The Democratic Presidential Debates

1…111112114116117…345

Comments

  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,471
    What happened in Iowa? In one sentence? Voting didn't work as planned?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,834
    mrussel1 said:
    cincybearcat said:
    brianlux said:
    pjl44 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    For those scoring at home,  here's how it stands.  Looks to be a tight one. 


    Hmmmmmmmm. Deceptively edited out Yang at 100%....

    LOL, Yang for the win!
    Yang ain’t doing well. And apparently at the place a friend is at they won’t go to another candidate. So dumb. Bernie-esque douchebagery
    Who else isn’t viable at the location?  
    Sorry, didn’t see this before I slept. 

    This was in eastern Iowa. Biden did terrible and wasn’t viable. Bernie didn’t make cut but only needed a couple of people and I believe they got them to be viable. Warren and Pete did the best and Amy was 3rd. At 1 location.

    the other had a strong Bernie presence. Then Pete and Warren.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,527
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    What happened in Iowa? In one sentence? Voting didn't work as planned?
    They developed a new reporting app that didn't work. Chaos ensues.
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,471
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,834
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    What happened in Iowa? In one sentence? Voting didn't work as planned?
    They developed a new reporting app that didn't work. Chaos ensues.
    Honestly I have no idea what the huge deal is. Reporting happened, some issues, they are looking back at the hard votes and data to ensure they get it right. Just cause you don’t get the info instantaneously doesn’t mean it’s bad.


    hippiemom = goodness
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    edited February 2020
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty ish of you.
    Post edited by Kat on
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    edited February 2020
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty ish of you.
    Could be suprahuman. 
    Post edited by Kat on
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,471
    edited February 2020
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty dickish of you.
    It was a very apparent joke. His last thing said is namedropping A Nightmare on Elm Street. I do understand that would not bring you over. I also do understand no one in here being brought over by a candidate mentioning a horror movie from the 80s. There lies the joke.

    I did not anticipate the risk of that flowing over anyones head. 

    You don't need to appreciate "calling anyone subhuman" because I did not - because it was an apparent joke -- The last thing said was namderopping a (fantastic) slasher movie from 1984. 

    But I am sorry, if you misinterpreted it.
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    ecdanc said:
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty dickish of you.
    Could be suprahuman. 
    Unless context matters to you.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty dickish of you.
    It was a very apparent joke. His last thing said is namedropping A Nightmare on Elm Street. I do understand that would not bring you over. I also do understand not being brought over by a candidate mentioning a horror movie from the 80s. There lies the joke.

    I do not understand how there would be a risk of that flowing over someones head. 

    You don't need to appreciate "calling anyone subhuman" because I did not - because it was an apparent joke -- The last thing said was namderopping a slasher movie from 1984. 


    Extremely sorry, SC. My hearing isn't so great and I completely missed that at the end! Apologize for my dickishness here. 
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,834
    edited February 2020
    (Problem post removed)
    All votes are counted properly. Media everywhere. Paper trail. This will be accurate when reported and not reported till accurate. I know a Fox News fan wouldn’t understand that. 


    Post edited by Kat on
    hippiemom = goodness
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    benjs said:
    ecdanc said:
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty dickish of you.
    Could be suprahuman. 
    Unless context matters to you.
    I thought your last line was a joke, so I made one back. If not, apologies: back to the self-seriousness. 
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    ecdanc said:
    benjs said:
    ecdanc said:
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty dickish of you.
    Could be suprahuman. 
    Unless context matters to you.
    I thought your last line was a joke, so I made one back. If not, apologies: back to the self-seriousness. 
    It was serious and in error - was my bad, so my apologies to you and SC. 
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    edited February 2020
    (Problem post removed)
    Is there a GOP nickname repository/contest you could submit this one to? It's really clever.
    Post edited by Kat on
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,471
    edited February 2020
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    benjs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HAHA! 

    THE LAST THING SAID HERE.

    COME ON PEOPLE. If that doesn't bring you over - than are you really human?

    https://youtu.be/30cneQiSE94
    Doesn't bring me over. It's enough for you to have Sanders say what he's not, who he is, and articulate no plan on how to get there. It's really not that complicated: if you can share a compelling reason why a person should feel that Bernie Sanders' ideas, based on Bernie Sanders' rhetoric, vision, and approaches, will have a shot in hell at getting an idea formed into a law in this polarized environment, where every tiptoe towards the left is weaponized by Republicans (and even some Democrats) in an instance, and where all Republican lawmakers are immediately united in opposing progress like that, then I would consider supporting Bernie Sanders. 

    Also, I don't appreciate you calling anyone on here subhuman for not supporting your candidate. That's pretty dickish of you.
    It was a very apparent joke. His last thing said is namedropping A Nightmare on Elm Street. I do understand that would not bring you over. I also do understand not being brought over by a candidate mentioning a horror movie from the 80s. There lies the joke.

    I do not understand how there would be a risk of that flowing over someones head. 

    You don't need to appreciate "calling anyone subhuman" because I did not - because it was an apparent joke -- The last thing said was namderopping a slasher movie from 1984. 


    Extremely sorry, SC. My hearing isn't so great and I completely missed that at the end! Apologize for my dickishness here. 

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,860
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    What happened in Iowa? In one sentence? Voting didn't work as planned?
    Vlad.
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    There was a clear winner in Iowa: Donald Trump.  In a country that exists in his image, the opposition is so out of sorts, divided, and disorganized, I wouldn’t be surprised if he wins every state this November.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • Ojamajoe
    Ojamajoe Posts: 14
    OnWis97 said:
    There was a clear winner in Iowa: Donald Trump.  In a country that exists in his image, the opposition is so out of sorts, divided, and disorganized, I wouldn’t be surprised if he wins every state this November.
    Couldn't agree more, unfortunately.  The appearance of incompetence, and / or corruption in the "Democratic" process is gonna stick. 😫
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,834
    OnWis97 said:
    There was a clear winner in Iowa: Donald Trump.  In a country that exists in his image, the opposition is so out of sorts, divided, and disorganized, I wouldn’t be surprised if he wins every state this November.
    What makes you think this? Because counting votes is taking longer? I’m just amazed at the media’s move here and those that seem to be following.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    This will be forgotten by next week.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories