to drop out cause they are old farts.
interesting. yeah its not the full count, but look at the differences between first and final counts.And the campaigns want to rush......
and Bernie releasing this makes me like him less. What an ass. 40%? Just let them count you old asshat.
You must be younghippiemom = goodness0 -
I don't think the Iowa caucus mess has anything to do with the screw ups. I think it has to do more more with where America is at as A WHOLE: poorly educated. That's why we need Yang. He wants to Make America Think Harder. We need to do that because we do not do things well any more. If we keep being stupid by electing the likes of Trump (please, never again!) or putting our hopes in old guys like Biden or angry old men like Sanders (nothing wrong with being old, but we have some vibrant younger candidates!) , we will continue to find ourselves going deep and deeper down the mire. This country is a mess and a disgrace. We have been better and we can be better again.
Post edited by brianlux on"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Closed for review. It appears some have forgotten the #1 rule about name-calling. Calling other members names is never ok. I hope no one loses posting privileges. This will be reopened after review.
Ok, it's ready to be reopened for new discussion. It's very busy with the new album and touring this year and so please be careful that your political passions don't make a problem with not following the Posting Guidelines. There are strong ways to say things without being abusive. Rise above...way above. Thank you.Post edited by Kat onFalling down,...not staying down0 -

Why name a company "shadow" unless it is the evil company for some 1980s Paul Verhoeven sci-fi thriller?"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
Once again --Ledbetterman10 said:
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
-- take the time to actually watch the video before commenting
-- he praises Bernie in the video.
Andrew Yang is a Bernies number one fan.
If you are for Andrew you are for Bernie. Andrew Yang is Bernie
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Ugh...what was I thinking even trying to converse with you? You could just say "Yeah I'm for Bernie but Yang praises Bernie in the video" without being so snarky about it.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Once again --Ledbetterman10 said:
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
-- take the time to actually watch the video before commenting
-- he praises Bernie in the video.
Andrew Yang is a Bernies number one fan.
If you are for Andrew you are for Bernie. Andrew Yang is Bernie
Post edited by Ledbetterman10 on2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
Forgive me, if I am mistaken. But I am pretty sure exactly this has played out before.Ledbetterman10 said:
Ugh...what was I thinking even trying to converse with you?Spiritual_Chaos said:
Once again --Ledbetterman10 said:
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
-- take the time to actually watch the video before commenting
-- he praises Bernie in the video.
Andrew Yang is a Bernies number one fan.
If you are for Andrew you are for Bernie. Andrew Yang is Bernie
If it has not, and that was someone else. Then I'm sorry.
And I do think I have posted videos from all candidates in here."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
No one is watching videos. Text, screenshot, gif, or link to text. Those are the choices.0
-
Well you replied before my edit but I went on to say "You could just say 'Yeah I'm for Bernie but Yang praises Bernie in the video' without being so snarky about it." I'm trying to play ball. But I'm not watching every video posted in these threads. Nor do I read every post. If I come to this page and it says thre's 55 new posts, I skip to the newest one.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Forgive me, if I am mistaken. But I am pretty sure exactly this has played out before.Ledbetterman10 said:
Ugh...what was I thinking even trying to converse with you?Spiritual_Chaos said:
Once again --Ledbetterman10 said:
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
-- take the time to actually watch the video before commenting
-- he praises Bernie in the video.
Andrew Yang is a Bernies number one fan.
If you are for Andrew you are for Bernie. Andrew Yang is Bernie
If it has not, and that was someone else. Then I'm sorry.
And I do think I have posted videos from all candidates in here.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I agree with you. I am sorry. He praises Bernie in the video in a weirdly honest way. Like pretty much saying "I love Bernie. He understands it all like I do. I'm a bit more modern though. But I voted for Bernie in 2016."Ledbetterman10 said:
Well you replied before my edit but I went on to say "You could just say 'Yeah I'm for Bernie but Yang praises Bernie in the video' without being so snarky about it." I'm trying to play ball. But I'm not watching every video posted in these threads. Nor do I read every post. If I come to this page and it says thre's 55 new posts, I skip to the newest one.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Forgive me, if I am mistaken. But I am pretty sure exactly this has played out before.Ledbetterman10 said:
Ugh...what was I thinking even trying to converse with you?Spiritual_Chaos said:
Once again --Ledbetterman10 said:
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
-- take the time to actually watch the video before commenting
-- he praises Bernie in the video.
Andrew Yang is a Bernies number one fan.
If you are for Andrew you are for Bernie. Andrew Yang is Bernie
If it has not, and that was someone else. Then I'm sorry.
And I do think I have posted videos from all candidates in here."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Fair enough.Spiritual_Chaos said:
I agree with you. I am sorry. He praises Bernie in the video in a weirdly honest way. Like pretty much saying "I love Bernie. He understands it all like I do. I'm a bit more modern though. But I voted for Bernie in 2016."Ledbetterman10 said:
Well you replied before my edit but I went on to say "You could just say 'Yeah I'm for Bernie but Yang praises Bernie in the video' without being so snarky about it." I'm trying to play ball. But I'm not watching every video posted in these threads. Nor do I read every post. If I come to this page and it says thre's 55 new posts, I skip to the newest one.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Forgive me, if I am mistaken. But I am pretty sure exactly this has played out before.Ledbetterman10 said:
Ugh...what was I thinking even trying to converse with you?Spiritual_Chaos said:
Once again --Ledbetterman10 said:
So are you for Yang, or Bernie? You seem to promote both.Spiritual_Chaos said:
-- take the time to actually watch the video before commenting
-- he praises Bernie in the video.
Andrew Yang is a Bernies number one fan.
If you are for Andrew you are for Bernie. Andrew Yang is Bernie
If it has not, and that was someone else. Then I'm sorry.
And I do think I have posted videos from all candidates in here.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
Agree.pjl44 said:No one is watching videos. Text, screenshot, gif, or link to text. Those are the choices.hippiemom = goodness0 -
I just now watched a BBC video about the worlds smallest catcincybearcat said:
Agree.pjl44 said:No one is watching videos. Text, screenshot, gif, or link to text. Those are the choices."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help





https://youtu.be/ZMPPxZMdd50
