Kavanaugh

oftenreading

If three sentences are too long to read, I'm thinking that addressing and mailing a package would be a challenge, too. 

Halifax2TheMax

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.

It’s all just a bunch of pissed off lying dem women, huh? How the “left” works? Who’s afraid of the FBI? Boo!

Well are ya gonna bet me or just flap your guns more?

After you answer my question about whether you’d hire someone who lied to you during a face to face interview and after I’ve thought about it some more. The repubs are as corrupt as Team Trump Treason and their selection of Kavanaugh is about protecting the coverup of NRA, RNC and Team Trump Treason’s complicity of colluding with putin on the ritz.

Whats an equal goody? $35 t from shop? What size is the T? When’s the deadline for the bet?

I think you’re delusional and wanting something so bad you’ve become a sheep.  I think Kavanaugh is a respected professional who is a great candidate for the seat.

anyway, I bet the value of an old shirt is more than a $35 dollars from the shop, but if that’s how you want to play it that’s fine with me- at least you’re willing to enjoy the game a bit.  If it makes it any more exciting, I’d bet a shuss 18 AP or a bottle of that BSB whiskey- stuff’s garbage but if someone wanted it it’s fair game

You still didn’t answer my question. And what is it that I want so bad? And for the record, I’m a delusional, Cheeto eating, basement dwelling, keyboard warrior, Internet tough guy, #ptape, sheep.
 
 
                                                                                                        

RoleModelsinBlood31

oftenreading said:

If three sentences are too long to read, I'm thinking that addressing and mailing a package would be a challenge, too. 

Cool story, no one cares.  You want in on the game? Put your merch where your keyboard is-  what will you gamble?  I’m serious- I’m looking to make it fun and have someone actually step up and gamble something nice instead of just talking tough page after page.  Vault 3 sealed? What will it take for someone
to put it on the line?

if you don’t think I’m serious, we can even pick a person like Mr. Switzerland or whatever you want to call them and each mail our shit tomorrow morning to this person.  If Rape Captain Kav gets in, it gets mailed to me.  If he doesn’t, it gets mailed to you.

njnancy

Making a bet on this is sleazy. But trolls need to be fed.

EdsonNascimento

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Halifax2TheMax

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
 

njnancy

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

EdsonNascimento

PJ_Soul said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

Why? That would just give him the opportunity to participate in SCOTUS decisions in the meantime, and then if he was removed later, any decision made while he sat would be brought into question. 

Fair enough. So he’s confirmed in case he’s not guilty, but doesn’t get to rule until fbi investigation is finished thus giving fbi incentive not to drag feet.  

See?  This is how fair compromise works.  I hear ya.  So how about that modification?   

EdsonNascimento

tbergs said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

Thanks for your clearly partisan opinion on this matter. You obviously have no issues with pushing this through. We should always just hire/appoint people with these minor types of accusations, no matter what the job.

I’m clearly parisan?  To funny.  I’m trying to solve an obvious problem.  Right wants to get it done now for obvious reason.  Left wants to delay for obvious reason.  I’m offering idea that serves both.   If it’s true, he shouldn’t sit.   If it’s not true, he should (not because of anything other than umder current circumstances we all know he’d be approved not bc I want him to).  

So so take off your left wingnut goggles off and try to join a cogent discussion.  

EdsonNascimento

Halifax2TheMax said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
 

That’s what you think the end result of this is if she’s proven to have not quite told the truth?   I want to live in your world.  

EdsonNascimento

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Halifax2TheMax

EdsonNascimento said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
 

That’s what you think the end result of this is if she’s proven to have not quite told the truth?   I want to live in your world.  

If an FBI investigation clears Kavanaugh as you seem to believe in his innocence, he gets confirmed and sits on the SC. If there’s confirmation of the allegations and his nomination is withdrawn or he’s voted down, he returns to the DC circuit. His life is hardly “ruined.” Further, why would his life be ruined if he’s the innocent choir boy he claims to be? Seems you might not believe in his innocence and are playing the “victim” card.

njnancy

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Disingenuous 

EdsonNascimento

Halifax2TheMax said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
 

That’s what you think the end result of this is if she’s proven to have not quite told the truth?   I want to live in your world.  

If an FBI investigation clears Kavanaugh as you seem to believe in his innocence, he gets confirmed and sits on the SC. If there’s confirmation of the allegations and his nomination is withdrawn or he’s voted down, he returns to the DC circuit. His life is hardly “ruined.” Further, why would his life be ruined if he’s the innocent choir boy he claims to be? Seems you might not believe in his innocence and are playing the “victim” card.

Ha ha. Typical left.  Please quote where I said I think he’s innocent.

Halifax2TheMax

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Are those alternate facts that you’re believing in?
 

EdsonNascimento

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Disingenuous 

Classic emotional response when your argument is proven foolish.  You forgot to correct my grammar.   

You also forgot got to call me a nincompoop 

oftenreading

EdsonNascimento said:

PJ_Soul said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

Why? That would just give him the opportunity to participate in SCOTUS decisions in the meantime, and then if he was removed later, any decision made while he sat would be brought into question. 

Fair enough. So he’s confirmed in case he’s not guilty, but doesn’t get to rule until fbi investigation is finished thus giving fbi incentive not to drag feet.  

See?  This is how fair compromise works.  I hear ya.  So how about that modification?   

So, your compromise is "hey, you get the job but you can't do the job until we decide if you're fit for the job or not".

Whereas in the real word people don't get a job until the ones doing the hiring are convinced they are fit to do the job.

There's no justifiable reason to rush the vote. There are plenty of reasons to delay the vote.

njnancy

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Disingenuous 

Classic emotional response when your argument is proven foolish.  You forgot to correct my grammar.   

You also forgot got to call me a nincompoop 

I simply prefer people to use correctly spelled words when they try to intimidate me. Which you don't. 

oftenreading

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Disingenuous 

Classic emotional response when your argument is proven foolish.  You forgot to correct my grammar.   

You also forgot got to call me a nincompoop 

If the shoe fits....

EdsonNascimento

Halifax2TheMax said:

EdsonNascimento said:

njnancy said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Gern Blansten said:

EdsonNascimento said:

Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on

How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.

Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  

Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

Get over it. The dam has burst. 

I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  

Are those alternate facts that you’re believing in?
 

What facts are you believing?   If you’re referring to the accusations they’ve yet to be proven true or false.  You and I have no idea.  That’s the point.